Indirect assortative mating for human disease and longevity


Phenotypic correlations among partners for traits such as longevity or late-onset disease have been found to be comparable to phenotypic correlations in first-degree relatives. How these correlations arise in late life is poorly understood. Here we introduce a novel paradigm to establish the presence of indirect assortment on factors correlated across generations, by examining correlations between parents of couples, i.e., in-laws. Using correlations in additive genetic values we further corroborate the presence of indirect assortment on heritable factors. Specifically, using couples from the UK Biobank cohort, we show that longevity and disease history of the parents of White British couples are correlated, with correlations of up to 0.09. The correlations in parental longevity are replicated in the FamiLinx cohort, a larger and geographically more diverse historical ancestry dataset spanning a broader time frame. These correlations in parental longevity significantly (pval < 0.0093 for all pairs of parents) exceed what would be expected due to variations in lifespan based on year and location of birth. For cardiovascular diseases, in particular hypertension, we find significant correlations (r = 0.028, pval = 0.005) in genetic values among partners, supporting a model where partners assort for risk factors to some extent genetically correlated with cardiovascular disease. Partitioning the relative importance of indirect assortative mating and shared common environment will require large, well-characterized longitudinal cohorts aimed at understanding phenotypic correlations among none-blood relatives. Identifying the factors that mediate indirect assortment on longevity and human disease risk will help to unravel factors affecting human disease and ultimately longevity.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

Required data can be accessed through the UK Biobank ( and the FamiLinx website (, respectively. For analyses involving genotypes, we used the individuals genotyped in phase 1 of the UK Biobank genotyping project, which were released by the UK Biobank in June 2015. The genotype data were downloaded on 5 June 2015. The DISSECT software used to perform the analysis based on genetic values is freely available from


  1. Anonymous (1903) Assortative mating in man: a cooperative study. Biometrika 2:481–498

  2. Begier MH, Hamdan MA (1971) Correlation in a bivariate normal distribution with truncation in both variables. Aust J Stat 13:77–82

  3. Belsky DW, Domingue BW, Wedow R et al. (2018) Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E7275-E7284

  4. Bulik-Sullivan, B, Finucane HK, Anttila V et al. (2015) An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet 47:1236–1241

  5. Canela-Xandri O, Law A, Gray A et al. (2015) A new tool called DISSECT for analysing large genomic data sets using a Big Data approach Nat Commun 6:10162

  6. Canela-Xandri O, Rawlik K, Tenesa A (2018) An atlas of genetic associations in UK Biobank. Nat Genet 50:1593–1599

  7. Canela-Xandri O, Rawlik K, Woolliams JA et al. (2016) Improved genetic profiling of anthropometric traits using a Big Data approach PLoS ONE 11:e0166755

  8. Conley D, Laidley T, Belsky DW et al. (2016) Assortative mating and differential fertility by phenotype and genotype across the 20th century. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 6647–6652

  9. Cover TM, Thomas JA (2012) Elements of information theory. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA

  10. Drasgow F (1986) Polychoric and polyserial correlations. In: Kotz S and Johnson N (eds) The Encyclopedia of Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA

  11. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Prentice Hall, Pearson

  12. Fox J (2010) polycor: Polychoric and polyserial correlations.

  13. Gianola D (1982) Assortative mating and the genetic correlation. Theor Appl Genet 62:225–231

  14. Herskind AM, McGue M, Holm NV et al. (1996) The heritability of human longevity: a population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870–1900. Human Genet 97:319–323

  15. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Pringle M et al. (2002) Married couples’ risk of same disease: cross sectional study BMJ 325:636

  16. Hugh-Jones D, Verweij KJ, Pourcain BS et al. (2016) Assortative mating on educational attainment leads to genetic spousal resemblance for polygenic scores Intelligence 59:103–108

  17. Joshi PK, Fischer K, Schraut KE et al. (2016) Variants near CHRNA3/5 and APOE have age-and sex-related effects on human lifespan. Nat Commun 7:11174

  18. Kaplanis J, Gordon A, Shor T et al. (2018) Quantitative analysis of population-scale family trees with millions of relatives. Science 360:171–175

  19. Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Frigge ML et al. (2018) The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes. Science 359:424–428

  20. Lee SH, Naomi RW, Goddard ME et al. (2011) Estimating missing heritability for disease from genome-wide association studies Am J Human Genet 88:294–305

  21. Muñoz M, Pong-Wong R, Canela-Xandri O et al. (2016) Evaluating the contribution of genetics and familial shared environment to common disease using the UK Biobank. Nat Genet 48:980–983

  22. Nordsletten AE, Larsson H, Crowley JJ et al. (2016) Patterns of nonrandom mating within and across 11 major psychiatric disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 73:354–361

  23. Peyrot WJ, Robinson MR, Penninx BW et al. (2016) Exploring boundaries for the genetic consequences of assortative mating for psychiatric traits JAMA Psychiatry 73:1189–1195

  24. Philippe P (1978) Familial correlations of longevity: an isolate-based study. Am J Med Genet 2:121–129

  25. Robinson MR, Kleinman A, Graff M et al. (2017) Genetic evidence of assortative mating in humans. Nat Hum Behav 1:0016

  26. Schulze R (2004) Meta-analysis-a comparison of approaches. Hogrefe & Huber, Ashland, Ohio, USA

  27. Silventoinen K, Kaprio J, Lahelma E et al. (2003) Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses Am J Human Biol 15:620–627

  28. Stulp G, Simons MJ, Grasman S et al. (2017) Assortative mating for human height: a meta‐analysis. Am J Hum Biol 29

  29. Tenesa A, Rawlik K, Navarro P et al. (2015) Genetic determination of height-mediated mate choice Genome Biol 16:1–8

  30. Xia C, Amador C, Huffman J et al. (2016) Pedigree- and SNP-associated genetics and recent environment are the major contributors to anthropometric and cardiometabolic trait variation. PLoS Genet 12:e1005804

  31. Zietsch BP, Verweij KJ, Heath AC et al. (2011) Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating Am Nat 177:605–616

Download references


This work was mainly supported by The Roslin Institute Strategic Grant funding from the BBSRC. AT also acknowledges funding from the Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit. This work used the ARCHER UK National Supercomputing Service ( and the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (ECDF) ( This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under project 6684.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Tenesa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rawlik, K., Canela-Xandri, O. & Tenesa, A. Indirect assortative mating for human disease and longevity. Heredity 123, 106–116 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading