Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comment on: ‘Quantification of anterior chamber reaction after intravitreal injections of conbercept and ranibizumab: a pilot study’

To the Editor:

We noted the recent use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to quantify anterior chamber inflammation in a pilot study of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents [1]. The authors reported an incidence of postinjection anterior chamber reaction of 30.5%, as detected on AS-OCT. This is more than 50-fold higher than previous clinical reports using slit lamp based examinations.

The perfect diagnostic tool is able to discriminate between subjects with and without disease. The current gold standard diagnostic for grading anterior chamber inflammation is slit lamp bio-microscopy using the Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) inflammatory cell count scoring system. Under this system, “0” (a level denoting disease inactivity) represents no cells seen by the clinician within a 1-mm beam of light at maximal intensity. Crucially, it does not denote the absence of anterior chamber cells.

We have derived the diagnostic accuracy measures, specifically sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values (NPV/PPV), from five of the key recent AS-OCT validation studies (Table 1) [2,3,4,5,6]. Figure 1 shows the accuracy metrics of AS-OCT for active inflammation in each of these studies. The consistently high-negative predictive values suggest that AS-OCT would be able to exclude anterior uveitis with high certainty. However, all studies reported detection of free floating cells in eyes which were ‘clinically’ free of inflammation. If one were to directly apply the thresholds provided by the SUN grading to AS-OCT, it would result in overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Further clinical validation and clinical utility work on normal and diseased cohorts is needed for us to understand the clinical relevance of imaging based cell counts.

Table 1 Summary of studies comparing anterior segment OCT grading of anterior chamber inflammation with standard clinical assessment
Fig. 1
figure1

Diagnostic accuracy measures from five key anterior segment OCT validation studies [2,3,4,5,6]

Anterior uveitis is the most common form of uveitis worldwide, and is a common cause of attendance to emergency ophthalmology care. This disease burden combined with a worsening national shortfall of ophthalmologists represents a challenge to care provision. The use of virtual clinics has revolutionized the delivery of glaucoma and age related macular degeneration services. AS-OCT quantification of anterior chamber inflammation could, following further clinical validation work, emerge as a valuable tool for improving the quality and efficiency of clinical service provision.

References

  1. 1.

    Liao X, Jin C, Chen W, Zhang G, Cen LP, Ng DS, Chen H. Quantification of anterior chamber reaction after intravitreal injections of conbercept and ranibizumab: a pilot study. Eye. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0537-5

  2. 2.

    Invernizzi A, Marchi S, Aldigeri R, Mastrofilippo V, Viscogliosi F, Soldani A, Cimino L. Objective quantification of anterior chamber inflammation. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1670–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baghdasaryan, E, Tepelus, TC, Marion, KM, Huang, J, Huang, P, Sadda, SR, Lee, OL. Analysis of ocular inflammation in anterior chamber-involving uveitis using swept-source anterior segment OCT. 2018. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1005-0

  4. 4.

    Sharma S, Lowder CY, Vasanji A, Baynes K, Kaiser PK, Srivastava SK. Automated analysis of anterior chamber inflammation by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1464–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Igbre, AO, Rico, MC, & Garg, SJ. High-speed optical coherence tomography as a reliable adjuvant tool to grade ocular anterior chamber inflammation. Retina. 2014;34:504–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31829f73bd

  6. 6.

    Li Y, Lowder C, Zhang X, Huang D. Anterior chamber cell grading by optical coherence tomography. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:258 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding

ALS received supported through an NIHR Clinician Scientist award. This work was undertaken at the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres (NIHR BRC) based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology UCL and Institute of Child Health/Great Ormond Street Hospital for children. The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research. This paper presents independent research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ameenat L. Solebo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minocha, A., Liu, X., Denniston, A.K. et al. Comment on: ‘Quantification of anterior chamber reaction after intravitreal injections of conbercept and ranibizumab: a pilot study’. Eye 34, 1482–1484 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0657-y

Download citation

Search

Quick links