Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Phenotyping in clinical nutrition

Computed tomography (CT)-defined sarcopenia and myosteatosis are prevalent in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)

Abstract

Background/objectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) may predispose patients to malnutrition. CT-defined sarcopenia and myosteatosis are common in other tumour types and recognized adverse prognostic factors. However, the prevalence and prognostic impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis remain undetermined in NEN patients to date.

Methods

A retrospective study of NEN patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) at a tertiary institution from 2012 to 2017. Patients with PET/CT imaging at baseline and follow-up were included. The L3 slice of the co-localizing CT was analysed using the Alberta Protocol. Skeletal muscle cross-sectional area and muscle attenuation were measured and compared with pre-defined cut-offs. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of sarcopenia and myosteatosis according to previously published cut-offs.

Results

Fourty-nine patients (median age 64 (range 26–80) years) were included. The most common primary sites of tumour were the small bowel (51%) and pancreas (26%). Baseline sarcopenia was prevalent in 67% of patients and myosteatosis in 71%. Forty-five percent of patients gained weight over the course of PRRT. The presence of baseline sarcopenia was not associated with progression-free survival (20.8 mo vs. 20.7 mo, HR 0.86, p = 0.70) nor overall survival. Similarly, baseline myosteatosis (PFS 19.5 mo vs. 20.8 mo, HR 0.77, p = 0.47) was not significantly associated with survival outcomes. The mean (SD) age of those with myosteatosis was 60.8 ± 11.6 years compared to 49.7 ± 12.7 years for those without (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Body composition analysis is feasible using routinely acquired PET/CT data for patients with NEN. CT-defined sarcopenia and myosteatosis are prevalent in NEN patients, although myosteatosis is more common with increasing age. These findings were not associated with worsened overall or progression-free survival in the current study.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Summary of body composition analysis method.

References

  1. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, Zhao B, Zhou S, Xu Y, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335–42.

  2. Halperin DM, Shen C, Dasari A, Xu Y, Chu Y, Zhou S, et al. Frequency of carcinoid syndrome at neuroendocrine tumour diagnosis: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:525–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaumont JL, Cella D, Phan AT, Choi S, Liu Z, Yao JC. Comparison of health-related quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors with quality of life in the general US population. Pancreas. 2012;41:461–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shachar SS, Williams GR, Muss HB, Nishijima TF. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1539–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prado CMM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Tonkin K, et al. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2009;15:2920–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Qureshi SA, Burch N, Druce M, Hattersley JG, Khan S, Gopalakrishnan K, et al. Screening for malnutrition in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maasberg S, Knappe-Drzikova B, Vonderbeck D, Jann H, Weylandt KH, Grieser C, et al. Malnutrition predicts clinical outcome in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;104:11–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laing E, Kiss N, Michael M, Krishnasamy M. Nutritional complications and the management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2019. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/503634.

  10. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl. 2019;38:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Isenring E, Zabel R, Bannister M, Brown T, Findlay M, Kiss N, et al. Updated evidence-based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of patients receiving radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy: 2012 Radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy nutrition guidelines. Nutr Diet. 2013;70:312–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:11–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baracos VE, Arribas L. Sarcopenic obesity: hidden muscle wasting and its impact for survival and complications of cancer therapy. Ann Oncol J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2018;29 Suppl 2:ii1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazemi-Bajestani SMR, Mazurak VC, Baracos V. Computed tomography-defined muscle and fat wasting are associated with cancer clinical outcomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;54:2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin L, Gioulbasanis I, Senesse P, Baracos VE. Cancer-associated malnutrition and CT-defined sarcopenia and myosteatosis are endemic in overweight and obese patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44:227–38.

  16. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiss N, Loeliger J, Findlay M, Isenring E, Baguley BJ, Boltong A, et al. Clinical Oncology Society of Australia: position statement on cancer‐related malnutrition and sarcopenia. Nutr Diet. 2020;77:416–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stretch C, Aubin J-M, Mickiewicz B, Leugner D, Al-Manasra T, Tobola E, et al. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are accompanied by distinct biological profiles in patients with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas. PloS ONE. 2018;13:e0196235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zamboni M, Gattazzo S, Rossi AP. Myosteatosis: a relevant, yet poorly explored element of sarcopenia. Eur Geriatr Med. 2019;10:5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amini B, Boyle SP, Boutin RD, Lenchik L. Approaches to assessment of muscle mass and myosteatosis on computed tomography: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74:1671–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pevny S, Maasberg S, Karber M, Knappe-Drzikova B, Weylandt KH, Pavel ME, et al. Systemic anti-cancer therapies in neuroendocrine tumor patients impair nutritional status. Neuroendocrinology. 106:Abst J18.

  22. Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, et al. Phase 3 trial of 177 Lu-Dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge M-P, Albu J, et al. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol 1985. 2004;97:2333–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Prado CMM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:629–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. p. 417 World Health Organization classification of tumours.

  26. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J, editors. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4. Auflage. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017. p. 355.

  27. Miljkovic I, Kuipers AL, Cvejkus R, Bunker CH, Patrick AL, Gordon CL, et al. Myosteatosis increases with aging and is associated with incident diabetes in African ancestry men. Obesity. 2016;24:476–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cree MG, Newcomer BR, Katsanos CS, Sheffield-Moore M, Chinkes D, Aarsland A, et al. Intramuscular and liver triglycerides are increased in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3864–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunne RF, Roussel B, Culakova E, Pandya C, Fleming FJ, Hensley B, et al. Characterizing cancer cachexia in the geriatric oncology population. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10:415–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun G, Li Y, Peng Y, Lu D, Zhang F, Cui X, et al. Can sarcopenia be a predictor of prognosis for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:1419–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mintziras I, Miligkos M, Wächter S, Manoharan J, Maurer E, Bartsch DK. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are significantly associated with poorer overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;59:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Findlay M, Brown C, De Abreu Lourenço R, White K, Bauer J. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis in patients undergoing curative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: impact on survival, treatment completion, hospital admission and cost. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020;33:811–21.

  33. Prado CM, Purcell SA, Laviano A. Nutrition interventions to treat low muscle mass in cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;8:jcsm.12525.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DLC, SJC and MF participated in study conception, design and acquisition/analysis of the data. All authors were involved in interpretation of the data, critical revision of the manuscript and approval of the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Chan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

DLC has received honoraria and travel support from Novartis and Ipsen, outside the scope of the submitted work. NP has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche Pharma AG, Merck Serono and Ipsen and has consulted for Merck Serono, Amgen, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, Ipsen, Merck, Baxalta, Specialised Therapeutics and AstraZeneca, outside the scope of the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, D.L., Clarke, S.J., Engel, A. et al. Computed tomography (CT)-defined sarcopenia and myosteatosis are prevalent in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Eur J Clin Nutr 76, 143–149 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00915-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00915-4

Search

Quick links