Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The transcriptomic signature of obligate parthenogenesis


Investigating the origin of parthenogenesis through interspecific hybridization can provide insight into how meiosis may be altered by genetic incompatibilities, which is fundamental for our understanding of the formation of reproductive barriers. Yet the genetic mechanisms giving rise to obligate parthenogenesis in eukaryotes remain understudied. In the microcrustacean Daphnia pulex species complex, obligately parthenogenetic (OP) isolates emerged as backcrosses of two cyclically parthenogenetic (CP) parental species, D. pulex and D. pulicaria, two closely related but ecologically distinct species. We examine the genome-wide expression in OP females at the early resting egg production stage, a life-history stage distinguishing OP and CP reproductive strategies, in comparison to CP females of the same stage from the two parental species. Our analyses of the expression data reveal that underdominant and overdominant genes are abundant in OP isolates, suggesting widespread regulatory incompatibilities between the parental species. More importantly, underdominant genes (i.e., genes with expression lower than both parentals) in the OP isolates are enriched in meiosis and cell-cycle pathways, indicating an important role of underdominance in the origin of obligate parthenogenesis. Furthermore, metabolic and biosynthesis pathways enriched with overdominant genes (i.e., expression higher than both parentals) are another genomic signature of OP isolates.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Life history of Daphnia.
Fig. 2: Inheritance mode.
Fig. 3: The distribution of index.
Fig. 4: KEGG pathways.
Fig. 5: Gene expression changes.


  • Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J (2019) TopGO: Enrichment Analysis for Gene Ontology. R package version 2.38.1

  • Avise JC (2015) Evolutionary perspectives on clonal reproduction in vertebrate animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:8867–8873

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbash DA, Siino DF, Tarone AM, Roote J (2003) A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5302–5307

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos O, Roslein J, Kotusz J, Paces J, Pekarik L, Petrtyl M et al. (2019) The legacy of sexual ancestors in phenotypic variability, gene expression, and homoeolog regulation of asexual hybrids and polyploids. Mol Biol Evol 36:1902–1920

  • Bell G (1982) The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57:289–300

  • Brandlova J, Brandl Z, Fernando CH (1972) The Cladocera of Ontario with remarks on some species and distribution. Can J Zool 50:1373–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caceres CE, Tessier AJ (2004a) Incidence of diapause varies among populations of Daphnia pulicaria. Oecologia 141:425–431

  • Caceres CE, Tessier AJ (2004b) To sink or swim: Variable diapause strategies among Daphnia species. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1333–1340

  • Chin TA, Caceres CE, Cristescu ME (2019) The evolution of reproductive isolation in Daphnia. BMC Evol Biol 19:216

  • Colbourne JK, Hebert PDN (1996) The systematics of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Anomopoda): A molecular phylogenetic approach. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 351):349–360

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colegrave N (2002) Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature 420:664–666

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colegrave N, Kaltz O, Bell G (2002) The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. VIII. The dynamics of adaptation to novel environments after a single episode of sex. Evolution 56:14–21

  • Cooper KF, Strich R (2011) Meiotic control of the APC/C: similarities & differences from mitosis. Cell Div 6:16

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TF (2007) Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol 5:1899–1905.

  • Cristescu ME, Constantin A, Bock DG, Caceres CE, Crease TJ (2012) Speciation with gene flow and the genetics of habitat transitions. Mol Ecol 21:1411–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng HW (1997) Photoperiodic response of sexual reproduction in the Daphnia pulex group is reversed in two distinct habitats. Limnol Oceanogr 42:609–611

  • Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S et al. (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudycha JL (2004) Mortality dynamics of Daphnia in contrasting habitats and their role in ecological divergence. Freshw Biol 49:505–514

  • Dudycha JL, Tessier AJ (1999) Natural genetic variation of life span, reproduction, and juvenile growth in Daphnia. Evolution 53:1744–1756

  • Felsenstein J (1974) The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78:737–756

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel W, Lynch M, Burger R (1993) Mullers ratchet and mutational meltdowns. Evolution 47:1744–1757

  • Gallot A, Shigenobu S, Hashiyama T, Jaubert-Possamai S, Tagu D (2012). Sexual and asexual oogenesis require the expression of unique and shared sets of genes in the insect Acyrthosiphon pisum. BMC Genomics 13

  • Goddard MR, Charles H, Godfray J, Burt A (2005) Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434:636–640

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbsky GJ (2015) The spindle checkpoint and chromosome segregation in meiosis. FEBS J 282:2471–2487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson SJ, Schurko AM, Hecox-Lea B, Welch DBM, Stelzer CP, Logsdon JM (2013) Inventory and phylogenetic analysis of meiotic genes in monogonont rotifers. J Hered 104:357–370

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Schwartz SS, Ward RD, Finston TL (1993) Macrogeographic patterns of breeding system diversity in the Daphnia pulex group. 1. breeding systems of Canadian populations. Heredity 70:148–161

  • Heier CR, Dudycha JL (2009) Ecological speciation in a cyclic parthenogen: sexual capability of experimental hybrids between Daphnia pulex and Daphnia pulicaria. Limnol Oceanogr 54:492–502

  • Hiruta C, Nishida C, Tochinai S (2010) Abortive meiosis in the oogenesis of parthenogenetic Daphnia pulex. Chromosome Res 18:833–840

  • Hiruta C, Tochinai S (2014) Formation and structure of the ephippium (resting egg case) in relation to molting and egg laying in the water flea Daphnia pulex De Geer (Cladocera: Daphniidae). J Morphol 275:760–767

  • Hotz H, Mancino G, Bucciinnocenti S, Ragghianti M, Berger L, Uzzell T (1985) Rana ridibunda varies geographically in inducing clonal gametogenesis in interspecies hybrids. J Exp Zool 236:199–210

  • Huynh T, Xu S (2018) Gene Annotation Easy Viewer (GAEV): Integrating KEGG’s gene function annotations and associated molecular pathways. F1000Res 7:416

  • Janko K, Pačes J, Wilkinson-Herbots H, Costa RJ, Röslein J, Drozd P et al. (2018) Hybrid asexuality as a primary reproductive barrier: on the interconnection between asexuality and speciation. Mol Ecol 27:248–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin F, Hamada M, Malureanu L, Jeganathan KB, Zhou W, Morbeck DE et al. (2010) Cdc20 is critical for meiosis i and fertility of female mice. PLoS Genet 6:e1001147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltz O, Bell G (2002) The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. XII. Repeated sexual episodes increase rates of adaptation to novel environments. Evolution 56:1743–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney M, Fujita MK, Ridenour J (2009) Lost sex in the reptiles: constraints and correlations. In: Schön I, Martens K, van Dijk P (eds.) Lost Sex. Springer, Dordrecht, p 447–474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosheleva K, Desai MM (2018) Recombination alters the dynamics of adaptation on standing variation in laboratory yeast populations. Mol Biol Evol 35:180–201

  • Li R, Murray AW (1991) Feedback-control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519–531

  • Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Burger R, Butcher D, Gabriel W (1993) The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J Hered 84:339–344

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Seyfert A, Eads B, Williams E (2008) Localization of the genetic determinants of meiosis suppression in Daphnia pulex. Genetics 180:317–327

  • Mack KL, Nachman MW (2016) Gene regulation and speciation. Trends Genet 33:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus CJ, Coolon JD, Duff MO, Eipper-Mains J, Graveley BR, Wittkopp PJ (2010) Regulatory divergence in Drosophila revealed by mRNA-seq. Genome Res 20:816–825

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millette KL, Gonzalez A, Cristescu ME (2020) Breaking ecological barriers: Anthropogenic disturbance leads to habitat transitions, hybridization, and high genetic diversity. Sci Total Environ 740:140046

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller H (1964) The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res 106:2–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller HJ (1940) Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. In: Huxley J (ed.) The New Systematics. Claredon Press, 185–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman M, Sharbel TF, Schwander T (2014) Genetic causes of transitions from sexual reproduction to asexuality in plants and animals. J Evol Biol 27:1346–1359

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nica AC, Dermitzakis ET (2013) Expression quantitative trait loci: present and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20120362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omilian AR, Lynch M (2009) Patterns of intraspecific DNA variation in the Daphnia nuclear genome. Genetics 182:325–336

  • Otto SP (2009) The evolutionary enigma of sex. Am Nat 174:S1–S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker DJ, Bast J, Jalvingh K, Dumas Z, Robinson-Rechavi M, Schwander T (2019) Repeated Evolution of Asexuality Involves Convergent Gene Expression Changes. Mol Biol Evol 36:350–364

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon A, Chao L (2004) Drift increases the advantage of sex in RNA bacteriophage Phi 6. Genetics 166:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presgraves DC (2003) A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163:955–972

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawson PD, Burton RS (2002) Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12955–12958

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RJ (1973) Unisexual fish: laboratory synthesis of a species. Science 179:180–181

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon JC, Delmotte F, Rispe C, Crease T (2003) Phylogenetic relationships between parthenogens and their sexual relatives: the possible routes to parthenogenesis in animals. Biol J Linn Soc 79:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan DG, Abdelhady A, Stern DL (2014) Gene expression analysis of parthenogenetic embryonic development of the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum suggests that aphid parthenogenesis evolved from meiotic oogenesis. Plos One 9:12

  • Stenberg P, Saura A (2009) Cytology of asexual animals. In: Schön I, Martens K, van Dijk P (eds.) Lost Sex. Springer, Dordrecht, p 63–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DL, Orgogozo V (2008) The loci of evolution: How predictable is genetic evolution? Evolution 62:2155–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya D, Gonzalez C, Lacefield S (2011) The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates APC/C activity during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 22:2848–2861

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MJD, Contreras N, Cheney J, Webb GC (1977) Cytogenetics of parthenogenetic grasshopper Warramaba (formerly Moraba) virgo and its bisexual relatives. 2. hybridization studies. Chromosoma 61:127–148

  • Wray GA (2007) The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:206–216

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Innes DJ, Lynch M, Cristescu ME (2013) The role of hybridization in the origin and spread of asexuality in Daphnia. Mol Ecol 22:4549–4561

  • Xu S, Spitze K, Ackerman MS, Ye Z, Bright L, Keith N et al. (2015) Hybridization and the origin of contagious asexuality in Daphnia pulex. Mol Biol Evol 32:3215–3225

  • Ye Z, Molinier C, Zhao C, Haag CR, Lynch M (2019) Genetic control of male production in Daphnia pulex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:15602–15609

  • Ye Z, Xu S, Spitze K, Asselman J, Jiang X, Ackerman MS et al. (2017) A new reference genome assembly for the microcrustacean Daphnia pulex. G3 (Bethesda) 7:1405–1416

  • Yu H (2007) Cdc20: A WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine. Mol Cell 27:3–16

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaffagnini F, Sabelli B (1972) Karyologic observations on the maturation of the summer and winter eggs of Daphnia pulex and Daphnia middendorffiana. Chromosoma 36:193–203

Download references


We thank A. Hall for his help with the experiments. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. This work is supported by NIH grant R35GM133730 to SX.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SX designed the experiments. SX, TH, and MS performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sen Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, S., Huynh, T.V. & Snyman, M. The transcriptomic signature of obligate parthenogenesis. Heredity 128, 132–138 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links