Correspondence | Published:

Localised corneal haze and scarring following pulsed accelerated collagen cross-linking for keratoconus

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Shajari M, Kolb CM, Agha B, Steinwender G, Müller M, Herrmann E, et al. Comparison of standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus: a meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; epub ahead of print 31 May 2018; https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13814

  2. 2.

    Schindl A, Rosado-Schlosser B, Trautinger F. Reciprocity regulation in photobiology. Overv Hautarzt. 2001;52:779–85.

  3. 3.

    Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caragiuli S, Rechichi M. Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT. Eye (Lond). 2014;28:1179–83.

  4. 4.

    Merwald H, Klosner G, Kokesch C, Der-Petrossian M, Hönigsmann H, Trautinger F. UVA-induced oxidative damage and cytotoxicity depend on the mode of exposure. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2005;79:197–207.

  5. 5.

    Peyman A, Nouralishahi A, Hafezi F, Kling S, Peyman M. Stromal demarcation line in pulsed versus continuous light accelerated corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:206–8.

Download references

Author information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Correspondence to Harminder S Dua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1