Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advances in research on the carrot, an important root vegetable in the Apiaceae family


Carrots (Daucus carota L.), among the most important root vegetables in the Apiaceae family, are cultivated worldwide. The storage root is widely utilized due to its richness in carotenoids, anthocyanins, dietary fiber, vitamins and other nutrients. Carrot extracts, which serve as sources of antioxidants, have important functions in preventing many diseases. The biosynthesis, metabolism, and medicinal properties of carotenoids in carrots have been widely studied. Research on hormone regulation in the growth and development of carrots has also been widely performed. Recently, with the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, many efficient tools have been adopted in carrot research. A large amount of sequence data has been produced and applied to improve carrot breeding. A genome editing system based on CRISPR/Cas9 was also constructed for carrot research. In this review, we will briefly summarize the origins, genetic breeding, resistance breeding, genome editing, omics research, hormone regulation, and nutritional composition of carrots. Perspectives about future research work on carrots are also briefly provided.


Carrot (Daucus carota L.), a biennial herbaceous species, is a member of the Apiaceae family1. The cultivated carrots are mainly classified into eastern carrots and western carrots based on pigmentation in the carrot roots2. Eastern carrots are thought to originate from Afghanistan, while the origin of western carrots is still uncertain2,3. The roots of most eastern carrots are purple, and some are yellow. They have slightly dissected leaves and branched roots. The roots of most western carrots are orange, red or white. The leaves of western carrots are highly dissected, and the roots are unbranched2,4. Currently, orange carrots are becoming more popular and more widely cultivated in the world.

The carrot storage root is a good source of carotenoids, vitamins, and dietary fiber and is also rich in minerals and antioxidants5,6. With increasing health awareness, carrots are becoming more popular due to their abundant nutrients and benefits for human health. The majority of studies on carrots have focused on cultivation, breeding, tissue culture, nutrient content, and carotenoid synthesis regulation7,8,9. With the development of molecular biology technology, a large amount of information has been produced in research on vegetable crops. As one of the most important members of the Apiaceae family that is widely cultivated around the world, a large number of studies on carrots have also been performed. This review is mainly focused on the domestication, breeding, omics, and chemical composition of carrots. Potential further work in carrot research is also discussed.

Biology and origins


The carrot is a biennial herbaceous species in the Apiaceae family. Carrot roots, which develop from the hypocotyls, have good storage ability. A large amount of carbohydrates are stored in the enlarged taproots for the carrot plant flowering in the second year. The flower of the carrot is a flattened umbrella-shaped umbel (Fig. 1). The umbel is a characteristic for distinguishing carrots from related taxa. The colors of the cultivated carrot flowers are usually white, and the carrot leaves are compound leaves4,10. The fleshy taproot of the carrot develops from the hypocotyls, and the shape of the carrot root is always conical. The color of the root is varied and includes orange, yellow, purple, red, and white4. Different pigment contents are responsible for the different colors. With the further development of sequencing, more functional genes related to pigment synthesis will be found. The basic chromosome number of carrots is 9–11. Most cultivated carrots are diploid (2n = 2x = 18). The average length of the carrot chromosome is 2.34 μm11,12. In 2011, Iovene integrated the linkage groups with pachytene chromosomes of carrot through fluorescent in situ hybridization. In the report, the lengths of carrot chromosomes were only 2–4 μm, and the nine chromosomes were classified into three groups. Chromosomes 1, 6, and 8 with subterminal centromeres were a group; chromosomes 2 and 4 with terminal centromeres were a group; and chromosomes 3, 5, 7, and 9 with nearly median centromeres were a group. Among the nine chromosomes, chromosome 1 was the longest chromosome and had a small heterochromatic knob13.

Fig. 1: Pictures of carrot flowers, roots and field production.
figure 1

a Carrot flower. b Carrot root. c, d Field production of carrot

Carrot is a cool climate crop that can be sown in spring in temperate climate zones or in the autumn or winter in subtropical climate zones14. Carrots are biennial plants. Vegetative growth is the main process of the first year of the life cycle to store material for reproductive growth. The flesh taproot collected for eating or selling is the root produced in the first year. Carrots will flower or bolt after vernalization when the roots are left in the ground. The time for vernalization must be at least 6 weeks. However, some wild carrots will flower or bolt with little or no vernalization15,16.


The time frame and geographical location(s) of the earliest cultivated carrots are still uncertain. In Vavilov’s opinion, Asia Minor and the inner Asiatic regions were the origin centers of cultivated carrots. In addition, regions including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan were the basic centers of cultivated carrots in Asia17. In the Stolarczyk and Janickan report, Afghanistan was thought to be the first center of carrot diversity, and Turkey was the second10. With the development of sequencing technology, many molecular markers have been used in research on plant evolution. In Orizzo and his group’s research, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were adopted to analyze the structure and phylogeny of wild and cultivated carrots. A clear separation was found between wild and cultivated carrots. Based on historical documents and experimental results, central Asia was thought to be one origin of cultivated carrot18. All of the above research supports the idea that central Asia was an origin of cultivated carrots.


Shape, color and flavor, etc. were surmised as selection criteria in the domestication of carrot4,19. The cultivated carrot can be mainly classified into the anthocyanin, or eastern-type, carrot (e.g., yellow or purple) and the carotene, or western-type, carrot (e.g., yellow, orange, or red) based on the pigmentation in the roots1,20,21. Western carrots are always cylindrical or tapered cylindrical in shape and have less pubescent leaves, higher provitamin A carotenoid content, and higher sugar content than eastern carrots1,22. Eastern carrots always have thicker, shorter, narrow, conical roots, have pubescent leaves, flower early, and are poor in provitamin A carotenoid content1.

The viewpoint that the eastern-type cultivated carrot was domesticated from the wild carrots in the area around Afghanistan is generally agreed upon2,4. A recent study based on the transcriptome data analysis also supports the hypothesis that the eastern-type cultivated carrot originated in Western Asia3. However, there are still some different viewpoints on the origin of western-type cultivated carrots. The western-type cultivated carrot was thought to originate from eastern-type carrots directly, based on the earliest molecular study about carrot domestication18. In contrast, Heywood held the idea that western-type cultivated carrots did not originate directly from the eastern-type carrot2. He summarized the hypothesis that there was a secondary domestication event in the domestication of western-type cultivated carrot2. According to a recent study, western-type orange carrots may also originate from eastern carrots by introgression from wild carrots3. Areas around Afghanistan are generally agreed to be the geographic regions of the first cultivation of eastern-type carrots. To determine the geographic regions of the first cultivation of western-type carrots, more genetic sequencing studies are needed.

Carrot breeding

Male sterile breeding

Carrot is an allogamous plant. The stamens usually mature earlier than pistils in carrots24,25. The rate of natural hybrids in carrots is very high, but the value of seed production by natural hybrids is uncertain26. Male sterile lines have been used in the hybridization breeding of many crops and have made hybridization breeding easier for many plants that are difficult to breed using artificial emasculation27. In heterosis breeding, male sterile lines were also widely used. F1-hybrid breeding based on cytoplasmic male sterility is the main method of carrot breeding28.

In carrot, “brown anther” type and “petaloid” type are the two types of male sterility29,30,31,32. The stamens of the “brown anther” type are deformed and brown-colored. Morelock has identified this type in many cultivated and wild carrots33. The stamens of the “petaloid” type are transformed into a petal-like shape34. This type was found by Thompson31 and Mccollum32 in wild carrot. The anthesis of the “brown anther” type is blocked at a late stage of meiosis, and the stamens of the “petaloid” type produce no pollen. In carrot breeding, the “petaloid” type of male sterility is used more often. In 2018, Tan et al. found a wild petaloid male sterile carrot line (Wuye-BY). The male sterile carrot line has no swollen storage root, petal or anther. The advantage of the F1 hybrid is obvious35. In their subsequent experiments, they found that the sequence length of ATP synthase subunit 6 (atp6) was shorter in the male sterile line (Wuye-D) and longer in the fertile line (Wuye-L). The atp6 gene is related to the fertility of plants. They thought that the longer atp6 gene was associated with carrot fertility and that the short atp6 gene was associated with carrot male sterility36. In a study by Szklarczyk et al., the sequence of the carrot atp9 gene (atp9-1) in petaloid carrots (Sp-cytoplasm) was shorter than the sequence of atp9-3 in N-cytoplasmic plants. In Sp-cytoplasm carrot, the enhanced expression level of atp9-1 was thought to be responsible for the enhanced ATP9 accumulation37. However, male sterility is a genocytoplasmic system, and the mutation in the atp6 gene sequence is not enough to determine plant male sterility. More genetic evidence is needed to determine plant male sterility.

Molecular breeding

Molecular marker breeding

Molecular markers are a new way to identify germplasm resources based on DNA and mRNA polymorphisms. They can be used in identifying core collections and examining the genetic relationship between parents in breeding research38. In genetic diversity analysis, molecular markers are also useful39. In basic research and breeding of carrots, molecular markers have been widely used.

In a study by Briard and colleagues, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was found to perform better than morphological or isoenzymatic markers in the varietal identification of carrot40. In the characterization of genetic diversity in Daucus varieties, 26 accessions of Daucus were discriminated into five Daucus species and seven D. carota subspecies by RAPD and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)41. Lian et al. classified 34 carrot resources into 5 groups and 8 subgroups with 20 random primers by RAPD42. In the research of Grzebelus and colleagues, RAPD and AFLP were used to analyze the genetic diversity of carrots. Four inbred lines and eight F1 hybrids were identified through AFLP technology43. Six sequence-tagged site (STS) primer combinations were used to identify the carrot petaloid type of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). Five CMS lines were classified into two groups, and eight fertile carrots were classified into six groups44.

In breeding carrots for resistance to leaf blight, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping technology was used to identify QTLs in carrots with new genetic backgrounds. Eleven QTLs were found in the two carrots with new genetic backgrounds of resistance to Alternaria dauci45. The QTLs for the synthesis of α-carotenes, β-carotenes, carotene lycopene, and precursors have also been found46. Among the molecular markers, simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are an important way to analyze genetic diversity. In the research of Baranski et al., 88 carrot accessions mainly from Europe, North America, and Asia were collected. Thirty SSR loci were fully characterized in these carrot accessions. As a result, the genetic diversity of the Western gene pool was lower than that of the Asian gene pool47.

In these studies, many molecular markers have been identified. Among these markers, some are disease resistance-related, some are agricultural trait-related and some reflect genetic diversity. All these markers will play important roles in carrot breeding with the carrot genome sequence database.

Transgenic breeding

Carrot is known as one of the pioneer species in the research of plant tissue culture48. The transformation protocols of carrots have also been established over decades. Many transformation methods for carrots have been established. Among the diverse techniques, Agrobacterium-based systems are the most common methods48,49. Agrobacterium includes A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes, and A. tumefaciens is the most common strain in Agrobacterium-based systems. The first carrot transformation based on A. tumefaciens was reported in 1987 50. According to many optimized transformation protocols of carrot transgenesis systems, explant type, variety, and bacterial strain were found to be the main factors affecting the transformation frequency48,51. In carrots, roots, cotyledons, hypocotyls, and petioles can all be used as explants. In Pawlicki and his group’s study, the transformation frequency was higher when petioles were used as the explants51,52. The time of cocultivation was also important. Compared with a cocultivation time of 1 or 7 days, the transformation frequency at a cocultivation time of 2 or 3 days was higher51. Following the development of the carrot transformation system, the media was also changed from MS to B5 53.

In the breeding research on carrots, the genetic engineering method was also adopted. The approach based on overexpressing functional genes was widely used. In the research of Wally et al., functional genes (OsPOC1, OsPrx114, and AtNPR1) from other species were overexpressed in carrots to enhance fungal and disease resistance. The transgenic lines overexpressing OsPrx114 displayed high disease resistance compared with the control54. In addition to resistance breeding, genetic engineering was also used to accumulate some special components by overexpressing characteristic genes in carrots. In the research of Luchakivskaya et al., HuINFα-2b was overexpressed in carrots to enhance the accumulation of human interferon alpha-2b protein. The transgenic lines expressing HuINFα-2b were thought to be useful in curing various viral diseases55.

In recent years, the genome editing method based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system has developed rapidly. This genome editing system has been applied in many spaces, including humans, mice, and plants56,57,58. The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a fast and easy way to edit the genome. In 2018, this genome editing system was first employed in carrot research. Klimek-Chodacka et al. knocked out the F3H gene in carrots and validated the importance of this gene in the biosynthesis of anthocyanin59. Xu et al. used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to knock out DcPDS in orange carrots and the DcMYB113-like gene in purple carrots, and the editing efficiencies were 35.35% and 36.4%, respectively60. These results suggest that the CRISPR/Cas9 system will be an important and useful method for further research on gene function in carrots.

The transformation method of carrots has matured. Transgenic breeding of carrots has been widely applied in experimental studies, and many important functional genes have been determined by overexpression or genome editing. However, this method should be used cautiously in field production.

Disease and pest resistance breeding

Aster yellows

Aster yellows is an insect-vectored carrot disease caused by a mycoplasma-like organism. This disease is one of the important diseases that limits the growth and yield of carrot61,62. Carrots infected by this typical disease will show stunting, yellowing, leaf bronzing, sterility and leaf-like petals63. Breeding carrot disease resistance to aster yellows has been implemented for many years. Gabelman and his collaborators selected breeding lines with high resistance to aster yellows through field evaluation and selection. In the breeding process, “Scarlet Nantes”, “Royal Chantenay”, and “Gold King” were found to have higher resistance to aster yellows and “Danvers 126”, “Py-60”, and “Spartan Bonus 80” were more susceptible63.

Fungal leaf blight

Fungal leaf blight is a kind of foliar disease in the cultivation of carrots. Fungal leaf blights are mainly caused by A. dauci (Kühn) and Cercospora carotae (Pass.) Solheim around the world64. A. dauci lesions always occur on older leaves, and C. carotae lesions always occur on new leaves in carrots65,66,67. Fungal leaf blights are found to cause yield loss by reducing leaf photosynthetic area and breaking carrot petioles. The A. dauci and C. carotae lesions can break carrot seedlings by girdling their petioles68. Breeding for leaf blight resistance has been performed for many years. The less-susceptible cultivars are found to have characteristics that delay the spread rate of pathogens. According to Gugino’s report, “Bolero”, “Carson”, “Calgary”, “Ithaca”, and “Fullback” were the cultivars that were less susceptible to A. dauci, and “Bolero”, “Carson”, and “Bergen” were the cultivars that were less susceptible to C. carotae68. In the research of Le Clerc et al., QTL mapping technology was adopted for the resistance breeding of leaf blight, and 11 QTLs related to resistance to A. dauci were found45.

Carrot fly

The carrot fly, Psila rosae F. (Diptera: Psilidae), is the most serious and widespread pest in carrot production69. Carrot leaves turn red, orange or rust- colored, and roots present rusty brown scars and tunnels when infected by carrot flies. Carrots infected by carrot flies are inedible and unmarketable70. Reports about carrot fly resistance breeding are available from more than 100 years ago69. From 1977 to 1978, Ellis and his group performed carrot fly resistance breeding at 12 different locations in England. A total of eight varieties with different resistances were cultivated, including “Clause’s Sytan Original”, “Gelbe Rheinische”, “Vertou LD”, “Clause’s Jaune Obtuse de Doubs”, “Royal Chantenay Elite (Rota) No.275”, “Long Chantenay”, “Danvers Half Long 126”, and “St. Valery”. Among the eight varieties, “Sytan”, cultivated in Nantes, showed the highest resistances to carrot fly71. To compare the difference between carrots with different resistances to carrot flies, “Sytan” (most resistant) and “Danvers” (least resistant) were chosen for comparison. The results of the comparative experiment suggested that carrots with high resistance to carrot flies reduce fly damage by delaying the development of larvae70. To overcome the effect of environmental factors in variety selection, Ellis and his group developed inbred carrots by using a single seed descent program. A total of nine carrot lines with moderate resistance to carrot fly were selected and seeded72. Many other reports about carrot fly resistance breeding have shown that “Sytan” is the variety with the highest resistance. The resistance of “Sytan” to carrot flies has been demonstrated in Canada, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, and the UK69,73,74,75. During breeding progress, it was realized that varieties with high carrot fly resistance have lower levels of chlorogenic acid than varieties with low resistance76. The concentration of chlorogenic acid may be used as a selection criterion to select a variety with high resistance to carrot flies. However, reports about genetic research into the resistance to carrot flies in carrots are still scarce.

Root-knot nematodes

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are significant pests that are widely present in plants77. In many carrot-producing regions, RKNs are major pests that limit carrot production78. In cooler producing regions, Meloidogyne hapla is the most prevalent. In warmer producing areas, Meloidogyne javanica and Meloidogyne incognita are the predominant RKN species79. The characteristics of RKNs (present in soil and having a broad host range) and the limited use of nematicides lead to difficulty in controlling the pathogen80. To guarantee carrot quality, it is necessary to perform root-knot nematode resistance breeding in carrots. Huang et al. found that “Brasilia” and “Tropical” are resistant to M. javanica81,82. “Brasilia” is the most promising source of resistance to M. javanica83,84. Through the use of molecular markers (RPAD and QTL), a locus named Mj-1 that imparts resistance to M. javanica was found in the “Brasilia” cultivar79,85. The Mj-1 locus is mapped on chromosome 8 79. In 2014, another locus that imparts resistance to M. javanica was mapped in the cultivar “PI652188” and named Mj-2. Mj-2 is also on chromosome 8 but does not map to the same locus as Mj-1 86. The discovery of Mj-1 and Mj-2 is meaningful for the root-knot nematode resistance breeding of carrots.

Omics research

Genomics research

Over the past few decades, sequencing technology has developed rapidly, and more than 100 plant genomes have been sequenced7. As the most important vegetable in the Apiaceae family, the carrot genome was also sequenced. In 2014, a genomic database for the carrot was released. This database provides de novo assembled whole-genome sequences and classified transcription factor families of carrots, which is helpful for further research on carrots87. Two years later, a high-quality carrot genome (421.5 Mb) was released. In this study, the evolution of the carrot genome was analyzed, and two new whole-genome duplications (WGDs) were identified. The two WGD possibilities occurred ~43 and ~70 million years ago, respectively. Furthermore, DCAR_032551 was hypothesized to play roles in regulating photomorphogenesis and root de-etiolation of carrots. Based on the whole-genome sequencing of carrots, 32,113 genes were predicted. Among the 32,113 genes, 10,530 genes unique to carrots were found88. In 2018, the genome sequence data for “Kurodagosun”, a major carrot cultivar in Japan and China, was also released89. All of these genome sequence data will significantly promote research on carrot evolution, carotenoid synthesis, and many other important projects in carrots. The genome in Iorizzo’s research (421.5 Mb) is obviously larger than that in Wang’s research (371.6 Mb), which suggests a difference between the sequencing quality in the two studies. The genome data in Iorizzo’s research have higher quality and were analyzed more deeply. The database published by Xu provides a tool for researchers to download gene sequences from Wang’s research. In future research, the two carrot genome datasets should be combined in carrot studies.

The plastid genome of carrots has also been sequenced. In 2006, the plastid genome of carrot was sequenced by Ruhlman et al. The length of the carrot plastid genome is 155,911 bp with 115 unique genes. The results from that research provided a valuable resource for phylogenetic analysis among different angiosperms. In the phylogenetic analysis, the bootstrap values between Daucus and Panax were all 100% in the Maximum parsimony (MP) tree and Maximum likelihood (ML) tree. The results strongly supported the sister relationship between Daucus and Panax90.

Transcriptomic research

Transcriptomics is an approach to studying gene expression by measuring all mRNA transcripts in one cell or tissue. The transcriptome sequence dataset is widely used in analyzing gene expression, discovering gene functions, and developing molecular markers91,92. In carrot research, transcriptomics was also widely adopted. In 2011, to build a molecular resource for revealing new markers and novel genes, the carrot transcriptome was de novo assembled and characterized by Simon’s group. To our knowledge, this transcriptome is the first transcriptome of carrot. Based on transcriptome sequencing, 114 computationally polymorphic SSRs and 20,058 SNPs were identified. In addition, polymorphisms were found predominantly between inbred lines93. Xiong’s group established the transcriptomic database (CarrotDB) in 2014. The database was established based on transcriptomic sequences from 14 carrot genotypes87.

To further investigate the domestication of carrots, the root transcriptomes of six cultivated carrots and five wild carrots were sequenced. Rong et al. thought that some other wild D. carota subspecies should also be involved in the research of carrot domestication. In cultivated carrots, the expression of the water-channel-protein gene and carotenoid-binding-protein gene was upregulated, and the expression of allergen-protein-like genes was silenced3. All these results revealed the potential role of regulators of gene expression in domestication. The western carrots were thought to originate from eastern carrots based on the analysis of transcriptome data from different cultivated and wild carrots.

Phytohormones play important roles in controlling plant root growth and development. As a root vegetable, the effect of hormones on carrot root growth should be investigated. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of hormones on carrot root growth, the transcriptomes of four different developmental stages were sequenced. A total of 4818 unigenes with differential expression between the four stages were identified. Among the 4818 unigenes, 87 genes were found to be involved in the hormone-related pathway 94. The transcriptome analysis of the key genes involved in the biosynthesis and signaling pathway of phytohormones helped to clarify the roles of hormones during root development.

To investigate the biosynthesis of carotenoids in carrot leaves and roots, Ma et al. sequenced the transcriptome of carrot leaves and roots. Based on the transcriptome data, DcPSY1 was thought to be the crucial factor responsible for the higher carotenoid content in carrot leaves. DcLBCY, DcLECY, and DcZEP1 may be responsible for the differences in carotene and xanthophyll levels between carrot leaves and roots95.

Depending on the demands of different studies, various transcriptome sequence datasets have been generated. All the datasets are the sequences of genes that are expressed under certain conditions. Transcriptomics promotes research on carrots, and many single important genes were found through this method. On the other hand, research on the relationship among different genes is also interesting. In the future, more research on the interaction among genes based on transcriptome sequence datasets should be performed in carrots.

microRNA research

microRNAs (miRNAs) are a type of noncoding small RNA ~20–24 nucleotides in length96. Numerous studies have found that plant miRNAs preferentially target transcription factors and play important roles in regulating plant development97. miRNAs are also important participants in responses to abiotic and biotic stresses 98. As a consensus, miRNA may be an important research object in research on improving the agronomic characteristics of crops.

The first carrot microRNA database was reported in 2013. Seventeen microRNAs were identified from the research. The 17 microRNAs came from 12 different families (dca-mir-156, 160, 167, 172, 774, 778, 854, 1310, 5015, 5030, 5658 and 5664). In analyzing the potential targets of the 17 microRNAs, 24 targets were determined. Among the 24 potential targets, 8 were transcription factors, 6 were stress related, 5 were involved in metabolism and 4 were related to plant growth. Most targets identified in the research have also been reported as microRNA targets in other plants99. The microRNA database and the findings are valuable resources for further research in improving the agronomic characteristics of carrots. Unfortunately, research about the microRNA in carrots is still scarce.

Proteomic research

Proteomics is an important technology for studying the growth, development, and stress responses of plants by systematically analyzing the plant proteome. This technology is an important complement to the genome100,101. Through proteomics, numerous proteins involved in the complex signaling and metabolic network of plants can be qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed100. In stress-response research in plants, proteomics has proven to be a powerful method and has been used in studying drought, flooding, and nutritional stress responses102. Furthermore, proteomics has also been widely used in studying the mechanisms and biological processes of plants, such as fruit ripening, seed germination, and floral development103.

In the research of Louarn et al., proteomics was used to analyze changes in the proteome of carrots during cold storage. Carrots cultivated in two different cropping systems were selected as the research object. A total of 15 proteins were found to change in levels in the first month of storage. Between the two different cropping systems, the change in protein level was small. Among the 15 proteins, three were related to the stress response, and three were related to the cytoskeleton. The research indicated that carrot roots have an adaptation to the low temperature within the first month of cold storage104. In the research of Wang et al., isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) were used to investigate the impact of elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) on carrot growth and development. Through proteome sequencing, they found a potential molecular mechanism for the altered lignin content in carrot roots induced by elevated CO2105. Proteomic technology provides a powerful way to understand the complex signaling and metabolic network of plant physiological progress and can contribute to further investigation of improving carrot yield and nutrition.

Metabolomic research

Metabolomics is a kind of functional genomics that measures all small molecules (molecular masses ≤ 1500 Da) in a cell or a tissue. The cell or the tissue measured is always in a particular physiological or developmental state106. This is a novel approach to performing qualitative and quantitative studies on plant biochemistry at a global level. Metabolomics has been widely adopted to study plant metabolism and food quality107.

To investigate the difference between wild and cultivated carrots, Grebenstein et al. constructed the metabolic fingerprinting of wild (“Dutch”) and cultivated (western orange) carrots through nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Differences between the two kinds of carrots only appeared at the quantitative level in the metabolic content. The metabolome of the hybrid of wild and cultivated carrots showed high similarity to that of the maternal carrot. The maternal characteristics and maternal environment may be the factors leading to the similar metabolic content between hybrid and maternal carrots108.

In carrot breeding research, metabolomics is also used as a powerful tool. In Leiss and his group’s research, metabolomics was adopted to investigate the resistance of different carrot varieties to Western flower thrips. A cultivated carrot (Ingot) was found to have the highest resistance. The wild and biofortified carrots did not show distinct resistance to the thrips. The contents of the flavanoid luteolin, the phenylpropanoid sinapic acid and the amino acid balanine were more abundant in the resistant carrots. These results were useful in the research of thrip resistance breeding in carrots109.

In 2014, the metabolomes of five carrot varieties were measured by NMR to study the effect of genotype on the metabolite components of carrot. In this study, orange carrot varieties were found to be more abundant in the contents of sucrose and β-carotene and to be lacking in the contents of fructose and glucose. The difference between yellow and white carrot varieties was unclear. Genetic differences, growing strategies, and soil types were finally determined to be the factors that affect the composition of different carrot varieties. The results are useful in breeding to improve carrot quality110.

Hormone regulation

Phytohormones are important regulators of plant growth and environmental responses. They are involved in almost all physiological processes during the growth and development of plants, such as cell division, growth and differentiation, flowering, seed development, and senescence111,112. Cytokinins (CK), abscisic acid (ABA), auxins (Aux), ethylene (ET), gibberellins (GA), brassinosteroids (BR) and jasmonates (JA) are the most studied hormones in plants111. Among these hormones, Aux, GA, BR and CK are mainly related to plant development; JA and ET are mainly related to plant defense; and ABA is related to the abiotic stress response111,113. Research on the roles of ABA, GA, BR, CK, Aux, and JA in growth and development of carrots has been performed.


Auxin is a pivotal plant hormone whose cellular level is important for regulating plant growth and development. Fruit formation, leaf abscission, cell division, and cell elongation were all reported to be regulated by auxin114,115. Among the different kinds of naturally active auxins, IAA is the best studied116. In the research of Wu et al., contents of IAA changed obviously at different growth stages and showed distinct discrepancies in different organs. In addition, 18 genes involved in the biosynthesis and signaling pathway of IAA were identified. The way that IAA regulates carrot growth and development may be tissue-specific117. However, there are few reports on the effect of exogenous IAA on the field production of carrots.


Gibberellins are diterpenoid compounds. Through the whole life cycle of plants, GAs play pivotal roles in regulating growth and development, including seed germination, stem elongation, flowering, and fruit development118. In cellular growth, promoting the elongation and expansion of cells are the main functions of GAs. Mutants that are defective in GA biosynthesis are always dwarfs119.

During the growth and development of carrots, GAs play pivotal roles. In carrots, the content levels in roots are lower than those in petioles and leaf blades120. Through foliar application, exogenous GA3 promotes the growth of the aboveground part and inhibits the growth of roots119. At higher temperatures, GA spray application can influence carrot flowering121. The impact of GAs on carrot roots promotes the development of secondary xylem and decreases the proportion of secondary phloem122. In a study by Wang et al., exogenous GA3 was shown to enhance the lignification of carrot roots123. In addition, GA was involved in the regulation of the differentiation of embryogenic cells in carrot124.


Brassinosteroids (BRs) are steroid hormones, an important kind of plant regulator125. To date, more than 70 brassinosteroid compounds have been isolated, and brassinolide is the most bioactive compound126. During plant growth and development, BRs are involved in various biological processes, such as the formation of stomata and lateral roots, flowering, and fruit maturation. BRs also play important roles in promoting cell division, vascular differentiation and cell elongation, and enhancing the tolerance of the plant127,128. The spatiotemporal distribution of brassinosteroid activity is a decisive factor that influences the function of BRs129. However, the precise spatial and subcellular distribution of BRs in plant organs is still unclear. Regarding the biosynthesis and signal transduction of BRs, the related genes have been determined by using BR-related mutants in Arabidopsis and many other plants125. In carrots, genes involved in the biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways have been identified via transcriptomic research. Foliar application of 24-epibrassinolide was proven to promote the elongation of carrot petioles. The aboveground part of the carrot treated with 24-epibrassinolide was taller and heavier than that without treatment130.

Abscisic acid

Abscisic acid (ABA) was first recognized as a plant hormone in the early 1960s131. ABA plays important roles in regulating almost all physiological processes during plant growth and development, including seed dormancy, seed germination, and fruit maturity132. In the presence of environmental stress, ABA plays important roles in inducing stomatal closure to respond to water deficiency133. The concentration of ABA within plants determines the roles of ABA in response to changing physiology. In carrots, most reports about ABA are related to somatic embryogenesis. Kiyosue et al. measured the concentration of endogenous ABA in the embryogenic cells, nonembryogenic cells and somatic embryos of carrot. They found that embryogenic cells had the highest level of ABA134. In the research of Nishiwaki et al., ABA was found to be the signal substance in the process of carrot somatic embryogenesis induced by stress135. In addition, ABA plays an important role in inducing the secondary embryogenesis of carrot somatic embryos136. Huang et al. found that genes involved in the biosynthesis and signal pathway of ABA may be affected by carotenogenesis in carrot137. The expression level of DcPSY2 (phytoene synthase) can be induced by salt stress and ABA138. In Arabidopsis, salt stress was found to induce carotenoid synthesis to contribute to ABA production139. These results suggest a critical relationship between carotenoids and ABA.


Cytokinin (CK) is one of the five classic plant hormones and is widely used in agriculture, industry, and research140. Regulating cell division and differentiation is the main function of cytokinins. In some plant physiology processes, CK plays critical roles such as promoting shoot growth, inhibiting root growth, and regulating female gametophyte development141. CK also plays important roles in enhancing the tolerance of plants to drought, salt stress, and heat142. In carrots, 2-isopentenyladenine and 2-isopentenyladenosine are the major cytokinins, and 2-isopentenyladenine was only detected in carrot roots. The diameter of carrot roots is positively related to the level of CK. The concentration of endogenous CK was found to have a circadian rhythm143. In Chen et al., cambium tissues were found to be the cytokinin biosynthetic site in carrots. In the field production of carrots, foliar application of CK could promote the growth of carrots on nitrogen- and phosphate-depleted soil. The application of exogenous CK promotes the synthesis of endogenous CK and stimulates the growth of the cortex in carrots144. In the study of Wang et al., CK was thought to serve an important function in the second stage of carrot growth (40 days after sowing)145.

Jasmonic acid

Jasmonic acid (JA) and its derivatives originate from lipids of chloroplast membranes146. This lipid-derived hormone plays critical roles in plant defense against various abiotic and biotic stresses such as pathogen infection, wounding, ultraviolet radiation, and freezing147. In some physiological processes of plant growth, JA also plays roles such as inhibiting root growth, and inducing leaf senescence and flowering148. The levels of JA in senescent leaves are significantly higher than those in nonsenescent leaves. The application of exogenous JA was reported to enhance the tolerance of Arabidopsis to low temperature149. In carrot, application of MeJA increased the total phenolics in Parano carrot. However, the concentrations of mono- and sesquiterpenes in the leaf were not influenced after MeJA treatment150. In Heredia and Cisneros-Zevallos’ research, MeJA application increased the accumulation of phenolics in wounded carrot tissues151. In the research of Wang et al., the levels of JA at different growth stages and expression profiles of genes related to JA were measured. They thought that the regulation of JA in carrots was stage-dependent and organ-specific152.



Carotenoids are natural pigments and were found to be present in all photosynthetic organisms. Additionally, carotenoids are known to be good for human health, especially in disease prevention9,153. According to previous reports, carotenoids function in preventing cancer, cerebrovascular disease (CVD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cataracts. Their antioxidant properties were thought to be the main factor for the abundant functions of carotenoids154. In Krinsky’s research, eating fruit and vegetables that are rich in carotenoids was found to prevent many diseases, such as disorders related to the eye155.

In horticultural crops, studies on carotenoids have been widely performed. Tomato, pepper, and carrot were found to be carotenoid-rich vegetables156,157. Carrot is a kind of root vegetable that has abundant carotenoids accumulating in the root. In the research of Perrin et al., the accumulation of carotenoids was different in the carrots with different root colors. The accumulation in different root tissues was also different. In orange and purple carrot roots, the content of carotenoids in phloem was obviously higher than that in xylem. In the red genotype, the contents of carotenoids in phloem and xylem were similar. The difference in the accumulation in different root tissues was thought to be the result of the different expression patterns of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in specific tissues158.

The biosynthesis of carotenoids has been widely studied in plants. In 2002, Santos and Simon identified some putative QTLs that are associated with the accumulation of ξ-carotene, α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene and phytoene in carrot46. In 2007, 24 potential carotenoid biosynthesis structural genes were identified by Just et al. Two phytoene synthase (PSY) genes (DQ192186 and DQ192187) were found in carrots159. PSY is an important gene that encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis pathway of carotenoids. The contents of carotenoids in the PSY-overexpressing lines of some vegetables were obviously enhanced160,161,162. In the sequencing of the carrot genome, a central gene (DCAR_032551) involved in regulating carotenoid accumulation was found. Furthermore, authors of the genome paper hypothesized that root de-etiolation may be responsible for carotenoid accumulation in carrot roots163. In the research of Ma et al., carotenoid contents in six different carrot cultivars were measured. They thought that carotene hydroxylase genes were involved in α-carotene accumulation and xanthophyll formation164. Although homologs of all known genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis have been identified in carrots, there are still some questions that need answers, such as the accumulation of carotenoids in nonphotosynthetic carrot roots.


Anthocyanins are widely distributed natural pigments and flavonoids165. Anthocyanins play critical roles in the pigmentation of flowers and fruits166. In many colored vegetables and fruits such as red cabbage, eggplant, purple corn, purple potato, grape, peach, plum, and pomegranate, anthocyanins were discovered167. In plants, anthocyanins can protect plants from strong light by forming light-absorbing screens and scavenging reactive oxygen species when suffering from light stress168. Anthocyanins have also been reported to have many health benefits, including prevention of cardiovascular diseases, anticarcinogenic activity, control of diabetes, and improvement of vision165. Providing antioxidants was determined to be the main mechanism for anthocyanins to prevent diseases in humans.

Among the cultivars of carrot, the taproot color variety is abundant. The main colors include orange, purple, yellow, red, and white. In the research of Xu et al., the taproot of purple carrots had more anthocyanin accumulation than that of yellow and orange carrots. Only a few anthocyanins were measured in the taproots of orange carrots, and no anthocyanins were measured in yellow carrot roots169. The accumulation of anthocyanins in the carrot roots was affected by many factors, including temperature, nutrients, and light170. At the molecular level, many studies on the biosynthesis pathway of anthocyanins have been performed in carrots. Phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), chalcone synthase (CHS), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), and leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) are members of the biosynthesis pathway and have been identified in carrots171. According to previous reports, the genes DcUCGalT1, DcMYB6, and DcUSAGT1 of carrot were involved in the biosynthesis of anthocyanins172,173,174. In Yildiz and his group’s research, the expression profiles of six anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes (CHS1, FLS1, F3H, LDOX2, PAL3, and UFGT) were measured. CHS1, DFR2, F3H, LDOX2 and PAL3 have the highest expression level in solid purple carrots175.

Dietary fiber

Dietary fiber is a class of compounds that mainly includes carbohydrates, polysaccharides, and lignin176,177. The dietary fibers are further classified into soluble and insoluble fibers. Pectins, gums, and hemicelluloses are soluble fibers, and cellulose is the main component of insoluble fiber. In most foods, insoluble fiber is the main dietary fiber, and the content of soluble fibers is small or negligible. The sources of soluble fibers are limited and include citrus fruits, barley, legumes, oats, avocado, and rye. The sources of insoluble fibers are abundant and include most vegetables and cereal grains178.

Dietary fiber is well known and popular as a healthy substance within society. The widely known benefit of dietary fiber is its role in improving gastrointestinal function. Insoluble fiber can improve gastrointestinal function by enhancing the peristalsis of the intestine and increasing the bulk of feces179. Another way that insoluble fiber protects the colon is through enhancing the proliferation of microbes178. In addition, many other functions of dietary fiber have also been reported, such as moderating the postprandial insulin response, reducing cholesterol, regulating appetite, and reducing the risk of coronary heart disease. Sufficient intake of dietary fiber is good for humans to stay healthy178,180.

In the storage root of carrot, 1.2–6.44% of the mass is dietary fiber, and 80.94% of the dietary fiber is cellulose8,181. Carrot is a good material for producing juice, but the carrot pomace is wasted. According to previous reports, the dietary fiber of the carrot pomace was abundant and was higher than that of some other agricultural byproducts, including asparagus and onion. The insoluble dietary fiber in the carrot pomace are mainly composed of pectic polysaccharides, hemicelluloses and cellulose and have desirable functions177. As a byproduct, carrot pomace is very abundant and could be chosen as a source of dietary fiber. In the research of Chou et al., reducing particle sizes of the carrot insoluble fiber-rich fraction (IFF) can clearly enhance the function of fiber in gastrointestinal function. Furthermore, the ability of micronized IFF to reduce the concentrations of serum triglycerides, serum total cholesterol, and liver lipids was substantially enhanced182.

In the research of Wang et al., most lignin in the carrot root was deposited in the xylem. The proportions of lignin in carrot roots decreased with root development183. Hypoxia was also found to enhance the lignification of carrot roots184. As a promising source of dietary fiber, carrot should be further studied.

Other compounds

Carrot is well known as being a good carotenoid provider. Moreover, carrot roots also contain many other beneficial contents, including vitamins, carbohydrates and minerals6,185. According to Li et al., sugars, glucose, fructose and starch are the main types of carbohydrates in carrot storage roots181. The biosynthesis of the sources is thought to be regulated by DcSus genes in carrot186. There are also many minerals in carrot roots, such as potassium, magnesium, calcium, sodium, and iron. In the research of Nicolle et al., potassium was found to be the most abundant mineral in carrots6. Among these minerals, the content of iron, sodium and magnesium is highly dependent on the carrot variety, whereas the content of potassium and calcium is not187. In addition, carrot roots are a good source of vitamin E and ascorbic acid. The concentrations of vitamin E and ascorbic acid in carrots are approximately 191−703 μg and 1.4−5.8 mg per 100 g fresh weight, respectively6.

Conclusions and future perspectives

Vegetables are good sources of nutritious substances such as vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber. With the increasing requirement for healthy diets, vegetables are becoming increasingly popular. Scientific studies on vegetables have become more necessary. Studies on vegetables have been substantially promoted by the use of many new technologies. As a nutritious root vegetable, carrots are popular and cultivated around the world. Many studies on the germplasm resource, breeding, tissue culture, and molecular research of carrots have been reported. Future research on carrots may focus on the following aspects.

Improving the genome editing system

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a highly efficient genome editing method developed in recent years. This system was first used in editing the human genome in 2013 and was then widely employed in editing the genomes of other species. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully applied in many plant species, including rice, Arabidopsis thaliana, soybean, maize, and liverwort. This system is an efficient technology for targeting and modifying DNA sequences of interest and is a useful way to study gene functions and crop improvement. However, this efficient tool has not been widely used in carrot research. Improving the CRISPR/Cas9 system in carrots and employing it for carrot improvement should be a focus in the future.

Mining functional genes

The carrot genome has been sequenced, and the genome sequence data have been released. With the rapid development of sequencing technology, many omics technologies, such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have been employed in carrot research. A large amount of data generated from these studies provides a potential reference for mining carrot functional genes. Genes controlling root genotype, disease resistance, and cytoplasmic male sterility are candidates to be further identified and determined in future research work. Mining functional genes will guide and promote the breeding work of carrots. The genes that control the swelling progress of carrot roots are still unidentified. With the development of sequencing technology, many opportunities will present themselves for research on the swelling of carrot roots.

Developing the medicinal value of carrots

Carrot storage roots contain abundant biologically active substances. Many of these substances are important for human health. Carrots are used to make juice and dietary fiber in the food industry. In medicinal use, there has been little research on the pharmacological mechanism of many active substances in carrots. Many antioxidants, such as anthocyanins, carotenoids, and polyacetylene, provided by carrots play important roles in preventing disease. With increasing health awareness, the active substances in carrots have good research value and prospects for medicinal use. More future work may focus on developing the medicinal uses of carrots.

Use of hormones in carrot field production

The human population is increasing rapidly around the world, and a substantial increase in agricultural productivity is needed. Through promoting plant growth and enhancing tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, plant hormones provide an opportunity to improve crop production. However, prohibitive costs restrict the widespread and continuous application of hormones in yield production. In carrots, there are almost no reports about the use of hormones in field production. In our opinion, plant hormone application in carrot yield production is worthy of further study. The interaction between human health and hormone application also needs to be studied. In the research on brassinosteroids, the application of brassinosteroids was reported to have no negative impact on human health. In clinical studies, only a very high concentration of brassinosteroids (1000 mg/kg) led to some undesirable side effects in rats188,189. However, there are few clinical studies on the application of other hormones. More future work may focus on the use of hormones in carrot field production, including application method and efficiency. At the same time, more clinical studies should be performed to investigate the interactions between human health and hormone application.


  1. 1.

    Rubatzky, V. E., Quiros, C. F. & Simon, P. W. Carrots and related vegetable Umbelliferae (CABI, University of Wisconsin, 1999).

  2. 2.

    Heywood, V. H. Relationships and evolution in the Daucus Carota complex. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 32, 51–65 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rong, J. et al. New insights into domestication of carrot from root transcriptome analyses. BMC Genom. 15, 895 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Simon, P. W. et al. in Carrot. Handbook of Plant Breeding, Vegetables II (eds Prohens, J. & Nuez, F.) 327–357 (Springer, New York, 2008).

  5. 5.

    Arscott, S. A. & Tanumihardjo, S. A. Carrots of many colors provide basic nutrition and bioavailable phytochemicals acting as a functional food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 9, 223–239 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nicolle, C., Simon, G., Rock, E., Amouroux, P. & Rémésy, C. Genetic variability influences carotenoid, vitamin, phenolic, and mineral content in white, yellow, purple, orange, and dark-orange carrot cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 129, 523–529 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Michael, T. P. & VanBuren, R. Progress, challenges and the future of crop genomes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 24, 71–81 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    da Silva, E. A. et al. Chemical, physical and sensory parameters of different carrot varieties (Daucus carota L.). J. Food Process Eng. 30, 746–756 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fraser, P. D. & Bramley, P. M. The biosynthesis and nutritional uses of carotenoids. Prog. Lipid Res. 43, 228–265 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stolarczyk, J. & Janick, J. Carrot: history and iconography. Chronica 51, 13 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang, Y., Zhuang, F., Zhao, Z. & Chen, J. Mitotic karyotyping and meiotic observation in carrot (Daucus carota L.). Acta Agriculturae Shanghai 21, 26–28 (2005).

  12. 12.

    Iorizzo, M. et al. De novo assembly and characterization of the carrot transcriptome reveals novel genes, new markers, and genetic diversity. BMC Genom. 12, 389 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Iovene, M. et al. Comparative FISH mapping of Daucus species (Apiaceae family). Chromosome Res. 19, 493–506 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Alessandro, M. S., Galmarini, C. R., Iorizzo, M. & Simon, P. W. Molecular mapping of vernalization requirement and fertility restoration genes in carrot. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 415–423 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bradeen, J. M., Simon, P. W. & Kole, C. Carrot. Genome Mapp. Mol. Breed. Plants 5, 161–184 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ricardo, C. & Ap Rees, T. Invertase activity during the development of carrot roots. Phytochemistry 9, 239–247 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vavilov, N. I., Vavylov, M. I., Vavílov, N. Í. & Dorofeev, V. F. Origin and Geography of Cultivated Plants (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).

  18. 18.

    Iorizzo, M. et al. Genetic structure and domestication of carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus)(Apiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 100, 930–938 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Grzebelus, D. et al. Diversity, genetic mapping, and signatures of domestication in the carrot (Daucus carota L.) genome, as revealed by Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) markers. Mol. Breed. 33, 625–637 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Banga, O. The development of the original European carrot material. Euphytica 6, 64–76 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Banga, O. Main Types of the Western Carotene Carrot and their Origin. 153 (W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle, 1963).

  22. 22.

    Baranski, R., Allender, C. & Klimek-Chodacka, M. Towards better tasting and more nutritious carrots: carotenoid and sugar content variation in carrot genetic resources. Food Res. Int. 47, 182–187 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Leja, M. et al. The content of phenolic compounds and radical scavenging activity varies with carrot origin and root color. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 68, 163–170 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Borthwick, H., Phillips, M. & Robbins, W. Floral development in Daucus carota. Am. J. Bot. 18, 784–796 (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hawthorn, L. R., Toole, E. H. & Toole, V. K. Yield and viability of carrot seeds as affected by position of umbel and time of harvest. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 80, 1−407 (1962).

  26. 26.

    Thompson, D. J. Studies on the inheritance of male sterility in the carrot (Daucus carota L). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 78, 332–338 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kwan-yuan, W., Li-ping, T. & Tsan-ran, C. Preliminary report on the male sterility of the carrot. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2, 006 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nothnagell, T., Straka, P. & Linke, B. Male sterility in populations of Daucus and the development of alloplasmic male-sterile lines of carrot. Plant Breed. 119, 145–152 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Welch, J. E. & G., E. Jr Male sterility in the carrot. Science 106, 594–594 (1947).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Banga, O., Petiet, J. & Bennekom, J. L. V. Genetical analysis of male-sterility in carrots, Daucus carota L. Euphytica 13, 75–93 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Thompson, D. J. Studies on the Inheritance of Male-Sterility and Other Characters in the Carrot, Daucus carota L. var. sativa (Cornell University, Sept., Cornell University, 1960).

  32. 32.

    Mccollum, G. D. Occurrence of petaloid stamens in wild carrot (Daucus carota) from Sweden. Econ. Bot. 20, 361–367 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Morelock, T. Influence of cytoplasmic source on expression of male sterility in carrot (Daucus carota L.) (Wisconsin University Press, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1974).

  34. 34.

    Eisa, H. & Wallace, D. Morphological and anatomical aspects of petaloidy in the carrot (Daucus carota L.). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94, 545–548 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tan, G. F., Wang, F., Ma, J., Zhang, X. Y. & Xiong, A. S. Identification and analysis of the characteristics of a wild petaloid male-sterile carrot ‘Wuye-BY’. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 18, 1216–1220 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tan, G. F., Wang, F., Zhang, X. Y. & Xiong, A. S. Different lengths, copies and expression levels of the mitochondrial atp6 gene in male sterile and fertile lines of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 29, 446–454 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Szklarczyk, M. et al. Mitochondrial atp9 genes from petaloid male-sterile and male-fertile carrots differ in their status of heteroplasmy, recombination involvement, post-transcriptional processing as well as accumulation of RNA and protein product. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 1689–1701 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sivolap, Y. M. Molecular markers and plant breeding. Cytol. Genet. 47, 188–195 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Grover, A. & Sharma, P. Development and use of molecular markers: past and present. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36, 290–302 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Le Clerc, V., Mausset, A., Veret, A. & Briard, M. A comparative study on the use of ISSR, microsatellites and RAPD markers for varietal identification of carrot genotypes. Acta Hortic. 546, 377–385 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nakajima, Y., Oeda, K. & Yamamoto, T. Characterization of genetic diversity of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes in Daucus varieties by RAPD and AFLP. Plant Cell Rep. 17, 848–853 (1998).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lian, Y. et al. Study on the identification of carrot hybrid F_1 by RAPD markers. J. Inner Mongolia Agric. Univ. 29, 12-14 (2008).

  43. 43.

    Baranski, R., Jagosz, B., Michalik, B., Simon, P. & Grzebelus, D. Comparison of RAPD and AFLP techniques used for the evaluation of genetic diversity of carrot breeding materials. Acta Hortic. 546, 413–416 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nakajima, Y., Yamamoto, T., Muranaka, T. & Oeda, K. Genetic variation of petaloid male-sterile cytoplasm of carrots revealed by sequence-tagged sites (STSs). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 837–843 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Le Clerc, V. et al. QTL mapping of carrot resistance to leaf blight with connected populations: stability across years and consequences for breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 2177–2187 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Santos, C. & Simon, P. QTL analyses reveal clustered loci for accumulation of major provitamin A carotenes and lycopene in carrot roots. Mol. Genet. Genom. 268, 122–129 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Baranski, R. et al. Genetic diversity of carrot (Daucus carota L.) cultivars revealed by analysis of SSR loci. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 59, 163–170 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Baranski, R. Genetic transformation of carrot (Daucus carota) and other Apiaceae species. Transgenic Plant J. 2, 18–38 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wang, K. in Agrobacterium Protocols, Vol. 2 (eds. Wally, O. S. & Punja, Z. K.) Ch. 6 (Springer, New York, 2015).

  50. 50.

    Scott, R. J. & Draper, J. Transformation of carrot tissues derived from proembryogenic suspension cells: a useful model system for gene expression studies in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 8, 265–274 (1987).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pawlicki, N., Sangwan, R. S. & Sangwan-Norreel, B. S. Factors influencing the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 31, 129–139 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chen, W. & Punja, Z. Transgenic herbicide-and disease-tolerant carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants obtained through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 20, 929–935 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hardegger, M. & Sturm, A. Transformation and regeneration of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Mol. Breed. 4, 119–127 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wally, O. & Punja, Z. Enhanced disease resistance in transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants over-expressing a rice cationic peroxidase. Planta 232, 1229–1239 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Luchakivskaya, Y. et al. High-level expression of human interferon alpha-2b in transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants. Plant Cell Rep. 30, 407–415 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910–918 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Feng Z, Mao Y, Xu N, et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 4632-4637 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Klimek-Chodacka, M., Oleszkiewicz, T., Lowder, L. G., Qi, Y. & Baranski, R. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in carrot cells. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 575–586 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Xu, Z. S., Feng, K. & Xiong, A. S. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiply targeted mutagenesis in orange and purple carrot plants. Mol. Biotechnol. 61, 1−9 (2019).

  61. 61.

    Arcelin, R. & Kushalappa, A. C. A survey of carrot diseases on muck soils in the southwestern part of Québec. Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 71, 147–153 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zalom, F. G. The influence of reflective mulches and lettuce types on the incidence of aster yellows and abundance of its vector, Macrosteles fascifrons (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), in Minnesota. Ssrn Electron. J. 14, 145–150 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Gabelman, W. H., Goldman, I. L. & Breitbach, D. N. Field evaluation and selection for resistance to aster yellows in carrot (Daucus carota L.). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 119, 1293–1297 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Gugino, B. K., Carroll, J., Chen, J., Ludwig, J. & Abawi, G. Carrot Leaf Blight Diseases and Their Management in New York (Cornell University Press, New York, 2004).

  65. 65.

    Farrar, J. J., Pryor, B. A. & Davis, R. M. Alternaria diseases of carrot. Plant Dis. 88, 776–784 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hooker, W. J. Comparative studies of two carrot leaf diseases. Phytopathology 34, 606–612 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Thomas, H. Cercospora blight of carrot. Phytopathology 33, 114–125 (1943).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Gugino, B., Carroll, J., Widmer, T., Chen, P. & Abawi, G. Field evaluation of carrot cultivars for susceptibility to fungal leaf blight diseases in New York. Crop Prot. 26, 709–714 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Ellis, P. The identification and exploitation of resistance in carrots and wild Umbelliferae to the carrot fly, Psila rosae (F.). Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 4, 259–268 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ellis, P., Freeman, G. & Hardman, J. Differences in the relative resistance of two carrot cultivars to carrot fly attack over five seasons. Ann. Appl. Biol. 105, 557–564 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ellis, P. & Hardman, J. The consistency of the resistance of eight carrot cultivars to carrot fly attack at several centres in Europe. Ann. Appl. Biol. 98, 491–497 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Ellis, P., SAW, P. L. & Crowther, T. Development of carrot inbreds with resistance to carrot fly using a single seed descent programme. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119, 349–357 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Stein, M. & Lehmann, W. Untersuchungen zur Befallshaufigkeit von Speisemohren mit der Mohrenfliege (Psila rosae F). Archiv fur Gartenbau 32, 407-413 (1984).

  74. 74.

    Maki, A. & Ryan, M. Root-mediated effects in carrot resistance to the carrot fly, Psila rosae. J. Chem. Ecol. 15, 1867–1882 (1989).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Carpenter, A., Van Epenhuijsen, C., Wright, S. & Tilbury, L. Effect of cultivar and cultural techniques on carrot rust fly and carrot production. In Proceedings of the 43rd New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference, 73–76 (Tauranga, 1990).

  76. 76.

    Cole, R. A., Phelps, K., Ellis, P. & Hardman, J. The effects of time of sowing and harvest on carrot biochemistry and the resistance of carrots to carrot fly. Ann. Appl. Biol. 110, 135–143 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Trudgill, D. L. & Blok, V. C. Apomictic, polyphagous root-knot nematodes: exceptionally successful and damaging biotrophic root pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 39, 53–77 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Roberts, P. A. The influence of planting date of carrot on meloidogyne incognita reproduction and injury to roots. Nematologica 33, 335–342 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Parsons, J., Matthews, W. C., Iorizzo, M., Roberts, P. A. & Simon, P. W. Meloidogyne incognita nematode resistance QTL in carrot. Mol. Breed. 35, 114 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Hutchinson, C. M., Mejr, M. G., Ohr, H. D., Sims, J. J. & Jobecker, B. Evaluation of methyl iodide as a soil fumigant for root-knot nematode control in carrot production. Plant Dis. 83, 33–36 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Huang, S. P., Vecchia, P. T. D. & Ferreira, P. E. Varietal response and estimates of heritability of resistance to Meloidogyne javanica in carrots. J. Nematol. 18, 496 (1986).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Huang, S. P. Penetration, development, reproduction, and sex ratio of Meloidogyne javanica in three carrot cultivars. J. Nematol. 18, 408–412 (1986).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Charchar, J. & Vieira, J. Seleção de cenoura com resistência a nematóides de galhas (Meloidogyne spp.). Hortic. Bras. 12, 144–148 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Simon, P., Roberts, P. & Boiteux, L. Germplasm sources, inheritance, and marker assisted selection for southern and northern nematodes in carrot. J. Appl. Genet. 38, 57–59 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Boiteux, L., Belter, J., Roberts, P. & Simon, P. RAPD linkage map of the genomic region encompassing the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) resistance locus in carrot. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 439–446 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ali, A. et al. Inheritance and mapping of Mj-2, a new source of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) resistance in carrot. J. Hered. 105, 288–291 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Xu, Z. S., Tan, H. W., Wang, F., Hou, X. L. & Xiong, A. S. CarrotDB: a genomic and transcriptomic database for carrot. Database 2014, bau096 (2014).

  88. 88.

    Iorizzo, M. et al. A high-quality carrot genome assembly provides new insights into carotenoid accumulation and asterid genome evolution. Nat. Genet. 48, 657 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Wang, F. et al. The genome sequence of ‘Kurodagosun’, a major carrot variety in Japan and China, reveals insights into biological research and carrot breeding. Mol. Genet. Genom. 293, 1−11 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ruhlman, T. et al. Complete plastid genome sequence of Daucus carota: implications for biotechnology and phylogeny of angiosperms. BMC Genom. 7, 222 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Wang, Z., Gerstein, M. & Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 57 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Li, M. Y., Wang, F., Jiang, Q., Ma, J. & Xiong, A. S. Identification of SSRs and differentially expressed genes in two cultivars of celery (Apium graveolens L.) by deep transcriptome sequencing. Hortic. Res. -Engl. 1, 10 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Iorizzo, M. et al. De novo assembly and characterization of the carrot transcriptome reveals novel genes, new markers, and genetic diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 389 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Wang, G. L., Jia, X. L., Xu, Z. S., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. S. Sequencing, assembly, annotation, and gene expression: novel insights into the hormonal control of carrot root development revealed by a high-throughput transcriptome. Mol. Genet. Genom. 290, 1379–1391 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Ma, J., Li, J., Xu, Z., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. Transcriptome profiling of genes involving in carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation between leaf and root of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 50, 481–490 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Zhang, B., Pan, X., Cobb, G. P. & Anderson, T. A. Plant microRNA: a small regulatory molecule with big impact. Dev. Biol. 289, 3–16 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Zhang, T. et al. Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 531 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Ferdous, J., Hussain, S. S. & Shi, B. J. Role of micro RNA s in plant drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 13, 293–305 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    SARANGZAI, A. M. Profiling the carrot (Daucus carota L.) microRNAs and their targets. Pak. J. Bot. 45, 353–358 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Chen, S. & Harmon, A. C. Advances in plant proteomics. Proteomics 6, 5504–5516 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Xu, Y. et al. Proteomic analysis of heat stress resistance of cucumber leaves when grafted onto Momordica rootstock. Hortic. Res. -Engl. 5, 53 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Hossain, Z., Nouri, M. Z. & Komatsu, S. Plant cell organelle proteomics in response to abiotic stress. J. Proteome Res. 11, 37–48 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Kerry, R. G. et al. Proteomic and genomic responses of plants to nutritional stress. Biometals 31, 161–187 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Louarn, S. et al. Proteomic changes and endophytic micromycota during storage of organically and conventionally grown carrots. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 76, 26–33 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Wang, Y. H. et al. DcC4H and DcPER are important in dynamic changes of lignin content in carrot roots under elevated carbon dioxide stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 8209–8220 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Tugizimana, F., Mhlongo, M. I., Piater, L. A. & Dubery, I. A. Metabolomics in plant priming research: the way forward? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1759 (2018).

  107. 107.

    Tian, H., Lam, S. M. & Shui, G. Metabolomics, a powerful tool for agricultural research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1871 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Grebenstein, C., Choi, Y., Rong, J., De Jong, T. & Tamis, W. Metabolic fingerprinting reveals differences between shoots of wild and cultivated carrot (Daucus carota L.) and suggests maternal inheritance or wild trait dominance in hybrids. Phytochemistry 72, 1341–1347 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Leiss, K. A., Cristofori, G., van Steenis, R., Verpoorte, R. & Klinkhamer, P. G. An eco-metabolomic study of host plant resistance to Western flower thrips in cultivated, biofortified and wild carrots. Phytochemistry 93, 63–70 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Clausen, M. R., Edelenbos, M. & Bertram, H. C. Mapping the variation of the carrot metabolome using 1H NMR spectroscopy and consensus PCA. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 4392–4398 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Ciura, J. & Kruk, J. Phytohormones as targets for improving plant productivity and stress tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 229, 32 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Shabir et al. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Crop J. 4, 162–176 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 219–229 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Wang, Y., Mopper, S. & Hasenstein, K. H. Effects of salinity on endogenous ABA, IAA, JA, AND SA in Iris hexagona. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 327–342 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Hayashi, K. et al. Auxin transport sites are visualized in planta using fluorescent auxin analogs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11557–11562 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Woodward, A. W. & Bartel, B. Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann. Bot. 95, 707–735 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Wu, X. et al. Regulation of auxin accumulation and perception at different developmental stages in carrot. Plant Growth Regul. 80, 243–251 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Rizza, A. & Jones, A. M. The makings of a gradient: spatiotemporal distribution of gibberellins in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 47, 9–15 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Wang, G., Que, F., Xu, Z., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. Exogenous gibberellin altered morphology, anatomic and transcriptional regulatory networks of hormones in carrot root and shoot. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 290 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Wang, G. et al. Morphological characteristics, anatomical structure, and gene expression: novel insights into gibberellin biosynthesis and perception during carrot growth and development. Hortic. Res. -Engl. 2, 15028 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Nieuwhof, M. Effect of gibberellic acid on bolting and flowering of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Sci. Hortic. 24, 211–219 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Mckee, J. M. T. & Morris, G. E. L. Effects of gibberellic acid and chlormequat chloride on the proportion of phloem and xylem parenchyma in the storage root of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Plant Growth Regul. 4, 203–211 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Wang, G. L., Que, F., Xu, Z. S., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. S. Exogenous gibberellin enhances secondary xylem development and lignification in carrot taproot. Protoplasma 254, 1–10 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Tokuji, Y. & Kuriyama, K. Involvement of gibberellin and cytokinin in the formation of embryogenic cell clumps in carrot (Daucus carota). J. Plant Physiol. 160, 133 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Fujioka, S. & Yokota, T. Biosynthesis and metabolism of brassinosteroids. Physiol. Plant 100, 137–164 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Bajguz, A. Metabolism of brassinosteroids in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45, 95–107 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Müssig, C. Brassinosteroid-promoted growth. Plant Biol. 7, 110–117 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Sasse, J. M. Physiological actions of brassinosteroids: an update. J. Plant Growth Regul. 22, 276–288 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Singh, A. P. & Savaldi-Goldstein, S. Growth control: brassinosteroid activity gets context. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 1123 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Que, F., Wang, G. L., Xu, Z. S., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. S. Transcriptional regulation of brassinosteroid accumulation during carrot development and the potential role of brassinosteroids in petiole elongation. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1356 (2017).

  131. 131.

    Nambara, E. & Marionpoll, A. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56, 165–185 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Dong, T., Park, Y. & Hwang, I. Abscisic acid: biosynthesis, inactivation, homoeostasis and signalling. Essays Biochem. 58, 29–48 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Kuromori, T., Seo, M. & Shinozaki, K. ABA transport and plant water stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 513–522 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Kiyosue, T. et al. Endogenous levels of abscisic acid in embryogenic cells, nonembryogenic cells and somatic embryos of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Biochemie und Physiol. der Pflanz. 188, 343–347 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Nishiwaki, M., Fujino, K., Koda, Y., Masuda, K. & Kikuta, Y. Somatic embryogenesis induced by the simple application of abscisic acid to carrot (Daucus carota L.) seedlings in culture. Planta 211, 756–759 (2000).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Ogata, Y. et al. Possible involvement of abscisic acid in the induction of secondary somatic embryogenesis on seed-coat-derived carrot somatic embryos. Planta 221, 417–423 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Huang, W. et al. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signal transduction during carrot growth and development. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 93, 167–174 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Simpson, K. et al. Unraveling the induction of phytoene synthase 2 expression by salt stress and abscisic acid in Daucus carota. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 4113–4126 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Ruiz-Sola, M. Á., Arbona, V., Gómez-Cadenas, A., Rodríguez-Concepción, M. & Rodríguez-Villalón, A. A root specific induction of carotenoid biosynthesis contributes to ABA production upon salt stress in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 9, e90765 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Keshishian, E. A. & Rashotte, A. M. Plant cytokinin signalling. Essays Biochem. 58, 13–27 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Siddique, S. et al. A parasitic nematode releases cytokinin that controls cell division and orchestrates feeding site formation in host plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12669–12674 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Werner, T. & Schmulling, T. Cytokinin action in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 527–538 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Stiebeling, B. & Neumann, K. H. Identification and concentration of endogenous cytokinins in carrots (Daucus carota L.) as influenced by development and a circadian rhythm. J. Plant Physiol. 127, 111–121 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Stiebeling, B., Pauler, B. & Neumann, K. H. The influence of 6‐BA‐application on yield, phosphorus and nitrogen uptake and endogenous cytokinin concentrations in carrots (Daucus carota L.) grown in phosphorus‐or nitrogen‐depleted soil. Z. für Pflanzenernähr. und Bodenkd. 150, 69–74 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Wang, G. L. et al. Morphological characteristics, anatomical structure, and gene expression: novel insights into cytokinin accumulation during carrot growth and development. PLoS ONE 10, e0134166 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Wasternack, C. & Strnad, M. Jasmonates: News on Occurrence, Biosynthesis, Metabolism and Action of an Ancient Group of Signaling Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2539 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Wasternack, C. & Hause, B. Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann. Bot. 111, 1021–1058 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Huang, H., Liu, B., Liu, L. & Song, S. Jasmonate action in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1349–1359 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Hu, Y. et al. Jasmonate regulates leaf senescence and tolerance to cold stress: crosstalk with other phytohormones. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1361–1369 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Nissinen, Anne, Ibrahim, Mohamed, Kainulainen, Pirjo, Kari Tiilikkala, A. & Holopainen, J. K. Influence of carrot Psyllid (Trioza apicalis) feeding or exogenous limonene or methyl jasmonate treatment on composition of carrot (Daucus carota) leaf essential oil and headspace volatiles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 8631–8638 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Heredia, J. B. & Cisneros-Zevallos, L. The effect of exogenous ethylene and methyl jasmonate on pal activity, phenolic profiles and antioxidant capacity of carrots (Daucus carota) under different wounding intensities. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 51, 242–249 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Wang, G. et al. Expression profiles of genes involved in jasmonic acid biosynthesis and signaling during growth and development of carrot. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 48, 795–803 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    El-Agamey, A. et al. Carotenoid radical chemistry and antioxidant/pro-oxidant properties. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 430, 37–48 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Rao, A. V. & Rao, L. G. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacol. Res. 55, 207–216 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Krinsky, N. I. & Johnson, E. J. Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 26, 459–516 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Nisar, N., Li, L., Lu, S., Khin, N. C. & Pogson, B. J. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol. Plant 8, 68–82 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Gómez-García, Md. R. & Ochoa-Alejo, N. Biochemistry and molecular biology of carotenoid biosynthesis in chili peppers (Capsicum spp.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 19025–19053 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Perrin, F. et al. Carotenoid gene expression explains the difference of carotenoid accumulation in carrot root tissues. Planta 245, 737–747 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Just, B. et al. Carotenoid biosynthesis structural genes in carrot (Daucus carota): isolation, sequence-characterization, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and genome mapping. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114, 693–704 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Shewmaker, C. K., Sheehy, J. A., Daley, M., Colburn, S. & Ke, D. Y. Seed-specific overexpression of phytoene synthase: increase in carotenoids and other metabolic effects. Plant J. 20, 401–412 (1999).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Ye, X. et al. Engineering the provitamin A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science 287, 303–305 (2000).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Welsch, R. et al. Provitamin A accumulation in cassava (Manihot esculenta) roots driven by a single nucleotide polymorphism in a phytoene synthase gene. Plant Cell 22, 3348–3356 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Arango, J., Jourdan, M., Geoffriau, E., Beyer, P. & Welsch, R. Carotene hydroxylase activity determines the levels of both α-carotene and total carotenoids in orange carrots. Plant Cell 26, 2223–2233 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Ma, J., Xu, Z., Tan, G., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. Distinct transcription profile of genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis among six different color carrot (Daucus carota L.) cultivars. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 49, 817–826 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    He, J. & Giusti, M. M. Anthocyanins: natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 1, 163–187 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Davies, K. M., Albert, N. W. & Schwinn, K. E. From landing lights to mimicry: the molecular regulation of flower colouration and mechanisms for pigmentation patterning. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 619–638 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Wu, X. et al. Concentrations of anthocyanins in common foods in the United States and estimation of normal consumption. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 4069–4075 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Hughes, N., Neufeld, H. & Burkey, K. Functional role of anthocyanins in high-light winter leaves of the evergreen herb Galax urceolata. New Phytol. 168, 575–587 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Xu, Z. S. et al. Transcript profiling of structural genes involved in cyanidin-based anthocyanin biosynthesis between purple and non-purple carrot (Daucus carota L.) cultivars reveals distinct patterns. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 262 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Turker, N., Aksay, S. & Ekiz, H. İ. Effect of storage temperature on the stability of anthocyanins of a fermented black carrot (Daucus carota var. L.) beverage: shalgam. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 3807–3813 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Hirner, A. A., Veit, S. & Seitz, H. U. Regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in UV-A-irradiated cell cultures of carrot and in organs of intact carrot plants. Plant Sci. 161, 315–322 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Xu, Z. S., Feng, K., Que, F., Wang, F. & Xiong, A. S. A MYB transcription factor, DcMYB6, is involved in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple carrot taproots. Sci. Rep. 7, 45324 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Xu, Z. S. et al. Identification and characterization of DcUCGalT1, a galactosyltransferase responsible for anthocyanin galactosylation in purple carrot (Daucus carota L.) taproots. Sci. Rep. 6, 27356 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Chen, Y. Y., Xu, Z. S. & Xiong, A. S. Identification and characterization of DcUSAGT1, a UDP-glucose: sinapic acid glucosyltransferase from purple carrot taproots. PLoS ONE 11, e0154938 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Yildiz, M. et al. Expression and mapping of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes in carrot. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 1689–1702 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Prosky, L. What is fibre? Current controversies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10, 271–275 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Chau, C. F., Chen, C. H. & Lee, M. H. Comparison of the characteristics, functional properties, and in vitro hypoglycemic effects of various carrot insoluble fiber-rich fractions. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 37, 155–160 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Davidson, M. H. & McDonald, A. Fiber: forms and functions. Nutr. Res. 18, 617–624 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Schneeman, Barbara O. Dietary Fibre and Gastrointestinal Function (Sparks Computer Solutions Ltd, Oxford 2008).

  180. 180.

    Jenkins, D. J., Kendall, C. W. & Ransom, T. P. Dietary fiber, the evolution of the human diet and coronary heart disease. Nutr. Res. 18, 633–652 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Li, B. W., Andrews, K. W. & Pehrsson, P. R. Individual sugars, soluble, and insoluble dietary fiber contents of 70 high consumption foods. J. Food Compos. Anal. 15, 715–723 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Chou, S. Y., Chien, P. J. & Chau, C. F. Particle size reduction effectively enhances the cholesterol-lowering activities of carrot insoluble fiber and cellulose. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 10994–10998 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Wang, G. L. et al. Transcriptome-based identification of genes revealed differential expression profiles and lignin accumulation during root development in cultivated and wild carrots. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 1–13 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Que, F. et al. Hypoxia enhances lignification and affects the anatomical structure in hydroponic cultivation of carrot taproot. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 1021–1032 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Luby, C. H., Maeda, H. A. & Goldman, I. L. Genetic and phenological variation of tocochromanol (vitamin E) content in wild (Daucus carota L. var. carota) and domesticated carrot (D. carota L. var. sativa). Hortic. Res. -Engl. 1, 14015 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Liu, Y. J. et al. Transcript profiling of sucrose synthase genes involved in sucrose metabolism among four carrot (Daucus carota L.) cultivars reveals distinct patterns. BMC Plant Biol. 18, 8 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Simpson K., Cerda A., Stange C. Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Daucus carota. Carotenoids in Nature 199−217 (Springer, New York, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Khripach, V. A., Zhabinskii, V. N. & de Groot, A. E. Brassinosteroids: A New Class of Plant Hormones (Academic Press, California, 1998).

  189. 189.

    Vardhini, B. V., Anuradha, S. & Rao, S. Brassinosteroids—new class of plant hormone with potential to improve crop productivity. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 11, 1 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872098), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872098), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20170460) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ai-Sheng Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Que, F., Hou, XL., Wang, GL. et al. Advances in research on the carrot, an important root vegetable in the Apiaceae family. Hortic Res 6, 69 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links