Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Characterization of integration frequency and insertion sites of adenovirus DNA into mouse liver genomic DNA following intravenous injection

Abstract

While generally referred to as “non-integrating” vectors, adenovirus vectors have the potential to integrate into host DNA via random, illegitimate (nonhomologous) recombination. The present study provides a quantitative assessment of the potential integration frequency of adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-based vectors following intravenous injection in mice, a common route of administration in gene therapy applications particularly for transgene expression in liver. We examined the uptake level and persistence in liver of first generation (FG) and helper-dependent (HD) Ad5 vectors containing the mouse leptin transgene. As expected, the persistence of the HD vector was markedly higher than that of the FG vector. For both vectors, the majority of the vector DNA remained extrachromosomal and predominantly in the form of episomal monomers. However, using a quantitative gel-purification-based integration assay, a portion of the detectable vector was found to be associated with high molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA, indicating potential integration with a frequency of up to ~44 and 7000 integration events per μg cellular genomic DNA (or ~0.0003 and 0.05 integrations per cell, respectively) for the FG and HD Ad5 vectors, respectively, following intravenous injection of 1 × 1011 virus particles. To confirm integration occurred (versus residual episomal vector DNA co-purifying with genomic DNA), we characterized nine independent integration events using Repeat-Anchored Integration Capture (RAIC) PCR. Sequencing of the insertion sites suggests that both of the vectors integrate randomly, but within short segments of homology between the vector breakpoint and the insertion site. Eight of the nine integrations were in intergenic DNA and one was within an intron. These findings represent the first quantitative assessment and characterization of Ad5 vector integration following intravenous administration in vivo in wild-type mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: FG-leptin and HD-leptin structures and vector primers for RAIC PCR.
Fig. 2: Southern analysis to examine the in vivo state of adenoviral DNA.
Fig. 3: Pulsed-field gel to remove free adenovirus vector DNA from HMW genomic DNA.
Fig. 4: Strategy of the RAIC PCR assay.
Fig. 5: Integrations in the FG-leptin-treated mouse liver DNA identified by RAIC PCR.
Fig. 6: Integration FG22 contained a rearrangement of both the mouse genomic and the vector DNA.
Fig. 7: Integrations in the FG-leptin-treated mouse liver DNA identified by RAIC PCR.
Fig. 8: Integrations in the HD-leptin-treated mouse liver DNA identified by RAIC PCR.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hitt MM, Addison CL, Graham FL. Human adenovirus vectors for gene transfer into mammalian cells. Adv Pharmacol. 1997;40:137–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai CM, Lai YK, Rakoczy PE. Adenovirus and adeno-associated virus vectors. DNA Cell Biol. 2002;21:895–913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. St George JA. Gene therapy progress and prospects: adenoviral vectors. Gene Ther. 2003;10:1135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ginn SL, Anais K, Amaya AK, Ian E, Alexander IE, Edelstein M, et al. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: an update. J Gene Med. 2018;20:e3015. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morsy MA, Gu M, Motzel S, Zhao J, Jing Lin J, Su Q, et al. An adenoviral vector deleted for all viral coding sequences results in enhanced safety and extended expression of a leptin transgene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7866–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morsy MA, Gu MC, Zhao JZ, Holder DJ, Rogers IT, Pouch WJ, et al. Leptin gene therapy and daily protein administration: a comparative study in the ob/ob mouse. Gene Ther. 1998;5:8–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Medicines Agency. Expert Committee on Medicinal Products Gene Therapy. Report from the CPMP Gene Therapy Expert Group Meeting 26th-27th February 2004. EMEA/CPMP/1879/04/Final.

  8. Mitani K, Kubo S. Adenovirus as an integrating vector. Curr Gene Ther. 2002;2:135–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harui A, Suzuki S, Kochanek S, Mitani K. Frequency and stability of chromosomal integration of adenovirus vectors. J Virol. 1999;73:6141–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillgenberg M, Tonnies H, Strauss M. Chromosomal integration pattern of a helper-dependent minimal adenovirus vector with a selectable marker inserted into a 27.4-kilobase genomic stuffer. J Virol. 2001;75:9896–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Doerfler W. A new concept in (adenoviral) oncogenesis: integration of foreign DNA and its consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1288:F79–F99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephen SL, Sivanandam VG, Kochanek S. Homologous and heterologous recombination between adenovirus vector DNA and chromosomal DNA. J Gene Med. 2008;10:1176–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilger-Eversheim K, Doerfler W. Clonal origin of adenovirus type 12-induced hamster tumors: nonspecific chromosomal integration sites of viral DNA. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3001–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen SL, Montini E, Sivanandam VG, Al-Dhalimy M, Kestler HA, Finegold M, et al. Chromosomal integration of adenoviral vector DNA in vivo. J Virol. 2010;84:9987–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nichols WW, Ledwith BJ, Manam SV, Troilo PJ. Potential DNA vaccine integration into host cell genome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;772:30–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ledwith BJ, Manam S, Troilo PJ, Barnum AB, Pauley CJ, Griffiths TG II, et al. Plasmid DNA vaccines: assay for integration into host genomic DNA. Dev Biol (Basel). 2000;104:33–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ledwith BJ, Manam S, Troilo PJ, Barnum AB, Pauley CJ, Griffiths TG II, et al. Plasmid DNA vaccines: investigation of integration into host cellular DNA following intramuscular injection in mice. Intervirology. 2000;43:258–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Z, Troilo PJ, Wang X, Griffiths TG II, Pacchione SJ, Barnum AB, et al. Detection of integration of plasmid DNA into host genomic DNA following intramuscular injection and electroporation. Gene Ther. 2004;11:711–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420:520–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Q, Muruve DA. Molecular basis of the inflammatory response to adenovirus vectors. Gene Ther. 2003;10:935–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li H, Malani N, Hamilton SR, Schlachterman A, Bussadori G, Edmonson SE, et al. Assessing the potential for AAV vector genotoxicity in a murine model. Blood. 2011;117:3311–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nowrouzi A, Penaud-Budloo M, Kaeppel C, Appelt U, Guiner CL, Moullier P, et al. Integration frequency and intermolecular recombination of rAAV vectors in non-human primate skeletal muscle and liver. Mol Ther. 2012;20:1177–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaeppel C, Beattie SG, Fronza R, Logtenstein RV, Salmon F, Schmidt S, et al. A largely random AAV integration profile after LPLD gene therapy. Nat Med. 2013;19:889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Milholland B, Dong X, Zhang L, Hao X, Suh Y, Vijg JJ. Differences between germline and somatic mutation rates in humans and mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15183.

  25. Cole J, Skopek TR. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Working paper no. 3. Somatic mutant frequency, mutation rates and mutational spectra in the human population in vivo. Mutat Res. 1994;304:33–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Willyard C. New human gene tally reignites debate. Nature. 2018;558:354–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wurtele H, Little KC, Chartrand P. Illegitimate DNA integration in mammalian cells. Gene Ther. 2003;10:1791–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakai H, Montini E, Fuess S, Storm TA, Grompe M, Kay MA. AAV serotype 2 vectors preferentially integrate into active genes in mice. Nat Genet. 2003;34:297–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schroder AR, Shinn P, Chen H, Berry C, Ecker JR, Bushman F. HIV-1 integration in the human genome favors active genes and local hotspots. Cell. 2002;110:521–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM. Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science. 2003;300:1749–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCormack MP, Rabbitts TH. Activation of the T-cell oncogene LMO2 after gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:913–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaiser J. Gene therapy. Panel urges limits on X-SCID trials. Science. 2005;307:1544–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Insertional mutagenesis and oncogenesis: update from non-clinical and clinical studies. Gene Therapy Expert Group of the Committee for Proprietary Medical Products (CPMP), European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products - June 2003 meeting. J Gene Med. 2004;6:127–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cichutek K. Lessons learned from gene therapy concerning and the use of integrating vectors and the possible risk of insertional oncogenesis. Dev Biol (Basel). 2006;123:29–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chandler RJ, Sands MS, Venditti CP. Recombinant adeno-associated viral integration and genotoxicity: insights from animal models. Human Gene Ther. 2017;28:314–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen GN, Everett JK, Kafle S, Roche AM, Raymond HE, Leiby J. A long-term study of AAV gene therapy in dogs with hemophilia A identifies clonal expansions of transduced liver cells. Nat Biotech. 2021;39:47–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ledwith BJ, Lanning CL, Gumprecht LA, Anderson CA, Coleman JB, Gatto NT, et al. Tumorigenicity assessments of Per.C6 cells and of an Ad5-vectored HIV-1 vaccine produced on this continuous cell line. Dev Biol (Basel). 2006;123:251–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. WHO. Meeting Report. WHO informal consultation on characterization and quality aspect of vaccines based on live viral vectors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. pp. 9–10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BJL supervised and conceived the project; ZW and PJT designed the experiments; ZW, PJT, TGG, LBH, ABB, SJP, and CJP conducted the experiments and collected the data; ZW drafted the manuscript; BJL, JAL, JW, and PJT edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Troilo, P.J., Griffiths, T.G. et al. Characterization of integration frequency and insertion sites of adenovirus DNA into mouse liver genomic DNA following intravenous injection. Gene Ther 29, 322–332 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-021-00278-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-021-00278-2

Search

Quick links