When phenotype does not match genotype: importance of “real-time” refining of phenotypic information for exome data interpretation

Abstract

Purpose

Clinical data provided to genetic testing laboratories are frequently scarce. Our purpose was to evaluate clinical scenarios where phenotypic refinement in proband’s family members might impact exome data interpretation.

Methods

Of 614 exomes, 209 were diagnostic and included in this study. Phenotypic information was gathered by the variant interpretation team from genetic counseling letters and images. If a discrepancy between reported clinical findings and presumably disease-causing variant segregation was observed, referring clinicians were contacted for phenotypic clarification.

Results

In 16/209 (7.7%) cases, phenotypic refinement was important due to (1) lack of cosegregation of disease-causing variant with the reported phenotype; (2) identification of different disorders with overlapping symptoms in the same family; (3) similar features in proband and family members, but molecular cause identified in proband only; and (4) previously unrecognized maternal condition causative of child’s phenotype. As a result of phenotypic clarification, in 12/16 (75%) cases definition of affected versus unaffected status in one of the family members has changed, and in one case variant classification has changed.

Conclusion

Detailed description of phenotypes in family members including differences in clinical presentations, even if subtle, are important in exome interpretation and should be communicated to the variant interpretation team.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Wai HA, Lord J, Lyon M, et al. Blood RNA analysis can increase clinical diagnostic rate and resolve variants of uncertain significance. Genet Med. 2020;22:1005–1014.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cao Y, Tokita MJ, Chen ES, et al. A clinical survey of mosaic single nucleotide variants in disease-causing genes detected by exome sequencing. Genome Med. 2019;11:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Basel-Salmon L, Orenstein N, Markus-Bustani K, et al. Improved diagnostics by exome sequencing following raw data reevaluation by clinical geneticists involved in the medical care of the individuals tested. Genet Med. 2019;21:1443–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bend R, Cohen L, Carter MT, Lyons MJ, et al. Phenotype and mutation expansion of the PTPN23 associated disorder characterized by neurodevelopmental delay and structural brain abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:76–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tan TY, Sedmík J, Fitzgerald MP, et al. Bi-allelic ADARB1 variants associated with microcephaly, intellectual disability, and seizures. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106:467–483.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mak CCY, Doherty D, Lin AE, et al. MN1 C-terminal truncation syndrome is a novel neurodevelopmental and craniofacial disorder with partial rhombencephalosynapsis. Brain. 2020;143:55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li L, Ghorbani M, Weisz-Hubshman M, et al. Lysine acetyltransferase 8 is involved in cerebral development and syndromic intellectual disability. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:1431–1445.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Horn S, Au M, Basel-Salmon L, et al. De novo variants in PAK1 lead to intellectual disability with macrocephaly and seizures. Brain. 2019;142:3351–3359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Magini P, Smits DJ, Vandervore L, et al. Loss of SMPD4 causes a developmental disorder characterized by microcephaly and congenital arthrogryposis. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105:689–705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Orenstein N, Goldberg-Stern H, Straussberg R, et al. A de novo GABRA2 missense mutation in severe early-onset epileptic encephalopathy with a choreiform movement disorder. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22:516–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Weisz Hubshman M, Broekman S, van Wijk E, et al. Whole-exome sequencing reveals POC5 as a novel gene associated with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:614–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tropeano M, Ahn JW, Dobson RJ, et al. Male-biased autosomal effect of 16p13.11 copy number variation in neurodevelopmental disorders. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61365.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brancati F, Sarkozy A, Dallapiccola B. KBG syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Posey JE, Harel T, Liu P, et al. Resolution of disease phenotypes resulting from multilocus genomic variation. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:21–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Waseem NH, Vaclavik V, Webster A, Jenkins SA, Bird AC, Bhattacharya SS. Mutations in the gene coding for the pre-mRNA splicing factor, PRPF31, in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1330–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rice GI, Kasher PR, Forte GM, et al. Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1243–1248.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Guo H, Bettella E, Marcogliese PC, et al. Disruptive mutations in TANC2 define a neurodevelopmental syndrome associated with psychiatric disorders. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dulovic-Mahlow M, Trinh J, Kandaswamy KK, et al. De novo variants in TAOK1 cause neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105:213–220.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The manuscript was edited by Debby Mir.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Basel-Salmon MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

CG-J and ARS are full-time employees of the Regeneron Genetics Center from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and receive stock options as part of compensation. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basel-Salmon, L., Ruhrman-Shahar, N., Orenstein, N. et al. When phenotype does not match genotype: importance of “real-time” refining of phenotypic information for exome data interpretation. Genet Med (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-00938-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • variant interpretation
  • phenotypic information
  • exome
  • variant classification
  • overlapping features

Search