Dystonia is a neurological disorder characterized by abnormal involuntary movements or postures owing to sustained or intermittent muscle contractions1. Monogenic forms of dystonia/dyskinesias (DYTs) are classified from DYT1 to DYT25, and 17 genes are known to be responsible for DYT2. In addition to these 17 genes, 9 new genes have been suggested to be responsible for DYT3. SGCE is the gene responsible for DYT111.

A 19-year-old female, without a family history of involuntary movements, noticed occasional jerking in her right hand when writing or using chopsticks at the age of eight. She often had difficulty holding things in her right hand. Her symptoms were aggravated by psychological stress. Her symptoms gradually worsened and spread to her left hand. She had no other significant medical history. Neurological examination revealed no abnormalities except for action myoclonus in her hands with right dominancy and occasionally dystonic posture in her right foot during walking. Her action myoclonus was inhibited by dorsiflexion of the wrist joint. No abnormalities were observed in brain magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalography. Her symptoms improved dramatically with clonazepam (1.5 mg/day). Her parents showed no neurological abnormalities. The patient was diagnosed with myoclonus-dystonia syndrome.

We performed exome sequencing for the patient who was diagnosed with DYT (Fig. 1A). We identified a total of 130,940 variants in the patient (II-1). Since she was diagnosed with myoclonus-dystonia syndrome2,3, we selected 80 variants located in 26 genes known to be associated with DYT (Table S1). Out of the 80 variants, we identified only two functional variants with a MAF (minor allele frequency) <0.02. One was a heterozygous variant in PKRA that is known to be associated with the autosomal recessive form of DYT, so we excluded this variant. Then, we retained only one variant, NM_003919.3:c.304C > T [Arg102*], in the epsilon sarcoglycan gene SGCE.

Fig. 1: Pedigree diagram and genotyping of the SGCE variant.
figure 1

A Pedigree of the tested family. Squares: males, circles: females, solid symbols: affected individuals, open symbols: unaffected individuals. B Electropherogram of the region of the NM_003919.3: c.304C > T variant in all family members. The location of the variant is indicated by a triangle.

We validated the variant by Sanger sequencing for all family members (forward primer, 5’-ACTACCAAAGCAACATGTGTGA-3’ and reverse primer 5’-GCTTCCCCACATTTTCAGCT-3’). This variant was also found in the unaffected father (I-1) of the patient as well as the patient, indicating the paternal inheritance of this variant for this patient (Fig. 1B). SGCE is known to be an imprinted gene and is expressed only from paternal alleles by silencing maternal alleles4,5. Since the father (I-1) carrying the variant does not show DYT symptoms, it is highly likely that the variant was maternally inherited from the patient’s grandmother and was silenced in I-1 by genomic imprinting. To confirm genetic silencing, we performed allele-specific real-time qPCR using total RNA extracted from peripheral blood to determine which allele was expressed (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table S2). Allele-specific PCR revealed that the SGCE mRNA of the patient (II-1) was only transcribed from the variant allele. The amount of SGCE mRNA in the patient (II-1) was lower than that in the mother (I-2) (Fig. 2A). This is likely due to nonsense-mediated decay degrading abnormal mRNAs. Allele-specific qPCR also revealed that the SGCE mRNA in the patient (II-1) was transcribed almost exclusively from the variant allele (Fig. 2B). However, we could not obtain statistical significance due to the very low expression of SGCE in the peripheral blood. Unfortunately, we could not include the father (I-1) in the analyses due to the unavailability of his total RNA.

Fig. 2: Allele-specific real-time qPCR of SGCE.
figure 2

A PCR products amplified with allele-specific primers were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel at 100 V for 20 min. B Expression levels of the two alleles of SGCE in the patient (II-1) were individually examined by qPCR. qPCR using allele-specific primers was performed using Applied Biosystems 7500. The experiment was performed with three technical replications. The expression levels of the wild-type allele and variant allele are shown in open and filled columns, respectively. Values are presented as the mean ± SD. In all experiments, the expression levels from the variant alleles is shown relative to the expression level from the wild-type allele. Most of the SGCE mRNA of the patient expressed the variant alleles. WT wild type, Var variant.

This variant has already been identified as the variant responsible for DYT in eight independent families worldwide6,7,8,9. This suggests that the identical variants have recurrently arisen at the mutational hotspot in the SGCE gene, despite the high CADD score (CADD = 41). According to the ACMG/AMP/CAP guidelines, the variant meets the criteria of PVS1, PS1, PM1, PM2, PP1, PP3, PP4, and PP510. Collectively, we concluded that the SGCE variant is responsible for DYT in the current patient, and she has been molecularly diagnosed with DYT11. We also directly confirmed that the genomic imprinting of SGCE affects the pathogenesis of DYT11. Specifically, the maternally inherited normal allele of SGCE was silenced, and only the paternally inherited variant allele was expressed in this patient.

HGV database

The relevant data from this Data Report are hosted at the Human Genome Variation Database at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.3213.