A commentary on

Silverman D A, Lin C, Tamaki A et al.

Respiratory and pulmonary complications in head and neck cancer patients: Evidence-based review for the COVID-19 era. Head Neck 2020; 28. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26217.

figure 1

GRADE rating

Commentary

NICE guidelines found that the majority of head and neck cancer patients have significant comorbidities and that death rates among these patients are higher than those with fewer comorbidities.1

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and its associated outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has brought with it many challenges. One particular challenge, among the many, is the impact it has on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients (HNSCC). Studies have shown that lower respiratory tract infections increase the mortality rate in HNSCC patients. Reviews have also shown an increase in the risk of death from delayed treatment in head and neck cancer with regards to delaying radiotherapy (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32).2 This results in a difficult situation as treating these patients during these times may increase their risk of death due to the coronavirus, but delaying their treatment may also increase their mortality risk.

figure 2

© Taechit Taechamanodom/Getty Images Plus

The review was a scoping review and therefore aimed to give an overview of what limited evidence there is currently on the subject; it does not focus on one type of study.3 Scoping reviews can be very useful when (as in the current situation) the research has not been expansively developed.4 It is without doubt that research in this area and on COVID-19 as a whole will continue to evolve. This paper has highlighted one key issue brought about by this pandemic. It concludes with several recommendations for the treatment of HNSCC patients during these times, taking into account the available, though limited, evidence on COVID itself and utilising the breadth of evidence published before its arrival.

There is a clear PICO question that has been followed, and although the inclusion and exclusion criteria are not made clear by the authors, the review of evidence collected before the COVID-19 outbreak, which forms the background section of the paper, is extensive. The authors make it clear they are discussing HNSCC patients, particularly regarding their respiratory outcomes and the effect COVID-19 may potentially have on this. However, there is very limited evidence on the virus due to how new it is and the vast majority of the papers reviewed by the authors were published before 2019, with only 13 of the 84 references being directly related to COVID-19. Table 1 of the paper compares several studies, each with clearly outlined outcomes (the authors do state these are not necessarily the primary outcomes) which the authors of this study have managed to group together.

It is shown that there is a susceptibility to COVID among individuals with HNSCC who show increased levels of infection and there is a strong association between HNSCC and severe effects from COVID-19 infection, with the review discussing early reports from China which show a 3.5 times higher risk for any cancer patients to require ICU admission after contracting the infection. However, the reports quoted did not contain any patients with head and neck cancer.

One of the areas the paper discussed was history of smoking, and importantly it has been shown that dentists with a short behavioural intervention can have a positive effect on a patient's smoking5 thereby reducing this risk. However, some studies have shown that dentists are not as good at assessing alcohol consumption6 and so this area may require some improvement. Finally, a previously published systematic review showed the link between improved oral care and a reduction in respiratory diseases.7 That review was limited to a cohort of elderly care home patients but does stress the importance of oral hygiene instructions in patients at risk of poor respiratory outcomes.