Pregnancy loss ranging from spontaneous abortion (SAB) to stillbirth can result from monogenic causes of Mendelian inheritance. This study evaluated the clinical application of exome sequencing (ES) in identifying the genetic etiology for pregnancy loss.
A cohort of 102 specimens from products of conception (POC) with normal karyotype and absence of pathogenic copy-number variants were selected for ES. Abnormality detection rate (ADR) and variants of diagnostic value correlated with SAB and stillbirth were evaluated.
ES detected 6 pathogenic variants, 16 likely pathogenic variants, and 17 variants of uncertain significance favor pathogenic (VUSfp) from this cohort. The ADR for pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants was 22% and reached 35% with the inclusion of VUSfp. The ADRs of SAB and stillbirth were 36% and 33%, respectively. Affected genes included those associated with multisystem abnormalities, neurodevelopmental disorders, cardiac anomalies, skeletal dysplasia, metabolic disorders, and renal diseases.
These results supported the clinical utility of ES for detecting monogenic etiology of pregnancy loss. The identification of disease-associated variants provided information for follow-up genetic counseling of recurrence risk and management of subsequent pregnancies. Discovery of novel variants could provide insight for underlying molecular mechanisms causing fetal death.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $41.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:189–194.
Rossen LM, Ahrens KA, Branum AM. Trends in risk of pregnancy loss among US women, 1990-2011. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018;32:19–29.
Nikcevic AV, Tunkel SA, Kuczmierczyk AR, Nicolaides KH. Investigation of the cause of miscarriage and its influence on women’s psychological distress. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:808–813.
Zhou Q, Wu S-Y, Amato K, Diadamo A, Li P. Spectrum of cytogenomic abnormalities revealed by array comparative genomic hybridization in products of conception culture failure and normal karyotype samples. J Genet Genomics. 2016;43:121–131.
Chen Y, Bartanus J, Liang D, et al. Characterization of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancy losses reveals critical genes and loci for human early development. Hum Mutat. 2017;38:669–677.
Shamseldin HE, Swaid A, Alkuraya FS. Lifting the lid on unborn lethal Mendelian phenotypes through exome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:307–309.
Alamillo CL, Powis Z, Farwell K, et al. Exome sequencing positively identified relevant alterations in more than half of cases with an indication of prenatal ultrasound anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1073–1078.
Qiao Y, Wen J, Tang F, et al. Whole exome sequencing in recurrent early pregnancy loss. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:364–372.
Yates CL, Monaghan KG, Copenheaver D, et al. Whole-exome sequencing on deceased fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: expanding our knowledge of genetic disease during fetal development. Genet Med. 2017;19:1171–1178.
Fu M, Mu S, Wen C, et al. Whole-exome sequencing analysis of products of conception identifies novel mutations associated with missed abortion. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18:2027–2032.
Sahlin E, Gréen A, Gustavsson P, et al. Identification of putative pathogenic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in genes associated with heart disease in 290 cases of stillbirth. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210017.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424.
Li P, Pomianowski P, DiMaio MS, et al. Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:1605–1615.
Choi M, Scholl UI, Ji W, et al. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19096–19101.
Seidelmann SB, Smith E, Subrahmanyan L, et al. Application of whole exome sequencing in the clinical diagnosis and management of inherited cardiovascular diseases in adults. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017;10:e001573.
Hoskinson DC, Dubuc AM, Mason-Suares H. The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017;42:33–39.
Ovunc B, Ashraf S, Vega-Warner V, et al. Mutation analysis of NPHS1 in a worldwide cohort of congenital nephrotic syndrome patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:139–146.
Crotti L, Tester DJ, White WM, et al. Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in intrauterine fetal death. JAMA. 2013;309:1473–1482.
Boissel S, Fallet-Bianco C, Chitayat D, et al. Genomic study of severe fetal anomalies and discovery of GREB1L mutations in renal agenesis. Genet Med. 2018;20:745–753.
Datkhaeva I, Arboleda VA, Senaratne TN, et al. Identification of novel PIEZO1 variants using prenatal exome sequencing and correlation to ultrasound and autopsy findings of recurrent hydrops fetalis. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:2829–2834.
Munroe PB, Addison S, Abrams DJ, et al. Postmortem genetic testing for cardiac ion channelopathies in stillbirths. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11:e001817.
Normand EA, Braxton A, Nassef S, et al. Clinical exome sequencing for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and a suspected Mendelian disorder. Genome Med. 2018;10:74.
Quinlan-Jones E, Lord J, Williams D, et al. Molecular autopsy by trio exome sequencing (ES) and postmortem examination in fetuses and neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies. Genet Med. 2019;21:1065–1073.
Lord J, McMullan DJ, Eberhardt RY, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet. 2019;393:747–757.
Stanley KE, Giordano J, Thorsten V, et al. Causal genetic variants in stillbirth. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1107–1116.
Filges I, Friedman JM. Exome sequencing for gene discovery in lethal fetal disorders—harnessing the value of extreme phenotypes. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1005–1009.
Colley E, Hamilton S, Smith P, Morgan NV, Coomarasamy A, Allen S. Potential genetic causes of miscarriage in euploid pregnancies: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:452–472.
Robbins SM, Thimm MA, Valle D, Jelin AC. Genetic diagnosis in first or second trimester pregnancy loss using exome sequencing: a systematic review of human essential genes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1539–1548.
Rajcan-Separovic E. Next generation sequencing in recurrent pregnancy loss-approaches and outcomes. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:103644.
Deignan JL, Chung WK, Kearney HM, et al. Points to consider in the reevaluation and reanalysis of genomic test results: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2019;21:1267–1270.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, C., Chai, H., Zhou, Q. et al. Exome sequencing analysis on products of conception: a cohort study to evaluate clinical utility and genetic etiology for pregnancy loss. Genet Med (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01008-6
- exome sequencing (ES)
- pregnancy loss
- products of conception (POC)
- abnormality detection rate (ADR)
- genetic etiology