Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nutrition during the early life cycle

Gestational weight gain trajectories in GARBH–Ini pregnancy cohort in North India and a comparative analysis with global references



To describe the pattern of gestational weight gain (GWG), derive reference centiles for GWG specific to North Indian population, and to compare the weight gain across different periods of gestation with the INTERGROWTH–21st reference.


A prospective pregnancy (GARBH-Ini) cohort was initiated and followed between May 2015 and June 2019 in a district hospital, Gurguram, North India. GWG centile curves were modelled by Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape method (n = 2844) and compared with INTERGROWTH-21st reference. The independent association of GWG with biological and social predictors was assessed using multivariable regression analysis.


Percentiles (3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97th) for each completed week from 18–40 weeks of gestation were derived from smoothed centile curves. The median GWG across pregnancy during specific antenatal visits was 1.29 at 18, 4.44 at 26, 5.8 at 30 and 9.06 kg at 40 weeks of gestation. Nearly 26% of participants had GWG < 10th centile at 18–20 weeks as per INTERGROWTH–21st reference and this increased to 45% at delivery. Significant predictors of GWG included maternal age, height, first trimester body mass index, parity, type of family, and use of clean fuel for cooking.


These GWG percentiles will serve as a useful reference, particularly during the WHO recommended antenatal visit schedule for optimum pregnancy outcomes, for clinicians and researchers. Multiple independent biological and social predictors of GWG suggest that single interventions are unlikely to bridge the gap between general Indian population and international references.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Study flow.
Fig. 2: Gestational weight gain trajectories and their comparison with INTERGROWTH-21st standard.
Fig. 3: Smoothed centile curves shown for participants in different BMI categories.

Data availability

Data described in the manuscript will be made available upon request pending approval.

Code availability

Analysis code will be made available upon request with the objective of use.


  1. Kominiarek MA, Peaceman AM. Gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(Dec):642–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines [Internet]. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009 [cited 2019 Jul 25]. (The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health). Available from:

  3. Cheikh Ismail L, Bishop DC, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Kac G, Abrams B, et al. Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2016;i555.

  4. Arora P, Tamber Aeri B. Gestational Weight Gain among Healthy Pregnant Women from Asia in Comparison with Institute of Medicine (IOM) Guidelines-2009: A Systematic Review. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019(Mar):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatnagar S, Majumder PP, Salunke DM. A pregnancy cohort to study multidimensional correlates of preterm birth in india: study design, implementation, and baseline characteristics of the participants. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(Apr):621–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP, Onis M. Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Acta Paediatrica. 2007;95(Jan):38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stasinopoulos MD, Rigby RA, Heller GZ, Voudouris V, Bastiani FD. Flexible regression and smoothing: Using GAMLSS in R (1st ed.) 2017. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. p. 572.

  8. Villar J, Altman D, Purwar M, Noble J, Knight H, Ruyan P, et al. The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: The INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(Sep):9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohd Saleem S. Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2019. Indian J Forensic Community Med. 2019;6:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization, editor. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. 152 p.

  11. [Standard values for the weight gain in pregnancy according to maternal height and weight] - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 16]. Available from:

  12. Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Abrams B, Himes KP, Simhan HN, Bodnar LM. A weight-gain-for-gestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:1062–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhavadharini B, Anjana R, Deepa M, Jayashree G, Nrutya S, Shobana M, et al. Gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in relation to body mass index in Asian Indian women. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21:588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahanta L, Choudhury M, Devi A, Bhattacharya A. On the study of pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and weight gain as indicators of nutritional status of pregnant women belonging to low socio-economic category: a study from Assam. Indian J Community Med. 2015;40:198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Misra A, Ray S, Patrikar S. A longitudinal study to determine association of various maternal factors with neonatal birth weight at a tertiary care hospital. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71:270–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pal R, Maiti M, Roychoudhury B, Sanyal P, Chowdhury B. Association of pregestational BMI and antenatal weight gain with pregnancy outcome: a prospective observational cohort study. Int J Women’s Health Reprod Sci. 2017;5:37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Radhakrishnan U, Kolar G, Nirmalan PK. Cross-sectional study of gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women at a tertiary care center in southern India: Gestational weight gain. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deputy NP, Sharma AJ, Kim SY, Hinkle SN. Prevalence and characteristics associated with gestational weight gain adequacy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(Apr):773–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amegah AK, Quansah R, Jaakkola JJK. Household air pollution from solid fuel use and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113920.

  20. Li X, Huang S, Jiao A, Yang X, Yun J, Wang Y, et al. Association between ambient fine particulate matter and preterm birth or term low birth weight: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2017;227:596–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Siega-Riz AM, Bodnar LM, Stotland NE, Stang J. The Current Understanding of Gestational Weight Gain Among Women with Obesity and the Need for Future Research. NAM Perspectives [Internet]. 2020 Jan [cited 2020 Jul 16]; Available from:

Download references


Prof. MK Bhan will always be remembered reverently for his critical scientific and technical feedback. We greatly appreciate the extraordinary efforts from Drs. A Gambhir and S Sinha from DBT-India for supporting the GARBH–Ini program. We recognize the efforts of the research physicians, study nurses, clinical and laboratory technicians, field workers, internal quality improvement team, project and the data management team of GARBH–Ini cohort. This work was funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India (BT/PR9983/MED/97/194/2013) and for some components of the biorepository by the Grand Challenges India – All Children Thriving Program (supported by the Programme Management Unit), Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC/GCI/0114/03/14–ACT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




SB, UCMN, NW, RT, KS, SM, NP, MJ, RB, PM, RT, and GARBH-Ini study team: conducted the GARBH–Ini cohort study and acquired the data; SB, RT, and BKD conceived the research questions and designed the analysis; BKD and RT analyzed data; SB, UCMN, HSS, SR, and RT guided and provided feedback on the analysis and interpretation of results; SB, RT, and BKD wrote the paper. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinjini Bhatnagar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiruvengadam, R., Desiraju, B.K., Natchu, U.C.M. et al. Gestational weight gain trajectories in GARBH–Ini pregnancy cohort in North India and a comparative analysis with global references. Eur J Clin Nutr 76, 855–862 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links