Abstract
Design
A review on antimicrobial resistance mechanisms discussing the main light-based antimicrobial approaches including ultraviolet light (UV), antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), and antimicrobial blue light (aBL).
Aim
To describe antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and to present potential light-based alternatives to conventional antimicrobials.
Methods
The paper was divided into different topics, starting with an approach to antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Subsequently, emphasis was placed on innovative light-based antimicrobials approaches, including aBL, UV, and aPDT.
Results
The review suggests that blue light (400–470 nm) acts on endogenous porphyrins with peak absorption at 405 nm, thus not requiring the administration of photosensitizers, to trigger antimicrobial effects. In this regarding, the direct effect of aBL could be attributed to both the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which induces microbicidal effects, and the inactivation of bacterial defense mechanisms. In turn, blue light combined with curcumin has been used in the treatment of dental infections. Otherwise, green light (495–570 nm) associated with the photosensitizer Rose Bengal has shown promising results both in wound closure due to the induction of additional collagen cross-link formation and in reducing the viability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Red light (620–750 nm) is the wavelength most commonly used in aPDT, presenting superior tissue penetration capability compared to blue and green light. Both red and infrared light act directly as photobiomodulation agents, promoting tissue repair with greater penetration depth for the infrared spectrum. Conversely, red light combined with methylene blue is the most commonly used technique in the treatment of localized infections. Meanwhile, infrared light associated with indocyanine green acts as a photothermal and photosensitizing agent, promoting thermal damage and production of ROS. Ultraviolet lights UVA, UVB, and UVC (200–400 nm) have antimicrobial potential related to inducing changes in DNA and generating both ROS and singlet oxygen. Furthermore, light can enhance the efficacy of traditional antimicrobial agents by deactivating microbial resistance, both through increasing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting the efflux pump and β-lactamases of the bacteria.
Conclusions
The antimicrobial potential of light is extensive; however, there is a limitation regarding the depth of penetration of certain wavelengths into infected areas. Furthermore, there is a need for additional studies to determine the safety and efficacy of various approaches using light at its different wavelengths.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Hamblin MR, Abrahamse H. Can light-based approaches overcome antimicrobial resistance? Drug Dev Res. 2019;80:48–67.
Piksa M, Lian C, Samuel IC, Pawlik KJ, Samuel IDW, Matczyszyn K. The role of the light source in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2023;52:1697–722.
Giannelli M, Bani D. Multi-photonic adjunctive therapy for the management of periodontitis: recent advances and new treatment approach. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1373:341–52.
Takeuchi Y, Aoki A, Hiratsuka K, Chui C, Ichinose A, Aung N, et al. Application of different wavelengths of LED lights in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the treatment of periodontal disease. Antibiotics. 2023;12:1676.
Leanse LG, Marasini S, dos Anjos C, Dai T. Antimicrobial resistance: is there a ‘light’ at the end of the tunnel? Antibiotics. 2023;12:1–19.
Gwynne PJ, Gallagher MP. Light as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1–9.
Hayashi S, Takeuchi Y, Hiratsuka K, Kitanaka Y, Toyoshima K, Nemoto T, et al. Effects of various light-emitting diode wavelengths on periodontopathic bacteria and gingival fibroblasts: an in vitro study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023;44:103860.
Carrera ET, Dias HB, Corbi SCT, Marcantonio RAC, Bernardi ACA, Bagnato VS, et al. The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in dentistry: a critical review. Laser Phys. 2016;26:1–23.
Annunziata M, Donnarumma G, Guida A, Nastri L, Persico G, Fusco A, et al. Clinical and microbiological efficacy of indocyanine green-based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment of periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:2385–94.
Aung N, Aoki A, Takeuchi Y, Hiratsuka K, Katagiri S, Kong S, et al. The effects of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes with different wavelengths on periodontopathic bacteria in vitro. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, Laser Surg. 2019;37:288–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amaral, A.L., Aoki, A. & Andrade, S.A. Could light be a broad-spectrum antimicrobial?. Evid Based Dent (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01042-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01042-2