Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Should local references or global standards be used to assess gestational weight gain?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Thiruvengadam R, Desiraju BK, Natchu UCM, Wadhwa N, Sachdeva K, Misra S, et al. Gestational weight gain trajectories in GARBH-Ini pregnancy cohort in North India and a comparative analysis with global references. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76:855–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hermanussen M. Pregnant women need local references for gestational weight gain - an editorial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76:781–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu J, Luntamo M, Kulmala T, Ashorn P, Cheung YB. A longitudinal study of weight gain in pregnancy in Malawi: unconditional and conditional standards. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:296–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang A, Xiao Y, Hu H, Zhao W, Yang Q, Ma W, et al. Gestational weight gain charts by gestational age and body mass index for Chinese women: a population-based follow-up study. J Epidemiol. 2020;30:345–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kac G, Carrilho TRB, Rasmussen KM, Reichenheim ME, Farias DR, Hutcheon JA. Gestational weight gain charts: results from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113:1351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, Misso ML, Boyle JA, Harrison CL, et al. Gestational weight gain across continents and ethnicity: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and infant outcomes in more than one million women. BMC Med. 2018;16:153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole TJ. The development of growth references and growth charts. Ann Hum Biol. 2012;39:382–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheikh-Ismail L, Bishop DC, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Kac G, Abrams B, et al. Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2016;352:i555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutcheon JA, Chapinal N, Bodnar LM, Lee L. The INTERGROWTH-21st gestational weight gain standard and interpregnancy weight increase: a population-based study of successive pregnancies. Obesity. 2017;25:1122–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutcheon JA, Bodnar LM. A systematic approach for establishing the range of recommended weight gain in pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:701–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amorim AR, Linne Y, Kac G, Lourenco PM. Assessment of weight changes during and after pregnancy: practical approaches. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Abrams B, Himes KP, Simhan HN, Bodnar LM. A weight-gain-for-gestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:1062–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

TC is a grantee from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) and the Brazilian Ministry of Health (grant number 445710/2020-9). JAH holds a Canada Research Chair in Perinatal Population Health. The funders did not play any role in the writing of this letter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TC wrote the letter with input from JAH and GK. All the authors read and approved the final version and are responsible for its content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thais Rangel Bousquet Carrilho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carrilho, T.R.B., Kac, G. & Hutcheon, J.A. Should local references or global standards be used to assess gestational weight gain?. Eur J Clin Nutr (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01202-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01202-6

Search

Quick links