Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Oral health

What is the influence of oral health literacy on the parents’ choice of fluoride toothpaste?

Abstract

Design

Investigator blind randomised controlled trial.

Intervention

One hundred and forty-five parents or carers of children up to four years of age were recruited from families attending a clinic for premature children in Brazil. The aim was to assess the influence of Oral Health Literacy (OHL/OHL-AQ) on the effective and safe use of fluoride toothpaste. The participants were stratified into adequate (12–17) and marginal/inadequate OHL (0–11) and randomly allocated into one of four intervention groups as follows, based on how information was provided: 1. written, 2. oral, 3. written & photograph, 4. oral & photograph. Socioeconomic status was also recorded. Prior to the intervention, the participant’s ability to apply the correct amount of toothpaste (1000 p.p.m F-) was assessed.

Data analysis

Data were analysed using the t-test and one-way ANOVA. The chi-squared test was used to evaluate associations between participants’ ability to select the correct toothpaste, sociodemographic characteristics, oral health habits and OHL.

Results

The majority of the sample were female (89%), with the whole sample’s mean age being 31.9 ± 8.3 years. The OHL-AQ score ranged from 2–16 (mean: 11.3 ± 3.0). Before or after the intervention, having a higher level of OHL was associated with a tendency to deliver the more correct amount of toothpaste onto the brush. The interventions did lead to an improvement in the volume of toothpaste used across all groups. Only schooling was associated with the correct choice of toothpaste.

Conclusions

Parents or guardians with higher OHL used less, and consequently more ideal amounts of, fluoride toothpaste for children compared to those with a lower level of OHL. This was the case both before and after the educational interventions. The allocation to intervention group did not predict the amount of toothpaste used. Finally, only schooling predicted the choice of correct fluoride toothpaste

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Marinho VCC, Jeroncic A. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019:CD007868. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub3.

  2. Public Health England, Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England, NHS Improvement. Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention. 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention.

  3. Firmino RT, Ferreira FM, Martins CC, Granville-Garcia AF, Fraiz FC, Paiva SM. Is parental oral health literacy a predictor of children’s oral health outcomes? Systematic review of the literature. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:459–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Deery.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deery, C. What is the influence of oral health literacy on the parents’ choice of fluoride toothpaste?. Evid Based Dent 24, 5–6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00861-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00861-z

Search

Quick links