Abstract
Background
To analyse structural characteristics and perifoveal/peripapillary vasculature by OCT in children with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) and compare the results with those of normal subjects.
Methods
Forty-five patients (84 eyes) under 18 years old with blurry disc margin were evaluated with spectral domain-OCT and swept course-OCT. Patients were divided into four groups, according to presence of PHOMS and then the size of the existing PHOMS. Eyes with visible optic disc drusen (ODD) were not included. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and vessel densities from macula and optic disc area were assessed and potential associations between vessel density and structural parameters, such as peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL), and macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness, were analysed.
Results
Among 45 patients (eighty-four eyes), coexisting buried ODD were found only in eyes with PHOMS. The scleral canal diameter was significantly smaller in PHOMS positive eyes compared to control eyes. Vessel density measurements from the papillary, peripapillary and optic nerve head (ONH) regions in the large PHOMS group were significantly lower compared to the control group (papillary; P = 0.014, peripapillary; P = 0.001, ONH; P = 0.046). FAZ area and macular vessel densities showed no difference compared to normal eyes in all three PHOMS groups. pRNFL and mGCIPL thickness did not differ among four groups and correlations were also not significant.
Conclusions
Children with PHOMS have smaller scleral canal and can entail buried ODD. Vessel densities of optic disc area in large PHOMS eyes are significantly lower than in normal eyes.
This is a preview of subscription content
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$119.00
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.


References
Kamin DF, Hepler RS, Foos RY. Optic nerve drusen. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;89:359–62.
Spencer WH. XXXIV Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture: drusen of the optic disc and aberrant axoplasmic transport. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:21–38.
Mullie MA, Sanders MD. Scleral canal size and optic nerve head drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:356–9.
Wilkins JM, Pomeranz HD. Visual manifestations of visible and buried optic disc drusen. J Neuroophthalmol. 2004;24:125–9.
Katz BJ, Pomeranz HD. Visual field defects and retinal nerve fiber layer defects in eyes with buried optic nerve drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:248–53.
Roh S, Noecker RJ, Schuman JS, Hedges TR 3rd, Weiter JJ, Mattox C. Effect of optic nerve head drusen on nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:878–85.
Chang MY, Pineles SL. Optic disk drusen in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61:745–58.
Sato T, Mrejen S, Spaide RF. Multimodal imaging of optic disc drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:275–82.e1.
Silverman AL, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Assessment of optic nerve head drusen using enhanced depth imaging and swept source optical coherence tomography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34:198–205.
Lee KM, Hwang JM, Woo SJ. Optic disc drusen associated with optic nerve tumors. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:S67–75.
Bassi ST, Mohana KP. Optical coherence tomography in papilledema and pseudopapilledema with and without optic nerve head drusen. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:1146–51.
Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Morphologic characteristics of optic nerve head drusen on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:1139–47.e1.
Slotnick S, Sherman J. Disc drusen. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:652.
Malmqvist L, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Digre K, Fraser JA, Fraser C, et al. The optic disc drusen studies consortium recommendations for diagnosis of optic disc drusen using optical coherence tomography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:299–307.
Spaide RF, Klancnik JM Jr., Cooney MJ. Retinal vascular layers imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:45–50.
Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Differentiation of optic nerve head drusen and optic disc edema with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:971–7.
Traber GL, Weber KP, Sabah M, Keane PA, Plant GT. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of optic nerve head drusen: a comparison of cases with and without visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:66–73.
Malmqvist L, Sibony PA, Fraser CL, Wegener M, Heegaard S, Skougaard M, et al. Peripapillary ovoid hyperreflectivity in optic disc edema and pseudopapilledema. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1662–4.
Auw-Haedrich C, Staubach F, Witschel H. Optic disk drusen. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:515–32.
Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures: is it optic disc drusen or not? J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38(4):567–8.
Savino PJ, Glaser JS, Rosenberg MA. A clinical analysis of pseudopapilledema. II. Visual field defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:71–5.
Gili P, Flores-Rodriguez P, Martin-Rios MD, Carrasco Font C. Anatomical and functional impairment of the nerve fiber layer in patients with optic nerve head drusen. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:2421–8.
Casado A, Rebolleda G, Guerrero L, Leal M, Contreras I, Oblanca N, et al. Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with optic nerve head drusen. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:1653–60.
Cennamo G, Tebaldi S, Amoroso F, Arvanitis D, Breve M, Cennamo G. Optical coherence tomography angiography in optic nerve drusen. Ophthalmic Res. 2018;59:76–80.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the patients for participating in this study.
Funding
This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT, MSIT) (NRF-2019R1C1C1009503).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the design and execution of this work, and all approved of this regarding submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, Y.J., Park, Y.Y. & Shin, S.Y. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in children. Eye 36, 533–539 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01461-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01461-w