Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

N-Terminal guanidine derivatives of teicoplanin antibiotics strongly active against glycopeptide resistant Enterococcus faecium

The Journal of Antibiotics volume 73, pages 603–614 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is one of the major challenges in healthcare of our time. To meet this challenge, we designed and prepared guanidine and lipophilic guanidine derivatives of the glycopeptide antibiotic teicoplanin to armed them with activity against the most threatening nosocomial bacteria, multiresistant enterococci. From teicoplanin and its pseudoaglycone, a series of N-terminal guanidine derivatives have been prepared with free and amide C-terminal parts. Six aliphatic and aromatic lipophilic carbodiimides were prepared and used for the synthesis of lipophilic guanidine teicoplanin conjugates. All new N-terminal guanidine antibiotics showed high activity against a standard panel of Gram-positive bacteria. Four selected derivatives displayed excellent antibacterial activity against a series of nosocomial VanA Enterococcus faecium strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Scheme 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laxminarayan R. Antibiotic effectiveness: balancing conservation against innovation. Science. 2014;345:1299–301.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cattoir V, Leclercq R. Twenty-five years of shared life with vancomycin-resistant enterococci: is it time to divorce? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:731–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattoir V, Giard J-C. Antibiotic resistance in Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12:239–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arias CA, Murray BE. Emergence and management of drug-resistant enterococcal infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:637–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendes RE, et al. Longitudinal (2001-14) analysis of enterococci and VRE causing invasive infections in European and US hospitals, including a contemporary (2010-13) analysis of oritavancin in vitro potency. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:3453–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney D, et al. Comparative in vitro activity of oritavancin and other agents against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:622–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pintér G, et al. Diazo transfer-click reaction route to new, lipophilic teicoplanin and ristocetin aglycon derivatives with high antibacterial and anti-influenza virus activity: an aggregation and receptor binding study. J Med Chem. 2009;52:6053–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szűcs Z, et al. Lipophilic teicoplanin pseudoaglycon derivatives are active against vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant enterococci. J Antibiot. 2017;70:664–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Szűcs Z, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of lipophilic teicoplanin pseudoaglycon derivatives containing a substituted triazole function. J Antibiot. 2017;70:152–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szűcs Z, et al. New semisynthetic teicoplanin derivatives have comparable in vitro activity to that of oritavancin against clinical isolates of VRE. J Antibiot. 2019;72:524–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vimberg V, et al. Fluorescence assay to predict activity of the glycopeptide antibiotics. J Antibiot. 2019;72:114–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishikawa T, editor. Superbases for organic synthesis. New York: Wiley; 2009.

  13. Zamperini C, et al. Identification, synthesis and biological activity of alkyl-guanidine oligomers as potent antibacterial agents. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8251–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pasero C, et al. Alkyl-guanidine compounds as potent broad-spectrum antibacterial agents: chemical library extension and biological characterization. J Med Chem. 2018;61:9162–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuppusamy R, et al. Guanidine functionalized anthranilamides as effective antibacterials with biofilm disruption activity. Org Biomol Chem. 2018;16:5877–88.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teng P, et al. Novel bis-cyclic guanidines as potent membrane-active antibacterial agents with therapeutic potential. Chem Commun. 2017;53:11948–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Binda E, Marinelli F, Marcone GL. Old and new glycopeptide antibiotics: action and resistance. Antibiotics. 2014;3:572–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wanner J, et al. A new and improved method for deglycosidation of glycopeptide antibiotics exemplified with vancomycin, ristocetin, and ramoplanin. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1169–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Suhs T, König B. Synthesis of functionalized guanidino amino acids. Chem Eur J. 2006;12:8150–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosamani B, Narendra N, Prabhu G, Sureshbabu VV. Synthesis of N-urethane protected amino alkyl (S-methyl)-isothiouronium compounds and carbodiimide tethered peptidomimetics: an application for guanidino and substituted guanidino peptidomimetics synthesis. RSC Adv. 2014;4:48920–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen J, Pattarawarapan M, Zhang AJ, Burgess K. Solution- and solid-phase syntheses of substituted guanidinocarboxylic acids. J Comb Chem. 2000;2:276–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fell JB, Coppola GM. A mild and efficient preparation of carbodiimides. Synth Commun. 1995;25:43–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin SW, Carver PL, DePestel DD. Dalbavancin: a new option for the treatment of gram-positive infections. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:449–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagarajan R. Structure-activity relationships of vancomycin-type glycopeptide antibiotics. J Antibiot. 1993;46:1181–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavlov AY, et al. Modification of glycopeptide antibiotic eremomycin by the action of alkyl halides and study on antibacterial activity of the compounds obtained. J Antibiot. 1994;47:225–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malabarba A, et al. N15-alkyl and N15,N15-dialkyl derivatives of teicoplanin antibiotics. J Antibiot. 1990;43:1107–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarkar P, Yarlagadda V, Ghosh C, Haldar J. A review on cell wall synthesis inhibitors with an emphasis on glycopeptide antibiotics. Med Chem Commun. 2017;8:516–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yarlagadda V, Akkapeddi P, Manjunath GB, Haldar J. Membrane active vancomycin analogues: a strategy to combat bacterial resistance. J Med Chem. 2014;57:4558–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Printsevskaya SS, et al. Structure-activity relationship studies of a series of antiviral and antibacterial aglycon derivatives of the glycopeptide antibiotics vancomycin, eremomycin, and dechloroeremomycin. J Med Chem. 2005;48:3885–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Csávás M, et al. Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of some teicoplanin pseudoaglycon derivatives containing alkyl- and arylthiosubstituted maleimides. J Antibiot. 2015;68:579–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Malabarba A, et al. Synthesis and biological properties of N63-carboxamides of teicoplanin antibiotics. Structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem. 1989;32:2450–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund under the projects GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00044 and GINOP-2.3.3-15-2016-00004 and by the European Social Fund under the project EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009. This research was also funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (K119509).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032, Hungary

    Zsolt Szűcs, Ilona Bereczki, Erzsébet Rőth, Anikó Borbás & Pál Herczegh

  2. Doctoral School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

    Zsolt Szűcs

  3. Department of Medical Microbiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Nagyvárad tér 4, H-1089, Hungary

    Márton Milánkovits & Eszter Ostorházi

  4. Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032, Hungary

    Gyula Batta

  5. Department of Applied Chemistry, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032, Hungary

    Lajos Nagy

  6. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032, Hungary

    Zsuzsanna Dombrádi

Authors
  1. Zsolt Szűcs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ilona Bereczki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erzsébet Rőth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Márton Milánkovits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eszter Ostorházi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gyula Batta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lajos Nagy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zsuzsanna Dombrádi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Anikó Borbás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Pál Herczegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pál Herczegh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szűcs, Z., Bereczki, I., Rőth, E. et al. N-Terminal guanidine derivatives of teicoplanin antibiotics strongly active against glycopeptide resistant Enterococcus faecium. J Antibiot 73, 603–614 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-0313-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-0313-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links