Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Preconception blood pressure and risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: a large cohort study in China

Abstract

Our objective was to examine whether high blood pressure in the preconception period was associated with gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in Chinese women. Data were obtained from the China-US Collaborative Project for Neural Tube Defects Prevention, a large population-based cohort study. We included 45,628 women who were registered before pregnancy in seven counties in South China. Blood pressure was measured during registration by trained health care workers, and other health-related information was recorded prospectively. We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations between preconception blood pressure and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, adjusting for potential confounders. The prevalence of hypertension in the preconception study population was 4.57% (2083/45,628). The incidences of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were 11.95% and 4.08%, respectively, in the hypertension group and 8.60% and 2.28%, respectively, in the nonhypertension group. Compared with the nonhypertension group, the hypertension group showed a significantly increased risk for gestational hypertension [adjusted risk ratio (RR) = 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22–1.60] and preeclampsia [adjusted RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.39–2.19]. When participants with normal blood pressure were used as the reference, the adjusted ORs for gestational hypertension were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.37–1.59), 1.70 (95% CI: 1.44–2.01), and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02–1.64), and for preeclampsia, the adjusted ORs were 1.55 (95% CI: 1.35–1.78), 1.95 (95% CI: 1.46–2.60), and 1.99 (95% CI: 1.39–2.85) for the participants with prehypertension, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension, respectively. Our results support an association between hypertension or higher blood pressure prior to pregnancy and an increased risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Evdokia Dimitriadis, Daniel L. Rolnik, … Ellen Menkhorst

References

  1. Ye C, Ruan Y, Zou L, Li G, Li C, Chen Y, et al. The 2011 survey on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in China: prevalence, risk factors, complications, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Klungsoyr K, Irgens LM, Vikse BE, Vatten LJ, et al. Cardiovascular mortality after pre-eclampsia in one child mothers: prospective, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e7677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Liberati M, Thilaganathan B. Preeclampsia is associated with persistent postpartum cardiovascular impairment. Hypertension. 2011;58:709–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Catov JM, Ness RB, Kip KE, Olsen J. Risk of early or severe pre-eclampsia related to pre-existing conditions. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:412–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harville EW, Viikari JS, Raitakari OT. Preconception cardiovascular risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology. 2011;22:724–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Myklestad K, Salvesen KA, Romundstad PR. Cardiovascular risk factors prior to conception and the length of pregnancy: population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:526 e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Tan H, Huang X, Zhou S, Hu S, Wang X, et al. Similarities and differences between the risk factors for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: a population based cohort study in south China. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016;6:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD, Li S, Moore CA, Wang H, et al. Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China-U.S. Collaborative Project for Neural Tube Defect Prevention. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1485–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gindler J, Li Z, Berry RJ, Zheng J, Correa A, Sun X, et al. Folic acid supplements during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage. Lancet. 2001;358:796–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitworth JA, Chalmers J. World health organisation-international society of hypertension (WHO/ISH) hypertension guidelines. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2004;26:747–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z, Ye R, Zhang L, Li H, Liu J, Ren A. Folic acid supplementation during early pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2013;61:873–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elvan-Taspinar A, Franx A, Bots ML, Koomans HA, Bruinse HW. Arterial stiffness and fetal growth in normotensive pregnancy. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomimatsu T, Fujime M, Kanayama T, Mimura K, Koyama S, Kanagawa T, et al. Maternal arterial stiffness in normotensive pregnant women who subsequently deliver babies that are small for gestational age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;169:24–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan F, Mires G, Macleod M, Belch JJ. Relationship between maternal arterial wave reflection, microvascular function and fetal growth in normal pregnancy. Microcirculation. 2010;17:608–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li N, Li Z, Ye R, Zhang L, Li H, Zhu Y, et al. Preconception blood pressure and risk of low birth weight and small for gestational age: a large cohort study in China. Hypertension. 2016;68:873–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Y, He Y, Li Q, Wang Y, Peng Z, Xu J, et al. Preconception blood pressure and risk of preterm birth: a large historical cohort study in a Chinese rural population. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:124–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noori M, Donald AE, Angelakopoulou A, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Prospective study of placental angiogenic factors and maternal vascular function before and after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Circulation. 2010;122:478–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Egeland GM, Klungsoyr K, Oyen N, Tell GS, Naess O, Skjaerven R. Preconception cardiovascular risk factor differences between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: Cohort Norway Study. Hypertension. 2016;67:1173–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Lund-Nilsen TI, Salvesen KA, Davey Smith G, Romundstad PR. Prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335:978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Everett TR, Lees CC. Beyond the placental bed: placental and systemic determinants of the uterine artery Doppler waveform. Placenta. 2012;33:893–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts JM, Hubel CA. Is oxidative stress the link in the two-stage model of pre-eclampsia? Lancet. 1999;354:788–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorp J.M. Placental vascular compromise: unifying the etiologic pathways of perinatal compromise. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil. 2001;24:0202–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foo FL, Mahendru AA, Masini G, Fraser A, Cacciatore S, MacIntyre DA, et al. Association between prepregnancy cardiovascular function and subsequent preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. Hypertension. 2018;72:442–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang G, Fan L, Tan J, Qi G, Zhang Y, Samet JM, et al. Smoking in China: findings of the 1996 National Prevalence Survey. JAMA. 1999;282:1247–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all of the volunteers and staff involved in this research.

Funding

NL was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7194285), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81903327), startup funding from the “Incubation” Program of China and Peking University Health Science Center (No. BMU2017YB003), and the Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS) (2018QNRC001). The original project was supported by a cooperative agreement between the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Peking University (Grant No. U01 DD000293).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NL had full access to all of the study’s data and takes complete responsibility for the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: NL, HA, and RY. Acquisition of data: NL, HA, HL, and JL. Interpretation of data: NL, HA, ZL, LZ, and JL. Drafting of the paper: NL and HA. Critical revision of the paper: NL, HL, RY, ZL, and LZ. Statistical analysis: NL and HA. Funding acquisition: NL, JL, and RY. Administrative and technical support: NL, HA, ZL, and RY. Study supervision: ZL and RY.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiwen Li or Rongwei Ye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, N., An, H., Li, Z. et al. Preconception blood pressure and risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: a large cohort study in China. Hypertens Res 43, 956–962 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0438-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0438-9

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links