Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The addition of STROBE-nut to the EJCN instructions to authors: some considerations and caveats


Inadequate reporting in nutritional epidemiology study has important downstream consequences for the public and the reputation of the nutrition research. Poor reporting of nutritional studies can have serious implications on knowledge transfer, public health policy, and research. In addition, it is a significant and avoidable source of research waste. The STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut) statement comprises a set of 24 items, organised as a checklist, with minimal information to be included in manuscripts describing findings of nutritional epidemiology research and dietary assessment. The goal of STROBE-nut is to ensure all information is available to enable quality appraisal, correct understanding, effective replication and application of findings. It has been suggested that robust implementation of reporting guidelines will translate into more complete reported research. Furthermore systematic use of reporting guidelines can indirectly improve the methodological qualities of research papers. In this regard, if STROBE-nut becomes a common practice between the community of nutritionist and epidemiologist, it can enhance the quality of the nutritional epidemiology field output. We thus suggest the endorsement of STROBE-nut at the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, JeffersonT, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014;383:257–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research. Accessed 6 Feb 2020.

  3. 3.

    Lachat C, Hawwash D, Ocke MC, Berg C, Forsum E, Hörnell A, et al. Strengthening the Reporting Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hörnell A, Berg A, Forsum E, Larsson C, Sonestedt E, Åkesson A, et al. Perspectives: an extension of the STROBE statement for observational studies in nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut): explanation and elaboration. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:652–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sharp MK, Bertizzolo L, Rius R, Wager E, Guadaupe Gómez G, Hren D. Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;116:26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


There was no outside funding for this study. DH is supported by the special research fund (BOF) from Ghent University.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Lachat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

CL and DH are member of the consortium that developed STROBE-nut and authored related papers. There are no other competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lachat, C., Hawwash, D. The addition of STROBE-nut to the EJCN instructions to authors: some considerations and caveats. Eur J Clin Nutr 74, 657–658 (2020).

Download citation


Quick links