Abstract
Purpose
To assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for management of impacted central incisors.
Methods
Search was performed in PubMed, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, and guideline-focused databases/repositories on 15-09-2022 without any limitations and was updated on 15-07-2023. Grey literature search was also performed. Two independent reviewers were involved in the study selection and data extraction. Quality assessment of the included CPG was performed by four independent appraisers using the AGREE-II instrument. The degree of agreement among the appraisers was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
Five CPG were included in the review. The Ministry of Health, Malaysia (MHM) guideline obtained the highest scores in all six domains of AGREE-II and an overall score of 73% demonstrating the “highest” quality. The remaining four guidelines obtained overall “low-quality” scores ranging from 34.57-37.52%. The ICC scores ranged from 0.530 to 0.990 for various domains of AGREE-II.
Conclusion
MHM guidelines demonstrated high-quality scores in domains of ‘scope and purpose’, ‘clarity of presentation’, ‘applicability domain’, and ‘editorial independence’, while others were found to have moderate or low quality. This review identified areas that can be addressed by future guideline developers to avoid these discrepancies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crawford LB. Impacted maxillary central incisor in mixed dentition treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:1–7.
Brin I, Zilberman Y, Azaz B. The unerupted maxillary central incisor: review of its etiology and treatment. ASDC J Dent Child. 1982;49:352–6.
Becker A. Early treatment for impacted maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:586–7.
Betts NJ, Vanarsdall RL, Barber HD, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10:75–96.
Brin I, Becker A, Shalhav M. Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to anomalous or missing lateral incisors: a population study. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:12–16.
Zilberman Y, Cohen B, Becker A. Familial trends in palatal canines, anomalous lateral incisors, and related phenomena. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:135–9.
Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Richmond S, Brook P. Quality control in orthodontics: risk/benefit considerations. Br Dent J. 1991;170:33–37.
Chaushu S, Becker T, Becker A. Impacted central incisors: factors affecting prognosis and treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147:355–62.
Jain S, Raza M, Sharma P, Kumar P. Unraveling impacted maxillary incisors: the why, when, and how. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:149–57.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Management of the developing dentition and occlusion in pediatric dentistry. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2021. p. 408–25.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Management considerations for pediatric oral surgery and oral pathology. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2021. p. 450–60.
Ayers E, Kennedy D, Wiebe C. Clinical recommendations for management of mesiodens and unerupted permanent maxillary central incisors. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15:421–8.
Seehra J, Yaqoob O, Patel S, O'Neill J, Bryant C, Noar J, et al. National clinical guidelines for the management of unerupted maxillary incisors in children. Br Dent J. 2018;224:779–85.
Oral Health division, MOH. Malaysia Publications Management of Unerupted Maxillary Incisor, 2nd ed. moh.gov.my. Accessed on 08-08- 2023.
Sarkies MN, Jones LK, Gidding SS, Watts GF. Improving clinical practice guidelines with implementation science. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19:3–4.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
Moher D, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II AGREE Tools | AGREE Enterprise website (agreetrust.org) [Assessed on 13-05- 2023].
Saikia A, Muthu MS, Orenuga OO, Mossey P, Ousehal L, Yan S, et al. Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral Health in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59:800–14.
Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence‐based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;390:415–23.
Woolf S, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci. 2012;7:61.
Lunny C, Ramasubbu C, Puil L, Liu T, Gerrish S, Salzwedel DM, et al. Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0250356.
Hoffmann-Eßer W, Siering U, Neugebauer EAM, Lampert U, Eikermann M. Systematic review of current guideline appraisals performed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument-a third of AGREE II users apply a cut-off for guideline quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;95:120–7.
Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet. 2000;355:103–6.
Seiffert A, Zaror C, Atala-Acevedo C, Ormeño A, Martínez-Zapata MJ, Alonso-Coello P. Dental caries prevention in children and adolescents: a systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:3129–41.
Deana NF, Zaror C, Seiffert A, Aravena-Rivas Y, Muñoz-Millán P, Espinoza-Espinoza G, et al. Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on provision of dental services during the first months of the covid-19 pandemic. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21:101633.
Montero-Odasso MM, Kamkar N, Pieruccini-Faria F, Osman A, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Close J, et al. Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2138911.
Saikia A, Patil SS, Ms M, Cv D, Sabarish R, Pandian S, et al. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2023;39:371–80.
Lygidakis NN, Chatzidimitriou K, Theologie-Lygidakis N, Lygidakis NA. Εvaluation of a treatment protocol for unerupted maxillary central incisors: retrospective clinical study of 46 children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:153–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The idea was conceptualized by RT and NT. The team comprising all the co-authors designed the protocol and the methods of the study. The extraction of data was conducted by RT and MA. The steps of analysis were conducted by VM, RT, MA, and SS. The initial draft of the manuscript was prepared by NT, RT. It was revised by all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Asaithambi, R., Atif, M., Tewari, N. et al. Quality analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for management of impacted maxillary central incisors: a systematic review. Evid Based Dent 25, 110–111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00965-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00965-6