Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases

Food cost and adherence to guidelines for healthy diets: evidence from Belgium



Evidence on whether healthy diets are more expensive than less healthy diets is mixed. The relative cost of meeting healthy diet guidelines in Belgium was estimated.


Data from the nationally representative food consumption survey (FCS) 2014–2015 (n = 3146; 3–64 years) were used. Dietary data were collected through two non-consecutive 24-h recalls (records for children). Average prices for >2000 foods were retrieved from the 2014 GfK ConsumerScan panel and linked with foods consumed in the FCS. Daily costs of meeting nutritional guidelines were estimated across age and household education level groups.


Processed meat contributed most (9.8%–14.4% dependent on age group) to the daily cost of diets. Soft drinks contributed to the daily cost more while fruits and vegetables contributed less for lower versus higher educated households. Compared to individuals not meeting any nutrient recommendations (sodium, saturated fat, free sugar, fibre), the average cost/2000 kcal was significantly higher for individuals meeting one (0.36 ± 0.11€, p = 0.001), two (0.87 ± 0.14€, p < 0.001) or three or more (1.44 ± 0.24€, p < 0.001) recommendations. Similarly, compared to individuals not meeting any of the food-based recommendations (fruit, vegetables, wholegrain, nuts and seeds, red meat, processed meat), the average cost/2000 kcal was significantly higher for individuals meeting three or more (1.04 ± 0.27€; p < 0.001) recommendations. For adults, diets meeting guidelines for vegetables were 20% and for fruits 10% more expensive than diets not meeting those guidelines.


The cost of diets of Belgian people meeting healthy diet guidelines is greater than of those not meeting guidelines. Policies that make healthy diets more affordable are recommended.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Causes of Death Collaborators Global, regional, and national age-sex specific for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017;390:1151–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Overweight—European Health Information Gateway. World Health Organization; 2018.

  3. 3.

    Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Peilin S, Powles J, et al. Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in2010: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e132–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vereecken C, Pedersen T, Ojala K, Krolner R, Dzielska A, Ahluwalia N, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption trends among adolescentsfrom 2002 to 2010 in 33 countries. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25:16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Breda J, Nash Castroa S, Whitinga S, Williams J, Jewell J, Engesveen K, et al. Towards better nutrition in Europe: evaluating progress and defining future directions. Food Policy. 2020.

  6. 6.

    World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases—technical meeting report, 5-6 May 2015, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: WHO; 2016. p. 35.

  7. 7.

    Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownell KD. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:216–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    World Cancer Research Fund. NOURISHING framework: our policy framework to promote healthy diets and reduce obesity. World Cancer Research Fund; 2020.

  9. 9.

    Backholer K, Blake M, Vandevijvere S. Have we reached a tipping point for sugar-sweetened beverage taxes? Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:3057–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Teng AM, Jones AC, Mizdrak A, Signal L, Genç M, Wilson N. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:1187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Redondo M, Hernández-Aguado I, Lumbreras B. The impact of the tax on sweetened beverages: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108:548–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Veerman L, Cobiac L. Removing the GST exemption for fresh fruits and vegetables could cost lives. Med J Aust. 2013;199:534–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis. Nutr Rev. 2015;73:643–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lloyd S, Lawton J, Caraher M, Singh G, Horsley K, Mussa F. A tale of two localities: healthy eating on a restricted income. Health Educ J. 2011;70:48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Taylor CA, Spees CK, Markwordt AM, Watowicz RP, Clark JK, Hooker NH. Differences in US adult dietary patterns by food security status: differences in US adult dietary patterns by food security status. J Consum Aff. 2017;51:549–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1107–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Desbouys L, De Ridder K, Rouche M, Castetbon KN. Food consumption in adolescents and Young adults: age-specific socio-economic and cultural disparities (Belgian Food Consumption Survey 2014). Nutrients. 2019;11:1520.

  18. 18.

    Rao M, Afshin A, Singh G, Mozaffarian D. Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e004277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Drewnowski A. The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:1181–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Monsivais P, Perrigue MM, Adams SL, Drewnowski A. Measuring diet cost at the individual level: a comparison of three methods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:1220–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Country profile—Belgium. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. 2020.

  22. 22.

    Bel S, De Ridder K, Lebacq T, Ost C, Teppers E, Cuypers K, et al. Habitual food consumption of the Belgian population in 2014-2015 and adherence to food-based dietary guidelines. Arch Public Health. 2019;77:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    De Ridder K, Bel S, Brocatus L. De consumptie van voedingsmiddelen en de inname van voedingsstoffen. In: Bel S, Tafforeau J, editors. Voedselconsumptiepeiling 2014-2015. Rapport 4. Brussels: Wetenschappenlijk Instituut voor Volksgezondheid; 2016.

  24. 24.

    Vandevijvere S, De Ridder K, Fiolet T, Bel S, Tafforeau J. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58:3267–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rehm CD, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. Relation between diet cost and Healthy Eating Index 2010 scores among adults in the United States 2007–2010. Prev Med. 2015;73:70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Morris MA, Hulme C, Clarke GP, Edwards KL, Cade JE. What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68:1043–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vandevijvere S, Young N, Mackay S, Swinburn B, Gahegan M. Modelling the cost differential between healthy and current diets: the New Zealand case study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Maillot M, Darmon N, Vieux F, Drewnowski A. Low energy density and high nutritional quality are each associated with higher diet costs in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:690–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Herforth, A, Y Bai, A Venkat, K Mahrt, A Ebel, WA Masters. Cost and affordability of healthy diets across and within countries. Background paper for The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Rome: FAO; 2020.

  30. 30.

    European Food Safety Authority. General principles for the collection of national food consumption data in the view of a pan-European dietary survey. EFSA J. 2009;17:1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bel S, Van den Abeele S, Lebacq T, Ost C, Brocatus L, Stievenart C, et al. Protocol of the Belgian food consumption survey 2014: objectives, design and methods. Arch Public Health. 2016;74:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Park MK, Freisling H, Huseinovic E, Winnkvist A, Huybrechts I, Crispim S, et al. Comparison of meal patterns across five European countries using standardized 24-h recall (GloboDiet) data from the EFCOVAL project. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57:1045–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2012;7:284–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    GfK ConsumerScan. 2020.

  35. 35.

    World Health Organisation. Healthy diet—key facts. World Health Organisation; 2019.

  36. 36.

    HGR-CSS. Voedingsaanbevelingen voor de Belgische volwassen bevolking met een focus op voedingsmiddelen - 2019. Brussel: HGR-CSS; 2019. Advies nr. 9284.

  37. 37.

    Lennernäs MFC, Becker W, Giachetti I, Schmitt A, Remaut de Winter AM, Kearney M. Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Glanz KB, Maibach M, Goldberg E, Snyder J, Why D. Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Dietetic Assoc. 1998;98:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    HLPE. Price volatility and food security. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: HLPE; 2011.

  40. 40.

    Lee A, Kane S, Herron L, Matsuyama M, Lewis M. A tale of two cities: the cost, price-differential and affordability of current and healthy diets in Sydney and Canberra, Australia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Darmon N, Ferguson EL, Briend A. Impact of a cost constraint on nutritionally adequate food choices for French women: an analysis by linear programming. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006;38:82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Maillot M, Vieux F, Delaere F, Lluch A, Darmon N. Dietary changes needed to reach nutritional adequacy without increasing diet cost according to income: an analysis among French adults. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0174679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dekkers AL, Verkaik-Kloosterman J, van Rossum CT, Ocke MC. SPADE, a new statistical program to estimate habitual dietary intake from multiple food sources and dietary supplements. J Nutr. 2014;144:2083–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Teng A, Jones A, Mizdrak A, Signal L, Genç M, Wilson N. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:1187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Afshin A, Peñalvo J, Del Gobbo L, Silva J, Michaelson M, O’Flaherty M, et al. The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors want to thank the Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment for providing funding for the national food consumption survey 2014/2015 and the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) for providing a Research credit (Grant no. J.0017.19) for this study.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Vandevijvere.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vandevijvere, S., Seck, M., Pedroni, C. et al. Food cost and adherence to guidelines for healthy diets: evidence from Belgium. Eur J Clin Nutr (2020).

Download citation


Quick links