Abstract
Speciation entails a reduction in gene flow between lineages. The rates at which genomic regions become isolated varies across space and time. Barrier markers are linked to putative genes involved in (processes of) reproductive isolation, and, when observed over two transects, indicate species-wide processes. In contrast, transect-specific putative barrier markers suggest local processes. We studied two widely separated transects along the 900 km hybrid zone between Bufo bufo and B. spinosus, in northern and southern France, for ~1200 RADseq markers. We used genomic and geographic cline analyses to identify barrier markers based on their restricted introgression, and found that some markers are transect-specific, while others are shared between transects. Twenty-six barrier markers were shared across both transects, of which some are clustered in the same chromosomal region, suggesting that their associated genes are involved in reduced gene flow across the entire hybrid zone. Transect-specific barrier markers were twice as numerous in the southern than in the northern transect, suggesting that the overall barrier effect is weaker in northern France. We hypothesize that this is consistent with a longer period of secondary contact in southern France. The smaller number of introgressed genes in the northern transect shows considerably more gene flow towards the southern (B. spinosus) than the northern species (B. bufo). We hypothesize that hybrid zone movement in northern France and hybrid zone stability in southern France explain this pattern. The Bufo hybrid zone provides an excellent opportunity to separate a general barrier effect from localized gene flow-reducing conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Geographic Variation in Genomic Signals of Admixture Between Two Closely Related European Sepsid Fly Species
Evolutionary Biology Open Access 25 August 2023
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Data availability
Supplementary figures, tables, and text can be downloaded from the online article version. Raw data used in this study are available on GenBank under NCBI BioProject PRJNA954537. Data assembly, validation, and analysis code and input files can be found on Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qv9s4mwkg.
References
Abbott R, Albach D, Ansell S, Arntzen JW, Baird SJE, Bierne N, Zinner D (2013) Hybridization and speciation. J Evolut Biol 26:229–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x
Arntzen JW (2019) An amphibian species pushed out of Britain by a moving hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 28:5145–5154
Arntzen JW, Canestrelli D, Martínez-Solano I (2020) Environmental correlates of the European common toad hybrid zone. Contrib Zool 89:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-bja10001
Arntzen JW, de Vries W, Canestrelli D, Martínez-Solano I (2017) Hybrid zone formation and contrasting outcomes of secondary contact over transects in common toads. Mol Ecol 26:5663–5675. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14273
Arntzen JW, de Vries W, Canestrelli D, Martínez-Solano I (2020) Genetic and morphological differentiation of common toads in the alps and the apennines. In Pontarotti P (ed), Evolutionary biology—a transdisciplinary approach. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_1
Arntzen JW, McAtear J, Butôt R, Martínez-Solano I (2018) A common toad hybrid zone that runs from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean. Amphib Reptilia 39:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-00003145
Arntzen JW, Trujillo T, Butot R, Vrieling K, Schaap OD, Gutiérrez-Rodriquez J, Martinez-Solano I (2016) Concordant morphological and molecular clines in a contact zone of the common and spined toad (Bufo bufo and B. spinosus) in the northwest of France. Front Zool 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-016-0184-7
Baack EJ, Rieseberg LH (2007) A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:513–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2007.09.001
Barton NH (1983) Multilocus clines. Evolution 37:454–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408260
Barton NH (2013) Does hybridization influence speciation? J Evolut Biol 26:267–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12015
Barton NH, Gale KS (1993) Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Harrison RG (Ed.) Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York, p 13–45
Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148
Bayona-Vásquez NJ, Glenn TC, Kieran TJ, Pierson TW, Hoffberg SL, Scott PA, Faircloth BC (2019) Adapterama III: Quadruple-indexed, double/triple-enzyme RADseq libraries (2RAD/3RAD). PeerJ 7:e7724. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7724
Benestan LM, Ferchaud A-L, Hohenlohe PA, Garner BA, Naylor GJP, Baums IB, Luikart G (2016) Conservation genomics of natural and managed populations: building a conceptual and practical framework. Mol Ecol 25:2967–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13647
Bierne N, Welch J, Loire E, Bonhomme F, David P (2011) The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes. Mol Ecol 20:2044–2072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05080.x
Brodie A, Azaria JR, Ofran Y (2016) How far from the SNP may the causative genes be? Nucleic Acids Res 44:6046–6054. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw500
Buerkle CA, Rieseberg LH (2001) Low intraspecific variation for genomic isolation between hybridizing sunflower species. Evolution 55:684–691. https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0684:livfgi]2.0.co;2
Buggs RJA (2007) Empirical study of hybrid zone movement. Heredity 99:301–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800997
Butlin RK, Smadja CM (2018) Coupling, reinforcement, and speciation. Am Nat 191:155–172. https://doi.org/10.1086/695136
Chhatre VE, Emerson KJ (2017) StrAuto: automation and parallelization of STRUCTURE analysis. BMC Bioinforma 18:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1593-0
Currat M, Ruedi M, Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2008) The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 62:1908–1920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00413.x
Dagilis AJ, Kirkpatrick M, Bolnick DI (2019) The evolution of hybrid fitness during speciation. PLoS Genet 15:e1008125
Derryberry EP, Derryberry GE, Maley JM, Brumfield RT (2014) HZAR: hybrid zone analysis using an R software package. Mol Ecol Resour 14:652–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12209
Dufresnes C, Litvinchuk SN, Rozenblut‐Kościsty B, Rodrigues N, Perrin N, Crochet P, Jeffries DL (2020) Hybridization and introgression between toads with different sex chromosome systems. Evol Lett 4:444–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.191
Dufresnes C, Brelsford A, Jeffries DL, Mazepa G, Suchan T, Canestrelli D, Nicieza A, Fumagalli L, Dubey S, Martínez-Solano I, Litvinchuk SN, Vences M, Perrin N, Crochet P-A (2021) Mass of genes rather than master genes underlie the genomic architecture of amphibian speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(36):e2103963118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103963118
Eaton DAR (2014) PyRAD: assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 30:1844–1849. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu121
Feulner PGD, De-Kayne R (2017) Genome evolution, structural rearrangements and speciation. J Evolut Biol 30(8):1488–1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13101
Fitzpatrick BM (2012) Estimating ancestry and heterozygosity of hybrids using molecular markers. BMC Evolut Biol 12:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-131
Francis RM (2017) POPHELPER: an R package and web app to analyse and visualize population structure. Mol Ecol Resour 17:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12509
Garcia-Porta J, Litvinchuk SN, Crochet PA, Romano A, Geniez PH, Lo-Valvo M, Carranza S (2012) Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the west-palearctic common toads (Bufo bufo species complex). Mol Phylogenetics Evol 63:113–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.019
Gel B, Serra E (2017) KaryoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data. Bioinformatics 33:3088–3090. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx346
Glenn TC, Nilsen RA, Kieran TJ, Finger Jr JW, Pierson TW, Bentley KE, … Faircloth BC (2016) Adapterama I: universal stubs and primers for thousands of dual-indexed Illumina libraries (iTru & iNext). BioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/049114v1.
Gompert Z, Buerkle CA (2011) Bayesian estimation of genomic clines. Mol Ecol 20:2111–2127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05074.x
Gompert Z, Buerkle CA (2012) bgc: software for Bayesian estimation of genomic clines. Mol Ecol Resour 12:1168–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12009.x
Gompert Z, Parchman TL, Buerkle CA (2012) Genomics of isolation in hybrids. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:439–450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0196
Graham CF, Glenn TC, McArthur AG, Boreham DR, Kieran T, Lance S, Somers CM (2015) Impacts of degraded DNA on restriction enzyme associated DNA sequencing (RADSeq). Mol Ecol Resour 15:1304–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12404
Harrison RG, Larson EL (2014) Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J Heredity 105:795–809. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esu033
Harrison RG, Larson EL (2016) Heterogeneous genome divergence, differential introgression, and the origin and structure of hybrid zones. Mol Ecol 25:2454–2466. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13582
Hemelaar A (1988) Age, growth and other population characteristics of Bufo bufo from different latitudes and altitudes. J Herpetol 22:369–388
Hewitt GM (1988) Hybrid zones - natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90033-X
Hoffberg S, Kieran T, Catchen J, Devault A, Faircloth BC, Mauricio R, Glenn TC (2016) RADcap: sequence capture of dual-digest RADseq libraries with identifiable duplicates and reduced missing data. Mol Ecol Resour 16:1264–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13494
Janoušek V, Wang L, Luzynski K, Dufková P, Vyskočilová MM, Nachman MW, Tucker PK (2012) Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. Mol Ecol 21:3032–3047. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05583.x
Jombart T (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129
Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521
Kopelman NM, Mayzel J, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA, Mayrose I (2015) Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Resour 15:1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12387
Larson EL, Andrés JA, Bogdanowicz SM, Harrison RG (2013) Differential introgression in a mosaic hybrid zone reveals candidate barrier genes. Evolution 67:3653–3661. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12205
Larson EL, Guilherme Becker C, Bondra ER, Harrison RG (2013) Structure of a mosaic hybrid zone between the field crickets Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus. Ecol Evol 3:985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.514
Larson EL, White TA, Ross CL, Harrison RG (2014) Gene flow and the maintenance of species boundaries. Mol Ecol 23:1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12601
Lawrence M, Huber W, Pagès H, Aboyoun P, Carlson M, Gentleman R, Carey VJ (2013) Software for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges. PLoS Comput Biol 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118
Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Macholán M, Munclinger P, Šugerková M, Dufková P, Bímová B, Božíková E, Piálek J (2007) Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 61:746–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x
Mandeville EG, Parchman TL, McDonald DB, Buerkle CA (2015) Highly variable reproductive isolation among pairs of Catostomus species. Mol Ecol 24(8):1856–1872. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13118
Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X, Thomas PD (2018) PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D4190–D426. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1038
Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 7:783–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y
Parchman TL, Gompert Z, Braun MJ, Brumfield RT, McDonald DB, Uy JAC, Buerkle CA (2013) The genomic consequences of adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation between species of manakins. Mol Ecol 22:3304–3317. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12201
Polechová J, Barton N (2011) Genetic drift widens the expected cline but narrows the expected cline width. Genetics 189:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.129817
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
Rafajlović M, Emanuelsson A, Johannesson K, Butlin RK, Mehlig B (2016) A universal mechanism generating clusters of differentiated loci during divergence-with-migration. Evolution 70:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12957
Ravinet M, Faria R, Butlin RK, Galindo J, Bierne N, Rafajlović M, Westram AM (2017) Interpreting the genomic landscape of speciation: finding barriers to gene flow. J Evolut Biol 30:1450–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13047
Recuero E, Canestrelli D, Vörös J, Szabó K, Poyarkov NA, Arntzen JW, Martínez-Solano I (2012) Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the radiation of the widespread Bufo bufo species group (Anura, Bufonidae). Mol Phylogenetics Evol 62:71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.008
Ren J, Duan Y, Qiao R, Yao F, Zhang Z, Yang B, … Huang L (2011) A missense mutation in PPARD causes a major QTL effect on ear size in pigs. PLoS Genet 7 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002043
Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225
Rieseberg LH, Whitton J, Gardner K (1999) Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics 152:713–727
Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x
Sequeira F, Arntzen JW, van Gulik D, Hajema S, Diaz RL, Wagt M, & van Riemsdijk I (2022) Genetic traces of hybrid zone movement across a fragmented habitat. J Evol Biol https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13982
Stankowski S, Sobel JM, Streisfeld MA (2016) Geographic cline analysis as a tool for studying genome-wide variation: a case study of pollinator-mediated divergence in a monkeyflower. Mol Ecol https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13645
Streicher JW, Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective, Tree of Life Core Informatics collective, D. T. of L. C (2021) The genome sequence of the common toad, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). Wellcome Open Res 6:281. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17298.1
Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, von Mering C (2021) The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D605–D612. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1074
Teeter K, Thibodeau LM, Gompert Z, Buerkle CA, Nachman C, M W, Tucker PK (2009) The variable genomic architecture of isolation between hybridizing species of house mice. Evolution 64:472–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00846.x
van Riemsdijk I, Butlin RK, Wielstra B, Arntzen JW (2019) Testing an hypothesis of hybrid zone movement for toads in France. Mol Ecol 28(5):1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15005
Vines TH, Dalziel AC, Albert AYK, Veen T, Schulte PM, Schluter D (2016) Cline coupling and uncoupling in a stickleback hybrid zone. Evolution 70:1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12917
Visser M, Leeuw M, De, Zuiderwijk A, Arntzen JW (2017) Stabilization of a salamander moving hybrid zone. Ecol Evol 7:689–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2676
Wickbom T (1945) Cytological studies on Dipnoi, Urodela, Anura, and Emys. Hereditas 31:241–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1945.tb02756.x
Wielstra B (2019) Historical hybrid zone movement: more pervasive than appreciated. J Biogeogr, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13600
Zhang LC, Li N, Liu X, Liang J, Yan H, Zhao K, Bin, Wang LX (2014) A genome-wide association study of limb bone length using a Large White × Minzhu intercross population. Genet Sel Evol 46:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0056-6
Acknowledgements
We thank the reviewers and editor for their comments, which helped improve the manuscript. We thank Frido Welker, Tara Luckau, and the members of the Butlin, Allentoft, Richards, and Bossdorf laboratories for support and discussion. IvR was supported by the ‘Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek’ (NWO Open Programme 824.14.014). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 655487. Part of this project was carried out by IvR at the Shaffer laboratory in Los Angeles, at the University of California. This study trip has been sponsored by the Leiden University Fund / Swaantje Mondt Fonds (D7102). MR was funded by the Hasselblad Foundation Grant to Female Scientists, a grant from the Swedish Research Council Formas (grant number: 2019-00882), from the Swedish Research Council Vetenskapsrådet (grant number: 2021-05243), and by additional grants from Swedish Research Councils (Formas and VR) to the Centre for Marine Evolutionary Biology at the University of Gothenburg. This work used the Vincent J. Coates Genomics Sequencing Laboratory at UC Berkeley, supported by NIH S10 OD018174 Instrumentation Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IvR, JWA, BS, and BW designed the study. IvR and JWA collected samples. IvR performed the laboratory work and data assembly with contributions from GB, EMM, PS, and ET. IvR analyzed and interpreted the data with contributions from BS, BW, JWA, MR, and PS. IvR, BW, and BS wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Associate editor Lounès Chikhi
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
van Riemsdijk, I., Arntzen, J.W., Bucciarelli, G.M. et al. Two transects reveal remarkable variation in gene flow on opposite ends of a European toad hybrid zone. Heredity 131, 15–24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-023-00617-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-023-00617-6
This article is cited by
-
Geographic Variation in Genomic Signals of Admixture Between Two Closely Related European Sepsid Fly Species
Evolutionary Biology (2023)