Abstract
Data sources The review searched for articles via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid. OpenGrey and the Brazilian Digital Library of Thesis and Dissertations (BDTD) were used to search for grey literature. As well as a manual searches of the reference lists from the included studies, a Google Scholar search was undertaken and the first 300 hits were screened. There was no restriction on date or language.
Study selection Two authors screened initially 10% of the abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then a calibration calculation was completed showing excellent agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.93). In phase one, abstracts were screened independently between the same two authors and discrepancies were discussed and resolved. In phase two, the full articles of those abstracts accepted were screened, as well as those whose abstracts were unavailable. Discrepancies were discussed with a third author for the final decision.
Data extraction and synthesis Data extracted included: study characteristics (authors, year of publication, study design, country, sampling, the presence of a pilot study, aim, calibration and losses); population (age range and sex, sociodemographics and sample size); exposure (eligibility criteria and type and classification criteria of vision impairment); and outcome (prevalence and mean and standard deviation of oral health issues, such as dental plaque, gingivitis, calculus, periodontitis, oral hygiene [OH], dental caries and traumatic dental injuries [TDI]). Discrepancies were discussed with a third author for the final decision. In total, 15 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, heterogeneity was measured using I2 statistics.
Results The meta-analysis found visually impaired children and adolescents had significantly higher levels of plaque (mean difference [MD] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.02; I2= 96%), gingival inflammation (MD = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.02-1.37; I2 = 100%), calculus (MD = 0.04; 95% CI = 0.03-0.06; I2 = 0%), OH indices (MD = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.24-1.18; I2 = 97%) and decayed missing filled surface (DMFS/dmfs) (MD = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.68-1.13; I2 = 26%) compared to sighted peers. TDI were statistically significantly higher (OR = 3.86; 95% CI = 2.63-5.68; I2 = 0%) in visually impaired children and adolescents. There was no significant difference in decayed missing filled teeth and DMFS/dmfs or caries.
Conclusions Children and adolescents who are visually impaired are at greater risk of TDI and levels of dental plaque, gingival inflammation, calculus and DMFS and poorer OH. Furthermore, robust homogenous studies are required to strengthen any evidence of association between oral health outcomes and visual impairment in children and adolescents. Future research should also explore the directionality of these relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rahman F, Zekite A, Bunce C, Jayaram H, Flanagan D. Recent trends in vision impairment certifications in England and Wales. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34: 1271-1278.
World Health Organisation. Blindness and vision impairment. 2021. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment(accessed August 2022).
Harding M A, Whelton H P, Shirodaria S C, O'Mullane D M, Cronin M S. Is tooth wear in the primary dentition predictive of tooth wear in the permanent dentition? Report from a longitudinal study. Community Dent Health 2010; 27: 41-45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crowder, L. Is the oral health of visually impaired children and adolescents different compared to their sighted peers?. Evid Based Dent 23, 104–105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0814-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0814-1