Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Influence of maternal and paternal pre-conception overweight/obesity on offspring outcomes and strategies for prevention


Overweight, obesity, and their comorbidities remain global health challenges. When established early in life, overweight is often sustained into adulthood and contributes to the early onset of non-communicable diseases. Parental pre-conception overweight and obesity is a risk factor for overweight and obesity in childhood and beyond. This increased risk likely is based on an interplay of genetic alterations and environmental exposures already at the beginning of life, although mechanisms are still poorly defined. In this narrative review, potential routes of transmission of pre-conceptional overweight/obesity from mothers and fathers to their offspring as well as prevention strategies are discussed. Observational evidence suggests that metabolic changes due to parental overweight/obesity affect epigenetic markers in oocytes and sperms alike and may influence epigenetic programming and reprogramming processes during embryogenesis. While weight reduction in overweight/obese men and women, who plan to become pregnant, seems advisable to improve undesirable outcomes in offspring, caution might be warranted. Limited evidence suggests that weight loss in men and women in close proximity to conception might increase undesirable offspring outcomes at birth due to nutritional deficits and/or metabolic disturbances in the parent also affecting gamete quality. A change in the dietary pattern might be more advisable. The data reviewed here suggest that pre-conception intervention strategies should shift from women to couples, and future studies should address possible interactions between maternal and paternal contribution to longitudinal childhood outcomes. Randomized controlled trials focusing on effects of pre-conceptional diet quality on long-term offspring health are warranted.


The health of a child depends on its environment. Exposure to suboptimal conditions early in life appears to affect the health not only momentarily but throughout a life course. The earliest environment is defined by the mother and, amongst other factors, both under- and overnutrition during pregnancy can lead to undesirable health outcomes in offspring. The observation that early-life exposure during pregnancy and infancy impacts life-long health led to the generation of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease hypothesis [1]. This theory is widely accepted today and resulted in a boost in research focusing on pregnant women. However, recent evidence points to the pre-conception and/or peri-conception phase as an important time to influence offspring health outcomes. The peri-conceptional phase encompasses the time that precedes, includes, and immediately follows conception [2].

With ever-increasing numbers, overweight and obesity in children and their comorbidities have become a major threat to personal and societal wellbeing in high-, middle- and low-income countries alike [3, 4]. Parental peri-conception overweight is a strong predictor for increased birth weight as well as for childhood overweight and obesity [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. While the causes for obesity are multifactorial and include effects of (food) environment, socioeconomic status, psychological health, and cultural aspects [12], results from adoption studies suggest that overweight and obesity also have a genetic component [13]. Mechanisms underlying overweight development and fetal adipogenic programming through influences of early-life stages are still poorly understood.

In this review, we focus on parental overweight/obesity in the peri-conceptional phase and its effects on gamete quality and epigenetic changes as mediators of increased risk for overweight or obesity in offspring. We further reviewed risks associated with pre-conceptional weight loss in overweight or obese mothers and fathers and discuss improvement of the diet as a possible alternative to body mass index (BMI) reduction.

Methods: sources and selection criteria

The articles selected for this review were English-language, full-text articles and abstracts that were identified by a series of PubMed and EMBASE searches using keywords either alone or in combination and published before July 31, 2020. The keywords used included obesity, overweight, child outcomes, infant outcomes, large for gestational age, small for gestational age (SGA), pregnancy, pre-conception, weight loss, bariatric surgery, micronutrient, oocyte quality, sperm quality, seminal fluid, assisted reproductive technologies, epigenetics, epigenetic programming, DNA methylation, and gestational weight gain. The reference lists of articles and reviews identified by this search strategy were also searched, and those articles that deemed to be relevant were selected. This review is not exhaustive; therefore, we provide references for more in-depth reviews when we thought it might be helpful or appropriate. We used the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ as an indication of the biological sex of the respective parent and not as a representation of their social gender.

Why is pre-conception health important?

The decision to have a child is life changing. However, about 40% of pregnancies are unintended [14], and these pregnancies seem to be associated with a higher risk for undesirable pregnancy and birth outcomes [15]. A recent systematic review reported that during the pre-conception phase and pregnancy, women may not meet recommendations for vegetable, cereal grain, vitamin, and mineral intake [16]. Even amongst those who plan to get pregnant, awareness of pre-conception health and motivation for behavioral changes appears limited in both women and men [16,17,18]. This evidence suggests that many women and men might not have optimal metabolic conditions prior to pregnancy. Overweight and obesity have become major global problems [3, 19]. Among women of childbearing age, up to 70% are overweight or obese and up to 40% are obese worldwide [19], and these numbers are predicted to increase [20, 21]. Therefore, pregnant women with overweight or obesity are not a minor instance but have become part of a new norm [19].

Obesity is a risk factor for a wide range of complications related to pregnancy. First, it causes in- and subfertility in men and women [22, 23]. In addition, pregnant women who are obese have higher rates of hypertension, preeclampsia, thromboembolism, cesarean section, and excessive weight gain during pregnancy and have increased rates of metabolic abnormalities such as gestational diabetes (reviewed in [24, 25]). Their children are more at-risk to be born large for gestational age or SGA, to have congenital defects, or to develop overweight and/or cardiometabolic diseases later in life (reviewed in [6, 7, 25, 26]). Studies that assessed the effect of the mothers’ high pre- or early-pregnancy BMI show a positive association with increases in birth weight, longitudinal BMI development during preschool age [27,28,29], and body weight in offspring up to age 18 years [7, 10]. In addition, evidence is emerging suggesting that paternal BMI may affect offspring risk for obesity or type 2 diabetes across the life course [5, 30]. However, high-quality studies are sparse.

Overweight and obesity developed in childhood and adolescence are generally sustained in adulthood and, if established already early in life, often progress to more severe stages over the course of a lifetime [31]. Overweight and obesity seem to be transferred from ancestor generations to their progeny, with data indicating that a susceptibility for overweight can be passed on over three generations, through environmental exposures modulating the germline epigenome and leading to a transgenerational phenotype [32]. Here, we focus on parent-to-child transmission. To overcome the associated personal and societal costs (psychological and financial), the intergenerational cycle has to be broken to stop the alarming rate of global obesity development. Lifestyle intervention studies in women with overweight and obesity during their pregnancy failed to prevent undesirable offspring outcomes at birth [33, 34]. Therefore, weight should be reduced prior to pregnancy, as very early embryonic development, when women might not yet know that they are pregnant, seems to be essential for pregnancy success and life-long health of a child [34]. The low adherence to pre-pregnancy health guidelines [16] and the high proportion of unplanned pregnancies [14] further strengthen the urgency to implement strategies for improvement of pre-conception health.

Gamete quality

The life of all vertebrates starts with the fusion of ovum and sperm. The gametes’ quality and potential are inherently affected by the health status of the individual who generates them. While women often are in the spotlight when it comes to the health of a growing life, the male counterparts contribute equally to the genetic material. Overweight and obesity affect the quality of oocytes and sperms alike (see below). Several studies demonstrated epigenetic changes in DNA and histone methylation, histone acetylation, and microRNA expression in oocytes and sperms. Epigenetic modifications change the way genes are expressed without altering the genetic code itself. In changing environments, these potentially reversible modifications might be beneficial over genetic alterations [35]. They are believed to be an adaptation mechanism that provides an evolutionary advantage for the subsequent generations.


The maturation process from primordial follicles to ovulation takes several months and is regulated by hormonal signals. The complete process remains to be fully understood. During the months of maturation, the oocyte and its surrounding cumulus cells are exposed to the nutritional and hormonal environment within the woman’s body [36]. Overweight and obesity affect sex hormones, oogenesis and fertility, and, within an oocyte, gene expression, epigenetic markers, and mitochondria [37,38,39].

The unique contribution of the oocyte quality to offspring health as opposed to the maternal metabolic environment during early-life development can hardly be assessed in natural pregnancies. However, egg retrievals are routinely performed in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), and several studies assessed offspring outcomes after ART [40, 41]. Decreased pregnancy and live birth rates resulted from increasing autologous [42] as well as a donor [43] oocyte BMI, possibly pointing to a BMI-related impairment of the oocyte quality prior to fertilization.

While observational evidence on transmission of maternal obesity to an offspring is solid, data on mechanisms are sparse. A recent report focused on STELLA, a protein highly expressed in primordial germ cells [44]. High-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity led to a reduction in STELLA in murine oocytes and a subsequent change in DNA methylation. Exogeneous overexpression of STELLA partly reversed methylation patterns as well as phenotypical obesity-associated defects during embryogenesis [44]. The insufficient amount of STELLA in oocytes from obese mice was suggested to be one route potentially contributing to the intergenerational transmission of maternal obesity to their offspring.

In addition, obesity-related overnutrition and alterations of metabolites (glucose, free fatty acids) in the circulation are assumed to be mirrored in the intra-follicular fluid with increased concentrations of lactate, insulin, leptin, and triglycerides [37, 45]. High intra-follicular insulin concentrations were related to adiposity in women and might potentially impair oocyte function [37, 46, 47]. Furthermore, within oocytes of obese mice and women, high intra-follicular lipid concentrations cause lipotoxicity [48, 49], and lipid accumulation was associated with impaired mitochondrial function and oxidative stress resulting in DNA damage [23, 38, 49]. In their recent review, Bradly and Swann concluded that a balance of fatty acid and pyruvate oxidation is a prerequisite for optimal oocyte function and early embryonic development, and a disruption of the balance—by excess or shortage of either substrate—will result in compromised oocyte and embryo quality [50]. However, not only the amount of lipids but also lipid quality could affect oocytes and pregnancy success. Higher palmitic acid and total saturated fatty acid concentrations were found in the intra-follicular fluid from degenerate bovine oocytes, whereas competent oocytes showed higher concentrations of linolenic acid [51]. Non-esterified fatty acids were higher in oocytes from obese than overweight and normal weight women, possibly affecting oocyte quality [52]. These results suggest that an adjustment of the nutritional quality of the oocyte environment might be able to dampen negative effects resulting from obesity.


Most interventions to improve pregnancy and child health target mothers, as their behavior from conception to the end of breastfeeding and onward affects the metabolic outcomes of their offspring. However, paternal pre-conception lifestyle seems to affect child outcomes as well. Children from pre-conceptionally obese fathers are likely to develop obesity and/or metabolic dysfunction independent of the mother’s weight [5, 30]. In mice, female offspring from pre-conceptionally obese fathers showed impaired insulin secretion and glucose tolerance [53]. Furthermore, paternal obesity was negatively associated with live birth rates in couples undergoing ART [54] and positively associated with changes in sperm, including alterations in small RNA species [55, 56].

Sperm carry non-coding RNAs, which might also modulate DNA methylation [57,58,59]. Obese male mice exhibited altered microRNA and DNA methylation profiles in sperm and transmission of adverse metabolic phenotypes, which were partly transferred to the following two generations [60]. A pre-conceptional weight loss study in obese male mice showed that changes in microRNA patterns in sperm are reversible through lifestyle changes (diet and/or exercise) and that these findings were associated with a decrease in the predisposition for adiposity and insulin resistance in female offspring [61]. Interestingly, in the Project Viva study, paternal BMI at conception was associated with methylation patterns in cord blood samples and in offspring blood at ages 3 and 7 years [9].

DNA methylation patterns and non-coding RNA content of sperm from obese men differed from those of lean men [62]. In the same report, sperm from obese men who underwent gastric bypass surgery showed DNA methylation changes in 1.509 genes 1 week after surgery (median BMI: 40.1 kg/m2, p < 0.05 compared with pre-surgery) in comparison to sperm obtained from the same individual 1 week before surgery (median BMI: 42.6 kg/m2) [62]. Of those, differences in 1.004 gene methylations were still evident 1 year after surgery when weight stabilized (median BMI: 33.9 kg/m2, p < 0.05 compared with pre-surgery) [62]. These findings suggest that epigenetic changes occur rapidly in sperm and that they are affected by body weight. Recently, it was discovered that seminal fluid has its own microbiome, which is affected by the diet [63, 64]. The microbiome composition may potentially also affect epigenetic markers in the sperm. However, the role of the seminal fluid microbiome remains to be elucidated.

Observational studies suggest that children born to two parents with overweight or obesity have a higher risk to develop obesity than children with only one overweight or obese parent [8, 65]. However, offspring’s weight at birth and at 3 years of age was stronger associated with maternal obesity than paternal obesity [66]. Future research needs to clarify whether good metabolic health of one parent could dampen adverse effects of an overweight/obese partner on the long-term outcome of the child.

Epigenetic programming

Once sperm and oocyte merged, their DNA undergoes substantial epigenetic reprogramming. During the first week after fertilization, parental DNA methylation is widely removed from all cells, and de novo methylation occurs. These new epigenetic markers—i.e., epigenetic programming—are partly sustained over the course of a life and can affect metabolism [67]. Primordial germ cells, the cells that will become the gametes, undergo a second round of demethylation during embryogenesis [68].

Environmental exposures affect the process of epigenetic programming, which is apparent e.g. in children conceived through ART. Changes in epigenetic programming and undesirable pregnancy and health outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, or birth defects, are increased after ART compared with spontaneous conception [69]. Limited evidence suggests long-term effects in offspring conceived through ART such as increased risks for cardiovascular diseases or decreased reproductive function [69]. One study found that children aged 0–4 years conceived via ART were smaller compared with those conceived naturally [40]. These differences were not detectable at 5 years of age or older [40], which indirectly suggests that the children conceived through ART might possibly develop accelerated growth in their first years of life. In ART, the environment for the zygote and during the first cell divisions is very different from the natural surroundings in a mother’s body. The culture medium itself affects offspring birth weight and weight trajectory in the first 2 years of life, as shown in a study where two different culture media for in vitro fertilization were tested [70, 71]. These results demonstrate that the intrauterine environment might be one route of intergenerational transmission of overweight or obesity through changes in epigenetic programming.

Risks associated with weight reduction prior to conception

Considering the outlined risks associated with overweight and obesity, health guidelines recommend a normalization of the body weight prior to pregnancy [72, 73]. The reasonable amount of weight loss and safe strategies to achieve a reduction in BMI differ considerably, as recently reviewed [73]. Studies focusing on fertility showed improved fertility rates after modest weight loss of a mean of 6.6 ± 4.6 kg (mean 6.9% of initial body weight) [74], and higher losses (>10% of body weight) might benefit fertility further [75]. A study in mice assessed the effects of pre-conceptional weight loss on epigenetic modulators in placenta and fetal liver at embryonic day (E) 18.5 [76]. Prior to mating, a normal weight group was fed with a control diet for 4 months and compared with an overweight group, fed a HFD for 4 months, and a weight loss group, fed a HFD for 2 months followed by a control diet for 2 months. The mice were sacrificed at E18.5, and expression levels of epigenetic modulators in fetal liver, placental labyrinth, and uterine junctional zone were assessed. Long-term HFD led to a reduction in fetal weight, which could be partially rescued by diet-induced weight loss prior to mating. Weight loss further induced a partial normalization of expression levels of a subset of genes belonging to the epigenetic machinery [76]. This study suggests that epigenetic processes could be modulated by weight change prior to pregnancy, at least in mice. As this study ended during pregnancy, long-term effects on the offspring would be of interest.

In a rat model with a similar intervention, male offspring were followed up until 150 days of age [77]. Pubs from obese dams who were subjected to a dietary intervention prior to pregnancy showed metabolic parameters similar to pubs from dams in the control diet group at postnatal day 21. Later at day 150, their serum leptin levels as well as fat tissue weight and fat cell size were lowered compared to offspring of obese dams, although fasting insulin (day 120), body weight, and food intake (day 150) were not [77]. The weight of the dams in the dietary intervention group was not stabilized, which might have affected offspring outcomes.

Clinical trials assessed the effects of severe weight loss after bariatric surgery on pregnancy and child outcomes. These results raise a note of caution for pre-conceptional weight loss. In addition to higher risks of prematurity and admission to neonatal intensive care unit, the rate of SGA was increased in offspring born to overweight/obese mothers who underwent bariatric surgery, as compared to offspring of mothers without operations (relative risk 1.93; 95% confidence interval 1.65–2.26) [78]. A shortage of maternal micronutrients resulting from bariatric surgery likely adds to the undesirable pregnancy outcomes [79], and thus, regular monitoring and nutritional recommendations are required for the pre-conception and gestational phases.

Furthermore, a recent systematic review suggested that weight reduction through lifestyle intervention in women with obesity prior to infertility treatment might cause an increase in the rate of miscarriages [33]. In the Norwegian Fit for Delivery study, the risk for SGA increased with higher pre-pregnancy (p-trend = 0.036) or early-pregnancy (p-trend = 0.043) diet quality scores [80]. The authors suggested that behaviors focused on energy balance might lead to a shortage of fuel for child development [80]. However, the relationship was no longer significant in a model adjusted for other maternal variables that might explain the higher SGA rate associated with the diet scores. In a French cohort study [81], a restrictive diet and weight loss prior to pregnancy resulted in increased gestational weight gain, which is a known risk factor for large-for-gestational-age birth weight and overweight in children [82]. Another study showed an increased risk for SGA in normal-weight women after weight loss prior to pregnancy (odds ratio 1.76; 95% confidence interval 1.10–2.81), while there were no effects on birth weight in children born to women with overweight/obesity (BMI 25–40 kg/m2) who had pre-pregnancy weight loss, although the sample size of this subgroup was small [83].

These findings highlight the challenge for a public health campaign targeting women who plan a pregnancy. While supervised weight loss prior to pregnancy might be beneficial to women who are overweight or obese, overly health-conscious women with normal weight might also follow the guidance addressed at women with higher BMI and lose weight or restrict their eating habits at the risk of nutritional deficiencies and SGA birth weight of babies. The timing, method, and extent of desirable weight loss in women with overweight or obesity have to be assessed in future studies.

Following the weight loss of men through bariatric surgery, different effects on sperm quality at 1–2 years after surgery are reported. In some case studies, reduced sperm quality or increased rates of infertility were reported [84,85,86], whereas others found improvements [87] or no changes of sperm quality [88]. It remains to be determined if the timing of weight loss in fathers prior to conception is associated with later health outcomes in the offspring. In male mice, pre-pregnancy undernutrition negatively affected sperm quality and led to adiposity and dyslipidemia in their offspring later in life [89]. Supplementation of antioxidants and vitamins of the paternal diet prior to mating them restored offspring metabolic health [89]. If dietary supplementation in overweight/obese men is beneficial for offspring health, remains to be studied.

These results suggest that weight loss may lead to metabolic disturbances affecting gamete quality and if in close proximity to conception might increase the risk for metabolic diseases in the offspring. Therefore, caution is advised when couples planning to become pregnant lose weight prior to conception. High-quality intervention trials are needed that test the timing and extent of advisable weight loss before conception to harvest potential beneficial effects for mother and child.

Improving diet and health rather than focusing on weight loss prior to conception

While motivation to change one’s lifestyle might be increased in persons planning to have a child, the obstacles to achieve weight loss are no less. In addition, advanced age in mothers [90] and fathers [91] is another risk factor for adverse pregnancy and child outcomes. Therefore, the risk stemming from increased BMI has to be weighed against the risk from advanced age, as weight loss and weight maintenance might take considerable time. One study even found low willingness in women in their mid-thirties (mean age 34.5 years) with overweight or obesity to postpone fertility treatment in order to actively reduce weight [92]. These findings should be considered in pre-conceptional health advice.

If weight loss is not possible due to advanced age or lack of means or willingness, then smaller changes in the dietary patterns might be an option. To shift the focus from weight reduction to an improved diet might also improve adherence to the advice, as persons with overweight or obesity and a history of weight loss attempts are less likely to lose weight in subsequent interventions [93]. Overweight and obesity seem to be associated with lesser diet quality in pregnant women [94, 95]. Women who adhered to a Mediterranean style dietary pattern seem to have higher pregnancy rates compared with women eating a Western style diet [96]. However, in an analysis of the Nurses’ Health Study II, peri-pregnancy diet quality was not associated with overweight or obesity in offspring at 12–23 years of age, when adjusted for maternal BMI [97].

Diet composition also affects sperm function and quality [98, 99]. In obese mice, a diet and/or exercise regime helped to restore sperm parameters, even if obesity was sustained [100]. However, epigenetic variation in sperm from mice provided with different diets (control diet, low-protein diet, and HFD) was not dependent on the diet type, and the authors concluded that there is no immediate effect of diet on the metabolism of the subsequent generation [101]. These three diets differed in their macronutrient compounds, but diet quality is not only measured in fat, protein, and carbohydrates. Various plant compounds including phytochemicals affect epigenetic mechanisms and might influence epigenetic programming in the embryo as reviewed elsewhere [102]. In addition, inadequate micronutrient intake, which is common in energy-dense Western dietary patterns [103] and in pre-conception overweight and obesity [104], might affect pregnancy and child outcomes [105], due to different potential mechanisms. First, the micronutrient density of a diet appears to impact hunger perception, and a micronutrient-dense diet has been shown to attenuate the negative experience of hunger [106]. Vice versa, deficiencies of micronutrients could potentially exacerbate hunger and thereby drive excessive calorie consumption and subsequent weight gain. Adequate intake is therefore a prerequisite for weight maintenance, especially in the peri-conception phase. Second, low concentrations of micronutrients, especially those acting as methyl donors, increased the cellular expression of genes that regulate adipogenesis and lipogenesis and altered epigenetic processes [107,108,109]. Even though micronutrient deficiencies early in human pregnancy have been shown to be associated with maternal obesity and dyslipidemia, the implications for offspring metabolic health are not fully understood [105, 110]. One study in humans showed that low maternal folate levels were associated with a slight increase in offspring BMI at age 5–6 years [111]. Besides, there seems to be a role for the father’s folate status at conception and offspring embryonic growth [112].

To date, the effects of pre-conception micronutrient deficiency on child outcomes including stunting are mostly studied in low- and middle-income countries in the context of undernourishment [113], while the consequences of energy-rich, micronutrient-poor diets at conception remain to be elucidated. Therefore, research is warranted that assesses the role of peri-conception dietary patterns rich in fruit and vegetables, micronutrients, and beneficial lipids on long-term health outcomes in offspring against a background of excessive energy intake as in overweight and obese mothers.


The focus of pre-conception intervention strategies needs to shift from women to couples, as emerging data show that fathers contribute to the health trajectory of their progeny. Future studies should also address possible interactions between maternal and paternal lifestyle and health status. While overweight and obesity in parents are risk factors for undesirable health outcomes in their offspring, weight loss in close proximity to a planned pregnancy should not be the main focus of interventions. An improvement of diet quality might be an alternative to prevent or lessen obesity-associated adverse health outcomes in offspring. However, if and what kind of change in parental pre-conception diets could protect the offspring from undesirable metabolic programming warrants future studies. Studies that aim to answer these questions are highly ambitious due to the challenges in recruitment, the number of subjects needed, the length of the follow-up, and the costs; however, they are needed.

The peri-conceptional period sets the stage for a healthy life of a person. However, how a life is lived, is determined by its environment. While the pre-conceptional phase might be a time for motivation to improve one’s health, pre-conceptional health is also a societal issue and should be addressed on a global, national, and community scale. Healthy choices should be attainable to everybody to improve public health in general. Following a life-course approach will improve health for couples before, during, and after pregnancy and improve the health of the future generations.


  1. 1.

    Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007;261:412–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Maclaughlin SM, Mühlhäusler BS, Gentili S, Mcmillen IC. When in gestation do nutritional alterations exert their effects? A focus on the early origins of adult disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;13:516–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Acosta-Cazares B, Acuin C, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390:2627–42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization. Taking action on childhood obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

  5. 5.

    Campbell JM, Mcpherson NO. Influence of increased paternal BMI on pregnancy and child health outcomes independent of maternal effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2019;13:511–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Godfrey KM, Reynolds RM, Prescott SL, Nyirenda M, Jaddoe VWV, Eriksson JG, et al. Influence of maternal obesity on the long-term health of offspring. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:53–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Heslehurst N, Vieira R, Akhter Z, Bailey H, Slack E, Ngongalah L, et al. The association between maternal body mass index and child obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002817.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jaaskelainen A, Pussinen J, Nuutinen O, Schwab U, Pirkola J, Kolehmainen M, et al. Intergenerational transmission of overweight among Finnish adolescents and their parents: a 16-year follow-up study. Int J Obes. 2011;35:1289–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Noor N, Cardenas A, Rifas-Shiman SL, Pan H, Dreyfuss JM, Oken E, et al. Association of periconception paternal body mass index with persistent changes in DNA methylation of offspring in childhood. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1916777.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Voerman E, Santos S, Patro Golab B, Amiano P, Ballester F, Barros H, et al. Maternal body mass index, gestational weight gain, and the risk of overweight and obesity across childhood: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002744.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Voigt M, Rochow N, Landau-Crangle E, Meyer-Kahrweg LM, Olbertz DM, Kunze M, et al. Individualized sex-specific birth weight percentiles for gestational age based on maternal height and weight. J Perinat Med. 2020;49:94–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:673–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sørensen TI, Holst C, Stunkard AJ. Childhood body mass index−genetic and familial environmental influences assessed in a longitudinal adoption study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16:705–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45:301–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hall JA, Benton L, Copas A, Stephenson J. Pregnancy intention and pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:670–704.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Caut C, Leach M, Steel A. Dietary guideline adherence during preconception and pregnancy: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16:e12916.

  17. 17.

    Poels M, Koster MP, Boeije HR, Franx A, Van Stel HF. Why do women not use preconception care? A systematic review on barriers and facilitators. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71:603–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shawe J, Patel D, Joy M, Howden B, Barrett G, Stephenson J. Preparation for fatherhood: a survey of men’s preconception health knowledge and behaviour in England. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213897.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chen C, Xu X, Yan Y. Estimated global overweight and obesity burden in pregnant women based on panel data model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202183.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Luhar S, Timaeus IM, Jones R, Cunningham S, Patel SA, Kinra S, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of overweight and obesity in India to 2040. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229438.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pineda E, Sanchez-Romero LM, Brown M, Jaccard A, Jewell J, Galea G, et al. Forecasting future trends in obesity across Europe: the value of improving surveillance. Obes Facts. 2018;11:360–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chambers TJG, Anderson RA. The impact of obesity on male fertility. Hormones. 2015;14:563–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gambineri A, Laudisio D, Marocco C, Radellini S, Colao A, Savastano S, et al. Female infertility: which role for obesity? Int J Obes Suppl. 2019;9:65–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dodd JM, Grivell RM, Nguyen AM, Chan A, Robinson JS. Maternal and perinatal health outcomes by body mass index category. Aust N. Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:136–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ. 2017;356:j1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dow ML, Szymanski LM. Effects of overweight and obesity in pregnancy on health of the offspring. Endocrinol Metab Clin Am. 2020;49:251–63.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li C, Zeng L, Wang D, Dang S, Chen T, Watson V, et al. Effect of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and weekly gestational weight gain on the development of infants. Nutr J. 2019;18:6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gomes D, Von Kries R, Delius M, Mansmann U, Nast M, Stubert M, et al. Late-pregnancy dysglycemia in obese pregnancies after negative testing for gestational diabetes and risk of future childhood overweight: an interim analysis from a longitudinal mother-child cohort study. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002681.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hu Z, Tylavsky FA, Kocak M, Fowke JH, Han JC, Davis RL, et al. Effects of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy on early childhood growth trajectories and obesity risk: The CANDLE study. Nutrients. 2020;12.

  30. 30.

    Sharp GC, Lawlor DA. Paternal impact on the life course development of obesity and type 2 diabetes in the offspring. Diabetologia. 2019;62:1802–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Geserick M, Vogel M, Gausche R, Lipek T, Spielau U, Keller E, et al. Acceleration of BMI in early childhood and risk of sustained obesity. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1303–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    King SE, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of obesity susceptibility. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31:478–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Espinos JJ, Sola I, Valli C, Polo A, Ziolkowska L, Martinez-Zapata MJ. The effect of lifestyle intervention on pregnancy and birth outcomes on obese infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Fertil Steril. 2020;14:1–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Catalano P, Demouzon SH. Maternal obesity and metabolic risk to the offspring: why lifestyle interventions may have not achieved the desired outcomes. Int J Obes. 2015;39:642–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lind MI, Spagopoulou F. Evolutionary consequences of epigenetic inheritance. Heredity. 2018;121:205–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dumesic DA, Meldrum DR, Katz-Jaffe MG, Krisher RL, Schoolcraft WB. Oocyte environment: follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:303–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Robker RL, Akison LK, Bennett BD, Thrupp PN, Chura LR, Russell DL, et al. Obese women exhibit differences in ovarian metabolites, hormones, and gene expression compared with moderate-weight women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1533–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Turner N, Robker RL. Developmental programming of obesity and insulin resistance: does mitochondrial dysfunction in oocytes play a role? Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21:23–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ou XH, Zhu CC, Sun SC. Effects of obesity and diabetes on the epigenetic modification of mammalian gametes. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:7847–55. e-pub ahead of print 2018/12/12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bay B, Lyngso J, Hohwu L, Kesmodel US. Childhood growth of singletons conceived following in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019;126:158–66. e-pub ahead of print 2018/09/01

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhu Y, Yan H, Tang M, Fu Y, Hu X, Zhang F, et al. Impact of maternal prepregnancy body mass index on cognitive and metabolic profiles of singletons born after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:1094–.e1092.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Luke B, Brown MB, Stern JE, Missmer SA, Fujimoto VY, Leach R, et al. Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:245–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cardozo ER, Karmon AE, Gold J, Petrozza JC, Styer AK. Reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles are associated with donor BMI. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:385–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Han L, Ren C, Li L, Li X, Ge J, Wang H, et al. Embryonic defects induced by maternal obesity in mice derive from Stella insufficiency in oocytes. Nat Genet. 2018;50:432–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Catteau A, Caillon H, Barriere P, Denis MG, Masson D, Freour T. Leptin and its potential interest in assisted reproduction cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:320–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Phy JL, Conover CA, Abbott DH, Zschunke MA, Walker DL, Session DR, et al. Insulin and messenger ribonucleic acid expression of insulin receptor isoforms in ovarian follicles from nonhirsute ovulatory women and polycystic ovary syndrome patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3561–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wyman A, Pinto AB, Sheridan R, Moley KH. One-cell zygote transfer from diabetic to nondiabetic mouse results in congenital malformations and growth retardation in offspring. Endocrinology. 2008;149:466–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Igosheva N, Abramov AY, Poston L, Eckert JJ, Fleming TP, Duchen MR, et al. Maternal diet-induced obesity alters mitochondrial activity and redox status in mouse oocytes and zygotes. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10074.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wu LL, Dunning KR, Yang X, Russell DL, Lane M, Norman RJ, et al. High-fat diet causes lipotoxicity responses in cumulus-oocyte complexes and decreased fertilization rates. Endocrinology. 2010;151:5438–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bradley J, Swann K. Mitochondria and lipid metabolism in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Int J Dev Biol. 2019;63:93–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Matoba S, Bender K, Fahey AG, Mamo S, Brennan L, Lonergan P, et al. Predictive value of bovine follicular components as markers of oocyte developmental potential. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014;26:337–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Valckx SD, Arias-Alvarez M, De Pauw I, Fievez V, Vlaeminck B, Fransen E, et al. Fatty acid composition of the follicular fluid of normal weight, overweight and obese women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ng SF, Lin RC, Laybutt DR, Barres R, Owens JA, Morris MJ. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature. 2010;467:963–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Campbell JM, Lane M, Owens JA, Bakos HW. Paternal obesity negatively affects male fertility and assisted reproduction outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:593–604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kort HI, Massey JB, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, Shapiro DB, Witt MA, et al. Impact of body mass index values on sperm quantity and quality. J Androl. 2006;27:450–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cropley JE, Eaton SA, Aiken A, Young PE, Giannoulatou E, Ho JWK, et al. Male-lineage transmission of an acquired metabolic phenotype induced by grand-paternal obesity. Mol Metab. 2016;5:699–708.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Filkowski JN, Ilnytskyy Y, Tamminga J, Koturbash I, Golubov A, Bagnyukova T, et al. Hypomethylation and genome instability in the germline of exposed parents and their progeny is associated with altered miRNA expression. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1110–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sinkkonen L, Hugenschmidt T, Berninger P, Gaidatzis D, Mohn F, Artus-Revel CG, et al. MicroRNAs control de novo DNA methylation through regulation of transcriptional repressors in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:259–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhang Y, Shi J, Rassoulzadegan M, Tuorto F, Chen Q. Sperm RNA code programmes the metabolic health of offspring. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15:489–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fullston T, Ohlsson Teague EM, Palmer NO, Deblasio MJ, Mitchell M, Corbett M, et al. Paternal obesity initiates metabolic disturbances in two generations of mice with incomplete penetrance to the F2 generation and alters the transcriptional profile of testis and sperm microRNA content. FASEB J. 2013;27:4226–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Mcpherson NO, Owens JA, Fullston T, Lane M. Preconception diet or exercise intervention in obese fathers normalizes sperm microRNA profile and metabolic syndrome in female offspring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308:E805–821.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Donkin I, Versteyhe S, Ingerslev LR, Qian K, Mechta M, Nordkap L, et al. Obesity and bariatric surgery drive epigenetic variation of spermatozoa in humans. Cell Metab. 2016;23:369–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Javurek AB, Spollen WG, Ali AM, Johnson SA, Lubahn DB, Bivens NJ, et al. Discovery of a novel seminal fluid microbiome and influence of estrogen receptor alpha genetic status. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23027.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Javurek AB, Spollen WG, Johnson SA, Bivens NJ, Bromert KH, Givan SA, et al. Consumption of a high-fat diet alters the seminal fluid and gut microbiomes in male mice. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;29:1602–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Svensson V, Jacobsson JA, Fredriksson R, Danielsson P, Sobko T, Schioth HB, et al. Associations between severity of obesity in childhood and adolescence, obesity onset and parental BMI: a longitudinal cohort study. Int J Obes. 2011;35:46–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Linabery AM, Nahhas RW, Johnson W, Choh AC, Towne B, Odegaard AO, et al. Stronger influence of maternal than paternal obesity on infant and early childhood body mass index: the Fels Longitudinal Study. Pediatr Obes. 2013;8:159–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sookoian S, Gianotti TF, Burgueno AL, Pirola CJ. Fetal metabolic programming and epigenetic modifications: a systems biology approach. Pediatr Res. 2013;73:531–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Zeng Y, Chen T. DNA methylation reprogramming during mammalian development. Genes. 2019;10.

  69. 69.

    Berntsen S, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, et al. The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’ Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:137–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kleijkers SH, Van Montfoort AP, Smits LJ, Viechtbauer W, Roseboom TJ, Nelissen EC, et al. IVF culture medium affects post-natal weight in humans during the first 2 years of life. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:661–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Nelissen EC, Van Montfoort AP, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Geraedts JP, Smits LJ, et al. Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1966–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Weight management before, during and after pregnancy. NICE public health guideline PH27. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2010.

  73. 73.

    Kominiarek MA, Chauhan SP. Obesity before, during, and after pregnancy: a review and comparison of five national guidelines. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:433–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sim KA, Dezarnaulds GM, Denyer GS, Skilton MR, Caterson ID. Weight loss improves reproductive outcomes in obese women undergoing fertility treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Obes. 2014;4:61–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kort JD, Winget C, Kim SH, Lathi RB. A retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of meaningful weight loss on fertility outcomes in an overweight population with infertility. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1400–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Panchenko PE, Voisin S, Jouin M, Jouneau L, Prezelin A, Lecoutre S, et al. Expression of epigenetic machinery genes is sensitive to maternal obesity and weight loss in relation to fetal growth in mice. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Zambrano E, Martinez-Samayoa PM, Rodriguez-Gonzalez GL, Nathanielsz PW. Dietary intervention prior to pregnancy reverses metabolic programming in male offspring of obese rats. J Physiol. 2010;588:1791–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Parent B, Martopullo I, Weiss NS, Khandelwal S, Fay EE, Rowhani-Rahbar A. Bariatric surgery in women of childbearing age, timing between an operation and birth, and associated perinatal complications. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:128–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hazart J, Le Guennec D, Accoceberry M, Lemery D, Mulliez A, Farigon N, et al. Maternal nutritional deficiencies and small-for-gestational-age neonates at birth of women who have undergone bariatric surgery. J Pregnancy. 2017;2017:4168541.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Hillesund ER, Bere E, Sagedal LR, Vistad I, Seiler HL, Torstveit MK, et al. Pre-pregnancy and early pregnancy dietary behavior in relation to maternal and newborn health in the Norwegian Fit for Delivery study - a post hoc observational analysis. Food Nutr Res. 2018;62.

  81. 81.

    Lecorguille M, Jacota M, De Lauzon-Guillain B, Forhan A, Cheminat M, Charles MA, et al. An association between maternal weight change in the year before pregnancy and infant birth weight: ELFE, a French national birth cohort study. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002871.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ensenauer R, Chmitorz A, Riedel C, Fenske N, Hauner H, Nennstiel-Ratzel U, et al. Effects of suboptimal or excessive gestational weight gain on childhood overweight and abdominal adiposity: results from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Obes. 2013;37:505–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Diouf I, Charles MA, Thiebaugeorges O, Forhan A, Kaminski M, Heude B, et al. Maternal weight change before pregnancy in relation to birthweight and risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26:789–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Lazaros L, Hatzi E, Markoula S, Takenaka A, Sofikitis N, Zikopoulos K, et al. Dramatic reduction in sperm parameters following bariatric surgery: report of two cases. Andrologia. 2012;44:428–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Di Frega AS, Dale B, Di Matteo L, Wilding M. Secondary male factor infertility after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: case report. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:997–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Sermondade N, Massin N, Boitrelle F, Pfeffer J, Eustache F, Sifer C, et al. Sperm parameters and male fertility after bariatric surgery: three case series. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:206–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    El Bardisi H, Majzoub A, Arafa M, Almalki A, Al Said S, Khalafalla K, et al. Effect of bariatric surgery on semen parameters and sex hormone concentrations: a prospective study. Reprod BioMedicine Online. 2016;33:606–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Reis LO, Zani EL, Saad RD, Chaim EA, De Oliveira LC, Fregonesi A. Bariatric surgery does not interfere with sperm quality−a preliminary long-term study. Reprod Sci. 2012;19:1057–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Mcpherson NO, Fullston T, Kang WX, Sandeman LY, Corbett MA, Owens JA, et al. Paternal under-nutrition programs metabolic syndrome in offspring which can be reversed by antioxidant/vitamin food fortification in fathers. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27010.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186287.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Eriksen W, Sundet JM, Tambs K. Paternal age at birth and the risk of obesity in young adulthood: a register-based birth cohort study of Norwegian males. Am J Hum Biol. 2013;25:29–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Sacha CR, Page CM, Goldman RH, Ginsburg ES, Zera CA. Are women with obesity and infertility willing to attempt weight loss prior to fertility treatment? Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018;12:125–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Myers VH, Mcvay MA, Champagne CM, Hollis JF, Coughlin JW, Funk KL, et al. Weight loss history as a predictor of weight loss: results from Phase I of the weight loss maintenance trial. J Behav Med. 2013;36:574–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Kleinman KP, Oken E, Gillman MW. Dietary quality during pregnancy varies by maternal characteristics in project Viva: a US cohort. J Am Dietetic Assoc. 2009;109:1004–11.

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Shin D, Lee KW, Song WO. Diet quality during pregnancy is inversely associated with prepregnancy weight status. FASEB J. 2016;30:677.610–677.610. S1

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Toledo E, Lopez-Del Burgo C, Ruiz-Zambrana A, Donazar M, Navarro-Blasco I, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Dietary patterns and difficulty conceiving: a nested case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1149–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Strohmaier S, Bogl LH, Eliassen AH, Massa J, Field AE, Chavarro JE, et al. Maternal healthful dietary patterns during peripregnancy and long-term overweight risk in their offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:283–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Gaskins AJ, Colaci DS, Mendiola J, Swan SH, Chavarro JE. Dietary patterns and semen quality in young men. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2899–907.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Salas-Huetos A, James ER, Aston KI, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT. Diet and sperm quality: nutrients, foods and dietary patterns. Reprod Biol. 2019;19:219–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Palmer NO, Bakos HW, Owens JA, Setchell BP, Lane M. Diet and exercise in an obese mouse fed a high-fat diet improve metabolic health and reverse perturbed sperm function. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302:E768–780.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Shea JM, Serra RW, Carone BR, Shulha HP, Kucukural A, Ziller MJ, et al. Genetic and epigenetic variation, but not diet, shape the sperm methylome. Dev Cell. 2015;35:750–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Li S, Chen M, Li Y, Tollefsbol TO. Prenatal epigenetics diets play protective roles against environmental pollution. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11:82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Andrieu E, Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:434–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Scholing JM, Olthof MR, Jonker FA, Vrijkotte TG. Association between pre-pregnancy weight status and maternal micronutrient status in early pregnancy. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:2046–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Rees WD. Interactions between nutrients in the maternal diet and the implications for the long-term health of the offspring. Proc Nutr Soc. 2019;78:88–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Fuhrman J, Sarter B, Glaser D, Acocella S. Changing perceptions of hunger on a high nutrient density diet. Nutr J. 2010;9:51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Adaikalakoteswari A, Vatish M, Alam MT, Ott S, Kumar S, Saravanan P. Low vitamin B12 in pregnancy is associated with adipose-derived circulating miRs targeting PPARgamma and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:4200–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Ngo S, Li X, O’neill R, Bhoothpur C, Gluckman P, Sheppard A. Elevated S-adenosylhomocysteine alters adipocyte functionality with corresponding changes in gene expression and associated epigenetic marks. Diabetes. 2014;63:2273–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Tanwar VS, Ghosh S, Sati S, Ghose S, Kaur L, Kumar KA, et al. Maternal vitamin B12 deficiency in rats alters DNA methylation in metabolically important genes in their offspring. Mol Cell Biochem. 2020;468:83–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Adaikalakoteswari A, Wood C, Mina TH, Webster C, Goljan I, Weldeselassie Y, et al. Vitamin B12 deficiency and altered one-carbon metabolites in early pregnancy is associated with maternal obesity and dyslipidaemia. Sci Rep. 2020;10:11066.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Krikke GG, Grooten IJ, Vrijkotte TG, Van Eijsden M, Roseboom TJ, Painter RC. Vitamin B12 and folate status in early pregnancy and cardiometabolic risk factors in the offspring at age 5-6 years: findings from the ABCD multi-ethnic birth cohort. BJOG. 2016;123:384–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Hoek J, Koster MPH, Schoenmakers S, Willemsen SP, Koning AHJ, Steegers EaP, et al. Does the father matter? The association between the periconceptional paternal folate status and embryonic growth. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:270–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Hanson MA, Bardsley A, De-Regil LM, Moore SE, Oken E, Poston L, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommendations on adolescent, preconception, and maternal nutrition: “Think Nutrition First”. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131:S213–S253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. Nathalie Eckel for her critical review of the first draft of the manuscript.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information




BH: conceptualization, writing original draft, writing—review & editing; RE: conceptualization, writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regina Ensenauer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hieronimus, B., Ensenauer, R. Influence of maternal and paternal pre-conception overweight/obesity on offspring outcomes and strategies for prevention. Eur J Clin Nutr 75, 1735–1744 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links