Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Time in therapeutic range and risk of preeclampsia in chronic hypertensive pregnant women

A Comment to this article was published on 02 October 2024

Abstract

Pregnancy Hypertensive Disorders (PHD), particularly Preeclampsia (PE), are significant contributors to maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality, with chronic arterial hypertension (CH) being a major risk factor. The prevalence of CH has risen alongside obesity and advanced maternal age. While antihypertensive treatment mitigates adverse pregnancy outcomes, the duration of effective blood pressure (BP) control, termed Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR), has not been extensively studied in pregnant women. TTR, reflecting the proportion of time BP remains within target ranges, predicts long-term cardiovascular and renal events in the general population but remains unexplored in pregnancy. This study investigates the association between TTR, assessed through office BP (OBP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and PE development in pregnant women with CH. In a retrospective longitudinal study, data from 166 pregnant women with HA referred to our hospital analyzed. BP was measured using OBP and ABPM from 10 weeks of gestation, with TTR calculated as the percentage of visits where BP remained within target ranges. The study defined four TTR control groups: 0%, 33%, 50–66%, and 100%. Results showed that 28% of the participants developed PE, with a higher incidence correlating with lower TTR in ABPM. TTR in ABPM was a significant predictor of PE risk, with the best-controlled group (100% TTR) demonstrating a 92% reduced risk compared to those with 0% TTR. The agreement between OBP and ABPM TTR was low, emphasizing the importance of ABPM for accurate BP monitoring in pregnancy. This study indicates that integrating ABPM for TTR assessment in high-risk pregnancies has the potential to reduce maternal and fetal complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magee LA, Brown MA, Hall DR, Gupte S, Hennessy A, Karumanchi SA, et al. The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;27:148–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2021.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ananth CV, Duzyj CM, Yadava S, Schwebel M, Tita ATN, Joseph KS. Changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy, United States, 1970 to 2010. Hypertension. 2019;74:1089–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P. Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:664. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2207889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tita AT, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, Dugoff L, Sibai B, Lawrence K, et al. Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy. N. Engl J Med. 2022;386:1781–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, Burnier M, Grassi G, Januszewicz A, et al. 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA). J Hypertens. 2023;41:1874–2071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doumas M, Tsioufis C, Fletcher R, Amdur R, Faselis C, Papademetriou V. Time in therapeutic range, as a determinant of all cause mortality in patients with hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e007131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Dolan E, Bilo G. Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20:1133–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckley LF, Baker WL, Van Tassell BW, Cohen JB, Alkhezi O, Bress AP, et al. Systolic Blood Pressure Time in Target Range and Major Adverse Kidney and Cardiovascular Events. Hypertension. 2023;80:305–13. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kario K, Tomitani N, Okawara Y, Kanegae H, Hoshide S. Home systolic blood pressure time in therapeutic range and cardiovascular risk: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP study extended. Hypertens Res. 2024;47:112–9.

  10. Mahfoud F, Mancia G, Schmieder RE, Ruilope L, Narkiewicz K, Schlaich M, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction after renal denervation according to time in therapeutic systolic blood pressure range. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:1871–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Salazar MR, Espeche WG, Leiva Sisnieguez BC, Balbín E, Leiva Sisnieguez CE, Stavile RN, et al. Significance of masked and nocturnal hypertension in normotensive women coursing a high-risk pregnancy. J Hypertens. 2016;34:2248–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garovic VD, Dechend R, Easterling T, Karumanchi SA, McMurtry Baird S, Magee LA, et al. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis, blood-pressure goals, and pharmacotherapy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2022;79:e21–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salazar MR, Espeche WG, Minetto J, Carrera PR, Cerri G, Leiva Sisnieguez CB, et al. Uncontrolled and masked uncontrolled blood pressure in treated pregnant women with chronic hypertension and risk for preeclampsia/eclampsia. Hypertens Res. 2023;46:2729–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01443-3.

  14. Fatani N, Dixon DL, Van Tassell BW, Fanikos J, Buckley LF. Systolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:1290–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Minetto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Espeche, W., Minetto, J., Leiva Sisnieguez, C.E. et al. Time in therapeutic range and risk of preeclampsia in chronic hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens Res 47, 2895–2901 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01830-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01830-4

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links