Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Accelerated genome sequencing with controlled costs for infants in intensive care units: a feasibility study in a French hospital network

Abstract

Obtaining a rapid etiological diagnosis for infants with early-onset rare diseases remains a major challenge. These diseases often have a severe presentation and unknown prognosis, and the genetic causes are very heterogeneous. In a French hospital network, we assessed the feasibility of performing accelerated trio-genome sequencing (GS) with limited additional costs by integrating urgent requests into the routine workflow. In addition to evaluating our capacity for such an approach, this prospective multicentre pilot study was designed to identify pitfalls encountered during its implementation. Over 14 months, we included newborns and infants hospitalized in neonatal or paediatric intensive care units with probable genetic disease and in urgent need for etiological diagnosis to guide medical care. The duration of each step and the pitfalls were recorded. We analysed any deviation from the planned schedule and identified obstacles. Trio-GS was performed for 37 individuals, leading to a molecular diagnosis in 18/37 (49%), and 21/37 (57%) after reanalysis. Corrective measures and protocol adaptations resulted in a median duration of 42 days from blood sampling to report. Accelerated trio-GS is undeniably valuable for individuals in an urgent care context. Such a circuit should coexist with a rapid or ultra-rapid circuit, which, although more expensive, can be used in particularly urgent cases. The drop in GS costs should result in its generalized use for diagnostic purposes and lead to a reduction of the costs of rapid GS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flowchart of the study.
Fig. 2: Actual duration by individual over time, step by step from blood sample dispatch to communication of the results to the referring clinician.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. FitzPatrick DR, Skeoch CH, Tolmie JL. Genetic aspects of admissions to a paediatric intensive care unit. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:639–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Srivastava S, Love-Nichols JA, Dies KA, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL, Chung WK, et al. Meta-analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet Med. 2019;21:2413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. OMIM. OMIM Entry Statistics. 2019. https://www.omim.org/statistics/entry

  4. Farnaes L, Hildreth A, Sweeney NM, Clark MM, Chowdhury S, Nahas S, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saunders CJ, Miller NA, Soden SE, Dinwiddie DL, Noll A, Alnadi NA, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:154ra135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soden SE, Saunders CJ, Willig LK, Farrow EG, Smith LD, Petrikin JE, et al. Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:265ra168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrikin JE, Cakici JA, Clark MM, Willig LK, Sweeney NM, Farrow EG, et al. The NSIGHT1-randomized controlled trial: rapid whole-genome sequencing for accelerated etiologic diagnosis in critically ill infants. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kingsmore SF, Cakici JA, Clark MM, Gaughran M, Feddock M, Batalov S, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the analytic and diagnostic performance of singleton and trio, rapid genome and exome sequencing in Ill infants. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105:719–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Diemen CC, Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, Bergman KA, de Koning TJ, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van der Velde JK, et al. Rapid targeted genomics in critically Ill newborns. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20162854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mestek-Boukhibar L, Clement E, Jones WD, Drury S, Ocaka L, Gagunashvili A, et al. Rapid Paediatric Sequencing (RaPS): comprehensive real-life workflow for rapid diagnosis of critically ill children. J Med Genet. 2018;55(Nov):721–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. French CE, Delon I, Dolling H, Sanchis-Juan A, Shamardina O, Mégy K, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals that genetic conditions are frequent in intensively ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:627–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang H, Lu Y, Dong X, Lu G, Cheng G, Qian Y, et al. Optimized trio genome sequencing (OTGS) as a first-tier genetic test in critically ill infants: practice in China. Hum Genet. 2020;139:473–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanford EF, Clark MM, Farnaes L, Williams MR, Perry JC, Ingulli EG, et al. Rapid whole genome sequencing has clinical utility in children in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:1007–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, Magoulas P, Ghazi AR, Vetrini F, et al. Use of exome sequencing for infants in intensive care units: ascertainment of severe single-gene disorders and effect on medical management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:e173438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott AM, du Souich C, Lehman A, Guella I, Evans DM, Candido T, et al. RAPIDOMICS: rapid genome-wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit-successes and challenges. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178:1207–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gubbels CS, VanNoy GE, Madden JA, Copenheaver D, Yang S, Wojcik MH, et al. Prospective, phenotype-driven selection of critically ill neonates for rapid exome sequencing is associated with high diagnostic yield. Genet Med. 2020;22:736–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Willig LK, Petrikin JE, Smith LD, Saunders CJ, Thiffault I, Miller NA, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:377–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Powis Z, Hagman KDF, Blanco K, Au M, Graham JM, Singh K, et al. When moments matter: finding answers with rapid exome sequencing. Mol Genet Genom Med. 2020;8:e1027.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carey AS, Schacht JP, Umandap C, Fasel D, Weng C, Cappell J, et al. Rapid exome sequencing in PICU patients with new-onset metabolic or neurological disorders. Pediatr Res. 2020;88:761–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dimmock D, Caylor S, Waldman B, Benson W, Ashburner C, Carmichael JL, et al. Project Baby Bear: rapid precision care incorporating rWGS in 5 California children’s hospitals demonstrates improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs of care. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:1231–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stark Z, Lunke S, Brett GR, Tan NB, Stapleton R, Kumble S, et al. Meeting the challenges of implementing rapid genomic testing in acute pediatric care. Genet Med. 2018;20:1554–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Petrikin JE, Willig LK, Smith LD, Kingsmore SF. Rapid whole genome sequencing and precision neonatology. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39:623–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Australian Genomics Health Alliance Acute Care Flagship, Lunke S, Eggers S, Wilson M, Patel C, Barnett CP, et al. Feasibility of ultra-rapid exome sequencing in critically ill infants and children with suspected monogenic conditions in the australian public health care system. JAMA 2020;323:2503–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bourchany A, Thauvin-Robinet C, Lehalle D, Bruel A-L, Masurel-Paulet A, Jean N, et al. Reducing diagnostic turnaround times of exome sequencing for families requiring timely diagnoses. Eur J Med Genet. 2017;60:595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Śmigiel R, Biela M, Szmyd K, Błoch M, Szmida E, Skiba P, et al. Rapid whole-exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool in a neonatal/pediatric intensive care unit. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang H, Qian Y, Lu Y, Qin Q, Lu G, Cheng G, et al. Clinical utility of 24-h rapid trio-exome sequencing for critically ill infants. NPJ Genom Med. 2020;5:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark MM, Hildreth A, Batalov S, Ding Y, Chowdhury S, Watkins K, et al. Diagnosis of genetic diseases in seriously ill children by rapid whole-genome sequencing and automated phenotyping and interpretation. Science Translational Medicine. 2019 Apr 24 [cited 2020 Aug 22]. https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/489/eaat6177.

  28. Sobreira N, Schiettecatte F, Valle D, Hamosh A. GeneMatcher: a matching tool for connecting investigators with an interest in the same gene. Hum Mutat. 2015;36:928–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoed J, den, Boer E, de, Voisin N, Dingemans AJM, Guex N, Wiel L, et al. Mutation-specific pathophysiological mechanisms define different neurodevelopmental disorders associated with SATB1 dysfunction. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:346–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Redin C, Brand H, Collins RL, Kammin T, Mitchell E, Hodge JC, et al. The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies. Nat Genet. 2017;49:36–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Belkadi A, Bolze A, Itan Y, Cobat A, Vincent QB, Antipenko A, et al. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:5473–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilton R, Szalay AS. Arioc: High-concurrency short-read alignment on multiple GPUs. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16:e1008383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stavropoulos DJ, Merico D, Jobling R, Bowdin S, Monfared N, Thiruvahindrapuram B, et al. Whole genome sequencing expands diagnostic utility and improves clinical management in pediatric medicine. NPJ Genom Med. 2016;1:15012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kernan KF, Ghaloul-Gonzalez L, Vockley J, Carcillo JA. Rapid whole genome sequencing and fulfilling the promise of precision pediatric critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:1085–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ryan MM, Sy C, Rudge S, Ellaway C, Ketteridge D, Roddick LG, et al. Dietary L-tyrosine supplementation in nemaline myopathy. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:609–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sztal TE, McKaige EA, Williams C, Oorschot V, Ramm G, Bryson-Richardson RJ. Testing of therapies in a novel nebulin nemaline myopathy model demonstrate a lack of efficacy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tamary H, Dgany O. Congenital Dyserythropoietic Anemia Type I. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Mirzaa G, et al., editors. GeneReviews®. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993 [cited 2021 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK5313/.

  38. Wolff M, Brunklaus A, Zuberi SM. Phenotypic spectrum and genetics of SCN2A-related disorders, treatment options, and outcomes in epilepsy and beyond. Epilepsia 2019;60(Dec):S59–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen BH, Chinnery PF, Copeland WC POLG-Related Disorders. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Mirzaa G, et al., editors. GeneReviews®. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993 [cited 2021 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26471/.

  40. Perales-Clemente E, Liedtke K, Studinski A, Radenkovic S, Gavrilov D, Oglesbee D, et al. A new D-galactose treatment monitoring index for PGM1-CDG. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2021;44:1263–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Billakota S, Andresen JM, Gay BC, Stewart GR, Fedorov NB, Gerlach AC, et al. Personalized medicine: vinpocetine to reverse effects of GABRB3 mutation. Epilepsia 2019;60(Dec):2459–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang Y, Lian Y, Xie N. Early onset epileptic encephalopathy with a novel GABRB3 mutation treated effectively with clonazepam: a case report. Med (Baltim). 2017;96(Dec):e9273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the families for taking part in the study, the CNRGH (Évry) for genome sequencing, the CCuB for technical support and management of the computing platform, and GeneMatcher for data sharing. Several authors are members of the ERN ITHACA. We acknowledge Suzan Rankin, Cyrille Chopelet and Jérémie Roquet for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, the Regional Council of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, the Sanofi Genzyme laboratory and the European Union through the FEDER programs. This work was supported by the France Génomique National infrastructure, funded as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program managed by the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-09). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ASDP: data collection, data production, data analysis, manuscript writing, study coordination. AV/FTMT/ALB/PC/CP data analysis. RO data production, study conception. JFD study conception. AZ/MJ/TB/CF/AT/AS data collection, manuscript editing. BI/JD/SN/MG/MN/MV/SM/MF/AL/PR/YC/JVG/SS/LP/MB/CP/DB/CC data collection. CR data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. AG/AP/AJ data collection, data analysis. RO/VC/CP/TJ/BF/DBD/CB/PG/ET data production. AB data production, manuscript editing. YD data production, manuscript editing, study conception. LF/CTR data collection, manuscript writing, study conception, study coordination.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anne-Sophie Denommé-Pichon or Christel Thauvin-Robinet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the appropriate French ethics committee (2016-A01347-44).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denommé-Pichon, AS., Vitobello, A., Olaso, R. et al. Accelerated genome sequencing with controlled costs for infants in intensive care units: a feasibility study in a French hospital network. Eur J Hum Genet 30, 567–576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00998-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00998-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links