Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context: translation and psychometric properties of the Italian version

Abstract

The Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context (QCSASC) is a validated and widespread used measure to assess the self-schemas elicited during sexual negative events in both men and women. The current study aimed to test the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the QCSASC in both heterosexual men and women. After linguistic translation, the psychometric properties (internal consistency, construct and discriminant validity) were evaluated in 1038 participants (435 men and 603 women, 767 healthy and 271 clinicals complaining of sexual problems). Confirmatory factor analyses showed a not satisfactory fit of the original factor structure of the QCSASC versions. Principal component analyses were performed highlighting two new factorial structures, further validated with CFAs (“Helpless” and “Unlovable”). Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability and average variance extracted were used as internal consistency measures. Moreover, the QCSASC showed a strong association with emotional response and sexual functioning, being able to differentiate between sexually clinical and control group. Current findings support the validity and the internal consistency of the QCSASC Italian version and allows to assess dysfunctional cognitive schemas activated when facing sexual problematic situations for both clinical and research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck AT. Depression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1967.

  2. Dozois DJ, Beck AT. Cognitive schemas, beliefs and assumptions. Risk Factors Depress. 2008;1:121–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nadkarni S, Narayanan VK. Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strateg Manag J. 2007;28:243–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Young JE. Schema-focused cognitive therapy and the case of Ms. S. J Psychother Integr. 2005;15:115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alford BA, Beck AT. The integrative power of cognitive therapy. Guilford Press; 1998.

  6. Janssen E, Everaerd W, Spiering M, Janssen J. Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: towards an information processing model of sexual arousal. J Sex Res. 2000;37:8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nimbi FM, Tripodi F, Rossi R, Simonelli C. Expanding the analysis of psychosocial factors of sexual desire in men. J Sex Med. 2018;15:230–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Emotions during sexual activity: differences between sexually functional and dysfunctional men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35:491–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context (QCASC). Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Coimbra, Portugal, 2000.

  10. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitive and emotional predictors of female sexual dysfunctions: preliminary findings. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008;34:325–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Sexual modes questionnaire: measure to assess the interaction among cognitions, emotions, and sexual response. J Sex Res. 2003;40:368–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson ZD, Janssen E. Ambivalent affect and sexual response: the impact of co-occurring positive and negative emotions on subjective and physiological responses to erotic stimuli. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:793–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vilarinho S, Laja P, Carvalho J, Quinta-Gomes AL, Oliveira C, Janssen E et al. Affective and cognitive determinants of women’s sexual response to erotica. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2671–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dewitte M. Different perspectives on the sex-attachment link: towards an emotion-motivational account. J Sex Res. 2012;49:105–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dewitte M. Gender differences in liking and wanting sex: examining the role of motivational context and implicit versus explicit processing. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:1663–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laan E, Everaerd W, Van Aanhold M, Rebel M. Performance demand and sexual arousal in women. Behav Res Ther. 1993;31:25–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meston C, Gorzalka B. Differential effects of sympathetic activation on sexual arousal in sexually dysfunctional and functional women. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105:582–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palace EM, Gorzalka BB. The enhancing effects of anxiety on arousal in sexually dysfunctional and functional women. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990;99:403–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Basson R. Human sex-response cycles. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001;27:33–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brotto LA, Basson R, Luria MA. Mindfulness-based group psychoeducational intervention targeting sexual arousal disorder in women. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1646–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Giles KP, McCabe MP. Conceptualizing women’s sexual function: linear vs. circular models of sexual response. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2761–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCabe M. The role of performance anxiety in the development and maintenance of sexual dysfunction in men and women. Int J Stress Manag. 2005;12:379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McCabe M, Cobain MJ. The impact of individual and relationship factors on sexual dysfunction in males and females. J Sex Marital Ther. 1998;13:131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1974

  25. Masters W, Johnson, V. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown; 1970.

  26. Barlow DH. Causes of sexual dysfunction: the role of anxiety and cognitive interference. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986;54:140–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carpenter KM, Andersen BL, Fowler JM, Maxwell GL. Sexual self schema as a moderator of sexual and psychological outcomes for gynecologic cancer survivors. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38:828–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cyranowski JM, Andersen BL. Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment. J Personal Social Psychol. 1998;74:1364–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cyranowski JM, Andersen BL. Evidence of self-schematic cognitive processing in women with differing sexual self-views. J Social Clin Psychol. 2000;19:519–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Géonet M, De Sutter P, Zech E. Cognitive factors in women hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Sexologies. 2013;22:e9–e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuffel SW, Heiman JR. Effects of depressive symptoms and experimentally adopted schemas on sexual arousal and affect in sexually healthy women. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35:160–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meston CM, Rellini AH, Heiman JR. Women’s history of sexual abuse, their sexuality, and sexual self-schemas. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:229–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reissing ED, Laliberté GM, Davis HJ. Young women’s sexual adjustment: the role of sexual self-schema, sexual self-efficacy, sexual aversion and body attitudes. Can J Human Sex. 2005;14:77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sigre-Leirós V, Carvalho J, Nobre P. Preliminary findings on men’s sexual self-schema and sexual offending: differences between subtypes of offenders. J Sex Res. 2016;53:204–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stanton AM, Meston CM, Boyd RL. Sexual self-schemas in the real world: investigating the ecological validity of language-based markers of childhood sexual abuse. Cyber Behav Social Netw. 2017;20:382–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ziaee P, Mashhadi A. The effectiveness of sexual education focused on cognitive schemas, on the improvement of sexual functioning among female married students. Evid Based Care. 2014;4:73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gagnon JH, Simon W. Sexual conduct: the social origins of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine; 1973.

  38. Andersen BL, Cyranowski JM. Women’s sexual self-schema. J Personal Social Psychol. 1994;67:1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Andersen BL, Cyranowski JM, Espindle D. Men’s sexual self-schema. J Personal Social Psychol. 1999;76:645–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gagnon JH, Rosen RC, Leiblum SR. Cognitive and social aspects of sexual dysfunction: sexual scripts in sex therapy. J Sex & Marital Ther. 1982;8:44–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gomes ALQ, Nobre P. Early maladaptive schemas and sexual dysfunction in men. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:311–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kirana PS, Tripodi F, Reisman Y, Porst H. The EFS and ESSM syllabus of clinical sexology. Amsterdam: Medix; 2013.

  43. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Questionnaire of cognitive schema activation in sexual context: a measure to assess cognitive schemas activated in unsuccessful sexual situations. J Sex Res. 2009a;46:425–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitive schemas associated with negative sexual events: a comparison of men and women with and without sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav. 2009b;38:842–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Oliveira C, Nobre PJ. Cognitive structures in women with sexual dysfunction: the role of early maladaptive schemas. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1755–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Peixoto MM, Nobre P. Cognitive schemas activated in sexual context: a comparative study with homosexual and heterosexual men and women, with and without sexual problems. Cogn Ther Res. 2015;39:390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Reisman Y, Porst H, Lowenstein L, Tripodi F, Kirana, SP. The ESSM manual of sexual medicine. Amsterdam: Medix; 2015.

  48. Beck J. Cognitive therapy: basics and beyond. New York: Guilford; 1995.

  49. Beck AT. Beyond belief: a theory of modes, personality, and psychopathology. In: Salkovskis P, editor. Frontiers of cognitive therapy. New York: Guilford; 1996. p. 1–25.

  50. Carey MP, Wincze JP, Meisler AW. Sexual dysfunction: male erectile disorder. In: Barlow DH, editor. Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: a step by step treatment manual. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 1993; p. 442–80.

  51. Rosen RC, Leiblum SR, Spector I. Psychologically based treatment for male erectile disorder: a cognitive-interpersonal model. J Sex Marital Ther. 1994;20:67–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sbrocco T, Barlow DH. Conceptualizing the cognitive component of sexual arousal: implications for sexuality research and treatment. In: Salkovskis PM, editor. Frontiers of cognitive therapy. New York: Guilford Press; 1996; p. 419–49.

  53. Leiblum SR. Commentary: critical overview of the new consensus-based definition and classification on female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001;27:159–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Basson R. Women’s sexual dysfunction: revised and expanded definitions. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;172:1327–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Young JE, Brown G. Young schema questionnaire. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach, 63–76, 1994.

  56. Nimbi FM, Tripodi F, Rossi R, Simonelli C. Biopsychosocial predictors of sexual desire level in men. J Sex Med. 2017a;14:e277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nimbi FM, Tripodi F, Rossi R, Simonelli C. PS-01-012 Which biopsychosocial variables affect more level of sexual desire in men? J Sex Med. 2017b;14:e109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Nobre PJ. Determinants of sexual desire problems in women: testing a cognitive–emotional model. J Sex & Marital Ther. 2009;35:360–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nobre PJ. Psychological determinants of erectile dysfunction: testing a cognitive–emotional model. J Sex Med. 2010;7(4pt1):1429–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Peixoto MM, Nobre P. “Macho” beliefs moderate the association between negative sexual episodes and activation of incompetence schemas in sexual context, in gay and heterosexual men. J Sex Med. 2017a;14:518–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Peixoto MM, Nobre P. The activation of incompetence schemas in response to negative sexual events in heterosexual and lesbian women: the moderator role of personality traits and dysfunctional sexual beliefs. J Sex Res. 2017b;9:1188–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Peixoto MM, Nobre P. Incompetence schemas and sexual functioning in heterosexual and lesbian women: the mediator role of automatic thoughts and affective states during sexual activity. Cogn Ther Res. 2017c;41:304–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Quinta-Gomes AL, Nobre P. Psychological variables in male sexual dysfunction: cognitive schemas and personality. Sexologies. 2008;17:124–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Viozzi E, Rossi V, Tripodi F, Fabrizi A, Nimbi FM, Simonelli C. Sex life in women with sexual pain: a preliminary study. J Sex Med. 2017a;14:e261.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Viozzi E, Rossi V, Tripodi F, Nimbi FM, Simonelli C. PS-03-001 female sexual pain and quality of sex life: preliminary results of the Italian protocol “sexuality and well-being”. J Sex Med. 2017b;14:e114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Quinta-Gomes AL, Nobre P. Early maladaptive chemas and sexual dysfunction in men. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:311–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Rosen C, Brown J, Heiman S, Leiblum C, Meston R, Shabsigh D et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex & Marital Ther. 2000;26:191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sakaluk JK, Short SD. A methodological review of exploratory factor analysis in sexuality research: used practices, best practices, and data analysis resources. J Sex Res. 2017;54:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. New York: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.

  71. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Psychology Press; 2013.

  72. Miles J, Shevlin M. A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personal Individ Differ. 2007;42:869–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Simonelli C, Fabrizi A, Rossi R, Silvaggi C, Tripodi F, Michetti PM. Clinical sexology: an integrated approach between the psychosomatic and the somatopsychic. Sexologies. 2010;19:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Nimbi FM, Tripodi F, Simonelli C, Nobre P. Sexual Modes Questionnaire (SMQ): translation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the automatic thought scale. J Sex Med. 2018;15:396–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. M. Nimbi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix A. Male version Italian Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context (QCSASC)

figure a

Appendix B. Female version Italian Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context (QCSASC)

figure b

Appendix C

Table 9

Table 9 Scoring male and female version QCSASC

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nimbi, F.M., Tripodi, F., Simonelli, C. et al. Questionnaire of Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context: translation and psychometric properties of the Italian version. Int J Impot Res 30, 253–264 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0055-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0055-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links