Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Relative accuracy of body adiposity index and relative fat mass in participants with and without down syndrome

Abstract

Background/Objectives

The body adiposity index (BAI) and relative fat mass (RFM) are anthropometric measures developed to estimate body composition (%Fat). There is limited research validating these methods of body composition assessment in adults with Down syndrome (DS). The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of the BAI and RFM in a sample of adults with- and without DS. We hypothesize that the RFM would provide greater accuracy than the BAI when estimating %Fat.

Subjects/Methods

BAI and RFM were assessed in a sample of adults (n = 235, 50.2% female, 20.0% DS, 23.1 ± 6.7 years). %Fat assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry served as the criterion method of body composition. Between-group differences were assessed using a two-way (SEX × DS) analysis of variance.

Results

BAI overestimated %Fat in men without DS, but underestimated %Fat in women without DS (4.1 ± 4.5%Fat vs. −3.5 ± 4.6%Fat, respectively, p < 0.001). BAI overestimated %Fat in men and women with DS (4.7 ± 7.8%Fat vs. 0.8 ± 7.5%Fat, respectively, p = 0.090). RFM slightly overestimated %Fat in male and female participants without DS, and did not vary by sex (0.9 ± 4.0%Fat vs. 0.2 ± 4.2%Fat, respectively, p = 0.248). RFM underestimated %Fat in men and women with DS, with no differences observed between sexes (−2.1 ± 5.3%Fat vs. −2.2 ± 6.9%Fat, respectively, p = 0.953).

Conclusions

The BAI and RFM can be used to estimate body composition in individuals with- and without DS, however, the RFM yields greater accuracy and is recommended when more advanced methods of body composition assessment are unavailable or create unwanted participant burden.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Presson AP, Partyka G, Jensen KM, Devine OJ, Rasmussen SA, McCabe LL, et al. Current estimate of Down Syndrome population prevalence in the United States. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1163–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rimmer JH, Wang E. Obesity prevalence among a group of Chicago residents with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1461–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rowland M, Peterson-Besse J, Dobbertin K, Walsh ES, Horner-Johnson W, Andresen E, et al. Health outcome disparities among subgroups of people with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:136–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maatta T, Tervo-Maatta T, Taanila A, Kaski M, Iivanainen M. Mental health, behaviour and intellectual abilities of people with Down syndrome. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2006;11:37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage - a cross-sectional study in American adult individuals. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring, MD) 2011;19:1083–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez-Aguero A, Ara I, Moreno LA, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Casajus JA. Fat and lean masses in youths with Down syndrome: gender differences. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1685–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karastergiou K, Smith SR, Greenberg AS, Fried SK. Sex differences in human adipose tissues–the biology of pear shape. Biol Sex Differ. 2012;3:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Myrelid Å, Gustafsson J, Ollars B, Annerén G. Growth charts for Downs syndrome from birth to 18 years of age. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87:97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nickerson BS, Esco MR, Bicard SC, Russell AR, Williford HN, Schaefer G. Validity of the body adiposity index in adults with Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;38:92–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Esco MR. The accuracy of the body adiposity index for predicting body fat percentage in collegiate female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:1679–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Casey AF. Measuring body composition in individuals with intellectual disability: a scoping review. J Obes. 2013;2013:628428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fedewa MV, Nickerson BS, Esco MR. Associations of body adiposity index, waist circumference, and body mass index in young adults. Clin Nutr. 2018. pii: S0261-5614(18)30126-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.03.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerqueira MS, Santos CAD, Silva DAS, Amorim P, Marins JCB, Franceschini S. Validity of the body adiposity index in predicting body fat in adults: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2018;9:617–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossato M, Dellagrana RA, de S ouza Bezerra E, da Costa RM, dos Santos JOL, Silva DAS, et al. Comparison of body adiposity index (BAI) and air displacement plethysmograph with estimations of % body fat in adults with Down’s syndrome. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71:1341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baptista F, Varela A, Sardinha LB. Bone mineral mass in males and females with and without Down syndrome. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:380–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wagner DR, Heyward VH. Measures of body composition in blacks and whites: a comparative review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:1392–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson AS, Stanforth PR, Gagnon J, Rankinen T, Leon AS, Rao DC, et al. The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: the Heritage Family Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:789–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael V. Fedewa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fedewa, M.V., Russell, A.R., Nickerson, B.S. et al. Relative accuracy of body adiposity index and relative fat mass in participants with and without down syndrome. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 1117–1121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0351-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0351-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links