Abstract
Background
The doubly labeled water (DLW) method has become widely used in studies of energy expenditure and body composition. Researchers differ in the analytical methods used to calculate the dilution spaces for deuterium and oxygen-18. Some determine dilution spaces using isotope enrichments extrapolated to the instant of dosing with DLW (slope-intercept method), but others use measured enrichments from body water samples obtained 3–10 h after dosing (plateau method). These differences limit the comparability of analyses across labs.
Methods
I derive a simple mathematical approach for recalculating reported dilution spaces to any time point post dosing, using reported dilution spaces and rates of isotope depletion. Simulated data are used to examine the effects of different dilution space protocols.
Results
Recalculating dilution spaces enables researchers to determine outcome variables of interest (e.g., total body water, energy expenditure, and water throughput) from different labs under a unified protocol for determining dilution spaces, and improves comparisons among studies.
Conclusions
Differences between dilution space protocols can lead to substantial differences in outcome variables of interest in DLW studies. When comparing results of DLW studies that employ different dilution space protocols, dilution spaces should be recalculated for a common time point, and outcome variables recalculated as needed, prior to comparison across studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schoeller DA. Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water. J Nutr. 1988;118:1278–89.
Speakman JR. Doubly labelled water: theory and practice. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997.
Westerterp KR, Wouters L, van Marken Lichtenbelt WD. The Maastricht protocol for the measurement of body composition and energy expenditure with labeled water. Obes Res. 1995;Suppl 1:49–57.
Wong WW, Roberts SB, Racette SB, Das SK, Redman LM, Rochon J, et al. The doubly labeled water method produces highly reproducible longitudinal results in nutrition studies. J Nutr. 2014;144:777–83.
International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA human health series no. 3. Assessment of body composition and total energy expenditure in humans using stable isotope techniques. Vienna: IAEA; 2009.
Roberts SB, Dietz W, Sharp T, Dallal GE, Hill JO. Multiple laboratory comparison of the doubly labeled water technique. Obes Res. 1995;Suppl 1:3–13.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks John Speakman for helpful discussions on this topic.
Funding
This work was supported by Hunter College and Duke University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pontzer, H. Method and rationale for recalculating dilution spaces to a single, common time point in doubly labeled water studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 1620–1624 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0361-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0361-1
This article is cited by
-
Maximizing precision and accuracy of the doubly labeled water method via optimal sampling protocol, calculation choices, and incorporation of 17O measurements
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2020)