Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The Global State of the Genetic Counseling Profession


The profession of genetic counseling (also called genetic counselling in many countries) began nearly 50 years ago in the United States, and has grown internationally in the past 30 years. While there have been many papers describing the profession of genetic counseling in individual countries or regions, data remains incomplete and has been published in diverse journals with limited access. As a result of the 2016 Transnational Alliance of Genetic Counseling (TAGC) conference in Barcelona, Spain, and the 2017 World Congress of Genetic Counselling in the UK, we endeavor to describe as fully as possible the global state of genetic counseling as a profession. We estimate that in 2018 there are nearly 7000 genetic counselors with the profession established or developing in no less than 28 countries.


“A genetic counselor is like air conditioning. When you do not have it, you do not realize you are missing it, but when you have it, you cannot live without it!” (paraphrased from a French Geneticist, as presented at TAGC 2016 by E. Davoine)

While the service of genetic counseling was in existence much earlier, the profession of genetic counseling (called genetic counselling in many countries, but shortened in this paper for consistency) began in the United States (US) in 1969 [1], approaching 50 years ago. Global expansion of genetic counseling in the early 1990’s [2, 3] led to the transition from genetic counseling being solely provided as part of the role of medical physicians (often, but not always medical geneticists) towards an international allied health profession dealing with inherited conditions. As defined by the National Society of Genetic Counselors in the US (NSGC, 2006), “Genetic counseling is the process of helping people understand and adapt to the medical, psychological and familial implications of genetic contributions to disease. This process integrates the following: (1) Interpretation of family and medical histories to assess the chance of disease occurrence or recurrence. (2) Education about inheritance, testing, management, prevention, resources and research. (3) Counseling to promote informed choices and adaptation to the risk or condition.” [4] While the role of genetic counselors (GCs) most consistently includes the clinical roles as described in the NSGC definition, many GCs now also work in research, laboratory, industry, educational, policy, and advocacy positions in many locations, and the scope of clinical practice varies both within and between countries. The commonality of genetic counseling as a profession is that individuals work primarily in the area of heritable disorders and related genetic testing, providing education and emotional support to patients and families who are impacted by them. As of 2018, genetic counseling is a healthcare profession with a presence in nearly all medical specialties, most frequently obstetrics, pediatrics (dealing with rare diseases), oncology, cardiology, and neurology.

The international expansion of genetic counseling has been a topic of interest for the past decade. The Transnational Alliance of Genetic Counseling (TAGC) was established by Janice Edwards (USC) via a Jane Engleberg Memorial Fellowship through NSGC in 2006 [5]. TAGC fosters communication within the international genetic counseling community, specifically with a focus on genetic counseling education transnationally. TAGC has a website and listserv, and has hosted international meetings in 2006 (Manchester), 2008 (Barcelona), 2011 (Montreal), and 2016 (Barcelona). The year 2017 also saw the first World Congress of Genetic Counselling in Cambridge, UK, hosted by Connecting Science at the Wellcome Genome Campus. This World Congress had over 220 GC attendees from 24 different countries and focused on empirical research on the genetic counselling process.

Through these international meetings, it became clear that while there are conceptually many similarities in approach to practice, there are different training and practice models globally. Some differences are based on the variations in healthcare systems, regulatory systems (see, for example,, accessed May 5, 2018), and university level training that is available in different countries. Examples of these differences include: the length of training, specific curriculum, and amount of clinical training; the background of individuals who are recruited into the profession (for example training nurses, midwives, or laboratory geneticists) (see, for example, a European review [6]) and the manner in which practicing providers are certified, registered, and/or licensed. For the purposes of this paper, since the genetic counseling profession was first developed in the US and many countries modeled the development of the profession on the US’s scope of practice and related training standards, these will be used as the basis of comparison when describing genetic counselor practice globally.

Several summaries exist detailing genetic counseling in specific countries or regions, including a special edition of the Journal of Genetic Counseling in December 2013 (volume 22:6), with many papers from that edition referenced for readers who desire more detailed information, and a commentary by some co-authors of this paper [7]. A comprehensive summary of the genetic counseling profession is presented below. It is primarily based on information presented at the 2016 TAGC meeting in Barcelona, with supplemental information added by those presenters and by others identified through TAGC, the NSGC International SIG and attendance at the 2017 World Congress of Genetic Counselling. We strive to be as internationally complete as possible and to cite publicly available references for the data presented in this paper, but in the event we have missed countries where genetic counseling is in development, we invite representatives from those countries to contact TAGC and become connected to the global community of GCs.

The majority of data for this paper is presented in tables, with the text elaborating on specifics that are unique to a particular country. Table 1 summarizes details of the numbers of GCs, training, and regulatory approaches across the globe; it is based on self-reported data from the paper authors, relevant publications, and publicly available websites including those of professional organizations. Table 2 outlines the requirements for credentialing (certification, registration) globally. Finally, Table 3 references the various professional organizations, defines their acronyms, and lists relevant websites for additional information and documentation of much of the data presented in the paper. We also provide images of the global distribution of genetic counseling (Fig. 1) and the ratio of GCs per million of population (Fig. 2) based on the data presented in Table 1.

Table 1 State of genetic counseling globally
Table 2 Requirements for credentialing
Table 3 Relevant websites of professional genetic counseling organizations and/or for genetic counseling licensure and regulation
Fig. 1

Map of genetic counselors internationally (2017)

Fig. 2

Trained genetic counselors per million population based on country population and estimated number of genetic counselors. (Assumes all trained genetic counselors are practicing clinically, which may significantly overestimate calculations in several countries, particularly the US and Canada where 1/3–1/4 do not regularly see patients. Cuba data is >75/million). Only a handful of countries come close to achieving the workforce recommendation, made by the Royal College of Physicians UK to have 6–12 genetic counselors/million population [48].

The Americas

United States of America (~4000 genetic counselors; 39 Master’s training programs)

Master’s degree trained GCs first originated in the US in 1969 [1, 8]. There are several US-based professional organizations addressing the profession, training, accreditation, and certification (Table 3). NSGC provides a professional status survey with information about areas of clinical and non-clinical practice, salary and roles, and other demographics. There are >1200 applicants yearly to US and Canadian programs (personal communication, Angela Trepanier on behalf of AGCPD) and nearly 400 graduates/year. Master’s training in ACGC accredited programs involves a combination of scientific and counseling coursework, supervised clinical training of no less than 50 cases, and a research project. ACGC graduates are eligible for the ABGC certification exam (Table 2). Starting in 2018, internationally trained GCs can be considered for eligibility to take the exam. Upon graduation and certification, GCs can practice clinically without direct supervision by physicians (though most work in an interdisciplinary environment). Within the US, many professions (including GCs) are regulated on a state-specific basis (called “licensure”), through laws meant to provide consumer protection from harm that may occur due to unqualified individuals providing services. This also provides title protection for licensed professionals. In 2018, 22 (of 50) states license GCs, typically on the basis of ABGC certification. Most employers, even in states without licensure, require either ABGC certification or its eligibility for clinical employment. NSGC has developed a scope of practice for genetic counselors, and in some states licensed GCs are able to order genetic tests independently. There has been significant growth in genetic counseling positions over the past 5 years, now resulting in a workplace shortage that is being addressed in various ways [9] including the expansion of training programs and numbers of enrolled students, and consideration of ways in which GCs can “work at the top of our scope” (of practice) and where our unique skills are most valuable within the changing landscape of genetics and genomic testing.

Canada (~350 genetic counselors; 5 Master’s training programs)

The Canadian Association of Genetic Counseling (CAGC), currently estimates that most of the ~270 practicing GCs are in clinical genetic counseling roles, with fewer in non-clinical research or industry roles. Training is based on the genetic counselling competencies as defined by CAGC and/or ACGC (which overlap significantly) [10, 11]. There are nearly 200 applicants/year, with 20–25 trainees enrolling each year. Canadian GC graduates are eligible to sit for the CAGC and ABGC certification exams and internationally trained GCs who wish to apply for CAGC certification may inquire as to eligibility; most employers require certification by CAGC or ABGC. Upon graduation and certification, GCs can practice without direct supervision but not autonomously. There is not yet licensure, registration, or other legal recognition of the profession (including title protection) for GCs in Canada due to the lower numbers and cost of such regulatory processes, although three provinces are actively pursuing this.

Cuba (~900 genetic counselors; 1 Master’s training program)

Cuba is the only country in Latin America that has a profession of GCs [12, 13]. A single Master’s degree program (Havana) is certified by the Ministry of Higher Education. Some trainees are physicians in other specialties, and others (nurses and psychologists) are trained specifically to enter the profession of genetic counseling. All receive training as GCs under the guidance of a Clinical Genetics specialist from the National Network of Medical Genetics. GCs work in community health centers, provincial health centers, and academic (research and reference) hospitals across Cuba.

Central and South America

Genetic counseling is not yet recognized as an independent profession in Central and South America, but instead is considered a medical competency provided by physicians, mostly geneticists and other specialty physicians (primarily in oncology). Still, the importance of genetic counseling services is highlighted by clinical guidelines from several Latin American countries [14,15,16,17]. There are a few formally trained GCs involved in clinical service (personal communication, Sonia Margarit), which is slowly increasing awareness and creating a space and demand for genetic counseling services. As of 2017, there is a single Master’s degree program starting in Sao Paolo, Brazil (see accessed May 5, 2018). The limited training and minimal regulation to define the credentials and roles of GCs results in a slow recognition of GCs as profession.


The profession of genetic counseling is established or developing in more than 11 European countries, with GCs trained in other countries beginning to establish genetic counseling-related roles in at least 7 more. There are at least eight GC training programs. Formal GC registration occurs through two different programs: in the United Kingdom (UK, via the GCRB as described below) and the European Union (EU) (via EBMG) [18].

United Kingdom (~310 genetic counselors; 3 Master’s training programs)

Genetic counseling began in the UK in 1992 [19], and the UK currently trains ~40 GCs per year. Historically in the UK, genetic counseling training was a 2-year Master’s degree at a program accredited by the GCRB, followed by a 2-year paid internship and voluntary registration by the GCRB. The AGNC and GCRB have been seeking statutory regulation for a number of years and at the time of writing, statutory regulation, answering to Parliament, is likely to become a reality during 2018.

Since September 2016, there is a funded scientific training program (STP) Master’s in Genomic Counseling for ~10–20 students per year for England only. This 3-year, full time Master’s degree, assessed as equivalent to the previous approach, consists of academic teaching (centralized at the University of Manchester), plus clinical training within a Training Genetics Centre. A new part-time, 3-year, largely e-Learning MSc in Genetic and Genomic Counselling was initiated in 2017 at Cardiff University in Wales. It will accept 20–25 students per year, all self-funded. There is also a Master’s in Genetic Counseling in Glasgow, accepting ~5 students per year, this is also self-funded. GCs had never previously been part of National Health Service (NHS) workforce planning, and the new STP program addresses this for England. Graduates from the STP program will be awarded statutory regulation as clinical scientists, attached to the Academy for Healthcare Scientists and the Health Care Professions Council [20].

Many aspects of the training and registration process for GCs in the UK are still evolving. While GCRB registration (Table 2) is still voluntary, UK employers typically only employ registered GCs or those working towards registration. Internationally trained GCs from some countries can be considered for registration in the UK. Most GCs in the UK work in NHS regional genetics centers, with a few working in research, education, patient support groups, and private clinical practice. In the UK, GCs are qualified to work autonomously or as part of multi-disciplinary team. As genomics is mainstreamed across whole healthcare services, GC roles are evolving [21,22,23].

EU registration via EBMG

The Genetic Nurse and Counsellor Professional Branch of the European Board of Medical Genetics (EBMG) developed competencies and standards of practice for GC registration within the European Union (EU) [24, 25]. Given the diversity of languages, healthcare systems, and cultural differences, as well as nationally accepted roles for GCs, it was challenging to develop a single set of standards. A European registration system for GCs was launched in 2013, and is separate from the UK registration process. The EBMG registration recognizes a Master’s in genetic counseling (MSGC) as the “gold standard” for training of GCs, but acknowledges that there are limited MSGC programs in Europe, and many longstanding professional GCs who trained in other ways. The registration system [26] offers evaluation and accreditation of MSGC training programs within Europe. During the first five cohorts of applicants, professionals with longstanding practice as GCs but without Master’s level training were allowed to apply for registration via a grandfather clause that necessitates a larger portfolio of evidence. Internationally trained GCs from the US, Canada, South Africa, Australia with current registration and/or certification in their home country may be considered after working full time in Europe for 1 year. As of 2017 there are 69 EBMG registered GCs/ genetic nurses. A survey of registered GCs showed that they value the confirmation of their competence and to advance the genetic counseling profession in Europe [17]. Recently, the professional branch opened “Associate Registration” in response to requests for a registration system for professionals outside Europe in countries where no registration or certification exists.

Belgium (>10 genetic counselors; no training programs)

The profession of genetic counselor is not yet recognized in Belgium, and there is not yet any registration process. The genetic counselors practicing in Belgium have been trained outside of Belgium, some but not all at MSGC programs.

Denmark (>20 genetic counselors; no training programs)

In Denmark most GCs have a professional degree in nursing or laboratory technology or were trained as medical secretaries, and have been trained for genetic counseling at a local clinical genetics department. Some GCs have further education such as a Diploma of Health (60 ECTS), but there are no GCs in Denmark with EBMG registration or an MSGC, although there are efforts to formalize GC education. All of the GCs work in the public health system, primarily in cancer genetics. The clinical roles include case preparation, conveying genetic testing information and working alongside other genetics professionals. There is no specific professional organization for GCs in Denmark, but they typically meet once a year as part of the Danish Society for Medical Genetics for a 1 day continuing education meeting.

Finland (genetic nurses, no training program)

There are 20 genetics nurses in Finland, ~5 of whom provide genetic counseling services across a range of clinical areas including prenatal diagnosis, carrier status and rare genetic disease, and predictive testing for neurology and oncology. There was previously a genetic nurse training program, and others obtained genetics training on the job. None of the genetic nurses in Finland have EBMG registration.

France (>175 genetic counselors; 1 Master’s training program)

The profession of GC was legally recognized by French law of Public Health in 2004, and there are up to 20 trainees each year who are eligible for EBMG registration. Nearly 25% of trainees enter with a prior professional degree in nursing, midwifery, clinical research, or laboratory sciences (PhD), and some also go on to an additional PhD after GC training. GCs in France are mainly employed by the public health service within Medical Genetics Services, and the scope of practice is the same for both Master’s and PhD trained GCs [27].

Ireland (<10 genetic counselors; no training programs)

Most GCs practicing in Ireland have MSGC training from outside of Ireland, and hold GCRB or EBMG registration. Irish GCs practice in a variety of general genetic counseling roles, speciality areas (cancer genetics), and non-clinical roles. GCs are not currently recognized by the Health and Social Care Regulatory Council in Ireland (CORU), but they are in the process of uniting to form a professional association and to obtain professional recognition and regulation.

The Netherlands (55 genetic counselors; 4 Master’s PA training programs)

GCs training in the Netherlands began in the early 1990s. Early trainees were nurses or other healthcare providers who received on-the-job training by clinical geneticists. This was followed by development of a GC training program in 1997, which was accredited by the VKGN in 1999. Due to an inability to obtain accreditation from the government, a 2015 needs assessment found that a Master’s degree in GC was needed, but the profession was too small to develop a specialized master’s program. As such, in 2016 a decision was made to offer experienced GCs a Master’s degree as a Physician Assistant (MPA) in order to allow GCs to provide services independently from clinical genetics and other physicians. There were two key reasons for this: billing rules in the Netherlands, and that only clinical geneticists and GCs can offer DNA based testing to patients. Four training locations are currently available (Nijmegen, Groningen, Amsterdam, Utrecht). GCs typically work in university hospitals or private outpatient clinics independently. Some GCs are eligible for EBMG registration through the ‘grandfather clause.’

Norway (40 genetic counselors; 1 Master’s training program)

Norway’s single training program (Bergen) includes coursework and a 1-year research project, but clinical training is not strongly emphasized, and therefore the most important clinical training occurs after employment as GCs. Because of this limited clinical training within the program, GCs in Norway must apply for EBMG registration via the Grandfather Clause until program revisions occur in 2019, when clinical training should meet EBMG criteria. Most entering students have a professional degree in nursing or medical laboratory technology or other relevant education and working experience, a few obtain an additional PhD-degree in genetic counseling. In Norway, The Act of 5 December No. 100 2003 (the Biotechnology Act) frames the regulatory politics concerning medical use of biotechnology. It requires that genetic testing and genetic counseling only occur at approved institutions, which limits genetic counseling to clinical genetics departments at four regional state hospitals. Although this law stresses that genetic counseling should only be performed by trained professionals, genetic counseling as a profession has not yet been authorized. Finally, in Norway there is an “Interest Organization for Genetic Counselors in Norway”, which meets yearly.

Portugal (<10 genetic counselors; 1 Master’s training program, currently inactive)

The Association of Genetic Counselors (APPAcGen), is working to achieve recognition of the profession of GCs in Portugal. There is a single training program (Porto), which has run only one course (2009–2011) and graduated six GCs at that time. GCs are eligible for EBMG registration [28].

Romania (>75 trained genetic counselors; 1 Master’s training program, currently inactive)

The Romanian Association of Genetic Counseling (RAGC) was founded to set national practice standards and lobby for recognition as a distinct health profession. In the meantime, genetic counseling tends to adhere to international organizations’ guidelines (e.g., EBMG). Most trainees have prior professional degrees in psychology, nursing, midwifery, or laboratory sciences. Training is structured similarly to the other EBMG approved programs in Europe, and graduates are eligible for EBMG registration after an additional clinical placement. Registration is voluntary and employers do not routinely verify proof of registration. Since the profession is not yet recognized as a distinct health profession, there are few jobs in the public sector and most graduates work in research, education, patient support groups, and private practice.

Spain (70 genetic counselors; 1 Master’s training program)

The Master’s degree training program (Barcelona) accepts 10–12 students every other year, and some students also pursue a PhD. Clinical genetic counseling jobs are possible in both the public and the private health system, but are more difficult to obtain in Spain as the profession has not yet been recognized and job titles often differ from “genetic counselor.”

Sweden (~40 genetic counselors; no training programs)

Most GCs in Sweden work in clinical genetics clinics, with some in obstetrics, cardiology or oncology. In the past there have been half-time 2-year programs that included coursework in clinical genetics, ethics and counseling training. The SFMG and SFGV recently developed an educational pathway aiming to certify GCs for clinical genetics work in Sweden [29].

Switzerland (<10 genetic counselors; no training programs)

Aside from a handful of GCs working primarily in laboratory settings in German-speaking Switzerland, GCs work clinically only in French-speaking Switzerland (Fribourg, Geneva, Lausanne). All have MSGC training from outside of Switzerland. These health professionals work in multi-disciplinary teams located both in the public (hospitals, universities) and in the private (clinics, laboratories) domains. They practice in various fields including oncology, cardiology, neurology, obstetrics, and general genetic counseling (positive family history, cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis). There is to date no federal recognition ruling on a single and consistent salary scale, and job titles vary.

Other countries in Europe

There are EBMG registered GCs in Greece, Iceland, Italy, and Belgium and we are aware of a handful of additional MSGCs in Austria [30] and Germany. A 2-year Master's Degree in "Genetic Counselors and Nurses" started in Siena, Italy in February 2017. Genetic counselors are not yet recognized as a profession in Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Portugal (and perhaps other countries) due to legal restrictions requiring that genetic counseling is medical act, and therefore conducted by physicians. In most other European countries where GCs do not provide clinical services, the roles appear quite varied, with some working in laboratories or private companies, providing healthcare provider education or assisting with laboratory reports and genetic test ordering.

Middle East

There are around 100 GCs practicing in the Middle East, mostly located in Israel and Saudi Arabia; we are aware of a handful of MSGCs in Lebanon, Oman, and Turkey as well.

Israel (80 genetic counselors; 3 Master’s training programs)

There are currently three 2-year master’s programs in genetic counseling in Israel; curriculum includes coursework, clinical training, and an optional research project (primarily performed in research labs, with a few epidemiological or psychologically based projects). About a third of counselors graduating from the master's program continue their studies for a PhD degree, either directly after graduation, or after a few years of working as GCs. GCs with a PhD have similar roles compared to counselors holding a master's degree, with some having more supervision and teaching roles [31]. In Israel, GCs are licensed (Table 2) and must work under the supervision of a medical geneticist; most counselors work in hospital based genetics departments across the country. A few counselors work in non-clinical research, or in the industry.

Saudi Arabia (20 genetic counselors; 2 Master’s training programs)

Saudi Arabia had a high diploma (postgraduate) program in Genetic Counseling from 2005 to 2007 [32]. Master’s programs have existed since 2015; both programs include coursework with a focus on genetic counseling in Islam and clinical training. All counselors practicing in Saudi Arabia are expected to obtain a license from SCHS [33, 34].

Australia/New Zealand (220 genetic counselors; 2 Master’s training programs)

Prior to 2008, GCs in Australia received 1 year of training and a graduate diploma. Since 2011, GC training has required a 2-year Master’s degree [3]. As of June 2017, there are two Master’s level training programs in Australia (Sydney and Melbourne) with no training programs in New Zealand. Tracking data suggests there are several hundred applicants yearly, with ~24 enrolling each year. Upon graduation from an HGSA accredited Master’s program, GCs can practice as Associate Genetic Counselors, working under the supervision of a clinical geneticist (MD) and certified genetic counselor. After 1 year of practice, they are considered board eligible and can enroll in the HGSA certification process. There is a process for international applicants to apply for certification.

Most GCs in Australia practice in hospital settings (both public and private), and increasingly in private practice with clinicians; some GCs are taking on non-clinical roles in laboratories, industry, policy within government, advocacy, or research roles. Others complete a research PhD in a related field to allow them to pursue clinical research. Australia does not yet formally recognize the profession of genetic counseling as an allied health profession within the country. However, as of 2017 Australasian GCs are working towards professional recognition via a nationally approved process of self-regulation. Currently a maintenance of professional standards program is voluntary, but will become compulsory once self-regulation is achieved. A paper by Barlow-Stewart et al. [35] describes many of the workforce issues in New South Wales, giving an overview of many of the broader issues in Australia.


Genetic counseling is an emerging profession in most of Asia, and in many countries the profession of GC refers to physicians with expertise in genetics who provide genetic counseling services rather than a specific independent profession. The major professional organization is the PSGCA, which formed in 2015 [36]. They welcome new members, especially GCs practicing in Asia and those from Asia working in other countries.


To date, the China Ministry of Health has not yet recognized GCs as an independent healthcare occupation. There are no official statistics for the number of healthcare professionals (e.g., physicians, nurses, lab technicians) who provide genetic counseling services in China. Genetic counseling is primarily provided by pediatricians or obstetricians, and the utilization of clinical genetic services is low. Many genetic tests can only be performed in academic institutions as research tests or in commercial direct-to-consumer companies for non-clinical use [37]. The Chinese Board of Genetic Counseling was established in 2015 and provides training through short term online and in-person lectures, educational conferences, and certification for trainees. In 2013, Fudan University established the first genetic counseling pilot training program in China with the goal of developing a master’s degree program [38]. However, there are no graduates of this program currently practicing as specialty-trained geneticists or GCs [39].


Currently, genetic counseling is not only provided by individuals trained as GCs, but is also performed by various medical and allied health professionals (clinical and human geneticists, physicians with continuing education in genetics, and medical social workers), prompting the need for a standardized approach to genetic counseling. In an effort to add legitimacy to the profession and maintain professional standards, the Board of Genetic Counseling, India [BGC] was established in 2014 [36]. There is a growing trend among the graduates trained in India to join the genetic diagnostics industry in genetic counseling roles as well as test reporting, sales, marketing, or medical science liaison roles. Currently, the BGC does not accredit training programs. There are 3 types of genetic counseling training in India: (1) a 2-year Master’s program at Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, (2) a post-graduate 1-year diploma program at Kamineni Hospital, Hyderabad, and (3) a 1-year certificate program at Manipal Hospital, Bangalore [40]. There are additional genetic counseling modules and workshops offered by universities, physician associations and diagnostic testing companies. A handful of Master’s trained GCs (US, UK, and Australia) contribute to the profession through industry, consultancy, clinical roles and pedagogical contributions to the existing educational programs.

Japan (~230 genetic counselors, 14 Master’s training programs)

The first training program in Japan was started in the early 2000’s. Curriculum and clinical training requirements are based on the US training model, although all program directors are physicians, and psychologists are used to teach the psychosocial curriculum in most programs. There is a national certification process; international graduates may request an application for certification examination. GCs in Japan work in cancer genetics, prenatal, pediatric, and neurogenetics areas, as well as more general genetic counseling positions, and are mostly employed in larger cities at larger (often academic) medical centers or in private practice.

Malaysia (<10 genetic counselors, 1 Master’s training program)

Genetic counseling services began in 1994 [41] and GCs in Malaysia have MSGC training from outside of the country as there is not yet any formal genetic counseling training in Malaysia. GCs provide genetic counseling to patients at academic universities and cancer research centers, and through diagnostic companies; one GC is in private practice. In 2015, the National University of Malaysia (NUM) launched a Master’s in Medical Science (Genetic Counseling) to train more GCs in Malaysia [42]. Plans are in progress to form a professional society, to create practice guidelines and certification pathways for all GCs working in Malaysia.

Philippines (>10 genetic counselors, 1 Master’s training program)

Genetic counseling training includes clinical training and a research requirement, has a significant focus on public health, including rare disorders and newborn screening. Many of the entering students have prior background in the sciences or various healthcare professions. Education is provided in English and Filipino, taking into account the many dialects across the Philippines, and funding is available for individuals from diverse regions to attend the program and return to their province in order to provide services countrywide. GCs in the Philippines are involved in various clinical activities, research and academic endeavors.

Singapore (10 genetic counselors, no training programs)

The genetic counseling profession in Singapore is still developing; the job description and scope of practice is not formalized across the country and the role is not yet recognized as an Allied Health profession. MSGCs trained in countries outside Singapore provide clinical genetic counseling in cancer genetics, general medical genetics (pediatrics/adult) and prenatal genetics, and research roles. The National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) is spearheading efforts to develop GC-led clinics and paired GC-geneticist clinics, modelled on the NSGC scope of practice. This model has resulted in improved efficiencies and cost-savings [43].

South Korea (12 genetic counselors; 2 Master’s training programs)

There are 2 Master’s level training programs (Suwon, Daejeon), and certification is provided by the KSMG [44].

Taiwan (120 genetic counselors, 1 Master’s training program)

A single 2-year master’s degree program (National Taiwan University) requires at least 300 internship hours (clinical and laboratory) prior to certification. Trainees are recruited from baccalaureate backgrounds including life science or related field, such as medicine, nursing, or medical technology. GCs work genetic counseling centers, private prenatal service providers, laboratories or other related organizations [45].


South Africa (~20 genetic counselors, 2 Master’s training programs)

Currently in Africa, there are medical genetics services in many countries, but the only formal genetic counseling services and training programs are in South Africa . Genetic counseling training started in 1989 in South Africa, and there are currently two 2-year master’s degree training programs (Johannesburg, Cape Town) [46, 47, 48]. Clinical training requires a 2-year internship, with the first year overlapping with the second year of the degree. Paid internships are challenging to obtain. GC practice is governed by the HPCSA, and GC-SA developed the standards of practice guidelines to guide the training and registration of GCs in alignment with the regulations approved by the HPCSA. In order to practice clinically, a GC must be registered through HPCSA, who registers GCs under the category “Medical Scientists” under the Medical and Dental Board. Internationally trained GCs from the UK, Europe and Australia are eligible for registration; GCs from other countries are considered on a case by case basis. Genetic counseling jobs are primarily clinical, in urban areas, in both state hospitals and private services, and recently expanding into industry.


We believe that in 2018 there are nearly 7000 genetic counselors globally, in at least 28 countries. Greater than 60% are practicing in North America. As described above, most countries with training programs in genetic counseling have adopted a 2-year Master’s degree approach, although there is variation in methods and requirements for training, certification, and registration/licensure. Our data suggests that flexibility in how the profession develops and expands will remain necessary to acknowledge the international variation in laws, health systems, and cultures. Genetic counseling remains a growing profession globally, and international collaboration and growing reciprocal agreements support ongoing improvements across training, regulation, and scopes of practice.


  1. 1.

    Heimler A. An oral history of the national society of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. 1997;6:315–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cordier C, Lambert D, Voelckel MA, Hosterey-Ugander U, Skirton H. A profile of genetic counsellor and genetic nurse profession in European countries. J Community Genet. 2012;3:19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sahhar M, Hodgson J, Wake SJ. Educating genetic counselors in Australia-developing a masters program. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:897–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Resta R, Biesecker BB, Bennett RL, et al. A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. J Genet Couns. 2006;15:77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Edwards JG. The transnational alliance for genetic counseling: promoting international communication and collaboration. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:688–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ingvoldstad C, Seven M, Taris N, Cordier C, Paneque M, Skirton H. Components of genetic counsellor education: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature. J Community Genet. 2016;7:107–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ormond, KE, Laurino, MY, Barlow-Steward K, Wessels, TM, Macaulay, S, Austin, J, et al. Genetic counseling globally: where are we now? Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:98–107.

  8. 8.

    Stern AM. A quiet revolution: the birth of the genetic counselor at Sarah Lawrence College, 1969. J Genet Couns. 2009;18:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dobson DaVanzo & Associates. Projecting the supply and demand for certified genetic counselors: a workforce study. Vienna, VA:Dobson DaVanzo & Associates; 2016. (Accessed Jan 31, 2018).

  10. 10.

    Ferrier RA, Connolly-Wilson M, Fitzpatrick J, et al. The establishment of core competencies for canadian genetic counsellors: validation of practice based competencies. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:690–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Doyle DL, Awwad RI, Austin JC, et al. 2013 review and update of the genetic counseling practice based competencies by a task force of the accreditation council for genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2016;25:868–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lantigua-Cruz A, González-Lucas N. Development of medical genetics in Cuba: 39 years in the training of human resources. Rev Cuba Genet Comunit. 2009;3:3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lantigua-Cruz A. An overview of genetic counseling en Cuba. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:849–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chavarri-Guerra Y, Blazer KR, Weitzel JN. Genetic cancer risk assessment for breast cancer in Latin America. Rev Invest Clin. 2017;69:94–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Penchaszadeh VB, Beiguelman B. Medical genetic services in Latin America: report of a meeting of experts. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1998;3:409–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Margarit S, Alvarado M, Alvarez K, Lay-Son G. Medical genetics and genetic counseling in Chile. J Genet Couns. 2013;6:869–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cruz-Correa M, Pérez-Mayoral J, Dutil J, et al. Puerto Rico Clinical Cancer Genetics Consortia. Clinical Cancer Genetics Disparities among Latinos. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:379–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Paneque M, Moldovan R, Cordier C, et al. The perceived impact of the European registration system for genetic counsellors and nurses. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017b;25:1075–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Skirton H, Kerzin-Storrar L, Barnes C, et al. Building the genetic counsellor profession in the United Kingdom: two decades of growth and development. J Genet Couns. 2013b;22:902–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    National School of Healthcare Science (2018) About the programme. Accessed 21 July from

  21. 21.

    Middleton A, Marks P, Bruce A, et al. The role of genetic counsellors in genomic healthcare in the UK. Eur J Human Genet. 2017;25:659–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Patch, C, Middleton, A Genetic counselling in the era of genomic medicine. British Medical Bulletin. published online 2 April 2018.

  23. 23.

    Middleton A, Hall G, Patch C. Genetic Counselors and Genomic Counseling in the UK Molecular Genetics and Genomic. Medicine. 2014;3:79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Skirton H, Patch C, Voelckel MA. Using a community of practice to develop standards of practice and education for genetic counsellors in Europe. J Community Genet. 2010;1:169–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Skirton H, Cordier C, Ingvoldstad C, Taris N, Benjamin C. The role of the genetic counsellor: a systematic review of research evidence. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:452–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Paneque, M, Moldovan, R, Cordier, C, et al. Genetic Counselling Profession in Europe. eLS2016; 1–6.

  27. 27.

    Cordier C, Taris N, Modovan R, Sobol H. Genetic professionals’ views on genetic counsellors: a French survey. J Community Genet. 2016;7:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Paneque M, Mendes Á, Saraiva J, Sequeiros J. Genetic Counseling in Portugal: Education, Practice and a Developing Profession. J Genet Couns. 2015;24:548–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pestoff R, Ingvoldstad C, Skirton H. Genetic counsellors in Sweden: their role and added value in the clinical setting. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:350–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gschmeidler B, Flatscher-Thoeni M. Ethical and professional challenges of genetic counseling - the case of Austria. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:741–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sagi M, Uhlmann WR. Genetic Counseling Services and Training of Genetic Counselors in Israel: an overview. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:890–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Qari AA, Balobaid AS, Rawashdeh RR, Al-Sayed MD. The development of genetic counseling services and training program in Saudi Arabia. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:835–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Al Aqeel A. Ethical in genetics and genomics: an islamic perspective. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:1862–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Balobaid A, Qari A, Al-Zaidan H. Genetic counselors' scope of practice and challenges in genetic counseling services in Saudi Arabia. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2016;3:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Barlow-Stewart, K, Dunlop, K, Fleischer, R, Shalhoub, C, & Williams, R (2015). The NSW Genetic counseling Workforce: Background Information Paper: an Evidence Check rapid review brokered by the Sax Institute ( for the Centre for the NSW Ministry of Health.

  36. 36.

    Laurino MY, Leppig KA, Abad PJ, et al. A Report on Ten Asia Pacific Countries on Current Status and Future Directions of the Genetic Counseling Profession: The Establishment of the Professional Society of Genetic Counselors in Asia. J Genet Couns 2017; e-pub Print. 2017. 11 July 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhao X, Wang P, Tao X, Zhong N. Genetic services and testing in China. J Community Genet. 2013;4:379–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    An Y, Chen H, Jin L, Wu BL, Lu DR. Genetic counseling training in China: A pilot program at Fudan University. NAJ Med Sci. 2013;6:221–2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li J, Xu T, Yashar BM. Genetics educational needs in China: physicians' experience and knowledge of genetic testing. Genet Med. 2014;17:757–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Elackatt NJ. Genetic counseling: a transnational perspective. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:854–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lee JM, Thong MK. Genetic counseling services and development of training programs in Malaysia. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:911–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    NUM (n.d.). Masters of Medical Science in Genetic Counselling. Faculty of Medicine. The National University of Malaysia. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from

  43. 43.

    Tan RYC, Met-Domestici M, Zhou K, et al. Using Quality Improvement Methods and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing to Improve Value-Based Cancer Care Delivery at a Cancer Genetics Clinic. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e320–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim HJ. Genetic Counseling in Korean Health Care System. J Genet Med. 2011;8:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chien S, Su PH, Chen SJ. Development of genetic counseling services in Taiwan. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:839–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Greenberg J, Kromberg J, Loggenberg K, Wessels TM. Genetic counseling in South Africa. In Genomics and Health in the Developing World. Oxford Mongraphs of Medical Genetics. In: Kumar D, Ed.. P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 531–46.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kromberg JG, Wessels TM, Krause A. Roles of genetic counselors in South Africa. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:753–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Clinical Genetics Committee of the Royal College of Physicians (1991) Purchasers’ guidelines to genetic services in the NHS. Royal College of Physicians.

Download references


Thanks to Irene Feroce, Maria Hintze, Ulla Parisaari, Sari Rasi, Ilene Slegers, and Angela Trepanier, for providing unpublished information cited in this paper, and to Kim Zayhowski and Tacy Framhein for help with formatting of the paper. Finally, open access publication of this work was supported by Wellcome grant [206194] to Connecting Science, Society and Ethics Research Group and Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge UK.

Author information




All authors have equal contribution to this paper, much of which is a result of presentations and networking at the 2016 TAGC conference in Barcelona, Spain and the 2017 World Congress of Genetic Counselling at the Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly E. Ormond.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abacan, M., Alsubaie, L., Barlow-Stewart, K. et al. The Global State of the Genetic Counseling Profession. Eur J Hum Genet 27, 183–197 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links