Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Are PHOMS a clinical sign of optic neuritis?

Abstract

Purpose

Assess the prevalence and evolution of PHOMS in optic neuritis.

Methods

We analysed the medical files of 126 patients included in the OCTON cohort. Patients’ medical files, digital retinal images and OCT examinations were reviewed, searching for optic nerve head oedema and PHOMS at the initial presentation and during the follow-up.

Results

We included 102 patients in the final analysis. Twenty-nine (29) eyes had optic nerve head oedema at the initial presentation. PHOMS were found to be present in 8 eyes affected with optic neuritis. All cases of PHOMS were associated with optic nerve head oedema. All the PHOMS decreased in size and disappeared with the improvement of the oedema.

Discussion

Our results show that PHOMS is not a common sign of optic neuritis. We didn’t observe any case of PHOMS in the absence of optic nerve head oedema in eyes with optic neuritis. PHOMS seem to be a rare sign of optic neuritis associated to optic nerve head oedema, and they tend to disappear with the improvement of the optic nerve head oedema. We suggest that the presence of PHOMS in optic neuritis eyes with no optic nerve oedema should be a considered warning sign.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flow chart of the study.
Fig. 2: Optical coherence tomography image of a PHOMS found in a left eye affected by optic neuritis.
Fig. 3: Optical coherence tomography image of an eye affected with PHOMS and its resolution.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the privacy of medical files but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Malmqvist L, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Digre K, Fraser JA, Fraser C, et al. The optic disc drusen studies consortium recommendations for diagnosis of optic disc drusen using optical coherence tomography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pichi F, Romano S, Villani E, Lembo A, Gilardoni F, Morara M, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings in pediatric tilted disc syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:1661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petzold A, Biousse V, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Crum A, Digre K, et al. Multirater validation of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS). Neuroophthalmology. 2020;44:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser JA, Sibony PA, Petzold A, Thaung C, Hamann S, ODDS Consortium. Peripapillary hyper-reflective ovoid mass-like structure (PHOMS): an optical coherence tomography marker of axoplasmic stasis in the optic nerve head. J Neuroophthalmol. 2021;41:431–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Petzold A, Coric D, Balk LJ, Hamann S, Uitdehaag BMJ, Denniston AK, et al. Longitudinal development of peripapillary hyper-reflective ovoid masslike structures suggests a novel pathological pathway in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2020;88:309–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Deschamps R, Shor N, Vignal C, Guillaume J, Boudot de la Motte M, Salviat F, et al. Prospective longitudinal study on prognostic factors of visual recovery and structural change after a first episode of optic neuritis. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29:2781–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gala F. Magnetic resonance imaging of optic nerve. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015;25:421–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Pena-Guzman, PhD, for his advice and contribution in finalising the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA, MP, RD, CV, and RH: design and conduct of the study. AA: data collection. AA and RH: data analysis and interpretation. AA and RH: writing of the manuscript. AA, MP, RD, CV, and RH: critical review and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Aziria.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziria, A., Philibert, M., Deschamps, R. et al. Are PHOMS a clinical sign of optic neuritis?. Eye 37, 2776–2780 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02419-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02419-w

Search

Quick links