Cancer genetics clinics have seen increasing demand, challenging genetic counselors (GCs) to increase efficiency and prompting some clinics to implement genetic counseling assistants (GCAs). To evaluate the impact of GCAs on Geisinger’s cancer genetics clinic, we tracked GC time utilization, new patient volume, and clinic cost per patient before and after implementing a GCA program.
GCs used time-tracking software while completing preappointment activities. Electronic health records were reviewed for appointment length and number of patients per week. Internal salary data for GCs and GCAs were used to calculate clinic costs per patient.
Time spent by GCs completing each preappointment activity (21.8 vs. 15.1 minutes) and appointment length (51.6 vs. 44.5 minutes) significantly decreased after GCA program implementation (p values < 0.001). New patients per week per GC significantly increased (7.9 vs. 11.4, p < 0.001). Weekly clinic cost per patient significantly decreased ($233 vs. $176, p = 0.03).
Implementing a GCA program increased GC efficiency in preappointment activities and clinic appointments, increased patient volume, and decreased clinic cost per patient. Such a program can improve access to GC services and assist GCs in focusing on the direct patient care for which they are specially trained.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $33.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Evans DG, Barwell J, Eccles DM, et al. The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:442.
Freedman R, Mountain H, Karina D, Schofield L. A retrospective exploration of the impact of the ‘Angelina Jolie Effect’ on the single state-wide familial cancer program in Perth, Western Australia. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:521–562.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Genetic/familial high risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Version 3.2019. January 18, 2019. NCCN.org. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf.
Markman M. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the management of ovarian cancer. Women’s Health (Lond). 2018;14:1745505717750694.
Keung MYT, Wu Y, Vadgama JV. PARP inhibitors as a therapeutic agent for homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancers. J. Clin Med. 2019;8:435.
Le DG, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2509–2520.
Kesselheim AS, Cook-Deegan RM, Winickoff DE, Mello MM. Gene patenting—the Supreme Court finally speaks. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:869–875.
Genetic Testing Registry. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/. Accessed May 2019.
Hoskovec JM, Bennett RL, Carey ME, et al. Projecting the supply and demand for certified genetic counselors: a workforce study. J Genet Couns. 2018;27:16–120.
Attard CA, Carmany EP, Trepanier AM. Genetic counselor workflow study: the times are they a-changin’? J Genet Couns. 2019;28:130–40.
Pirzadeh-Miller S, Robinson LS, Read P, Ross TS. Genetic counseling assistants: an integral piece of the evolving genetic counseling service delivery model. J Genet Couns. 2016;26:716–727.
Cohen SA, Nixon DM. A collaborative approach to cancer risk assessment services using genetic counselor extenders in a multi-system community hospital. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;159:527–534.
Heydrich C, Stickevers S. The genetic counseling assistant: Dana-Farber’s experience in establishing a new role. Presented at: 35th Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors; September 28–October 1, 2016; Seattle, WA.
Hooker GW, Babu D, Myers MF, Zierhut H, McAllister M. Standards for the reporting of Genetic Counseling Interventions in Research and Other Studies (GCIRS): an NSGC Task Force report. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:355–360.
Berry DA, Iversen ES, Gudbjartsson DF, et al. BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2701–2712.
Chen S, Wang W, Lee S, et al. Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome. JAMA. 2006;296:1479–1487.
Riley BD, Culver JO, Skrzynia C, et al. Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2012;21:151–161.
Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3660–3667.
Toggl time tracking software. Toggle.com. Wilmington, DE, USA: Toggl Inc; Accessed November–December 2015 and March–April 2017.
Hox JJ, Moerbeek M, van de Schoot R. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010.
Fox J. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.
Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. 2005;1:86–92.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. https://www.R-project.org/.
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.
Special thanks to our genetic counseling colleague, Audrey Fan, for her efforts to begin and evaluate the GCA program at Geisinger. The authors also acknowledge the funding support of Geisinger Research and Hematology/Oncology departments.
M.R. is a stockholder of Helix, LLC. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Hallquist, M.L.G., Tricou, E.P., Hallquist, M.N. et al. Positive impact of genetic counseling assistants on genetic counseling efficiency, patient volume, and cost in a cancer genetics clinic. Genet Med 22, 1348–1354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0797-2
- genetic clinic efficiency
- genetic counseling assistants
- cancer genetic counseling
- service delivery
Genetic counseling service delivery models: A study of genetic counselors’ interests, needs, and barriers to implementation
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2021)
Genetic counseling for patients with positive genomic screening results: Considerations for when the genetic test comes first
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2021)
Embedding a genetic counselor into oncology clinics improves testing rates and timeliness for women with ovarian cancer
Gynecologic Oncology (2021)