Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

No need for options for choice for unsolicited findings in informed consent for clinical genetic testing

Subjects

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hallquist MLG, Borensztein MJ, Coughlin CR 2nd, Buchanan AH, Faucett WA, Peay HL, et al. Defining critical educational components of informed consent for genetic testing: views of US-based genetic counselors and medical geneticists. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01401-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Faden R, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vears DF, Borry P, Savulescu J, Koplin JJ. Old challenges or new issues? Genetic health professionals’ experiences obtaining informed consent in diagnostic genomic sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020;12:12–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bos W, Bunnik EM. Informed consent practices for exome sequencing: an interview study with clinical geneticists in the Netherlands. Mol Genet Genom Med. 2022;10:e1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van der Schoot V, Haer-Wigman L, Feenstra I, Tammer F, Oerlemans AJM, van Koolwijk MPA, et al. Lessons learned from unsolicited findings in clinical exome sequencing of 16,482 individuals. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stemkens D, Brüggenwirth HT, van der Crabben S, Elting MW, Feenstra I, van Gassen K, et al. Consensus-based leidraad voor het melden van nevenbevindingen in de klinisch genetische diagnostiek (versie 2, 12 januari 2022). https://www.vkgn.org/vakinformatie/richtlijnen-en-protocollen/uitgebreid-dna-onderzoek-en-nevenbevindingen/.

Download references

Funding

There was no specific funding for this commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EB is the single author of this commentary.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eline M. Bunnik.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bunnik, E.M. No need for options for choice for unsolicited findings in informed consent for clinical genetic testing. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 1095–1096 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01424-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01424-7

Search

Quick links