Table 3 SSR, SNP, distorted markers, and bin markers mapped to each LG for the three diploid rose population as well as the integrated consensus map

From: Genotyping-by-sequencing application on diploid rose and a resulting high-density SNP-based consensus map

   Population
LG Marker statistics J14-3×LC J14-3×VS OB×RF ICD
LG1 SSR no. 3 2 4 4
SNP no. 186 159 99 344
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 0 60 48
Bin marker no. 38 39 48 93
Total 189 161 103 348
LG2 SSR no. 1 1 2 2
SNP no. 270 296 367 751
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 81 7 53
Bin marker no. 60 81 76 161
Total 271 297 369 753
LG3 SSR no. 2 2 4 4
SNP no. 194 121 80 336
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 22 27 14
Bin marker no. 49 43 31 91
Total 196 123 84 340
LG4 SSR no. 1 1 1 1
SNP no. 198 223 220 519
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 32 4 0
Bin marker no. 40 49 61 120
Total 199 224 221 520
LG5 SSR no. 2 2 1 2
SNP no. 273 224 302 562
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 29 60 0
Bin marker no. 50 56 64 121
Total 275 226 303 564
LG6 SSR no. 1 1 1 1
SNP no. 219 139 224 471
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 52 10 87
Bin marker no. 45 39 61 109
Total 220 140 225 472
LG7 SSR no. 4 4 5 6
SNP no. 227 259 241 524
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 0 32 24
Bin marker no. 54 62 45 125
Total 231 263 246 530
Overall SSR no. 14 13 18 20
SNP no. 1567 1421 1533 3507
Distorted marker (p < 0.05) 216 200 226
Bin marker no. 336 369 386 820
Total 1581 1434 1551 3527
  1. Marker distortion was based on a χ2 test (p < 0.05); LGs having more than 50 highly distorted markers are shown in bold for each population; “—” indicates distortion is not available for the consensus map.