Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Beyond the limits of indirect calorimetry

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 77, pages 925–926 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Predictive equations are often inaccurate [1] and therefore indirect calorimetry has been recognized as the gold standard for evaluating the energy requirements of critically ill patients [2]. Significant technological improvement has been achieved in recent years [3], however, the list of limitations and contraindications for the use of indirect calorimetry remains mostly unchanged [4]. In recent years, some of these contraindications and limitations have been re-evaluated and the use of IC has been found to be acceptable in extra corporeal systems and in continuous renal replacement therapy, in particular [5]. Handling the loss of CO2 from the circuit could have been challenging but has been demonstrated to affect the final evaluation of energy expenditure by less than 5%. During extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), this challenge is more significant. First there is no gold standard for ECMO patients and most of the studies existing compared results to predictive equations. Several teams have studied small groups of patients on veno-venous ECMO [6,7,8]). Results showed substantial variability. This may be related to level of awareness, sedation and paralysis, use of vasopressors, temperature (active cooling in specific cases) and presence of sepsis [6]. Technically, in the Wollersheim setup [6], conventional IC is performed and extended by calculating O2 uptake and CO2 elimination through the difference in gas content before and after the filter and the extracorporeal life support (ECLS) blood flow. Practically, results of the blood gas analysis are inserted into the model of Dash and Bassingthwaighte, which is a mathematical model that calculates O2 and CO2 concentrations in the blood [9]. D ˙VO2 and D ˙VCO2 can be determined by multiplying the difference of O2 (DcO2) and CO2 concentrations (DcCO2), in volume percentages, with the volumetric blood flow in the ECMO-circuit (˙Vblood). In the de Waele study [7], gas sampling and flow measurements were obtained with a metabolic cart at the ECMO side. Breath‐by‐breath technology was used. In 7 ICU children connected to ECMO and ventilated with FIO2 < 0.6 [8], VO2 and VCO2 from the mechanical ventilator (Native Lung Measurement) and VO2 and VCO2 from the ECMO oxygenator (ECMO Lung) were obtained. The VO2 total was obtained by adding the VO2 native lung to the VO2 ECMO lung. The VCO2 total was the VCO2 native lung combined with the VCO2 ECMO lung. The VO2 total and VCO2 total were then placed in the modified Weir equation to calculate REE in Kcal/day: REE (Kcal/day) = ([3.9 × VO2 total] + [1.1 × VCO2 total]) × 1.44. in this study too, large variability was noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Zusman O, Kagan I, Bendavid I, Theilla M, Cohen J, Singer P. Predictive equations versus measured energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry: A retrospective validation. Clin Nutr. 2019;38:1206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019;38:48–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oshima T, Berger MM, De Waele E, Guttormsen AB, Heidegger CP, Hiesmayr M, et al. Indirect calorimetry in nutritional therapy. A position paper by the ICALIC study group. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:651–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lev S, Cohen J, Singer P. Indirect Calorimetry: Measurements in the Ventilated Critically Ill Patient: Facts and Controversies—The Heat is On. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26:e1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Alesio M, Martucci G, Arcadipane A, Lorusso R, Amrein K. Nutrition during extracorporeal life support: A review of pathophysiological bases and application of guidelines. Artif Organs. 2022;46:1240–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wollersheim T, Frank S, Müller MC, Skrypnikov V, Carbon NM, Pickerodt PA, et al. Measuring energy expenditure in extracorporeal lung support patients (MEEP) ‐ protocol feasibility and pilot trial. Clin Nutr. 2018;37:301–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.01.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Waele E, Jonckheer J, Pen JJ, Demol J, Staessens K, Puis L, et al. Energy expenditure of patients on ECMO: A prospective pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63:360–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ewing LJ, Domico MB, Ramirez R, Starr JP, Lam DR, Mink RB. Measuring the Resting Energy Expenditure in Children on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Prospective Pilot Study. ASAIO J. 2023;69:122–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dash RK, Bassingthwaighte JB. Erratum to: Blood HbO2 and HbCO2 Dissociation Curves at Varied O2, CO2, pH, 2,3-DPG and Temperature Levels. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:1683–701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tatucu-Babet OA, Diehl A, Kratzing C, Lambell K, Burrell A, Tierney A, et al. Modified Indirect Calorimetry for Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Eur J Clin Nutr.

  11. Priem S, Jonckheer J, De Waele E, Stiens J. Indirect Calorimetry in Spontaneously Breathing, Mechanically Ventilated and Extracorporeally Oxygenated Patients: An Engineering Review. Sensors. 2023;23:4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Herzlia Medical Center intensive care unit and Reichman University, Herzlia, Israel

    Pierre Singer

  2. Beilinson Medical Center, Institute for Nutrition Research, Petah Tiqwa, Israel

    Liran Statlender

Authors
  1. Pierre Singer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liran Statlender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PS and LS contributed both to the redaction of this comment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Singer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singer, P., Statlender, L. Beyond the limits of indirect calorimetry. Eur J Clin Nutr 77, 925–926 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01319-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01319-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links