Genetic testing and results disclosure in diverse populations: what does it take?

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Shaibi GQ, Kullo IJ, Singh DP, et al. Returning genomic results in a federally qualified health center: the intersection of precision medicine and social determinants of health. Genet Med. 2020.

  2. 2.

    Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation. 2009;119:2633–2642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;45:626–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    West KM, Blacksher E, Cavanaugh KL, et al. At the research-clinical interface: Returning individual genetic results to research participants. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020. [Epub ahead ahead of print].

  5. 5.

    Horowitz CR, Sabin T, Ramos MA, et al. Successful recruitment and retention of diverse participants in a genomics clinical trial: a good invitation to a great party. Genet Med. 2019;21:2364–2370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ejiogu N, Norbeck JH, Mason MA, et al. Recruitment and retention strategies for minority or poor clinical research participants: Lessons from the healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. Gerontologist. 2011;51(Suppl 1):S33–S45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kaplan B, Ferryman K, Robinson M, et al. Culture of understanding: reflections and suggestions from a genomics research community board. Prog Community Health Partnerships. 2017;11:161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Goldman LE, Chu PW, Tran H, et al. Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schaa KL, Roter DL, Biesecker BB, et al. Genetic counselors’ implicit racial attitudes and their relationship to communication. Health Psychol. 2015;34:111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kinney AY, Steffen LE, Brumbach BH, et al. Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone delivery of BRCA1/2 genetic counseling compared with in-person counseling: 1-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2914–2924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Weitzel KW, Duong BQ, Arwood MJ, et al. A stepwise approach to implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the primary care setting. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20:1103–1112.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


C.R.H. thanks all community and academic partners in the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Genomic Stakeholder Board, and Sabrina Clermont for her invaluable assistance with the manuscript. C.R.H. received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for her work.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol R. Horowitz MD.

Ethics declarations


C.R.H. declares no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horowitz, C.R. Genetic testing and results disclosure in diverse populations: what does it take?. Genet Med (2020).

Download citation