Correspondence | Published:

Localised corneal haze and scarring following pulsed accelerated collagen cross-linking for keratoconus

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Shajari M, Kolb CM, Agha B, Steinwender G, Müller M, Herrmann E, et al. Comparison of standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus: a meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; epub ahead of print 31 May 2018;

  2. 2.

    Schindl A, Rosado-Schlosser B, Trautinger F. Reciprocity regulation in photobiology. Overv Hautarzt. 2001;52:779–85.

  3. 3.

    Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caragiuli S, Rechichi M. Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT. Eye (Lond). 2014;28:1179–83.

  4. 4.

    Merwald H, Klosner G, Kokesch C, Der-Petrossian M, Hönigsmann H, Trautinger F. UVA-induced oxidative damage and cytotoxicity depend on the mode of exposure. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2005;79:197–207.

  5. 5.

    Peyman A, Nouralishahi A, Hafezi F, Kling S, Peyman M. Stromal demarcation line in pulsed versus continuous light accelerated corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:206–8.

Download references

Author information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Correspondence to Harminder S Dua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1