Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The potential target of bithionol against Staphylococcus aureus: design, synthesis and application of biotinylated probes Bio-A2

Abstract

This study aims to explore the potential targets of bithionol in Staphylococcus aureus.The four bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2-1, Bio-A2-2, Bio-A2-3, and Bio-A2-4 were synthesized, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these probes against S. aureus were determined. The bithionol binding proteins in S. aureus were identified through immunoprecipitation and LC-MS/MS with bithionol biotinylated probe. The biotinylated bithionol probes Bio-A2-1 and Bio-A2-3 displayed antibacterial activities against S. aureus. The Bio-A2-1 showed lower MICs than Bio-A2-3, and both with the MIC50/MIC90 at 12.5/12.5 μM against S. aureus clinical isolates. The inhibition rates of bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2-1 and Bio-A2-3 on the biofilm formation of S. aureus were comparable to that of bithionol, and were stronger than that of Bio-A2-2 and Bio-A2-4. The biofilm formation of 10 out of 12S. aureus clinical isolates could be inhibited by Bio-A2-1 (at 1/4×, or 1/2× MICs). There are three proteins identified in S. aureus through immunoprecipitation and LC-MS/MS with bithionol biotinylated probe Bio-A2-1: Protein translocase subunit SecA 1 (secA1), Alanine--tRNA ligase (alaS) and DNA gyrase subunit A (gyrA), and in which the SecA1 protein the highest coverage and the most unique peptides. The LYS112, GLN143, ASP213, GLY496 and ASP498 of SecA1 protein act as hydrogen acceptors to form 6 hydrogen bonds with bithionol biotinylated probe Bio-A2-1 by molecular docking analysis. In conclusion, the bithionol biotinylated probe Bio-A2-1 has antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities against S. aureus, and SecA1 was probably one of the potential targets of bithionol in S. aureus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schilcher K, Horswill AR. Staphylococcal biofilm development: structure, regulation, and treatment strategies. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020;8:e00026–19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan F, Pham DTN, Oloketuyi SF, Kim YM. Antibiotics application strategies to control biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2020;21:270–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh A, Jayaraman N, Chatterji D. Small-molecule inhibition of bacterial biofilm. ACS Omega. 2020;5:3108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shemesh M, Kolter R, Losick R. The biocide chlorine dioxide stimulates biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis by activation of the histidine kinase KinC. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:6352–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Davey ME, O’toole GA. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:847–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeuchi T, Kobayashi S, Tanabe M, Fujiwara T. In vitro inhibition of Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas vaginalis growth by bithionol, dichlorophene, and hexachlorophene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;27:65–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Amakawa M, Gunawardana S, Jabbour A, et al. Repurposing clinically approved drugs for the treatment of Bacillus cereus, a surrogate for Bacillus anthracis. ACS Omega. 2020;5:21929–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Leonardi W, Zilbermintz L, Cheng LW, et al. Bithionol blocks pathogenicity of bacterial toxins, ricin, and Zika virus. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayyagari VN, Diaz-Sylvester PL, Hsieh TJ, Brard L. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of the Bithionol-paclitaxel combination in a panel of human ovarian cancer cell lines. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dayal N, Onyedibe KI, Gribble WM, Sintim HO. Membrane acting Povarov-Doebner derived compounds potently disperse preformed multidrug resistant Gram-positive bacterial biofilms. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;240:114550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. She P, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. Drug repurposing: in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of bithionol against Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:579806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. van Tilburg Bernardes E, Charron-Mazenod L, Reading DJ, Reckseidler-Zenteno SL, Lewenza S. Exopolysaccharide-Repressing Small Molecules with Antibiofilm and Antivirulence Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e01997–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim W, Zou G, Hari TPA, et al. A selective membrane-targeting repurposed antibiotic with activity against persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:16529–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng J, Shang Y, Wu Y, et al. Diclazuril inhibits biofilm formation and hemolysis of Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Infect Dis. 2021;7:1690–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X, Xiong Y, Shi Y, et al. In vitro activities of licochalcone A against planktonic cells and biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:970901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Yang X, Gan J, et al. CB-Dock2: improved protein-ligand blind docking by integrating cavity detection, docking and homologous template fitting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:W159–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang SP, Lin CC. Treatment of paragonimiasis with bithionol and bithionol sulfoxide. Dis Chest. 1967;52:220–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barr FS, Collins GF, Wyatt LG. Potentiation of the antimicrobial activity of bithionol. J Pharm Sci. 1965;54:801–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Niu H, Yee R, Cui P, et al. Identification of agents active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 from a clinical compound library. Pathogens 2017;6:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lister JL, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cui J, Jin J, Chaudhary AS, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of triazole-pyrimidine analogues as SecA inhibitors. ChemMedChem. 2016;11:43–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin J, Cui J, Chaudhary AS, et al. Evaluation of small molecule SecA inhibitors against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23:7061–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Weiguang Pan and Jie Lian (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Nanshan People’s Hospital and the 6th Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Medical School) for helping identify and preserve the S. aureus strains.

Funding

This work was supported by the following grants: The Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Bio-Manufacture (No. XTD2210); National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 82172283); Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2020A1515111146, 2020A1515011049, 2020A1515010979); Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (No.SZXK06162); the Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality basic research funds (grants JCYJ20180302144403714; JCYJ20220530141810023, JCYJ20220530142006015) and key funds JCYJ20180508162403996).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL participated in the design of this study and the synthesis of bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2, and drafted manuscript. ZW conducted the immunoprecipitation, participated in the measurement of the growth of S. aureus planktonic cells, and conducted LC-MS/MS experiments. YX participated in the synthesis of bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and molecular docking. XC participated in the synthesis of bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2. ZS and PL collected S. aureus strains and conducted biofilm assay, and participated in the measurement of the growth of S. aureus planktonic cells. YP participated in the synthesis of bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2. QD and ZY participated in the design of this study, and participate in guiding and analyzing immunoprecipitation and LC-MS/MS experiments and data analysis, and reviewed this manuscript. JZ and SH designed the study, participated in the synthesis of bithionol biotinylated probes Bio-A2 and immunoprecipitation and LC-MS/MS experiments, conducted the data analysis, and provided critical revisions of the manuscript for valuable intellectual content.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jinxin Zheng or Shiqing Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the institutional ethical committee of Shenzhen Nanshan People’s Hospital and the 6th Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Medical School. Isolates were collected as part of the routine clinical management of patients, according to the national guidelines in China.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Wen, Z., Xiong, Y. et al. The potential target of bithionol against Staphylococcus aureus: design, synthesis and application of biotinylated probes Bio-A2. J Antibiot 76, 406–415 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-023-00618-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-023-00618-x

Search

Quick links