Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Health issues and nutrition in the elderly

Handgrip strength as a valid practical tool to screen early-onset sarcopenia in acute care wards: a first evaluation

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 76, pages 56–64 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/objectives

Sarcopenia is an age-related muscle disease associated with higher mortality, morbidity risk and health costs. An easy and convenient sarcopenia screening test would be hugely valuable for clinical critical care. The study aimed to assess handgrip strength (HGS) as a screening tool for sarcopenia in acute care-unit inpatients, using the EWGSOP 1 reference-standard definition.

Subjects/methods

Inpatients, aged 75 years old or above, of two acute care wards—a multidisciplinary care unit (MCU) and a geriatric care unit (GCU), were included between September 2017 and June 2018 in a cross-sectional study. HGS, sarcopenia, nutritional status, functional status, number of medications and sociodemographic data were collected. The accuracy of HGS as a screening test for sarcopenia was assessed by gender using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) in a population of older patients (n = 223; age: 85.8 yrs; BMI: 26.7 kg/m²).

Results

Screening was positive (patients confirmed with sarcopenia by the HGS test) with cut-off values of 18 kg for women and 25.5 kg for men, with ROC analysis giving a sensitivity of 92.9% in women and 78.6% in men. ROC curve analysis found also that HGS should be strictly higher than 15 kg in women and 18 kg in men to maximise AUC. Prevalence of sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP1 definition was 31.8% (95% CI: 22.1–41.6%) in the MCU and 27.8% (95% CI: 19.6–36.0%) in the GCU.

Conclusions

Acute care wards can use HGS as a valid, easy tool for early screening of sarcopenia.

Highlights

  • Handgrip strength is a valid and clinically practicable test, for screening early-onset sarcopenia during hospitalisation.

  • Handgrip strength cut-off values of 18 kg in women and 25.5 kg in men gave 92.9% and 78.6% sensitivity, respectively.

  • One-third of patients admitted to acute care wards have sarcopenia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: In women, ROC curves is for HGS > 15 kg and in men for HGS > 18 kg.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Visser M, Schaap LA. Consequences of sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27:387–99. août

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leeper C, Lin E, Hoffman M, Fombona A, Zhou T, Kutcher M, et al. CT abbreviated assessment of sarcopenia following trauma: the CAAST measurement predicts 6-month mortality in older adult trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:805–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen I. Influence of sarcopenia on the development of physical disability: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shachar SS, Williams GR, Muss HB, Nishijima TF. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishigori T, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Hisamori S, Sakai Y. Sarcopenia as a predictor of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang S-F, Lin P-L. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the association of sarcopenia with mortality. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2016;13:153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Amaral TF. Sarcopenia and length of hospital stay. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;34:881–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nishiguchi S, Yamada M, Shirooka H, Nozaki Y, Fukutani N, Tashiro Y, et al. Sarcopenia as a risk factor for cognitive deterioration in community-dwelling older adults: a 1-year prospective study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:372.e5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011;305:50–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Clynes MA, Edwards MH, Buehring B, Dennison EM, Binkley N, Cooper C. Definitions of sarcopenia: associations with previous falls and fracture in a population sample. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirani V, Blyth F, Naganathan V, Le Couteur DG, Seibel MJ, Waite LM, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with incident disability, institutionalization, and mortality in community-dwelling older men: the concord health and ageing in men project. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16:607–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerri AP, Bellelli G, Mazzone A, Pittella F, Landi F, Zambon A, et al. Sarcopenia and malnutrition in acutely ill hospitalized elderly: prevalence and outcomes. Clin Nutr. 2015;34:745–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vetrano DL, Landi F, Volpato S, Corsonello A, Meloni E, Bernabei R, et al. Association of sarcopenia with short- and long-term mortality in older adults admitted to acute care wards: results from the CRIME study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:1154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster J-Y, Bruyère O. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2017;12:e0169548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Ferreira S, Amaral TF. Financial impact of sarcopenia on hospitalization costs. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70:1046–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Janssen I, Shepard DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Roubenoff R. The healthcare costs of sarcopenia in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaudart C, Rizzoli R, Bruyère O, Reginster J-Y, Biver E. Sarcopenia: burden and challenges for public health. Arch Public Health. 2014;72:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhillon RJS, Hasni S. Pathogenesis and management of sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017;33:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM, Zúñiga C, Arai H, Boirie Y, et al. Prevalence of and interventions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age Ageing. 2014;43(nov):748–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Walrand S, Gryson C, Salles J, Giraudet C, Migné C, Bonhomme C, et al. Fast-digestive protein supplement for ten days overcomes muscle anabolic resistance in healthy elderly men. Clin Nutr. 2016;35:660–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boirie Y, Guillet C. Fast digestive proteins and sarcopenia of aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018;21:37–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chanet A, Verlaan S, Salles J, Giraudet C, Patrac V, Pidou V, et al. Supplementing breakfast with a vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein medical nutrition drink enhances postprandial muscle protein synthesis and muscle mass in healthy older men. J Nutr. 2017;147:2262–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ibrahim K, Howson FFA, Culliford DJ, Sayer AA, Roberts HC. The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:941–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laplante J, Cole M, McCusker J, Singh S, Ouimet M-A. Confusion Assessment Method. Validation of a French-language version. Perspect Infirm Rev Ordre Infirm Infirm Qué. 2005;3:12–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ. 2003;326:41–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tichet J, Vol S, Goxe D, Salle A, Berrut G, Ritz P. Prevalence of sarcopenia in the French senior population. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12:202–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40:423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salvi F, Miller MD, Grilli A, Giorgi R, Towers AL, Morichi V, et al. A manual of guidelines to score the modified cumulative illness rating scale and its validation in acute hospitalized elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1926–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katz S, Akpom CA. A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Serv Plan Adm Eval. 1976;6:493–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salvà A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M366–372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haute Autorité de Santé S des recommandations professionnelles. Stratégie de prise en charge en cas de dénutrition protéino-énergétique chez la personne âgée. Haute Autorité de Santé; 2007 avr p. 25.

  37. Comparing the accuracy of two diagnostic tests. In: Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011 [cité 19 janv 2020]. p. 165–92. Disponible sur: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470906514.ch5.

  38. Comparing the accuracy of two diagnostic tests. In: Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008 [cité 19 févr 2020]. p. 165–94. Disponible sur: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470317082.ch5.

  39. Takwoingi Y, Quinn TJ. Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) studies in older people. Age Ageing. 2018;47:349–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smoliner C, Sieber CC, Wirth R. Prevalence of sarcopenia in geriatric hospitalized patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:267–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rossi AP, Fantin F, Micciolo R, Bertocchi M, Bertassello P, Zanandrea V, et al. Identifying sarcopenia in acute care setting patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:303.e7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zengarini E, Giacconi R, Mancinelli L, Riccardi GR, Castellani D, Vetrano DL, et al. Prognosis and interplay of cognitive impairment and sarcopenia in older adults discharged from Acute Care Hospitals. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bianchi L, Abete P, Bellelli G, Bo M, Cherubini A, Corica F, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of sarcopenia, identified according to the EWGSOP definition and diagnostic algorithm, in hospitalized older people: the GLISTEN study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:1575–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sipers WMWH, Meijers JMM, van Dijk RB, Halfens RJG, Schols JMGA. Impact of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of sarcopenia in an acute care geriatric ward. J Frailty Aging. 2014;3:222–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Amaral TF. Sarcopenia among hospitalized patients—a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr. 2015;34:1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gariballa S, Alessa A. Sarcopenia: prevalence and prognostic significance in hospitalized patients. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:772–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jacobsen EL, Brovold T, Bergland A, Bye A. Prevalence of factors associated with malnutrition among acute geriatric patients in Norway: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Papadopoulou SK, Tsintavis P, Potsaki P, Papandreou D. Differences in the prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling, nursing home and hospitalized individuals. a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24:83–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research team thanks paramedical and medical staff of the two acute care wards.

Funding

The study was funded by Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital and two local hospitals. The study was sponsored by Nutriset and Nutricia (support from a national congress research price). These financial supports played no role in the design, execution, analysis and interpretation of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Médecine, Centre Hospitalier de MAURIAC, Mauriac, France

    Marie Blanquet & Vincent Guiyedi

  2. Service de Santé Publique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de CLERMONT-FERRAND, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Marie Blanquet, Candy Guiguet-Auclair, Pauline Berland & Laurent Gerbaud

  3. Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, F-63000, CLERMONT-FERRAND, France

    Marie Blanquet, Candy Guiguet-Auclair & Laurent Gerbaud

  4. Service de Gériatrie, BEAUMONT, Beaumont, France

    Guillaume Ducher

  5. Diététicienne R&D—Chef de projet NutriSeniors. NUTRISET, Hameau du Bois Ricard - CS 80035 - 76770, MALAUNAY, France

    Anaïs Sauvage

  6. Service de Médecine, Centre Hospitalier de BRIOUDE, Brioude, France

    Sylvain Dadet

  7. Service de Nutrition Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de CLERMONT-FERRAND, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Nicolas Farigon & Yves Boirie

  8. Service de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier de Riom, RIOM, France

    Jérôme Bohatier

  9. Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, UMR 1019, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, CLERMONT-FERRAND, France

    Yves Boirie

Authors
  1. Marie Blanquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Ducher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anaïs Sauvage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sylvain Dadet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vincent Guiyedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nicolas Farigon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Candy Guiguet-Auclair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pauline Berland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jérôme Bohatier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yves Boirie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Laurent Gerbaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MB was responsible for designing the protocol, writing the protocol, conducting the clinical research, interpreting results and writing the article. GD was responsible for designing the protocol, conducting the clinical research and reading the article. AS was responsible for reading the article. SD and NF were responsible for designing the protocol and writing the article. VG was responsible for conducting the clinical research and reading the article. CGA and PB were responsible for designing the protocol, writing the protocol, extracting and analysing data, interpreting results and writing the article. JB was responsible for designing the protocol and reading the article. YB and LG were responsible for designing the protocol, interpreting results and writing the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Blanquet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blanquet, M., Ducher, G., Sauvage, A. et al. Handgrip strength as a valid practical tool to screen early-onset sarcopenia in acute care wards: a first evaluation. Eur J Clin Nutr 76, 56–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00906-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00906-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links