The objective of this study is to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of corneal parameters in different stages of keratoconus patients using a combined Scheimpflug–Placido disc analysis system.
Materials and methods
In this prospective study, three consecutive measurements were performed by the same observer using Scheimpflug–Placido disc anterior segment analysis device in keratoconus patients. Flattest and steepest simulated keratometry and corneal volume, corneal aberrations, thinnest corneal thickness, symmetry index, keratoconus vertex and Baiocchi–Calossi–Versaci index were recorded. Keratoconic eyes were divided into four stages using the Amsler–Krumeich classification. Repeatability was evaluated using within the subject standard deviation, repeatability index (Ri) and coefficient of variation; reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between the parameters evaluated.
Two hundred sixty-one eyes of 261 keratoconus patients were included in the study. The repeatability for all corneal curvature parameters decreased as the keratoconus severity increased, and there is a positive correlation between keratometry of the apex and corneal curvature parameters (p < 0.05) except mean simulated keratometry. The corneal aberrations were repeatable in all keratoconus subgroups (Ri < 0.34 μm). There are also positive correlations between keratometry of apex and corneal aberrations (p < 0.05) except total high-order root mean square and spherical aberration. The reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.90) for all indices except keratoconus vertex back.
The parameters used in the diagnosis and follow-up of keratoconus in the Sirius corneal tomography system may differ more than expected at stages 3 and 4 of the disease. Awareness of this situation may be helpful in planning follow-up and treatment.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $41.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297–319.
Arntz A, Duran J, Pijoan J. Subclinical keratoconus diagnosis by elevation topography. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003;78:659–64.
de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1534–9.
Ambrósio R, Caiado ALC, Guerra FP, Louzada R, Roy AS, Luz A, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:753–8.
Fan R, Chan TC, Prakash G, Jhanji V. Applications of corneal topography and tomography: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:133–46.
Shetty R, Arora V, Jayadev C, Nuijts RM, Kumar M, Puttaiah NK, et al. Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5263–8.
Kosekahya P, Koc M, Caglayan M, Kiziltoprak H, Atilgan CU, Yilmazbas P. Repeatability and reliability of ectasia display and topometric indices with the Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:63–70.
Bayhan HA, Bayhan SA, Muhafız E, Can I. Repeatability of aberrometric measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using a new Scheimpflug–Placido topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:269–75.
Montalbán R, Alió JL, Javaloy J, Piñero DP. Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography–based system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:211–8.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.
Prakash G, Philip R, Srivastava D, Bacero R. Evaluation of the robustness of current quantitative criteria for keratoconus progression and corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:465–72.
de Luis Eguileor B, Argaluza JE, Zubizarreta JIP, Carro AS, Ecenarro JE. Evaluation of the reliability and repeatability of Scheimpflug system measurement in keratoconus. Cornea. 2018;37:177–81.
Hashemi H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M. Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: comparison of 5 devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1065–72.
Szalai E, Berta A, Hassan Z, Módis LJr. Reliability and repeatability of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:485–94.
de Luis Eguileor B, Arriola-Villalobos P, Zubizarreta JIP, Lera RF, Carro AS, Diaz-Valle D, et al. Multicentre study: reliability and repeatability of Scheimpflug system measurement in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314954. [Epub ahead of print].
Amsler M. The” forme fruste” of keratoconus. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1961;73:842–3.
Guilbert E, Saad A, Elluard M, Grise-Dulac A, Rouger H, Gatinel D. Repeatability of keratometry measurements obtained with three topographers in keratoconic and normal corneas. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:187–92.
Sinjab MM. Quick Guide to the Management of Keratoconus, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012. P. 34–9.
Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1809–16.
Gore D, Shortt A, Allan B. New clinical pathways for keratoconus. Eye. 2013;27:329–39.
Burcu A. Current interventional methods in the treatment of keratokonus. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2013;43:263–70.
Akçay BİS, Özgürhan EB, Bozkurt E, Kurt T, Yıldırım Y, Coşar MG, et al. Evaluation of pachymetric measurements with Scheimpflug photography-based system and optical coherence tomography pachymetry at different stages of keratoconus. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:719205.
Alió JL, Shabayek MH. Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:539–45.
De la Parra-Colín P, Garza-León M, Barrientos-Gutierrez T. Repeatability and comparability of anterior segment biometry obtained by the Sirius and the Pentacam analyzers. Int Ophthalmol. 2014;34:27–33.
Thanks to Sibel Donmez (SD) for performing Sirius tomography.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Tunç, U., Akbaş, Y.B., Yıldırım, Y. et al. Repeatability and reliability of measurements obtained by the combined Scheimpflug and Placido-disk tomography in different stages of keratoconus. Eye (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01238-7