Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases

Associations between body composition and prognosis of patients admitted because of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the possible associations of muscle and visceral fat mass with the prognosis of patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis.

Methods

Body composition analysis (Sliceomatic, TomoVision, Montreal, Canada) was performed on CT images at the L3 level in patients admitted with acute pancreatitis during 2008–2014. Regression analysis was used to examine associations of body composition with 1-year mortality and 1-year readmission rates.

Results

A total of 158 patients were included (mean age 63.7 ± 17.4 years, 91 (57.6%) were male). Fat was the most abundant tissue (408 ± 180 cm2 surface area). None of the prognostic factors examined were associated with 1-year mortality. Values below compared to above the medians for muscle mass and visceral fat were associated with higher mean 1-year readmissions: 1.7 versus 1.0, p = 0.02 and 1.6 versus 1.1, p = 0.09, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed an association of high visceral fat with reduced 1-year readmission (OR 0.995, 95% CI 0.991–1.000, p = 0.03). Linear regression analysis showed an inverse correlation of visceral fat mass with the number of 1-year readmissions (HR −0.004, 95% CI −0.008–000, p = 0.070).

Conclusions

Higher amounts of visceral fat and muscle mass were positively associated with lower recurrent hospitalizations in patients admitted with acute pancreatitis. These results support the importance of nutritional rehabilitation in patients after admission due to acute pancreatitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:1179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gapp J, Hall AG, Walters RW, Jahann D, Kassim T, Reddymasu S. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations related to acute pancreatitis: epidemiology from 2001 to 2014 in the United States. Pancreas. 2019;48:548–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brindise E, Elkhatib I, Kuruvilla A, Silva R. Temporal trends in incidence and outcomes of acute pancreatitis in hospitalized patients in the United States from 2002 to 2013. Pancreas. 2019;48:169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garg SK, Campbell JP, Anugwom C, Wadhwa V, Singh R, Gupta N, et al. Incidence and predictors of readmissions in acute pancreatitis: a nationwide analysis. Pancreas. 2018;47:46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mok SR, Mohan S, Elfant AB, Judge TA. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation iv, a new scoring system for predicting mortality and complications of severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2015;44:1314–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Basit H, Ruan GJ, Mukherjee S Ranson Criteria. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019–2019.

  7. Al-Qahtani HH, Alam MKH, Waheed M. Comparison of harmless acute pancreatitis score with ranson’s score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. J Coll Phys Sug Pak. 2017;27:75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:997–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacDonald AJ, Greig CA, Baracos V. The advantages and limitations of cross-sectional body composition analysis. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011;5:342–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Jarvis R, Bhogal T, Dalmia S Meta-analysis of the effect of sarcopenia in predicting postoperative mortality in emergency and elective abdominal surgery. Surgeon. 2018. pii: S1479-666X(18)30119-7.

  11. Hamidi M, Ho C, Zeeshan M, O’Keeffe T, Hamza A, Kulvatunyou N, et al. Can sarcopenia quantified by computed tomography scan predict adverse outcomes in emergency general surgery? J Surg Res. 2019;235:141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leibovitz E, Ben-David N, Shibanov L, Elias S, Shimonov M. Visceral adiposity but not subcutaneous fat associated with improved outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis. J Surg Res. 2018;225:15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall TC, Stephenson JS, Jones MJ, Ngu WS, Horsfield MA, Rajesh A, et al. Is abdominal fat distribution measured by axial CT imaging an indicator of complications and mortality in acute pancreatitis. J Gastroint Surg. 2015;19:2126–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadr-Azodi O, Orsini N, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Wolk A. Abdominal and total adiposity and the risk of acute pancreatitis: a population-based prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:133–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Natu A, Stevens T, Kang L, Yasinow S, Mansoor E, Lopez R, et al. visceral adiposity predicts severity of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2017;46:776–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells JCK. Using body composition assessment to evaluate the double burden of malnutrition. Ann Nutr Metab. 2019;75:103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim SL, Ong KC, Chan YH, Loke WC, Ferguson M, Daniels L. Malnutrition and its impact on cost of hospitalization, length of stay, readmission and 3-year mortality. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Somekawa S, Mine T, Ono K, Hayashi N, Obuchi S, Yoshida H, et al. Relationship between sensory perception and frailty in a community-dwelling elderly population. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21:710–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gentile S, Lacroix O, Durand AC, Cretel E, Alazia M, Sambuc R, et al. Malnutrition: a highly predictive risk factor of short-term mortality in elderly presenting to the emergency department. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17:290–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moran RA, García-Rayado G, de la Iglesia-García D, Martínez-Moneo E, Fort-Martorell E, Lauret-Braña E, et al. Influence of age, body mass index and comorbidity on major outcomes in acute pancreatitis, a prospective nation-wide multicentre study. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2018;6:1508–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi JS, Yi SW, Park JW, Lee S, Jeong SH, Yi JJ, et al. Body mass index and the risk of acute pancreatitis by etiology: a prospective analysis of Korean National Screening Cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34:603–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wells JCK. The capacity-load model of non-communicable disease risk: understanding the effects of child malnutrition, ethnicity and the social determinants of health. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:688–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mordechai Shimonov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimonov, M., Abtomonova, Z., Groutz, A. et al. Associations between body composition and prognosis of patients admitted because of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. Eur J Clin Nutr 75, 817–822 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00789-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00789-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links