Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reference values for trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference and its association with systemic biometric factors

Eye (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objectives

To provide reference values of trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) and reveal the association of TLCPD with systemic biometric factors.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 526 quasi-healthy subjects (including 776 eyes) who required lumbar puncture for medical reasons were selected from 4915 neurology inpatients from 2019 to 2022. Patients with any diseases affecting intraocular pressure (IOP) or intracranial pressure (ICP) were excluded. The ICPs of all subjects were obtained by lumbar puncture in the left lateral decubitus position. IOP was measured in the seated position by a handheld iCare tonometer prior to lumbar puncture. TLCPD was calculated by subtracting ICP from IOP. Systemic biometric factors were assessed within 1 h prior to TLCPD measurement.

Results

The TLCPD (mean ± standard deviation) was 4.4 ± 3.6 mmHg, and the 95% reference interval (defined as the 2.5th–97.5th percentiles) of TLCPD was −2.27 to 11.94 mmHg. The 95% reference intervals for IOP and ICP were 10–21 and 6.25–15.44 mmHg, respectively. IOP was correlated with ICP (r = 0.126, p < 0.001). TLCPD was significantly negatively correlated with body mass index (r = −0.086, p = 0.049), whereas it was not associated with age, gender, height, weight, blood pressure, pulse, or waist and hip circumference.

Conclusions

This study provides reference values of TLCPD and establishes clinically applicable reference intervals for normal TLCPD. Based on association analysis, TLCPD is higher in people with lower BMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Histograms of trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference, intraocular pressure, and intracranial pressure.
Fig. 2: Scatterplots of trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference, intraocular pressure, and intracranial pressure.
Fig. 3: Box plots of trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference, intraocular pressure, and intracranial pressure.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Berdahl JP, Yu DY, Morgan WH. The translaminar pressure gradient in sustained zero gravity, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and glaucoma. Med Hypotheses. 2012;79:719–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yavin D, Luu J, James MT, Roberts DJ, Sutherland GR, Jette N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement for the detection of raised intracranial pressure: meta-analysis: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:680–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu KC, Fleischman D, Lee AG, Killer HE, Chen JJ, Bhatti MT. Current concepts of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and the translaminar cribrosa pressure gradient: a paradigm of optic disk disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020;65:48–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren R, Jonas JB, Tian G, Zhen Y, Ma K, Li S, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in glaucoma: a prospective study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindén C, Qvarlander S, Jóhannesson G, Johansson E, Östlund F, Malm J, et al. Normal-tension glaucoma has normal intracranial pressure: a prospective study of intracranial pressure and intraocular pressure in different body positions. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berdahl JP, Ferguson TJ, Samuelson TW. Periodic normalization of the translaminar pressure gradient prevents glaucomatous damage. Med Hypotheses. 2020;144:110258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berdahl JP, Fautsch MP, Stinnett SS, Allingham RR. Intracranial pressure in primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension: a case-control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5412–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berdahl JP, Allingham RR, Johnson DH. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure is decreased in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:763–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JWY, Chan PP, Zhang X, Chen LJ, Jonas JB. Latest developments in normal-pressure glaucoma: diagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, etiology, causes and mechanisms to management. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Philos). 2019;8:457–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pircher A, Remonda L, Weinreb RN, Killer HE. Translaminar pressure in Caucasian normal tension glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e524–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wall M, White WN II. Asymmetric papilledema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prospective interocular comparison of sensory visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:134–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Radke PM, Rubinstein TJ, Hamilton SR, Jamil AL, Sires BS. The translaminar pressure gradient: papilledema after trabeculectomy treated with optic nerve sheath fenestration. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:e154–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoehn R, Mirshahi A, Hoffmann EM, Kottler UB, Wild PS, Laubert-Reh D, et al. Distribution of intraocular pressure and its association with ocular features and cardiovascular risk factors: the Gutenberg Health Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:961–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomoyose E, Higa A, Sakai H, Sawaguchi S, Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, et al. Intraocular pressure and related systemic and ocular biometric factors in a population-based study in Japan: the Kumejima study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:279–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleischman D, Berdahl JP, Zaydlarova J, Stinnett S, Fautsch MP, Allingham RR. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure decreases with older age. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Malm J, Jacobsson J, Birgander R, Eklund A. Reference values for CSF outflow resistance and intracranial pressure in healthy elderly. Neurology. 2011;76:903–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Price DA, Harris A, Siesky B, Mathew S. The influence of translaminar pressure gradient and intracranial pressure in glaucoma: a review. J Glaucoma. 2020;29:141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan WH, Yu DY, Alder VA, Cringle SJ, Cooper RL, House PH, et al. The correlation between cerebrospinal fluid pressure and retrolaminar tissue pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1419–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Balaratnasingam C, Morgan WH, Johnstone V, Pandav SS, Cringle SJ, Yu DY. Histomorphometric measurements in human and dog optic nerve and an estimation of optic nerve pressure gradients in human. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89:618–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jonas JB, Wang N, Wang YX, You QS, Xie X, Yang D, et al. Body height, estimated cerebrospinal fluid pressure and open-angle glaucoma. The Beijing Eye Study 2011. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jonas JB, Nangia V, Wang N, Bhate K, Nangia P, Nangia P, et al. Trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference and open-angle glaucoma. The central India eye and medical study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:871–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SC, Lueck CJ. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in adults. J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34:278–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Norager NH, Olsen MH, Pedersen SH, Riedel CS, Czosnyka M, Juhler M. Reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure: a systematic review. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2021;18:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vishwaraj CR, Kavitha S, Venkatesh R, Shukla AG, Chandran P, Tripathi S. Neuroprotection in glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70:380–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Downs JC. Neural coupling of intracranial pressure and aqueous humour outflow facility: a potential new therapeutic target for intraocular pressure management. J Physiol. 2020;598:1429–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao J, Solano MM, Oldenburg CE, Liu T, Wang Y, Wang N, et al. Prevalence of normal-tension glaucoma in the chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;199:101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jonas JB, Wang N, Yang D, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Facts and myths of cerebrospinal fluid pressure for the physiology of the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;46:67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu H, Yang D, Ma T, Shi W, Zhu Q, Kang J, et al. Measurement and associations of the optic nerve subarachnoid space in normal tension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;186:128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang N, Xie X, Yang D, Xian J, Li Y, Ren R, et al. Orbital cerebrospinal fluid space in glaucoma: the Beijing intracranial and intraocular pressure (iCOP) study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2065–73. e2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Killer HE, Pircher A. Normal tension glaucoma: review of current understanding and mechanisms of the pathogenesis. Eye (Lond). 2018;32:924–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Z, Yang Y, Lu Y, Liu D, Xu E, Jia J, et al. Intraocular pressure vs intracranial pressure in disease conditions: a prospective cohort study (Beijing iCOP study). BMC Neurol. 2012;12:66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hou R, Zhang Z, Yang D, Wang H, Chen W, Li Z, et al. Pressure balance and imbalance in the optic nerve chamber: The Beijing Intracranial and Intraocular Pressure (iCOP) Study. Sci China Life Sci. 2016;59:495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ren R, Zhang X, Wang N, Li B, Tian G, Jonas JB. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in ocular hypertension. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:e142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wakerley BR, Warner R, Cole M, Stone K, Foy C, Sittampalam M. Cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure: the effect of body mass index and body composition. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;188:105597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pasquale LR, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Kang JH. Anthropometric measures and their relation to incident primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1521–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank AiMi Academic Services (www.aimieditor.com) for the English language editing and review services.

Funding

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82130029). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Ruiqi Pang, Danting Lin.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Jiawei Wang, Ningli Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Ruiqi Pang, Danting Lin, Kai Cao, Tianmin Ren, Ying Cheng & Ningli Wang

  2. Department of Neurology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Xiaomeng Di, Xinyu Liu & Jiawei Wang

  3. Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Lehong Gao, Jia Chen, Yu Jia & Yuping Wang

Authors
  1. Ruiqi Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danting Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaomeng Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lehong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jia Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yu Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kai Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tianmin Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ying Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yuping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jiawei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ningli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NLW and JWW contributed to the design, acquisition of funding and general supervision of the research group. RQP and DTL contributed to the design, acquired data, analysis of results and drafting of the manuscript. XMD, XYL, LHG, JC, YJ and YPW contributed to the acquired data and advised on the research. KC, TMR and YC contributed to the data analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiawei Wang or Ningli Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, R., Lin, D., Di, X. et al. Reference values for trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference and its association with systemic biometric factors. Eye (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02323-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02323-9

Search

Advanced search

Quick links