A coalescent-based estimator of genetic drift, and acoustic divergence in the Pteronotus parnellii species complex

Determining the processes responsible for phenotypic variation is one of the central tasks of evolutionary biology. While the importance of acoustic traits for foraging and communication in echolocating mammals suggests adaptation, the seldom-tested null hypothesis to explain trait divergence is genetic drift. Here we derive FST values from multi-locus coalescent isolation-with-migration models, and couple them with estimates of quantitative trait divergence, or PST, to test drift as the evolutionary process responsible for phenotypic divergence in island populations of the Pteronotus parnellii species complex. Compared to traditional comparisons of PST to FST, the migration-based estimates of FST are unidirectional instead of bidirectional, simultaneously integrate variation among loci and individuals, and posterior densities of PST and FST can be compared directly. We found the evolution of higher call frequencies is inconsistent with genetic drift for the Hispaniolan population, despite many generations of isolation from its Puerto Rican counterpart. While the Hispaniolan population displays dimorphism in call frequencies, the higher frequency of the females is incompatible with sexual selection. Instead, cultural drift toward higher frequencies among Hispaniolan females might explain the divergence. By integrating Bayesian coalescent and trait analyses, this study demonstrates a powerful approach to testing genetic drift as the default evolutionary mechanism of trait differentiation between populations.


Introduction
Determining the evolutionary processes shaping phenotypes has been a central task of genetics since its inception (Wright 1931). While traits such as body size or structure of acoustic calls have obvious implications for fitness (Brommer et al. 2014;Campbell et al. 2010;Kingston and Rossiter 2004;Puechmaille et al. 2014), genetic drift must first be tested as a potential primary evolutionary mechanism operating within and between populations. Echolocating mammals use acoustic calls for spatial orientation, foraging, and communication (Knörnschild et al. 2012), hence, acoustic traits should be subject to strong selection. Thus, the relative contributions of genetic isolation and resulting drift vs. adaptive, social, or sexual selection to acoustic traits becomes a central question in the evolutionary ecology of echolocating organisms.
In the absence of selection, traits-including acoustic traits-will evolve through neutral processes, reflecting population genetic structure and effective population size (Armstrong and Coles 2007;Chen et al. 2009;Odendaal et al. 2014). Very few studies of acoustic traits, however, directly evaluate predictions from drift models of trait evolution (e.g., Campbell et al. (2010)). Instead of modeling the amount of trait divergence attributable to neutral processes, given the evolutionary history of the lineage in question, qualitative assessments of genetic divergence compared to call frequency tend to be interpreted as reflecting some combination of neutral and selective processes (Clare et al. 2013). Additionally, constraints on acoustic traits arising from body size must be considered when analyzing the evolution of calls. Other things being equal, smaller bats will emit calls at higher frequencies than larger bats, in a pattern resulting from the acoustic properties of any physical object (Jones 1996). It is therefore important to include other correlated traits, such as body size, in analyses of mammalian echolocation traits.
Among bats, new phylogenies coupled with comparative analyses reveal ecological convergence in echolocation traits, including the evolution of highly sophisticated constant-frequency echolocation (Davies et al. 2012). Instead of emitting calls sweeping across multiple frequencies-or frequency modulated (FM) echolocation-, bats that use constant-frequency (CF) echolocation emit a pure tone at a constant frequency, ending with a FM sweep. Constant frequency calls are both simple and highly constrained (Kingston et al. 2001), and therefore easy to characterize by their dominant frequency.
In the New World, only the noctilionoid Pteronotus parnellii species complex has evolved constant frequency echolocation with Doppler-shift compensation (Clare et al. 2013). Recent research on the call frequencies of different populations in this species complex has focused on their correspondence with systematics (Clare et al. 2013;López-Baucells et al. 2017;Pavan et al. 2018;Pavan and Marroig 2016), but not on the evolutionary processes responsible for shaping these traits. Here we integrate population and quantitative genetic models to test drift as the primary driver of acoustic divergence in sister populations in the P. parnellii species complex. As island populations originating through over-water dispersal (Dávalos 2006;Pavan and Marroig 2017), the two focal populations have likely been subject to random genetic drift for at least part of their evolutionary history. We couple the isolation-withmigration model (Hey and Nielsen 2007) with quantitative analyses of phenotypic divergence codified by Spitze (1993) based on Lande's (1992) interpretation of Wright's (1951) island model, and extended to account for uncertainty in trait heritability and scaling by Leinonen et al. (2006). The methods presented here can be easily extended to test drift as an evolutionary mechanism across populations with known isolation-with-migration parameters (Muscarella et al. 2011;Russell et al. 2008).

Methods
Study sites, capture, and sampling methods A total of 61 Pteronotus pusillus and P. portoricensis individuals were captured using a harp trap at the entrance of 6 caves distributed throughout the Dominican Republic on the island of Hispaniola (P. pusillus) and Puerto Rico (P. portoricensis, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2) (Núñez-Novas et al. 2016;Pavan and Marroig 2016). For ease in communication, we refer to individuals from both populations as Pteronotus parnellii species complex or sensu lato (s.l.). Within minutes of capture, skin tissue was sampled using an Acu-Punch sterile, disposable 2-mm skin biopsy punch (Acuderm, Inc.). Punctures were transferred to~0.7 g indicator silica for desiccation and transport (Corthals et al. 2015). Bats were released at the site of capture within 60 min of being caught.

Morphological and echolocation data collection
After sexing, standard mammalian measurements were collected comprising length of body, tail, ear, foot, and forearm, and body mass. We recorded biosonar vocalizations from bats in a wire mesh cage (approximately 15 × 15 × 35 cm). Recordings were made with a Larson Davis 6.25 mm instrumentation microphone (model no. 2520) and Larson Davis preamplifier (model no. PRM 422), and amplified with a PCB Piezotronics Signal Conditioner (model no. 480E09). Calls were recorded onto a laptop computer using a National Instruments A-D card (DAQ-Card-6062E), recording at 356 kHz using BatSound Pro v3.31 (Pettersson Elektronik). We placed bats into the cage and allowed them to calm briefly. With the microphone held 10 cm from the bat's head, we recorded three to five files of 5 s in duration.
We analysed the vocalizations using the callViewer-18 script compiled with Matlab by Mark Skowronski. The spectrogram parameters of the program were set at a window length of 3 ms and an FFT size of 16,384 points resulting in a resolution of 22 Hz. Automated detection parameters set a frame rate of 10,000 frames per second (resulting in a frame duration of 0.1 ms), a bandpass filter between 20 and 130 kHz, and a minimum energy of 45 dB. We focused frequency analysis on the constant frequency (CF) portion of the second harmonic of the calls, as this is known to be the highest amplitude and most consistent component of the biosonar calls of this species, and relates directly to the best frequency of the cochlea, auditory nerve, and central nervous system (Huffman and Henson 1990).
Calls were selected for analysis based on the best available signal-to-noise ratio. Approximately 65 individual calls were identified for each bat and targeted for frequency analysis in callViewer-18. The resulting tables assigned a number to each call, the time to the centre of each analysis frame, and the frequency of that frame and its slope (kHz/ ms), among other parameters. Segments of calls were included in analysis when their slopes were zero for a minimum of 1 ms (10 consecutive frames). Within a single call, variations in the frequency of the CF component were accepted if they shifted within one increment of resolution, provided that the shift persisted for a minimum of 1 ms. These variations correspond to Doppler-shifts induced by motion of the bat in the cage. All frames of a call deemed to be of constant frequency were averaged and this value was taken as the frequency of the CF portion of the call.

Molecular data collection
DNA was extracted from the desiccated skin samples using QIAmp or DNeasy extraction kits (Qiagen, Inc.), and following the manufacturer's protocol for animal tissues (Corthals et al. 2015). Extracted DNA was used as a template in PCR amplifications using Taq polymerase and primers for the entire mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene, and partial sequences from four nuclear loci: stat5a, plcb4, rag2, and atp7a. Primers and amplification conditions for each locus have been described in detail elsewhere (Dávalos et al. 2014).

Population genetic analyses
Aligned datasets for each locus were edited by eye to remove sites violating the infinite sites model (i.e., sites with >2 character states). The remaining data were then filtered using the Perl script IMgc (Woerner et al. 2007) to yield the longest non-recombining fragment for each locus. The filtered data included 1,121 bp for cytb (n DR = 26, n PR = 6), 472 bp for rag2 (n DR = 34, n PR = 28), 307 bp for plcb4 (n DR = 26, n PR = 24), 429 bp for stat5a (n DR = 10, n PR = 12), and 637 bp for atp7a (n DR = 2, n PR = 8). Sample sizes for the nuclear loci are given as numbers of sequenced chromosomes. McDonald and Kreitman (1991) tests were conducted on all coding regions (cytb, atp7a, and rag2); in no case did we find evidence of selection (Supplementary  Table 3).
Previous analyses indicated the two populations are completely discontinuous (Pavan and Marroig 2016), and our own analyses failed to show consistent differentiation among sampling sites within islands. The historical demography of these populations was therefore estimated using the two-population model of IMa2 v.8.27.12 (Hey and Nielsen 2004). As implemented here, this model estimated six parameters: θ (=4N e μ) for each of the populations from Hispaniola, Puerto Rico, and the most recent common ancestor, m (=M i /μ, where M i is the rate of migration into population i) in each direction, and τ (=tμ, where t is the time since population splitting). Priors were set to uniform distributions (U) (0,50) for θ and migration parameters, and U(0,5) for τ. Five independent runs were allowed to burn-in for~5 million steps each, after which each Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search was allowed to continue for 10 million steps. Each run consisted of 30 heated chains with heating parameters h a = 0.975 and h b = 0.75. Relative substitution rates for each locus were estimated in IMa2 and converted to substitutions/site/year based on a cytb rate of 2.99 × 10 −8 substitutions/site/year from a fossil-calibrated phylogenetic analysis of Noctilionoidea including P. parnellii s.l. (Rojas et al. 2016). Coalescent-scaled parameters (θ, m, and τ) were converted to natural parameters (N e , M i , and t, in order) as described above using the geometric mean of locus-specific substitution rates (=5.67 × 10 −7 substitutions/locus/year) and a generation time of 2 years. After verifying that all runs converged on similar posterior distributions, we used IMa2 to calculate the joint posterior densities for each parameter based on the 47,983 coalescent genealogies resulting from all five separate runs.
We estimated fixation index, or F ST values (Wright 1965), based on the posterior densities of directional effective number of migrants (N e m or Nm) from IMa2 (Supplementary Figure 1). The transformation to obtain F ST values was based on Wright's (1965) island model with Takahata's (1983) correction for a finite number (d) of populations, in which: While attempts to estimate Nm from F ST values have long been criticized as overly simplistic (Whitlock and McCauley 1999), here we instead use this relationship to transform a posterior distribution of Nm into a posterior distribution of F ST values. This transformation accounts for the variance in F ST arising from stochastic errors as well as differences between loci, which are overlooked when transforming F ST into migration rates. In addition, by estimating directional values of Nm using a non-equilibrium coalescent-based method, we avoid the assumptions of equal N e and m for all populations, as well as the condition of mutation-driftmigration equilibrium for the entire system. In addition to obtaining F ST distributions from coalescent posterior distributions of Nm, we estimated global G′ ST (equivalent to F ST ) from the multi-locus sequence data, including a correction for finite number of subpopulations (Hedrick 2005), and then bootstrapped to obtain a distribution around that value using the R package mmod v. 1.3.3 (Winter 2012). This provided a direct comparison between our coalescent-based method and previous methods of characterizing neutral variation within the genome.

Quantitative trait comparisons
All statistical analyses were conducted in the R statistical language v.3.4.4. We estimated the summary statistics of Hispaniolan and Puerto Rican populations for call frequency, body mass, and forearm length phenotypes. Bayesian estimates of differences between populations were obtained using the BEST R package (Kruschke 2013).

Models of echolocation frequency as a function of morphological data
The frequency of the CF portion of the second harmonic of a set of biosonar calls was analyzed for each bat, as described above. The median of these values was used to represent its CF in frequentist statistical analyses. Principal component analysis of morphological measurements was used to obtain orthogonal variables summarizing the variation in body size among individuals. We used linear models of CF call frequency as a function of principal components or body measurements to test whether variation in call frequency was explained by body size (Jones 1996).
Using Bayesian models to estimate P ST and compare to F ST The divergence in a quantitative, heritable trait is expressed as an analogue of the F ST called the Q ST , and given by: in which σ 2 A B is the additive variance for the trait between populations, and σ 2 A W is the additive variance within populations. Genetic drift as a mechanism behind the quantitative differentiation is rejected when Q ST exceeds F ST from neutral loci. For most traits in wild populations, however, the additive genetic variance is unknown (Brommer 2011). In this case, the variance terms need to be scaled by a constant c and the heritability h 2 , resulting in the estimate of phenotypic differentiation, or P ST : in which c/h 2 is the additive genetic contribution to the proportion of the between-population variance. In most empirical cases the c/h 2 ratio is unknown, but it determines how robust the P ST approximation to the Q ST is. If the P ST exceeds the neutral expectation -the F ST -at c = h 2 , then it will also exceed this expectation when c > h 2 . However, when c < h 2 , there is a limit to the extent to which the P ST reflects the Q ST exceeding the neutral expectation. This critical value is estimated by calculating c / h 2 critical (Eq. 13) for the lower 5% tail of P ST and the upper 5% tail of F ST distributions (Brommer 2011): When c / h 2 critical is low, there is a large range of c / h 2 over which the phenotypic divergence (Q ST ) will exceed the neutral genetic divergence (F ST ), indicating the comparison is robust, and thus greater confidence in the inference of quantitative divergence exceeding neutral genetic divergence.
One advantage of our method emerges from obtaining F ST values from posteriors for directional migration rates (Supplementary Figure 1). Unlike F ST distributions based on assumptions of normality, the distribution of multi-locus F ST values can be directly compared to the distribution of trait-specific P ST values without assuming a canonical frequency distribution for either. Thus, we can also summarize the entire parameter-space over which any differences between P ST and F ST can be observed in the best-case scenario of c = h 2 . We use the frequency distributions of F ST and trait-specific P ST to visualize differences and test genetic drift as the evolutionary mechanism underlying differentiation in the two populations. The overlap between distributions was calculated by computing kernel densities on the same scale and their overlap using the R package sfsmisc v. 1.1-0 (Maechler 2016).
To calculate trait-specific P ST values, we estimated the phenotypic variance between and within populations using linear hierarchical (or multilevel) models (Brommer et al. 2014). Multilevel models have the advantage of fitting parameters specific to clusters of observations (Gelman and Hill 2007), such as islands, without discarding the variation in observations of individuals. These models had the quantitative trait as a response variable, with population as an island-specific (or random) effect, and sex as either a sample-wide (or fixed) or an island-specific effect (including a potential interaction between sex and island). Including sex as an effect accounts for phenotypic variance between sexes that might otherwise obscure the pattern of variation between populations. The P ST was estimated as a derived quantity by coding eq. 13 for c = h 2 , including the population-specific phenotypic variance σ 2 B , and the residual variance σ 2 W , after factoring out the effects of sex on the traits. In general, Bayesian analyses of the Q ST , approximated here by the P ST , increase precision in estimates of the entire posterior distribution (O'Hara and Merilä 2005).
Hierarchical models were coded in Jags v.3.3.0 (Plummer 2003), and ran in the R package R2jags v.0.04-01 (Su and Yajima 2012), with a burn-in of 25,000 iterations followed by 25,000 additional iterations. Posteriors were sampled every 25 generations to produce effective sampling sizes for the posterior of at least 1600, and assessed using the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF), which approaches 1 at convergence (Gelman and Rubin 1992). All posterior parameter estimates had PSRF ≤ 1.003. The prior for the population-specific effect was drawn from a normal distribution, with identical independent priors for betweenand within-population variances set as half-Cauchy distributions with variance of at least 10,000. These priors are robust and do not make any assumptions about the relative contribution of variation from different levels in the hierarchy (Gelman and Hill 2007). In addition, we used estimates from these models to build posterior predictive checks, and compared the simulated data to parameters from the observations using the bayesplot R package (Gabry 2017). Estimates of P ST with their posterior distribution are shown for the best-case scenario of c = h 2 .

Population genetic analyses of isolation with migration
We estimated the historical demography of Hispaniolan and Puerto Rican populations of Pteronotus parnellii s.l. using the two-population model of IMa2. Five independent runs of~10 million steps each converged on similar point estimates and posterior densities for all parameters except θ MRCA (Supplementary Table 4). We focus here on the parameters of interest for the phenotypic evolution models: θ for each island population, directional migration rates (m i ), and the splitting time (τ) for the two daughter populations. The scaled population size parameter for Hispaniola (θ DR = 0.625, 95% high probability density [HPD] = 0.225, 1.975) was consistently estimated to be greater than that for Puerto Rico (θ PR = 0.125, 95% HPD = 0.025, 0.575). Assuming a mean multilocus substitution rate of 1.13 × 10 −6 substitutions/locus/generation, these θ estimates correspond to modal effective population sizes of~138,000 individuals in the Hispaniolan population (95% HPD = 50k, 435k) and~28,000 individuals in the Puerto Rican population (95% HPD = 6k, 127k; Fig. 1a). These results are consistent with our best knowledge of the biology of these species, namely, that members of the island P. parnellii species complex are of least conservation concern in

Estimates of genotypic and phenotypic differentiation
The posterior distributions of population-specific migration rates were used to calculate F ST values (Table 1, Fig. 3). While all Bayesian models for quantitative traits performed well in posterior predictive checks, modelling the islandspecific effects of sex improved estimates of the variance  Figure 3). Body size variables showed no sex-specific effects: the posterior distributions of the coefficients of the effect of being male had slightly negative means for each trait, but included zero (Table 1). Compared to females, Hispaniolan males called at lower frequency (Table 1, Supplementary   Table 5, Fig. 2a). This effect persisted even after including body mass or forearm length as covariates of call frequency ( Table 2). Estimates of trait-specific P ST at c = h 2 showed the greatest differentiation in echolocation call frequency, with lower estimates for body mass and forearm length ( Table 1). The call frequency P ST for Hispaniola also had low c/h 2 critical (0.014 with island-specific sex effect, 0.022 with sample-wide sex effect), while the c / h 2 critical values of almost all other comparisons were several times larger, and even >1 for the body size data from Puerto Rico. Comparisons of the distributions of P ST and F ST show overlap in distributions ≥4.9% for body size variables and Puerto Rico, while the lowest overlap corresponded to P ST call frequency and F ST Hispaniola (0.02% with island-specific sex effect, Fig. 3, and 0.06% with sample-wide sex effect, Supplementary Figure 4). This indicates phenotypic differentiation was significantly greater than neutral genetic differentiation for call frequency trait in the Hispaniolan population.

Discussion
We tested genetic drift as the evolutionary process underlying acoustic differentiation by integrating phenotypic and genotypic models, rejecting this evolutionary mechanism as a probable explanation for the divergent call in the Hispaniolan population. To this end, we integrated coalescent-based models and well-established methods for estimating F ST (Wright 1965) to directly compare measures of differentiation. This approach accounts for variation in F ST estimates in comparisons with P ST , allows the estimation of different F ST distributions corresponding to directional rates of migration, and enables measuring overlap to quantify the correspondence between genotypic and phenotypic divergence. In addition, compared to a The sex effect is coded with females as the baseline, the effect shown is for males. c / h 2 critical , critical value of the proportion of heritability ascribable to the additive genetic variance for the P ST vs. F ST comparison His. Hispaniola, HPD high probability density, P.R. Puerto Rico

Comparisons of F ST and P ST
Our comparisons differ from traditional comparisons of genotypic and phenotypic differentiation in two ways. First, calculating F ST values from estimates of the number of migrants (Nm) overcomes the limitations of traditional approximations by integrating both stochastic variation from individual sampling and variance across loci and by allowing for asymmetric rates of gene flow (Muir et al. 2012;Sundqvist et al. 2016). Importantly, because Nm is a compound parameter (4Nm ¼ 4N e μ Ã M μ ), these estimates are independent from the highly variable mutation rate. This approach, then, can test the genetic drift hypothesis for each population, with potential applications for testing the evolutionary processes behind differentiation in continuous traits across many populations in the West Indies and beyond (Muscarella et al. 2011;Russell et al. 2008). Second, F ST values were derived from a Bayesian posterior of Nm, and the resulting distribution of F ST was then compared against the posterior of phenotypic differentiation (Fig. 3). Therefore, the frequency distribution of F ST does not need to be generated by bootstrapping, or some other means of introducing variation around a single point estimate. The difference between the frequency distributions of F ST and P ST can then be calculated as a derived quantity in Bayesian analyses or, in the case of overlap, as an estimate of the overlapping portion of the frequency distributions (Fig. 3). When estimates of neutral genetic and trait differentiation clearly overlap, as for body size variables for Puerto Rico (Fig. 3), the c / h 2 critical value becomes irrelevant because the overlap between trait-specific P ST values and estimates of genetic differentiation occurs under the best-case scenario of c ≥ h 2 . In cases in which the frequency distributions differ, as for call frequency and perhaps body mass (Fig. 3), the c / h 2 critical value can be estimated with greater confidence on the upper tail of the F ST than has been feasible before. An analysis using the traditional method of estimating a distribution of genetic differentiation illustrates some benefits of the proposed approach. We estimated global G′ ST (equivalent to F ST ) from the sequence data (Hedrick 2005), and bootstrapped to obtain a distribution around that value. With a mean G' ST = 0.215 (normalized 95% CI: 0.116-0.314), and like the transformed Bayesian posterior distribution of Nm for Hispaniola, the global G′ ST shows no overlap with P ST for the call frequency, but does overlap with P ST for both body mass and forearm length. Unlike our approach using transformed posterior distributions, the traditional approach assumes an equilibrium model with gene flow being equal in both directions, and so would lead to rejection of genetic drift for the Puerto Rican population with a c / h 2 critical value of 0.03. In contrast, the method presented here accounts for directional differences in F ST that lead to a sixfold higher c / h 2 critical for the Puerto Rican (0.080) compared to the Hispaniolan population (0.014), resulting in much greater robustness for the rejection of drift for the latter.
Our method of deriving F ST distributions from Bayesian posterior distributions of Nm may be practically implemented in future studies. Here, we chose the IMa2 software package to estimate distributions of Nm because the underlying demographic model is directly applicable to the sampled populations of P. portoricensis and P. pusillus, two sister species with no genetic structure within islands and DNA sequence data well described by the infinite sites model. In other applications, more complex demographic scenarios and/or different data types may apply different methods to estimate the Nm posterior (e.g., approximate Bayesian methods). Regardless of the specific method used to estimate these posterior distributions, we urge that the data be tested for neutrality, that appropriate demographic models be used, and that appropriate substitution models be specified in the analysis. In addition, we expect that, regardless of the method used, Bayesian estimates of the Nm composite parameter will yield more precise posteriors The sex effect is coded with females as the baseline, i.e., the effect shown is for males HPD high probability density with larger datasets, particularly with an increase in the number of variable markers rather than an increase in the number of sampled individuals (Knowles and Carstens 2007;Leaché et al. 2013).

Acoustic divergence despite similar body size
Previous analyses had shown genetic differentiation between the Hispaniolan (Pteronotus pusillus) and Puerto Rican (P. portoricensis) populations in the P. parnellii species complex (Dávalos 2006;Pavan and Marroig 2016). We confirmed two independent, allopatric populations characterized by divergent acoustic signals. Acoustic differentiation cannot be explained by the subtle differences in body size that characterize the two populations. Linear combinations of morphological measurements of the skull or body can discriminate between species (Pavan and Marroig 2016), but if the two populations were sympatric they could not be easily distinguished using external measurements (Fig. 2b), and would be considered cryptic (Kingston et al. 2001). In contrast, differences in call frequency were large and consistently explained by population membership, but not by size (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figure  2). These observations raise the question of how the two sister populations evolved divergent call frequencies.
Pteronotus pusillus and P. portoricensis are allopatric, insular populations with a long history of isolation for approximately 1.2 million years (Fig. 1b). This long isolation coupled with little subsequent migration makes genetic drift an obvious mechanism for acoustic divergence (Supplementary Figure 1). Multiple adaptive, social, and sexdriven evolutionary causes have been invoked to explain variation in call frequency between populations and between species, including habitat physical features (Odendaal et al. 2014), ambient humidity (Guillén et al. 2000), acoustic environment (Gillam and McCracken 2007), ecological segregation (Kingston et al. 2001;Kingston and Rossiter 2004), female choice (Puechmaille et al. 2014), and cultural drift (Yoshino et al. 2008). Crucially, the genetic drift model is seldom tested in a way that considers more than simple pairwise genetic distances (e.g., Odendaal et al. 2014;Puechmaille et al. 2011;Yoshino et al. 2008). Here, the genetic drift hypothesis is rejected for Hispaniola over~98% of the range of c / h 2 < 1or additive proportion of heritability (Table 1, Fig. 3). This finding, along with sexual dimorphism in the Hispaniolan but not Puerto Rican population, detected even after accounting for body size, suggests sexual or social mechanisms could explain trait differentiation in these island populations.
As high-frequency calls are an honest signal of body condition, females seem to select for higher-frequency males in at least one constant-frequency echolocating bat species (Puechmaille et al. 2014). If that were the case here, female choice would lead to the higher frequency of Pteronotus pusillus. Male calls, however, were significantly lower in this population even after accounting for their somewhat smaller body size (Table 2). If this dimorphism is the result of female choice, then it runs counter to the direction of divergence that needs to be explained. The alternative is for females to drive the change in call frequency, not through sexual selection, but through cultural drift (Yoshino et al. 2008). In this case, the maternal transmission of culturally distinct higher-frequency calls coupled with female philopatry leads to long-term divergence in acoustic calls even after males disperse. Over the time of estimated isolation even subtle cultural differences together with overwater barriers could explain the divergence found. Although ecological factors cannot be entirely ruled out without additional data, the cultural drift hypothesis has the advantage of explaining sexual dimorphism as well. Future studies can explore the implications of these initial findings, including the extent of sex-biased dispersal between the two isolated populations (Pavan and Marroig 2016).
In conclusion, we have introduced a Bayesian coalescent-based approach to estimate F ST and thereby test genetic drift as an evolutionary mechanism to explain phenotypic divergence across multiple traits. This approach directly calculates the extent of overlap between posterior distributions of F ST and P ST . Coalescent-based analyses revealed isolated populations with minimal subsequent migration, leading to high F ST values, while trait analyses showed acoustic divergence and sexual dimorphism in call frequency. Comparisons between F ST and P ST rejected genetic drift as a probable evolutionary mechanism behind acoustic divergence in Pteronotus pusillus, and somewhat less robustly in P. portoricensis. The significantly higher calls of the Hispaniolan population, together with lower calls of males make female choice an unlikely evolutionary mechanism, and instead leave open the possibility of female-mediated cultural drift. By integrating Bayesian coalescent and trait analyses, this study demonstrates a powerful approach to testing genetic drift as the key evolutionary process in trait differentiation.