Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Importance of critical thinking to understand ChatGPT

European Journal of Human Genetics (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

This is a response to [1] providing constructive criticism about [2, 3]. In the following, we will address the points of criticism in the order of appearance as they were presented in [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ray PP, Majumder P. Beyond the Hype: a comprehensive critique of ChatGPT’s applicability in genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01442-5.

  2. Duong D, Solomon BD. Analysis of large-language model versus human perfor- mance for genetics questions. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01396-8.

  3. Emmert-Streib F. Can ChatGPT understand genetics? Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01419-4.

  4. Turing AM. I.—Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. 1950;LIX:433–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goertzel B. Artificial general intelligence: concept, state of the art, and future prospects. J Artif Gen Intell. 2014;5:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emmert-Streib F, Dehmer M. Evaluation of regression models: model assessment, model selection and generalization error. Machine learning and knowledge extraction 1, no. 1 2019:521–51.

  7. Facione PA, Sanchez CA, Facione NC, Gainen J. The disposition toward critical thinking. J Gen Educ. 1995;44:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emmert-Streib F, Moutari S, Dehmer M. Mathematical foundations of data science using R. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 2022.

  9. George EB. Science and statistics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1976;71:791–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ikuenobe P. Questioning as an epistemic process of critical thinking. Educ Philos Theory. 2001;33:325–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Predictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Frank Emmert-Streib

Authors
  1. Frank Emmert-Streib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FES conceived and drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Emmert-Streib.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emmert-Streib, F. Importance of critical thinking to understand ChatGPT. Eur J Hum Genet (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01443-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01443-4

Search

Advanced search

Quick links