In colloquial English, a “grower” is a man whose phallus expands significantly in length from the flaccid to the erect state; a “shower” is a man whose phallus does not demonstrate such expansion. We sought to investigate various factors that might predict a man being either a grower or a shower. A retrospective review of 274 patients who underwent penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU) for erectile dysfunction between 2011 and 2013 was performed. Penile length was measured, both in the flaccid state prior to intracavernosal injection (ICI) of a vasodilating agent (prostaglandin E1), and at peak erection during PDDU. The collected data included patient demographics, vascular, and anatomic parameters. The median change in penile length from flaccid to erect state was 4.0 cm (1.0–7.0), and was used as a cut-off value defining a grower (≥4.0 cm) or a shower (4.0 cm). A total of 73 men (26%) fit the definition of a grower (mean change in length of 5.3 cm [SD 0.5]) and 205 (74%) were showers (mean change in length of 3.1 cm [SD 0.9]). There were no differences between the groups with regards to race, smoking history, co-morbidities, erectile function, flaccid penile length, degree of penile rigidity after ICI, or PDDU findings. Growers were significantly younger (mean age 47.5 vs. 55.9 years, p < 0.001), single (37% vs. 23%, p = 0.031), received less vasodilator dose (10.3 mcg vs. 11.0 mcg, p = 0.038) and had a larger erect phallus (15.5 cm vs. 13.1 cm, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only younger age was significantly predictive of being a grower (p < 0.001). These results suggest that younger age and single status could be predictors of a man being a grower, rather than a shower. Larger, multicultural and multinational studies are needed to confirm these results.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Talalaj J, Talalaj S. The strangest human sex, ceremonies and customs. Melbourne: Hill of Content; 1994.
Burton R. The kama sutra of Vatsayana. New York: Penguin Books; 1962. p. 247–52.
Winter HC An examination of the relationships between penis size and body image, genital image, and perception of sexual competency in the male. DAI-A November 1989; 50/05: 1225.
Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown & Co; 1966.
Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown; 1970.
Eisenman R. Penis size: survey of female perceptions of sexual satisfaction. BMC Women’s Health. 2001;1:1.
Mautz BS, Wong BB, Peters RA, Jennions MD. Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:6925–30.
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1948.
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156(1):995–7.
Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ, Brock G, Morales AM. Standardization of vascular assessment of erectile dysfunction: standard operating procedures for duplex ultrasound. J Sex Med. 2013;10(1):120–9.
Yafi FA, Libby RP, McCaslin IR, Sangkum P, Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ. Failure to attain stretched penile length after intracavernosal injection of a vasodilator agent is predictive of veno-occlusive dysfunction on penile duplex Doppler ultrasonography. Andrology . 2015;3(5):919–23.
Salama, N. Penile Dimensions of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Case–Control Study. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(3):514–523.
Kamel I, Gadalla A, Ghanem H, Oraby M. Comparing penile measurements in normal and erectile dysfunction subjects. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2305–10.
Awwad ZM, Abu-Hijleh MO, Basari SN, Shegam N, Murshidi M, Ajlouni K. Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:191–5.
Khan S, Somani B, Law M, Donat R. Establishing a reference range for penile length in Caucasian British men: a prospective study of 609 men. BJU Int. 2012;109:740–4.
Berookhim BM, Nelson CJ, Kunzel B, Mulhall JP, Narus JB. Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2014;113:E131–6.
Moreira de Goes P, Wespes E, Schulman C. Penile extensibility: to what is it related? J Urol. 1992;148:1432–4.
Bondil P, Costa P, Daures JP, Louis JF, Navratil H. Clinical study of the longitudinal deformation of the flaccid penis and of its variations with aging. Eur Urol. 1992;21:284–6.
Akkus E, Carrier S, Baba K, Hus GL, Padma-Nathan H, Nunes L, et al. Structural alterations in the tunica albuginea of the penis: impact of Peyronie’s disease, ageing and impotence. Br J Urol. 1997;79:47–53.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Yafi, F.A., Alzweri, L., McCaslin, I.R. et al. Grower or shower? Predictors of change in penile length from the flaccid to erect state. Int J Impot Res 30, 287–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0053-3
This article is cited by
International Journal of Impotence Research (2020)
International Journal of Impotence Research (2018)
International Journal of Impotence Research (2018)