Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation


Bioelectrical impedance analysis is an extremely popular method for assessment of body composition. Despite its wide-spread use over the past thirty years, its accuracy and clinical value is still questioned. Most frequently, criticisms focus on its purported poor absolute accuracy and that different impedance analysers or prediction equations fail to measure body composition identically. This perspective review highlights that the magnitude of errors associated with impedance methods are not dissimilar to those observed for so-called gold standard methods. It is argued that the focus on statistically significant but small differences between methods can obscure operational equivalence and that such differences may be of minor clinical significance. Finally, the need for better standardization of protocols and the need for consensus on what is a minimal clinically important difference between methods is highlighted.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. 1.

    Lukaski HC, Johnson PE, Bolonchuk WW, Lykken GI. Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;41:810–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thomasset M. Bioelectric properties of tissue. Impedance measurement in clinical medicine. Significance of curves obtained. Lyon Med. 1962;94:107–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hoffer EC, Meador CK, Simpson DC. Correlation of whole-body impedance with total body water volume. J Appl Physiol. 1969;27:531–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—Part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1226–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ward LC. Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012;15:424–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhu F, Leonard EF, Levin NW. Body composition modeling in the calf using an equivalent circuit model of multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis body composition modeling in the calf using an equivalent circuit model of multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis. Physiol Meas. 2005;26:s133–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mulasi U, Kuchnia AJ, Cole AJ, Earthman CP. Bioimpedance at the bedside: current applications, limitations, and opportunities. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30:180–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ward LC, Isenring E, Dyer JM, Kagawa M, Essex T. Resistivity coefficients for body composition analysis using bioimpedance spectroscopy: effects of body dominance and mixture theory algorithm. Physiol Meas. 2015;36:1529–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lukaski HC, Kyle UG, Kondrup J. Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis: phase angle and impedance ratio. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017;20:330–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1430–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Earthman CP. Body composition tools for assessment of adult malnutrition at the bedside. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2015;39:787–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sergi G, De Rui M, Stubbs B, Veronese N, Manzato E. Measurement of lean body mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a consideration of the pros and cons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29:591–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guo SS, Chumlea WC, Cockram DB. Use of statistical methods to estimate body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:428S–435S.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tronstad C, Pripp AH. Statistical methods for bioimpedance analysis. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2014;5:14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Geddes L, Baker LE. The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng. 1967;5:271–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cornish BH, Thomas BJ, Ward LC. Improved prediction of extracellular and total body water using impedance loci generated by multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Phys Med Biol. 1993;38:337.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Davies P, Gregory J. Body water measurements in growth disorders. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:1467.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nielsen BM, Dencker M, Ward L, Linden C, Thorsson O, Karlsson MK, et al. Prediction of fat-free body mass from bioelectrical impedance among 9- to 11-year-old Swedish children. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9:521–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Horlick M, Arpadi SM, Bethel J, Wang J, Moye J Jr, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis models for prediction of total body water and fat-free mass in healthy and HIV-infected children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:991–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    De Lorenzo A, Di Campli C, Andreoli A, Sasso GF, Bonamico M, Gasbarrini A. Assessment of body composition by bioelectrical impedance in adolescent patients with celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2951–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wickramasinghe VP, Lamabadusuriya SP, Cleghorn GJ, Davies PS. Assessment of body composition in Sri Lankan children: validation of a bioelectrical impedance prediction equation. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:1170–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lakens D. Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t-tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017;8:355–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Richter SJ, Richter C. A method for determining equivalence in industrial applications. Qual Eng. 2002;14:375–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dixon PM, Saint-Maurice PF, Kim Y, Hibbing P, Bai Y, Welk GJ. A primer on the use of equivalence testing for evaluating measurement agreement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:837–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Matthie JR. Bioimpedance measurements of human body composition: critical analysis and outlook. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:239–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Seoane F, Abtahi S, Abtahi F, Ellegård L, Johannsson G, Bosaeus L, et al. Mean expected error in prediction of total body water. A true accuracy comparison between bioimpedance spectroscopy and single frequency regression equations. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:656323.

  28. 28.

    Raimann JG, Zhu F, Wang J, Thijssen S, Kuhlmann MK, Kotanko P, et al. Comparison of fluid volume estimates in chronic hemodialysis patients by bioimpedance, direct isotopic, and dilution methods. Kidney Int. 2013;85:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Page P. Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9:726–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7:541–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D. Users’ guides to the medical literature diagnostic test. JAMA. 1994;271:703–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Warkentin LM, Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Agborsangaya CB, Rueda-Clausen CF, Sharma AM, et al. Weight loss required by the severely obese to achieve clinically important differences in health-related quality of life: two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2014;12:175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rothberg AE. Weight loss ≥ 10% is required by the severely obese to achieve minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life. Evid Based Med. 2015;20:69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Federation TI, Chemistry C, Group W, et al. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). J Clin Chem 2002;2001:1–5.

  35. 35.

    Yanovski S, Hubbard V, Heymsfield S, Lukaski HC. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement. NIH Technology Assessment Statement. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:387S–532S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    National Institutes of Health. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:524s–532s.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Brantlov S, Jødal L, Lange A, Rittig S, Ward LC. Standardisation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the estimation of body composition in healthy paediatric populations: a systematic review. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Brantlov S, Ward LCLC, Jødal L, Rittig S, Lange A. Critical factors and their impact on bioelectrical impedance analysis in children: a review. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41:22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wootton S, Durkin K, Jackson A. Quality control issues related to assessment of body composition. Food Nutr Bull. 2014;35:S79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jackson AA, Johnson M, Durkin K. Wootton s. Body composition assessment in nutrition research: value of BIA technology. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:S71–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Villa F, Magnani A, Merati G, Castiglioni P. Feasibility of long-term monitoring of multifrequency and multisegment body impedance by portable devices. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61:1877–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Asogwa C, Lai D. A review on opportunities to assess hydration in wireless body area networks. Electronics. 2017;6:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leigh C. Ward.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author provides consultancy services to ImpediMed Ltd. ImpediMed Ltd. had no involvement in the inception or execution of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, L.C. Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 194–199 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links