What do we do now?: Responding to claims of germline gene editing in humans

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Marchione M. Chinese researcher claims first gene-edited babies. Associated Press. 26 November 2018. https://www.apnews.com/4997bb7aa36c45449b488e19ac83e86d. Accessed December 2018.

  2. 2.

    Begley S, Joseph A. The CRISPR shocker: how genome-editing scientist He Jiankui rose from obscurity to stun the world. Stat News. 17 December 2018. https://www.statnews.com/2018/12/17/crispr-shocker-genome-editing-scientist-he-jiankui/. Last accessed 26 January 2019.

  3. 3.

    Normile D. Government report blasts creator of CRISPR twins. Science. 2019;363:328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jiankui, H, Ferrell, R, Yuanlin, C, Jinzhou, Q Draft Ethical Principles for Therapeutic Assisted Reproductive Technologies. The CRISPR Journal. 2018, https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/crispr.2018.0051.retract. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  5. 5.

    Molten M. Scientist who Crispr’d babies bucked his own ethics policy. Wired Magazine. 27 November 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/he-jiankui-crispr-babies-bucked-own-ethics-policy/. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  6. 6.

    Brokowski C. Do CRISPR ethics statements cut it?. CRISPR J. 2018;2:115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Associated Press. Could anyone have stopped gene-edited babies experiment? Chicago Sun Times. 2 December 2018. https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/gene-edited-babies-experiment-what-could-have-stopped/. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  8. 8.

    Cyranoski D, Ledford H. Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry. Nature. 2018;563:607–608.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Le Page M. CRISPR babies: more details on the experiment that shocked the world. New Scientist. 28 November 2018. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2186911-crispr-babies-more-details-on-the-experiment-that-shocked-the-world/. Accessed December 2018.

  10. 10.

    Associated Press. China says doctor who claimed using CRISPR to make gene-edited babies acted on his own. STAT News. 21 January 2019. https://www.statnews.com/2019/01/21/china-doctor-gene-edited-babies/. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  11. 11.

    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Transferring embryos with genetic anomalies detected in preimplantation testing: an Ethics Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wee S-L, Chen E. In China, gene-edited babies are the latest in a string of ethical dilemmas. The New York Times. 30 November 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/30/world/asia/gene-editing-babies-china.html. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  13. 13.

    Banks M. First CRISPR clinical trial begins in Europe. ScienceLine. 12 November 2018. https://scienceline.org/2018/11/first-crispr-clinical-trial-begins-in-europe/. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  14. 14.

    Isasi R, Kleiderman E, Knoppers BM. Genetic technology regulation Editing policy to fit the genome?. Science. 2016;351:337–339.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Burall S. Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Nature. 2018;555:438–439.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Choi C, Marchione M. Chinese scientist told US Nobelist about gene-edited babies. Associated Press. 2019. https://apnews.com/3f3bdc73e7c84fe685f2813510329d62. Accessed January 2019.

  17. 17.

    Editorial Board of Nature Magazine. How to respond to CRISPR babies. Nature. 2018;564:5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Allyse PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

M.A. is supported by K01 HG009542. Y.B. is supported by an early career award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allyse, M., Bombard, Y., Isasi, R. et al. What do we do now?: Responding to claims of germline gene editing in humans. Genet Med 21, 2181–2183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0492-3

Download citation

Further reading