A genome-wide analysis in consanguineous families reveals new chromosomal loci in specific language impairment (SLI)

Abstract

Language is a uniquely human ability, and failure to attain this ability can have a life-long impact on the affected individuals. This is particularly true for individuals with specific language impairment (SLI), which is defined as an impairment in normal language development in the absence of any other developmental disability. Although SLI displays high heritability, family-based linkage studies have been hampered by an unclear mode of Mendelian segregation, variable disease penetrance, and heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria. We performed genome-wide parametric linkage analysis and homozygosity mapping in 14 consanguineous families from Pakistan segregating SLI. Linkage analysis revealed a multipoint LOD score of 4.18 at chromosome 2q in family PKSLI05 under a recessive mode of inheritance. A second linkage score of 3.85 was observed in family PKSLI12 at a non-overlapping locus on chromosome 2q. Two other suggestive linkage loci were found in family PKSLI05 on 14q and 22q with LOD scores of 2.37 and 2.23, respectively, that were also identified in homozygosity mapping. Reduction to homozygosity was observed on chromosomes 2q, 5p, 8q, 14q, 17q, and 22q. Each homozygosity region occurred in multiple PKSLI families. We report new SLI loci on chromosomes 2 and 8 and confirm suggestive SLI linkage loci on chromosomes 5, 14, 17, and 22 reported previously in the population of Robinson Crusoe Island. These findings indicate that linkage and homozygosity mapping in consanguineous families can improve genetic analyses in SLI and suggest the involvement of additional genes in the causation of this disorder.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Tomblin JB, Records NL, Buckwalter P, Zhang X, Smith E, O’Brien M. Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:1245–60.

  2. 2.

    Rice ML. Overlooked by public health: specific language impairment. 1st edn. Lawrence, KS: Open Access Government; 2017.

  3. 3.

    Rice ML, Smith SD, Gayán J. Convergent genetic linkage and associations to language, speech and reading measures in families of probands with specific language impairment. J Neurodev Disord. 2009;1:264.

  4. 4.

    Dunn LM, Dunn DM. PPVT-4: Peabody picture vocabulary test. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.; 2007. Pearson Assessments 2007.

  5. 5.

    Rice ML, Hoffman L. Predicting vocabulary growth in children with and without specific language impairment: a longitudinal study from 2;6 to 21 years of age. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58:345–59.

  6. 6.

    Bishop DV, Adams CV, Norbury CF. Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short‐term memory deficits: evidence from 6‐year‐old twins. Genes Brain Behav. 2006;5:158–69.

  7. 7.

    Choudhury N, Benasich AA. A family aggregation study: the influence of family history and other risk factors on language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46:261–72.

  8. 8.

    De Barbieri Z, Fernández MA, Newbury DF, Villanueva P. Family aggregation of language impairment in an isolated Chilean population from Robinson Crusoe Island. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53:643–55.

  9. 9.

    Rice ML, Haney KR, Wexler K. Family histories of children with SLI who show extended optional infinitives. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:419–32.

  10. 10.

    Tallal P, Hirsch LS, Realpe-Bonilla T, Miller S, Brzustowicz LM, Bartlett C, et al. Familial aggregation in specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:1172–82.

  11. 11.

    Rice ML, Zubrick SR, Taylor CL, Hoffman L, Gayán J. Longitudinal study of language and speech of twins at 4 and 6 years: twinning effects decrease, zygosity effects disappear, and heritability increases. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61:79–93.

  12. 12.

    Villanueva P, Nudel R, Hoischen A, Fernandez MA, Simpson NH, Gilissen C, et al. Correction: exome sequencing in an admixed isolated population indicates NFXL1 variants confer a risk for specific language impairment. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005336.

  13. 13.

    Morton NE. Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet. 1955;7:277–318.

  14. 14.

    Ott J, Wang J, Leal SM. Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:275.

  15. 15.

    Raza MH, Gertz EM, Mundorff J, Lukong J, Kuster J, Schaffer AA, et al. Linkage analysis of a large African family segregating stuttering suggests polygenic inheritance. Hum Genet. 2013;132:385–96.

  16. 16.

    Szatmari P, Paterson AD, Zwaigenbaum L, Roberts W, Brian J, Liu XQ, et al. Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Genet. 2007;39:319–28.

  17. 17.

    SLI Consortium. A genomewide scan identifies two novel loci involved in specific language impairment. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:384–98.

  18. 18.

    Bartlett CW, Flax JF, Logue MW, Vieland VJ, Bassett AS, Tallal P, et al. A major susceptibility locus for specific language impairment is located on 13q21. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:45–55.

  19. 19.

    Newbury DF, Monaco AP. Genetic advances in the study of speech and language disorders. Neuron. 2010;68:309–20.

  20. 20.

    Bartlett CW, Flax JF, Logue MW, Smith BJ, Vieland VJ, Tallal P, et al. Examination of potential overlap in autism and language loci on chromosomes 2, 7, and 13 in two independent samples ascertained for specific language impairment. Hum Hered. 2004;57:10–20.

  21. 21.

    Villanueva P, Newbury DF, Jara L, De Barbieri Z, Mirza G, Palomino HM, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic susceptibility to language impairment in an isolated Chilean population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19:687.

  22. 22.

    Nudel R, Simpson NH, Baird G, O’Hare A, Conti‐Ramsden G, Bolton PF, et al. Genome‐wide association analyses of child genotype effects and parent‐of‐origin effects in specific language impairment. Genes Brain Behav. 2014;13:418–29.

  23. 23.

    McQuillan R, Leutenegger A-L, Abdel-Rahman R, Franklin CS, Pericic M, Barac-Lauc L, et al. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:359–72.

  24. 24.

    Imtiaz F, Taibah K, Ramzan K, Bin-Khamis G, Kennedy S, Al-Mubarak B, et al. A comprehensive introduction to the genetic basis of non-syndromic hearing loss in the Saudi Arabian population. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:91.

  25. 25.

    Lencz T, Lambert C, DeRosse P, Burdick KE, Morgan TV, Kane JM, et al. Runs of homozygosity reveal highly penetrant recessive loci in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19942–7.

  26. 26.

    Nalls MA, Guerreiro RJ, Simon-Sanchez J, Bras JT, Traynor BJ, Gibbs JR, et al. Extended tracts of homozygosity identify novel candidate genes associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurogenetics. 2009;10:183–90.

  27. 27.

    Vine AE, McQuillin A, Bass NJ, Pereira A, Kandaswamy R, Robinson M, et al. No evidence for excess runs of homozygosity in bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 2009;19:165–70.

  28. 28.

    Mir A, Kaufman L, Noor A, Motazacker MM, Jamil T, Azam M, et al. Identification of mutations in TRAPPC9, which encodes the NIK-and IKK-β-binding protein, in nonsyndromic autosomal-recessive mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85:909–15.

  29. 29.

    Raza MH, Riazuddin S, Drayna D. Identification of an autosomal recessive stuttering locus on chromosome 3q13.2-3q13.33. Hum Genet. 2010;128:461–3.

  30. 30.

    Hamilton CM, Strader LC, Pratt JG, Maiese D, Hendershot T, Kwok RK, et al. The PhenX Toolkit: Get the Most From Your Measures. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;174:253–260.

  31. 31.

    Chaudhry IS, Rahman S. The impact of gender inequality in education on rural poverty in Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Eur J Econ Fin Admin Sci. 2009;15:174–88.

  32. 32.

    Silberstein M, Weissbrod O, Otten L, Tzemach A, Anisenia A, Shtark O, et al. A system for exact and approximate genetic linkage analysis of SNP data in large pedigrees. Bioinformatics. 2012;29:197–205.

  33. 33.

    Greenberg DA, Abreu P, Hodge SE. The power to detect linkage in complex disease by means of simple LOD-score analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:870–9.

  34. 34.

    Hodge SE, Abreu PC, Greenberg DA. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: A simulation study. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:217–27.

  35. 35.

    Seelow D, Schuelke M, Hildebrandt F, Nürnberg P. HomozygosityMapper—an interactive approach to homozygosity mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl_2):W593–9.

  36. 36.

    Raza MH, Amjad R, Riazuddin S, Drayna D. Studies in a consanguineous family reveal a novel locus for stuttering on chromosome 16q. Hum Genet. 2012;131:311–3.

  37. 37.

    Riaz N, Steinberg S, Ahmad J, Pluzhnikov A, Riazuddin S, Cox NJ, et al. Genomewide significant linkage to stuttering on chromosome 12. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:647–51.

  38. 38.

    Kang C, Riazuddin S, Mundorff J, Krasnewich D, Friedman P, Mullikin JC, et al. Mutations in the lysosomal enzyme-targeting pathway and persistent stuttering. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:677–85.

  39. 39.

    Raza MH, Domingues CE, Webster R, Sainz E, Paris E, Rahn R, et al. Mucolipidosis types II and III and non-syndromic stuttering are associated with different variants in the same genes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:529–34.

  40. 40.

    Rice ML, Taylor CL, Zubrick SR. Language outcomes of 7-year-old children with or without a history of late language emergence at 24 months. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:394–407.

  41. 41.

    Wiszniewski W, Hunter JV, Hanchard NA, Willer JR, Shaw C, Tian Q, et al. TM4SF20 ancestral deletion and susceptibility to a pediatric disorder of early language delay and cerebral white matter hyperintensities. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:197–210.

  42. 42.

    Pescucci C, Meloni I, Bruttini M, Ariani F, Longo I, Mari F, et al. Chromosome 2 deletion encompassing the MAP2 gene in a patient with autism and Rett-like features. Clin Genet. 2003;64:497–501.

  43. 43.

    Bartsch D, Casadio A, Karl KA, Serodio P, Kandel ER. CREB1 Encodes a Nuclear Activator, a Repressor, and a Cytoplasmic Modulator that Form a Regulatory Unit Critical for Long-Term Facilitation. Cell. 1998;95:211–23.

  44. 44.

    SLI Consortium. Highly significant linkage to the SLI1 locus in an expanded sample of individuals affected by specific language impairment. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:1225–38.

  45. 45.

    Patterson SL, Pittenger C, Morozov A, Martin KC, Scanlin H, Drake C, et al. Some forms of cAMP-mediated long-lasting potentiation are associated with release of BDNF and nuclear translocation of phospho-MAP kinase. Neuron. 2001;32:123–40.

  46. 46.

    Hunt MC, Rautanen A, Westin MA, Svensson LT, Alexson SE. Analysis of the mouse and human acyl-CoA thioesterase (ACOT) gene clusters shows that convergent, functional evolution results in a reduced number of human peroxisomal ACOTs. FASEB J. 2006;20:1855–64.

  47. 47.

    Raza MH, Mattera R, Morell R, Sainz E, Rahn R, Gutierrez J, et al. Association between rare variants in AP4E1, a component of intracellular trafficking, and persistent stuttering. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:715–25.

  48. 48.

    Guardia CM, De Pace R, Mattera R, Bonifacino JS. Neuronal functions of adaptor complexes involved in protein sorting. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;51:103–10.

  49. 49.

    Devanna P, Chen XS, Ho J, Gajewski D, Smith SD, Gialluisi A, et al. Next-gen sequencing identifies non-coding variation disrupting miRNA-binding sites in neurological disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1375–84.

  50. 50.

    Tom Tang Y, Emtage P, Funk WD, Hu T, Arterburn M, Park EE, et al. TAFA: a novel secreted family with conserved cysteine residues and restricted expression in the brain. Genomics. 2004;83:727–34.

  51. 51.

    Reader RH, Covill LE, Nudel R, Newbury DF. Genome-wide studies of specific language impairment. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2014;1:242–50.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the start-up research funds provided by the University of Kansas, Lawrence and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant awarded to the University of Kansas: T32 DC000052, Training Researchers in Language Impairments (PD: Mabel Rice). We are extremely thankful to the members of the PKSLI families for their participation in this research. We are thankful to Kathleen Kelsey Earnest for her input in the data collection of U-PPVT-4 in our families. We also thank Dennis Drayna for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Muhammad Hashim Raza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andres, E.M., Hafeez, H., Yousaf, A. et al. A genome-wide analysis in consanguineous families reveals new chromosomal loci in specific language impairment (SLI). Eur J Hum Genet 27, 1274–1285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0398-1

Download citation