Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Introducing the ‘Benign Eyelid Lesion Pathway’: 1 year experience of synchronous tele-oculoplastics in a tertiary hospital



Patients with benign eyelid lesions make up a large proportion of referrals to the oculoplastic service and lend themselves well to telemedicine with assessments heavily reliant on history, observation-based examination and photographs to enable management decision-making. Our tertiary unit set up tele-oculoplastics clinics for all new patients referred for benign eyelid lesions comprising tele-consultation with antecedent patient photograph: Benign Eyelid Lesion Pathway (BELP). One year on, we describe a retrospective analysis of 974 patients looking at distinct parameters of effectiveness.


We retrospectively collected data from electronic patient records (EPR) for BELP patients from July 2020 to August 2021 (n = 974). We analysed time efficiency (referral time to treatment plan, consultation duration in minutes, average waiting times, number of patients seen per clinician and DNA rate), accessibility, safety (via video surveillance clinic) and theatre utilisation.


57.3% (n = 558) were listed for a surgical procedure direct from tele-consultation with 94.9% (n = 513) of these proceeding to surgery; 22.8% (n = 222) were discharged, 10.7% (n = 104) had further video follow-up and 6.7% (n = 65) required face-to-face follow-up. Our results showed efficient referral-to-treatment times, waiting times, consultation times and non-attendance rate. There was only a 2.57% non-attendance rate. There was no missed diagnosis of a malignancy of a presumed benign lesion.


Tele-oculoplastics provides a streamlined, safe, effective, and logistically convenient way to review benign eyelid lesions. With the increased waiting times for referral to biopsy of eyelid lesions, this clinic shows it is imperative to provide digital accessibility for patient assessment and booking to operating theatre.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Benign Eyelid Lesion Pathway (BELP).
Fig. 2: BELP Outcomes of First Attendance (%).

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient identifiable data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. NHS Digital. Hospital Outpatient Activity 2020-21—NHS Digital. 2021. Accessed 21 Nov 2021.

  2. Royal College of Ophthalmology. Workforce Census 2018. 2019. Accessed 21 Nov 2021

  3. Kang S, Dehabadi M, Sim DA, Thomas PBM, Appiah Ewusi D, Ezra D. Accuracy of periocular lesion assessment using telemedicine. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021;28:e100287.

  4. Verma M, Raman R, Mohan RE. Application of tele-ophthalmology in remote diagnosis and management of adnexal and orbital diseases. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57:381–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossato LA, Carneiro RC, Miyazaki A, Matayoshi S. Accuracy of clinical examination in the diagnosis of eyelid lesions. Rev Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2014;73:324–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soto JL, Vrcek I, Ozgur O, Mancini R. Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37:1257–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kersten RC, Ewing-Chow D, Kulwin DR, Gallon M. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of cutaneous eyelid lesions. Ophthalmology 1997;104:479–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hind J, Edington M, McFall K, Salina E, Diaper C, Drummond S. et al. An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot. Eye. 2022;36:1314–8.

  9. Rayner S, Beaconsfield M, Kennedy C, Collin R, Taylor P, Murdoch I. Subspecialty adnexal ophthalmological examination using telemedicine. J Telemed telecare. 2001;7:29–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Threlkeld AB, Fahd T, Camp M, Johnson MH. Telemedical evaluation of ocular adnexa and anterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:464–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang CJ, Eftekhari K, Schwarcz RM, Massry GG. The aesthetic oculoplastic surgery video teleconference consult. Aesthetic Surg J. 2019;39:714–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lelli GJ, Luo S, Liu Y, van Landingham SW. Telemedicine Use by Oculoplastic Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed e-Health. 2021.

  13. Kang S, Thomas PBM, Sim DA, Parker RT, Daniel C, Uddin JM. Oculoplastic video-based telemedicine consultations: Covid-19 and beyond. Eye. 2020;34:1193–5.

  14. Kang S, Raja L, Sim DA, Thomas PBM, Ezra DG Telemedicine in oculoplastic and adnexal surgery: clinicians perspectives in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021.

  15. Kiruparan P, Kiruparan N, Debnath D. Impact of pre-appointment contact and short message service alerts in reducing ‘Did Not Attend’(DNA) rate on rapid access new patient breast clinics: a DGH perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NHS England. NHS England. Quarterly Hospital Activity Data. 2018-2019.

  17. Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and Facilitators That Influence Telemedicine-Based, Real-Time, Online Consultation at Patients’ Homes: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e16407–e16407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karlsson M, Öhman DP. Material consumption in the healthcare sector: Strategies to reduce its impact on climate change—The case of Region Scania in South Sweden. J Clean Prod. 2005;13:1071–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fryer K, Delgado A, Foti T, Reid CN, Marshall J. Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond. Matern child health J. 2020;24:1104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the clinicians who see patients in the BELP clinic and Caroline Kilduff for creating the illustrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conception: SK, DS, PT, CD, JU, DE Methodology: LA, SK, AG, HT Investigation: LA, SK, AG, HT Formal analysis: LA, AB, AG Initial drafting: LA, AB Revision: LA, AB, SK, HT, AG Final approval: SK, DS, PT, CD, JU, DE.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Ah-Kye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Permission to perform this study as a clinical audit was granted by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Ethical approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ah-Kye, L., Butt, A., Gupta, A. et al. Introducing the ‘Benign Eyelid Lesion Pathway’: 1 year experience of synchronous tele-oculoplastics in a tertiary hospital. Eye (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links