Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Clinical nutrition

Examining the pathophysiology of short bowel syndrome and glucagon-like peptide 2 analogue suitability in chronic intestinal failure: experience from a national intestinal failure unit

Abstract

Introduction

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a leading cause of intestinal failure (IF). Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) remains the standard treatment, with small intestinal transplantation reserved for cases with severe complications to HPN. There have recently been significant developments in growth factor therapy. We aimed to develop a greater contemporary understanding of our SBS-IF subset.

Method

We performed a retrospective observational study of a prospectively maintained HPN audit database in October 2017. Intestinal anatomical details and parenteral requirements were recorded. Each case was assessed for eligibility for growth factor therapy using recently published trials.

Results

Of 273 patients receiving HPN, 152 (55.7%) had type three IF as a result of SBS (SBS-IF), with a mean duration of HPN of 61 months (range 4–416). Mean length of small intestine was 98 cm. Furthermore, 114 (41.8%) patients had an end jejunostomy (SBS-J), 18 (6.6%) had an end ileostomy, and 7.3% of patients had all or part of the colon-in-continuity. Crohn’s disease was the most common underlying pathology. Univariate analysis for the whole HPN cohort demonstrated SBS-IF and a longer duration of HPN to be associated with higher PN energy requirements, p ≤ 0.0001. Of all, 73 (48%) patients with SBS-IF were deemed suitable for GLP-2 analogue therapy, with co-morbidity being the most frequent cause of non-suitability (29.1%).

Conclusion

We describe a large U.K. HPN cohort using ESPEN pathophysiological and clinical severity classification. The majority of patients with SBS-IF had a jejunostomy and relatively few had colon-in-continuity. Co-morbidity is the most common contra-indication to GLP-2 analogue therapy.

Clinical relevancy

GLP-2 analogues are emerging as an important treatment for patients with short bowel syndrome. Our study explores patient suitability in a large HPN cohort managed in a national IF centre. Furthermore, the international variation in the pathophysiology of SBS-IF varies significantly, which can have a bearing on PN requirements and outcomes when GLP-2 analogues are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Pironi L, Arends J, Bozzetti F, Cuerda C, Gillanders L, Jeppesen PB. et al.ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. Clin Nutr. 2016;35:247–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pironi L, Konrad D, Brandt C, Joly F, Wanten G, Agostini F et al. Clinical classification of adult patients withchronic intestinal failure due to benign disease: an international multicenter cross-sectional survey. Clin Nutr. 2017;728-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.013.

  3. O’Keefe S, Buchman A, Fishbein T, Jeejeebhoy K, Jeppesen P, Shaffer J. Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure: consensus definitions and overview. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Staun M, Pironi L, Bozzetti F, Baxter J, Forbes A, Joly F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in adult patients. Clin Nutr. 2009;28:467–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). American Gastroenterological Association medical positionstatement: short bowel syndrome and intestinal transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1105–10.

  6. Amiot A, Messing B, Corcos O, Panis Y, Joly F. Determinants of home parenteral nutrition dependence and survival of 268 patients with non-malignant short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:368–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dibb M, Soop M, Teubner A, Shaffer J, Abraham A, Carlson G, et al. Survival and nutritional dependence on home parenteral nutrition: three decades of experience from a single referral centre. Clin Nutr. 2016;16:S0261–5614.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu G, Jiang Y, Zhu X.Jin D, Prevalence and risk factors for complications in adult patients with short bowel syndrome receiving long-term home parenteral nutrition. 2017;26:591–7.

  9. Iyer K. Surgical management of short bowel syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2014;31:53S–59S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeppesen P. New approaches to the treatments of short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30:182–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Billiauws L, Bataille J, Boehm V, Corcos O, Joly F. Teduglutide for treatment of adult patients with short bowel syndrome. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017;17:623–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tappenden K, Edelman J, Joelsson B. Teduglutide enhances structural adaptation of the small intestinal mucosa in patients with short bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:602–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vipperla K, O’Keefe S. Study of teduglutide effectiveness in parenteral nutrition-dependent short-bowel syndrome subjects. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;7:683–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Naberhuis J, Tappenden K. Teduglutide for safe reduction of parenteral nutrient and/or fluid requirements in adults: a systematic review. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2016;40:1096–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Keefe SJD, Jeppesen PB, Gilroy R, Pertkiewicz M, Allard JP, Messing B. Safety and efficacy of teduglutide after 52 weeks of treatment in patients with short bowel intestinal failure. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:815–e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kochar B, Long M, Shelton E, Young L, Farraye F, Yajnik V, et al. Safety and efficacy of teduglutide gattex in patients with Crohns disease and need for parenteral support due to short bowel syndrome associated intestinal failure. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51:508–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz LK, O’Keefe SJD, Fujioka K, Gabe SM, Lamprecht G, Pape U-F, et al. Long-term teduglutide for the treatment of patients with intestinal failure associated with short bowel syndrome. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7:e142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brandt CF, Tribler S, Hvistendahl M, Staun M, Brobech P, Jeppesen PB. A single-center, adult chronic intestinal failure cohort analyzed according to the ESPEN-endorsed recommendations, definitions, and classifications. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2015;41:566–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, Bando T, Matsuoka H, Takahashi Y, Takesue Y, et al. Risk factors for short bowel syndrome in patients with Crohn’s disease. Surg Today. 2012;42:447–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hedrick T, Friel C. Colonic Crohn disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26:84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iyer KR, Kunecki M, Boullata JI, Fujioka K, Joly F, Gabe S. et al. Independence from parenteral nutrition and intravenous fluid support during treatment with teduglutide among patients with intestinal failure associated with short bowel syndrome. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2016;41:946–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeppesen P, Gabe S, Seidner D, Lee H, Olivier C. Factors associated with response to teduglutide in patients with short-bowel syndrome and intestinal failure. Gastroenterology. 2017;22:S0016–5085.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joly F, Gabe S, Seidner D, Mu F, Xie J, Kelkar S, et al. Predictors of response to teduglutide among patients with parenteral nutrition–dependent short bowel syndrome. Transplantation. 2017;101:pS8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam K, Schwartz L, Batisti J, Iyer KR. Single-center experience with the use of teduglutide in adult patients with short bowel syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2017;42:225–30.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buchman A, Katz S, Fang J, Bernstein C, Abou-Assi S. Teduglutide, a novel mucosally active analog of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:962–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bond.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bond, A., Taylor, M., Abraham, A. et al. Examining the pathophysiology of short bowel syndrome and glucagon-like peptide 2 analogue suitability in chronic intestinal failure: experience from a national intestinal failure unit. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 751–756 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0278-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0278-8

Search

Quick links