Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Long-term surgical outcomes of preoperative prism adaptation in patients with partially accommodative esotropia

Abstract

Background:

To determine the long-term surgical outcomes of preoperative prism adaptation test (PAT) in patients with partially accommodative esotropia.

Methods:

PAT was performed for the remaining esotropia after full correction of hyperopia. Prism adaptation (PA) responders were defined as patients with stable esodeviation between 0 and 8 prism diopters (PD) while developing sensory fusion throughout the prism adaptation period. Surgical success was defined as a deviation within 8 PD of both the far and near deviation angles at the last follow-up examination.

Results:

Of the 102 patients, 43 (42.2%) were PA responders, and 59 were PA non-responders (57.8%). After a mean follow-up duration of 6 years after surgery, the surgical success rate was significantly higher in PA responders (76.7% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.023). By multivariate analysis, good stereoacuity at near before surgery significantly correlated with successful outcomes after surgery (p = 0.001, β = 4.466). The risk factors of undercorrection were preoperative esotropia >35 PD (OR 3.067, p = 0.041), and preoperative hyperopia >+5.25 diopters (OR 3.099, p = 0.049). Among undercorrected patients, the annual decrease of esodeviation was significantly greater in PA responders (p = 0.043).

Conclusions:

PA responders showed a better long-term success rate than in PA nonresponders. Patients with high hyperopia and large esotropia had a higher risk of undercorrection. Undercorrected patients eventually achieved good motor outcome with postoperative prism correction if they were PA responders before surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Data are available on request. Any requests for data can be made to the corresponding author and are subject to ethics approval.

References

  1. Wright KW, Bruce-Lyle L. Augmented surgery for esotropia associated with high hypermetropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993;30:167–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jotterand VH, Isenberg SJ. Enhancing surgery for acquired esotropia. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19:263–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yazawa K. Postoperative exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1981;18:58–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. von Noorden GK. Inidcations of the posterior fixation operation in strabismus. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kushner BJ, Preslan MW, Morton GV. Treatment of partly accommodative esotropia with a high accommodative convergence-accommodation ratio. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:815–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbaum AL, Jampolsky A, Scott AB. Bimedial recession in high AC/A esotropia. A long-term follow-up. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;91:251–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohtsuki H, Hasebe S, Tadokoro Y, Kishimoto F, Watanabe S, Okano M. Preoperative prism correction in patients with acquired esotropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231:71–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott WE, Thalacker JA. Preoperative prism adaptation in acquired esotropia. Ophthalmologica. 1984;189:49–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Group PASR. Efficacy of prism adaptation in the surgical management of acquired esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1248–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Repka MX, Wentworth D. Predictors of prism response during prism adaptation. Prism Adaptation Study Research Group. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28:202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Velez FG, Rosenbaum AL. Preoperative prism adaptation for acquired esotropia: long-term results. J AAPOS. 2002;6:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Repka MX, Connett JE, Scott WE. The one-year surgical outcome after prism adaptation for the management of acquired esotropia. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:922–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang JM, Min BM, Park SC, Oh SY, Sung NK. A randomized comparison of prism adaptation and augmented surgery in the surgical management of esotropia associated with hypermetropia: one-year surgical outcomes. J AAPOS. 2001;5:31–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kushner BJ. Partly accommodative esotropia. Should you overcorrect and cut the plus? Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1530–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kushner BJ. Fifteen-year outcome of surgery for the near angle in patients with accommodative esotropia and a high accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1150–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wabulembo G, Demer JL. Long-term outcome of medial rectus recession and pulley posterior fixation in esotropia with high AC/A ratio. Strabismus. 2012;20:115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choe HR, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Long-term outcomes of prismatic correction in partially accommodative esotropia. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0225654.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han SB, Hwang JM. Prismatic correction of residual esotropia of 20 prism dioptres or less after full hypermetropic correction. Eye. 2009;23:2052–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson ME, Bluestein EC, Parks MM. Binocularity in accommodative esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993;30:233–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beneish R, Flanders M. The role of stereopsis and early postoperative alignment in long-term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1994;29:119–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee HJ, Kim SJ, Yu YS. Stereopsis in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS. 2017;21:190–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bateman JB, Parks MM, Wheeler N. Discriminant analysis of acquired esotropia surgery. Predictor variables for short- and long-term outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:1154–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arnoldi K. Long-term surgical outcome of partially accommodative esotropia. Am Orthopt J. 2002;52:75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors took an active part in the design, conduct, data analysis, and publication drafting and approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong-Min Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (IRB No.: SNUBH B-2004/607-102)

Patient consent for publication

The Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital waived the requirement of informed consent. Patient records and information were anonymized prior to access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.H., Yang, H.K. & Hwang, JM. Long-term surgical outcomes of preoperative prism adaptation in patients with partially accommodative esotropia. Eye 35, 1165–1170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1086-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1086-7

Search

Quick links